-
Causally Sound Priors for Binary Experiments
Authors:
Nicholas J. Irons,
Carlos Cinelli
Abstract:
We introduce the BREASE framework for the Bayesian analysis of randomized controlled trials with a binary treatment and a binary outcome. Approaching the problem from a causal inference perspective, we propose parameterizing the likelihood in terms of the baseline risk, efficacy, and adverse side effects of the treatment, along with a flexible, yet intuitive and tractable jointly independent beta…
▽ More
We introduce the BREASE framework for the Bayesian analysis of randomized controlled trials with a binary treatment and a binary outcome. Approaching the problem from a causal inference perspective, we propose parameterizing the likelihood in terms of the baseline risk, efficacy, and adverse side effects of the treatment, along with a flexible, yet intuitive and tractable jointly independent beta prior distribution on these parameters, which we show to be a generalization of the Dirichlet prior for the joint distribution of potential outcomes. Our approach has a number of desirable characteristics when compared to current mainstream alternatives: (i) it naturally induces prior dependence between expected outcomes in the treatment and control groups; (ii) as the baseline risk, efficacy and risk of adverse side effects are quantities commonly present in the clinicians' vocabulary, the hyperparameters of the prior are directly interpretable, thus facilitating the elicitation of prior knowledge and sensitivity analysis; and (iii) we provide analytical formulae for the marginal likelihood, Bayes factor, and other posterior quantities, as well as exact posterior sampling via simulation, in cases where traditional MCMC fails. Empirical examples demonstrate the utility of our methods for estimation, hypothesis testing, and sensitivity analysis of treatment effects.
△ Less
Submitted 31 October, 2023; v1 submitted 25 August, 2023;
originally announced August 2023.
-
Orthogonal Statistical Learning with Self-Concordant Loss
Authors:
Lang Liu,
Carlos Cinelli,
Zaid Harchaoui
Abstract:
Orthogonal statistical learning and double machine learning have emerged as general frameworks for two-stage statistical prediction in the presence of a nuisance component. We establish non-asymptotic bounds on the excess risk of orthogonal statistical learning methods with a loss function satisfying a self-concordance property. Our bounds improve upon existing bounds by a dimension factor while l…
▽ More
Orthogonal statistical learning and double machine learning have emerged as general frameworks for two-stage statistical prediction in the presence of a nuisance component. We establish non-asymptotic bounds on the excess risk of orthogonal statistical learning methods with a loss function satisfying a self-concordance property. Our bounds improve upon existing bounds by a dimension factor while lifting the assumption of strong convexity. We illustrate the results with examples from multiple treatment effect estimation and generalized partially linear modeling.
△ Less
Submitted 19 June, 2022; v1 submitted 30 April, 2022;
originally announced May 2022.
-
Long Story Short: Omitted Variable Bias in Causal Machine Learning
Authors:
Victor Chernozhukov,
Carlos Cinelli,
Whitney Newey,
Amit Sharma,
Vasilis Syrgkanis
Abstract:
We develop a general theory of omitted variable bias for a wide range of common causal parameters, including (but not limited to) averages of potential outcomes, average treatment effects, average causal derivatives, and policy effects from covariate shifts. Our theory applies to nonparametric models, while naturally allowing for (semi-)parametric restrictions (such as partial linearity) when such…
▽ More
We develop a general theory of omitted variable bias for a wide range of common causal parameters, including (but not limited to) averages of potential outcomes, average treatment effects, average causal derivatives, and policy effects from covariate shifts. Our theory applies to nonparametric models, while naturally allowing for (semi-)parametric restrictions (such as partial linearity) when such assumptions are made. We show how simple plausibility judgments on the maximum explanatory power of omitted variables are sufficient to bound the magnitude of the bias, thus facilitating sensitivity analysis in otherwise complex, nonlinear models. Finally, we provide flexible and efficient statistical inference methods for the bounds, which can leverage modern machine learning algorithms for estimation. These results allow empirical researchers to perform sensitivity analyses in a flexible class of machine-learned causal models using very simple, and interpretable, tools. We demonstrate the utility of our approach with two empirical examples.
△ Less
Submitted 26 May, 2024; v1 submitted 26 December, 2021;
originally announced December 2021.
