-
Advances and Open Problems in Federated Learning
Authors:
Peter Kairouz,
H. Brendan McMahan,
Brendan Avent,
Aurélien Bellet,
Mehdi Bennis,
Arjun Nitin Bhagoji,
Kallista Bonawitz,
Zachary Charles,
Graham Cormode,
Rachel Cummings,
Rafael G. L. D'Oliveira,
Hubert Eichner,
Salim El Rouayheb,
David Evans,
Josh Gardner,
Zachary Garrett,
Adrià Gascón,
Badih Ghazi,
Phillip B. Gibbons,
Marco Gruteser,
Zaid Harchaoui,
Chaoyang He,
Lie He,
Zhouyuan Huo,
Ben Hutchinson
, et al. (34 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
Federated learning (FL) is a machine learning setting where many clients (e.g. mobile devices or whole organizations) collaboratively train a model under the orchestration of a central server (e.g. service provider), while kee** the training data decentralized. FL embodies the principles of focused data collection and minimization, and can mitigate many of the systemic privacy risks and costs re…
▽ More
Federated learning (FL) is a machine learning setting where many clients (e.g. mobile devices or whole organizations) collaboratively train a model under the orchestration of a central server (e.g. service provider), while kee** the training data decentralized. FL embodies the principles of focused data collection and minimization, and can mitigate many of the systemic privacy risks and costs resulting from traditional, centralized machine learning and data science approaches. Motivated by the explosive growth in FL research, this paper discusses recent advances and presents an extensive collection of open problems and challenges.
△ Less
Submitted 8 March, 2021; v1 submitted 10 December, 2019;
originally announced December 2019.
-
Data Generation for Neural Programming by Example
Authors:
Judith Clymo,
Haik Manukian,
Nathanaël Fijalkow,
Adrià Gascón,
Brooks Paige
Abstract:
Programming by example is the problem of synthesizing a program from a small set of input / output pairs. Recent works applying machine learning methods to this task show promise, but are typically reliant on generating synthetic examples for training. A particular challenge lies in generating meaningful sets of inputs and outputs, which well-characterize a given program and accurately demonstrate…
▽ More
Programming by example is the problem of synthesizing a program from a small set of input / output pairs. Recent works applying machine learning methods to this task show promise, but are typically reliant on generating synthetic examples for training. A particular challenge lies in generating meaningful sets of inputs and outputs, which well-characterize a given program and accurately demonstrate its behavior. Where examples used for testing are generated by the same method as training data then the performance of a model may be partly reliant on this similarity. In this paper we introduce a novel approach using an SMT solver to synthesize inputs which cover a diverse set of behaviors for a given program. We carry out a case study comparing this method to existing synthetic data generation procedures in the literature, and find that data generated using our approach improves both the discriminatory power of example sets and the ability of trained machine learning models to generalize to unfamiliar data.
△ Less
Submitted 6 November, 2019;
originally announced November 2019.
-
Private Protocols for U-Statistics in the Local Model and Beyond
Authors:
James Bell,
Aurélien Bellet,
Adrià Gascón,
Tejas Kulkarni
Abstract:
In this paper, we study the problem of computing $U$-statistics of degree $2$, i.e., quantities that come in the form of averages over pairs of data points, in the local model of differential privacy (LDP). The class of $U$-statistics covers many statistical estimates of interest, including Gini mean difference, Kendall's tau coefficient and Area under the ROC Curve (AUC), as well as empirical ris…
▽ More
In this paper, we study the problem of computing $U$-statistics of degree $2$, i.e., quantities that come in the form of averages over pairs of data points, in the local model of differential privacy (LDP). The class of $U$-statistics covers many statistical estimates of interest, including Gini mean difference, Kendall's tau coefficient and Area under the ROC Curve (AUC), as well as empirical risk measures for machine learning problems such as ranking, clustering and metric learning. We first introduce an LDP protocol based on quantizing the data into bins and applying randomized response, which guarantees an $ε$-LDP estimate with a Mean Squared Error (MSE) of $O(1/\sqrt{n}ε)$ under regularity assumptions on the $U$-statistic or the data distribution. We then propose a specialized protocol for AUC based on a novel use of hierarchical histograms that achieves MSE of $O(α^3/nε^2)$ for arbitrary data distribution. We also show that 2-party secure computation allows to design a protocol with MSE of $O(1/nε^2)$, without any assumption on the kernel function or data distribution and with total communication linear in the number of users $n$. Finally, we evaluate the performance of our protocols through experiments on synthetic and real datasets.
△ Less
Submitted 2 March, 2020; v1 submitted 9 October, 2019;
originally announced October 2019.
-
Differentially Private Summation with Multi-Message Shuffling
Authors:
Borja Balle,
James Bell,
Adria Gascon,
Kobbi Nissim
Abstract:
In recent work, Cheu et al. (Eurocrypt 2019) proposed a protocol for $n$-party real summation in the shuffle model of differential privacy with $O_{ε, δ}(1)$ error and $Θ(ε\sqrt{n})$ one-bit messages per party. In contrast, every local model protocol for real summation must incur error $Ω(1/\sqrt{n})$, and there exist protocols matching this lower bound which require just one bit of communication…
▽ More
In recent work, Cheu et al. (Eurocrypt 2019) proposed a protocol for $n$-party real summation in the shuffle model of differential privacy with $O_{ε, δ}(1)$ error and $Θ(ε\sqrt{n})$ one-bit messages per party. In contrast, every local model protocol for real summation must incur error $Ω(1/\sqrt{n})$, and there exist protocols matching this lower bound which require just one bit of communication per party. Whether this gap in number of messages is necessary was left open by Cheu et al.
