Showing 1–17 of 17 results for author: Chakraborty, B

Optimal Adaptive SMART Designs with Binary Outcomes

Authors: Rik Ghosh, Bibhas Chakraborty, Inbal Nahum-Shani, Megan E. Patrick, Palash Ghosh

Abstract: In a sequential multiple-assignment randomized trial (SMART), a sequence of treatments is given to a patient over multiple stages. In each stage, randomization may be done to allocate patients to different treatment groups. Even though SMART designs are getting popular among clinical researchers, the methodologies for adaptive randomization at different stages of a SMART are few and not sophistica… ▽ More In a sequential multiple-assignment randomized trial (SMART), a sequence of treatments is given to a patient over multiple stages. In each stage, randomization may be done to allocate patients to different treatment groups. Even though SMART designs are getting popular among clinical researchers, the methodologies for adaptive randomization at different stages of a SMART are few and not sophisticated enough to handle the complexity of optimal allocation of treatments at every stage of a trial. Lack of optimal allocation methodologies can raise serious concerns about SMART designs from an ethical point of view. In this work, we develop an optimal adaptive allocation procedure to minimize the expected number of treatment failures for a SMART with a binary primary outcome. Issues related to optimal adaptive allocations are explored theoretically with supporting simulations. The applicability of the proposed methodology is demonstrated using a recently conducted SMART study named M-Bridge for develo** universal and resource-efficient dynamic treatment regimes (DTRs) for incoming first-year college students as a bridge to desirable treatments to address alcohol-related risks. △ Less

Submitted 31 October, 2023; originally announced January 2024.

Skew Probabilistic Neural Networks for Learning from Imbalanced Data

Authors: Shraddha M. Naik, Tanujit Chakraborty, Abdenour Hadid, Bibhas Chakraborty

Abstract: Real-world datasets often exhibit imbalanced data distribution, where certain class levels are severely underrepresented. In such cases, traditional pattern classifiers have shown a bias towards the majority class, impeding accurate predictions for the minority class. This paper introduces an imbalanced data-oriented approach using probabilistic neural networks (PNNs) with a skew normal probabilit… ▽ More Real-world datasets often exhibit imbalanced data distribution, where certain class levels are severely underrepresented. In such cases, traditional pattern classifiers have shown a bias towards the majority class, impeding accurate predictions for the minority class. This paper introduces an imbalanced data-oriented approach using probabilistic neural networks (PNNs) with a skew normal probability kernel to address this major challenge. PNNs are known for providing probabilistic outputs, enabling quantification of prediction confidence and uncertainty handling. By leveraging the skew normal distribution, which offers increased flexibility, particularly for imbalanced and non-symmetric data, our proposed Skew Probabilistic Neural Networks (SkewPNNs) can better represent underlying class densities. To optimize the performance of the proposed approach on imbalanced datasets, hyperparameter fine-tuning is imperative. To this end, we employ a population-based heuristic algorithm, Bat optimization algorithms, for effectively exploring the hyperparameter space. We also prove the statistical consistency of the density estimates which suggests that the true distribution will be approached smoothly as the sample size increases. Experimental simulations have been conducted on different synthetic datasets, comparing various benchmark-imbalanced learners. Our real-data analysis shows that SkewPNNs substantially outperform state-of-the-art machine learning methods for both balanced and imbalanced datasets in most experimental settings. △ Less

Submitted 10 December, 2023; originally announced December 2023.

Thompson sampling for zero-inflated count outcomes with an application to the Drink Less mobile health study

Authors: Xueqing Liu, Nina Deliu, Tanujit Chakraborty, Lauren Bell, Bibhas Chakraborty

Abstract: Mobile health (mHealth) technologies aim to improve distal outcomes, such as clinical conditions, by optimizing proximal outcomes through just-in-time adaptive interventions. Contextual bandits provide a suitable framework for customizing such interventions according to individual time-varying contexts, intending to maximize cumulative proximal outcomes. However, unique challenges such as modeling… ▽ More Mobile health (mHealth) technologies aim to improve distal outcomes, such as clinical conditions, by optimizing proximal outcomes through just-in-time adaptive interventions. Contextual bandits provide a suitable framework for customizing such interventions according to individual time-varying contexts, intending to maximize cumulative proximal outcomes. However, unique challenges such as modeling count outcomes within bandit frameworks have hindered the widespread application of contextual bandits to mHealth studies. The current work addresses this challenge by leveraging count data models into online decision-making approaches. Specifically, we combine four common offline count data models (Poisson, negative binomial, zero-inflated Poisson, and zero-inflated negative binomial regressions) with Thompson sampling, a popular contextual bandit algorithm. The proposed algorithms are motivated by and evaluated on a real dataset from the Drink Less trial, where they are shown to improve user engagement with the mHealth system. The proposed methods are further evaluated on simulated data, achieving improvement in maximizing cumulative proximal outcomes over existing algorithms. Theoretical results on regret bounds are also derived. A user-friendly R package countts that implements the proposed methods for assessing contextual bandit algorithms is made publicly available at https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/countts. △ Less

Submitted 24 November, 2023; originally announced November 2023.

