An Approach to Multiple Comparison Benchmark Evaluations that is Stable Under Manipulation of the Comparate Set
Authors:
Ali Ismail-Fawaz,
Angus Dempster,
Chang Wei Tan,
Matthieu Herrmann,
Lynn Miller,
Daniel F. Schmidt,
Stefano Berretti,
Jonathan Weber,
Maxime Devanne,
Germain Forestier,
Geoffrey I. Webb
Abstract:
The measurement of progress using benchmarks evaluations is ubiquitous in computer science and machine learning. However, common approaches to analyzing and presenting the results of benchmark comparisons of multiple algorithms over multiple datasets, such as the critical difference diagram introduced by Demšar (2006), have important shortcomings and, we show, are open to both inadvertent and inte…
▽ More
The measurement of progress using benchmarks evaluations is ubiquitous in computer science and machine learning. However, common approaches to analyzing and presenting the results of benchmark comparisons of multiple algorithms over multiple datasets, such as the critical difference diagram introduced by Demšar (2006), have important shortcomings and, we show, are open to both inadvertent and intentional manipulation. To address these issues, we propose a new approach to presenting the results of benchmark comparisons, the Multiple Comparison Matrix (MCM), that prioritizes pairwise comparisons and precludes the means of manipulating experimental results in existing approaches. MCM can be used to show the results of an all-pairs comparison, or to show the results of a comparison between one or more selected algorithms and the state of the art. MCM is implemented in Python and is publicly available.
△ Less
Submitted 19 May, 2023;
originally announced May 2023.