In this note we show a protocol with $O(1/ε)$ error and $O(\log(n/δ))$ messages of size $O(\log(n))$ per party. This protocol is based on the work of Ishai et al.\ (FOCS 2006) showing how to implement distributed summation from secure shuffling, and the observation that this allows simulating the Laplace mechanism in the shuffle model.
△ Less
Submitted 21 August, 2019; v1 submitted 20 June, 2019;
originally announced June 2019.
-
The Privacy Blanket of the Shuffle Model
Authors:
Borja Balle,
James Bell,
Adria Gascon,
Kobbi Nissim
Abstract:
This work studies differential privacy in the context of the recently proposed shuffle model. Unlike in the local model, where the server collecting privatized data from users can track back an input to a specific user, in the shuffle model users submit their privatized inputs to a server anonymously. This setup yields a trust model which sits in between the classical curator and local models for…
▽ More
This work studies differential privacy in the context of the recently proposed shuffle model. Unlike in the local model, where the server collecting privatized data from users can track back an input to a specific user, in the shuffle model users submit their privatized inputs to a server anonymously. This setup yields a trust model which sits in between the classical curator and local models for differential privacy. The shuffle model is the core idea in the Encode, Shuffle, Analyze (ESA) model introduced by Bittau et al. (SOPS 2017). Recent work by Cheu et al. (EUROCRYPT 2019) analyzes the differential privacy properties of the shuffle model and shows that in some cases shuffled protocols provide strictly better accuracy than local protocols. Additionally, Erlingsson et al. (SODA 2019) provide a privacy amplification bound quantifying the level of curator differential privacy achieved by the shuffle model in terms of the local differential privacy of the randomizer used by each user. In this context, we make three contributions. First, we provide an optimal single message protocol for summation of real numbers in the shuffle model. Our protocol is very simple and has better accuracy and communication than the protocols for this same problem proposed by Cheu et al. Optimality of this protocol follows from our second contribution, a new lower bound for the accuracy of private protocols for summation of real numbers in the shuffle model. The third contribution is a new amplification bound for analyzing the privacy of protocols in the shuffle model in terms of the privacy provided by the corresponding local randomizer. Our amplification bound generalizes the results by Erlingsson et al. to a wider range of parameters, and provides a whole family of methods to analyze privacy amplification in the shuffle model.
△ Less
Submitted 2 June, 2019; v1 submitted 7 March, 2019;
originally announced March 2019.
-
TAPAS: Tricks to Accelerate (encrypted) Prediction As a Service
Authors:
Amartya Sanyal,
Matt J. Kusner,
Adrià Gascón,
Varun Kanade
Abstract:
Machine learning methods are widely used for a variety of prediction problems. \emph{Prediction as a service} is a paradigm in which service providers with technological expertise and computational resources may perform predictions for clients. However, data privacy severely restricts the applicability of such services, unless measures to keep client data private (even from the service provider) a…
▽ More
Machine learning methods are widely used for a variety of prediction problems. \emph{Prediction as a service} is a paradigm in which service providers with technological expertise and computational resources may perform predictions for clients. However, data privacy severely restricts the applicability of such services, unless measures to keep client data private (even from the service provider) are designed. Equally important is to minimize the amount of computation and communication required between client and server. Fully homomorphic encryption offers a possible way out, whereby clients may encrypt their data, and on which the server may perform arithmetic computations. The main drawback of using fully homomorphic encryption is the amount of time required to evaluate large machine learning models on encrypted data. We combine ideas from the machine learning literature, particularly work on binarization and sparsification of neural networks, together with algorithmic tools to speed-up and parallelize computation using encrypted data.
△ Less
Submitted 9 June, 2018;
originally announced June 2018.
-
Blind Justice: Fairness with Encrypted Sensitive Attributes
Authors:
Niki Kilbertus,
Adrià Gascón,
Matt J. Kusner,
Michael Veale,
Krishna P. Gummadi,
Adrian Weller
Abstract:
Recent work has explored how to train machine learning models which do not discriminate against any subgroup of the population as determined by sensitive attributes such as gender or race. To avoid disparate treatment, sensitive attributes should not be considered. On the other hand, in order to avoid disparate impact, sensitive attributes must be examined, e.g., in order to learn a fair model, or…
▽ More
Recent work has explored how to train machine learning models which do not discriminate against any subgroup of the population as determined by sensitive attributes such as gender or race. To avoid disparate treatment, sensitive attributes should not be considered. On the other hand, in order to avoid disparate impact, sensitive attributes must be examined, e.g., in order to learn a fair model, or to check if a given model is fair. We introduce methods from secure multi-party computation which allow us to avoid both. By encrypting sensitive attributes, we show how an outcome-based fair model may be learned, checked, or have its outputs verified and held to account, without users revealing their sensitive attributes.
△ Less
Submitted 8 June, 2018;
originally announced June 2018.
