Showing 1–2 of 2 results for author: Duchin, M
-
Measuring Segregation via Analysis on Graphs
Authors:
Moon Duchin,
James M. Murphy,
Thomas Weighill
Abstract:
In this paper, we use analysis on graphs to study quantitative measures of segregation. We focus on a classical statistic from the geography and urban sociology literature known as Moran's I, which in our language is a score associated to a real-valued function on a graph, computed with respect to a spatial weight matrix such as the adjacency matrix associated to the geographic units that tile a c…
▽ More
In this paper, we use analysis on graphs to study quantitative measures of segregation. We focus on a classical statistic from the geography and urban sociology literature known as Moran's I, which in our language is a score associated to a real-valued function on a graph, computed with respect to a spatial weight matrix such as the adjacency matrix associated to the geographic units that tile a city. Our results characterizing the extremal behavior of I illustrate the important role of the underlying graph structure, especially the degree distribution, in interpreting the score. In addition to the standard spatial weight matrices encoding unit adjacency, we consider the Laplacian L and a doubly-stochastic approximation M. These alternatives allow us to connect I to ideas from Fourier analysis and random walks. We offer illustrations of our theoretical results with a mix of stylized synthetic examples and real geographic/demographic data.
△ Less
Submitted 18 May, 2022; v1 submitted 20 December, 2021;
originally announced December 2021.
-
A Computational Approach to Measuring Vote Elasticity and Competitiveness
Authors:
Daryl DeFord,
Moon Duchin,
Justin Solomon
Abstract:
The recent wave of attention to partisan gerrymandering has come with a push to refine or replace the laws that govern political redistricting around the country. A common element in several states' reform efforts has been the inclusion of competitiveness metrics, or scores that evaluate a districting plan based on the extent to which district-level outcomes are in play or are likely to be closely…
▽ More
The recent wave of attention to partisan gerrymandering has come with a push to refine or replace the laws that govern political redistricting around the country. A common element in several states' reform efforts has been the inclusion of competitiveness metrics, or scores that evaluate a districting plan based on the extent to which district-level outcomes are in play or are likely to be closely contested.
In this paper, we examine several classes of competitiveness metrics motivated by recent reform proposals and then evaluate their potential outcomes across large ensembles of districting plans at the Congressional and state Senate levels. This is part of a growing literature using MCMC techniques from applied statistics to situate plans and criteria in the context of valid redistricting alternatives. Our empirical analysis focuses on five states---Utah, Georgia, Wisconsin, Virginia, and Massachusetts---chosen to represent a range of partisan attributes. We highlight situation-specific difficulties in creating good competitiveness metrics and show that optimizing competitiveness can produce unintended consequences on other partisan metrics. These results demonstrate the importance of (1) avoiding writing detailed metric constraints into long-lasting constitutional reform and (2) carrying out careful mathematical modeling on real geo-electoral data in each redistricting cycle.
△ Less
Submitted 26 May, 2020;
originally announced May 2020.
