Showing 1–2 of 2 results for author: Danieli, C
-
Privacy-preserving estimation of an optimal individualized treatment rule : A case study in maximizing time to severe depression-related outcomes
Authors:
Erica EM Moodie,
Janie Coulombe,
Coraline Danieli,
Christel Renoux,
Susan M Shortreed
Abstract:
Estimating individualized treatment rules - particularly in the context of right-censored outcomes - is challenging because the treatment effect heterogeneity of interest is often small, thus difficult to detect. While this motivates the use of very large datasets such as those from multiple health systems or centres, data privacy may be of concern with participating data centres reluctant to shar…
▽ More
Estimating individualized treatment rules - particularly in the context of right-censored outcomes - is challenging because the treatment effect heterogeneity of interest is often small, thus difficult to detect. While this motivates the use of very large datasets such as those from multiple health systems or centres, data privacy may be of concern with participating data centres reluctant to share individual-level data. In this case study on the treatment of depression, we demonstrate an application of distributed regression for privacy protection used in combination with dynamic weighted survival modelling (DWSurv) to estimate an optimal individualized treatment rule whilst obscuring individual-level data. In simulations, we demonstrate the flexibility of this approach to address local treatment practices that may affect confounding, and show that DWSurv retains its double robustness even when performed through a (weighted) distributed regression approach. The work is motivated by, and illustrated with, an analysis of treatment for unipolar depression using the United Kingdom's Clinical Practice Research Datalink.
△ Less
Submitted 14 February, 2022;
originally announced February 2022.
-
Preserving data privacy when using multi-site data to estimate individualized treatment rules
Authors:
Coraline Danieli,
Erica Moodie
Abstract:
Precision medicine is a rapidly expanding area of health research wherein patient level information is used to inform treatment decisions. A statistical framework helps to formalize the individualization of treatment decisions that characterize personalized management plans. Numerous methods have been proposed to estimate individualized treatment rules that optimize expected patient outcomes, many…
▽ More
Precision medicine is a rapidly expanding area of health research wherein patient level information is used to inform treatment decisions. A statistical framework helps to formalize the individualization of treatment decisions that characterize personalized management plans. Numerous methods have been proposed to estimate individualized treatment rules that optimize expected patient outcomes, many of which have desirable properties such as robustness to model misspecification. However, while individual data are essential in this context, there may be concerns about data confidentiality, particularly in multi-centre studies where data are shared externally. To address this issue, we compared two approaches to privacy preservation: (i) data pooling, which is a covariate microaggregation technique and (ii) distributed regression. These approaches were combined with the doubly robust yet user-friendly method of dynamic weighted ordinary least squares to estimate individualized treatment rules. In simulations, we extensively evaluated the performance of the methods in estimating the parameters of the decision rule under different assumptions. The results demonstrate that double robustness is not maintained in data pooling setting and that this can result in bias, whereas the distributed regression provides good performance. We illustrate the methods via an analysis of optimal Warfarin dosing using data from the International Warfarin Consortium.
△ Less
Submitted 21 December, 2021;
originally announced December 2021.
