-
A study on group fairness in healthcare outcomes for nursing home residents during the COVID-19 pandemic in the Basque Country
Authors:
Hristo Inouzhe,
Irantzu Barrio,
Paula Gordaliza,
María Xosé Rodríguez-Álvarez,
Itxaso Bengoechea,
José María Quintana
Abstract:
We explore the effect of nursing home status on healthcare outcomes such as hospitalisation, mortality and in-hospital mortality during the COVID-19 pandemic. Some claim that in specific Autonomous Communities (geopolitical divisions) in Spain, elderly people in nursing homes had restrictions on access to hospitals and treatments, which raised a public outcry about the fairness of such measures. I…
▽ More
We explore the effect of nursing home status on healthcare outcomes such as hospitalisation, mortality and in-hospital mortality during the COVID-19 pandemic. Some claim that in specific Autonomous Communities (geopolitical divisions) in Spain, elderly people in nursing homes had restrictions on access to hospitals and treatments, which raised a public outcry about the fairness of such measures. In this work, the case of the Basque Country is studied under a rigorous statistical approach and a physician's perspective. As fairness/unfairness is hard to model mathematically and has strong real-world implications, this work concentrates on the following simplification: establishing if the nursing home status had a direct effect on healthcare outcomes once accounted for other meaningful patients' information such as age, health status and period of the pandemic, among others. The methods followed here are a combination of established techniques as well as new proposals from the fields of causality and fair learning. The current analysis suggests that as a group, people in nursing homes were significantly less likely to be hospitalised, and considerably more likely to die, even in hospitals, compared to their non-residents counterparts during most of the pandemic. Further data collection and analysis are needed to guarantee that this is solely/mainly due to nursing home status.
△ Less
Submitted 16 June, 2023;
originally announced June 2023.
-
Review of Mathematical frameworks for Fairness in Machine Learning
Authors:
Eustasio del Barrio,
Paula Gordaliza,
Jean-Michel Loubes
Abstract:
A review of the main fairness definitions and fair learning methodologies proposed in the literature over the last years is presented from a mathematical point of view. Following our independence-based approach, we consider how to build fair algorithms and the consequences on the degradation of their performance compared to the possibly unfair case. This corresponds to the price for fairness given…
▽ More
A review of the main fairness definitions and fair learning methodologies proposed in the literature over the last years is presented from a mathematical point of view. Following our independence-based approach, we consider how to build fair algorithms and the consequences on the degradation of their performance compared to the possibly unfair case. This corresponds to the price for fairness given by the criteria $\textit{statistical parity}$ or $\textit{equality of odds}$. Novel results giving the expressions of the optimal fair classifier and the optimal fair predictor (under a linear regression gaussian model) in the sense of $\textit{equality of odds}$ are presented.
△ Less
Submitted 26 May, 2020;
originally announced May 2020.
-
A survey of bias in Machine Learning through the prism of Statistical Parity for the Adult Data Set
Authors:
Philippe Besse,
Eustasio del Barrio,
Paula Gordaliza,
Jean-Michel Loubes,
Laurent Risser
Abstract:
Applications based on Machine Learning models have now become an indispensable part of the everyday life and the professional world. A critical question then recently arised among the population: Do algorithmic decisions convey any type of discrimination against specific groups of population or minorities? In this paper, we show the importance of understanding how a bias can be introduced into aut…
▽ More
Applications based on Machine Learning models have now become an indispensable part of the everyday life and the professional world. A critical question then recently arised among the population: Do algorithmic decisions convey any type of discrimination against specific groups of population or minorities? In this paper, we show the importance of understanding how a bias can be introduced into automatic decisions. We first present a mathematical framework for the fair learning problem, specifically in the binary classification setting. We then propose to quantify the presence of bias by using the standard Disparate Impact index on the real and well-known Adult income data set. Finally, we check the performance of different approaches aiming to reduce the bias in binary classification outcomes. Importantly, we show that some intuitive methods are ineffective. This sheds light on the fact trying to make fair machine learning models may be a particularly challenging task, in particular when the training observations contain a bias.
△ Less
Submitted 6 April, 2020; v1 submitted 31 March, 2020;
originally announced March 2020.
-
Confidence Intervals for Testing Disparate Impact in Fair Learning
Authors:
Philippe Besse,
Eustasio del Barrio,
Paula Gordaliza,
Jean-Michel Loubes
Abstract:
We provide the asymptotic distribution of the major indexes used in the statistical literature to quantify disparate treatment in machine learning. We aim at promoting the use of confidence intervals when testing the so-called group disparate impact. We illustrate on some examples the importance of using confidence intervals and not a single value.
We provide the asymptotic distribution of the major indexes used in the statistical literature to quantify disparate treatment in machine learning. We aim at promoting the use of confidence intervals when testing the so-called group disparate impact. We illustrate on some examples the importance of using confidence intervals and not a single value.
△ Less
Submitted 17 July, 2018;
originally announced July 2018.