Incorporating nonparametric methods for estimating causal excursion effects in mobile health with zero-inflated count outcomes

Authors: Xueqing Liu, Tianchen Qian, Lauren Bell, Bibhas Chakraborty

Abstract: In mobile health, tailoring interventions for real-time delivery is of paramount importance. Micro-randomized trials have emerged as the "gold-standard" methodology for develo** such interventions. Analyzing data from these trials provides insights into the efficacy of interventions and the potential moderation by specific covariates. The "causal excursion effect", a novel class of causal estima… ▽ More In mobile health, tailoring interventions for real-time delivery is of paramount importance. Micro-randomized trials have emerged as the "gold-standard" methodology for develo** such interventions. Analyzing data from these trials provides insights into the efficacy of interventions and the potential moderation by specific covariates. The "causal excursion effect", a novel class of causal estimand, addresses these inquiries. Yet, existing research mainly focuses on continuous or binary data, leaving count data largely unexplored. The current work is motivated by the Drink Less micro-randomized trial from the UK, which focuses on a zero-inflated proximal outcome, i.e., the number of screen views in the subsequent hour following the intervention decision point. To be specific, we revisit the concept of causal excursion effect, specifically for zero-inflated count outcomes, and introduce novel estimation approaches that incorporate nonparametric techniques. Bidirectional asymptotics are established for the proposed estimators. Simulation studies are conducted to evaluate the performance of the proposed methods. As an illustration, we also implement these methods to the Drink Less trial data. △ Less

Submitted 11 March, 2024; v1 submitted 29 October, 2023; originally announced October 2023.

Comments: 52pages

Incorporating Participants' Welfare into Sequential Multiple Assignment Randomized Trials

Authors: Xinru Wang, Nina Deliu, Yusuke Narita, Bibhas Chakraborty

Abstract: Dynamic treatment regimes (DTRs) are sequences of decision rules that recommend treatments based on patients' time-varying clinical conditions. The sequential multiple assignment randomized trial (SMART) is an experimental design that can provide high-quality evidence for constructing optimal DTRs. In a conventional SMART, participants are randomized to available treatments at multiple stages with… ▽ More Dynamic treatment regimes (DTRs) are sequences of decision rules that recommend treatments based on patients' time-varying clinical conditions. The sequential multiple assignment randomized trial (SMART) is an experimental design that can provide high-quality evidence for constructing optimal DTRs. In a conventional SMART, participants are randomized to available treatments at multiple stages with balanced randomization probabilities. Despite its relative simplicity of implementation and desirable performance in comparing embedded DTRs, the conventional SMART faces inevitable ethical issues including assigning many participants to the empirically inferior treatment or the treatment they dislike, which might slow down the recruitment procedure and lead to higher attrition rates, ultimately leading to poor internal and external validities of the trial results. In this context, we propose a SMART under the Experiment-as-Market framework (SMART-EXAM), a novel SMART design that holds the potential to improve participants' welfare by incorporating their preferences and predicted treatment effects into the randomization procedure. We describe the steps of conducting a SMART-EXAM and evaluate its performance compared to the conventional SMART. The results indicate that the SMART-EXAM can improve the welfare of the participants enrolled in the trial, while also achieving a desirable ability to construct an optimal DTR when the experimental parameters are suitably specified. We finally illustrate the practical potential of the SMART-EXAM design using data from a SMART for children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). △ Less

Submitted 19 September, 2023; v1 submitted 28 October, 2022; originally announced October 2022.

A Flexible Micro-Randomized Trial Design and Sample Size Considerations

Authors: **g Xu, Xiaoxi Yan, Caroline Figueroa, Joseph Jay Williams, Bibhas Chakraborty

Abstract: Technological advancements have made it possible to deliver mobile health interventions to individuals. A novel framework that has emerged from such advancements is the just-in-time adaptive intervention (JITAI), which aims to suggest the right support to the individuals when their needs arise. The micro-randomized trial (MRT) design has been proposed recently to test the proximal effects of these… ▽ More Technological advancements have made it possible to deliver mobile health interventions to individuals. A novel framework that has emerged from such advancements is the just-in-time adaptive intervention (JITAI), which aims to suggest the right support to the individuals when their needs arise. The micro-randomized trial (MRT) design has been proposed recently to test the proximal effects of these JITAIs. However, the extant MRT framework only considers components with a fixed number of categories added at the beginning of the study. We propose a flexible MRT (FlexiMRT) design which allows addition of more categories to the components during the study. The proposed design is motivated by collaboration on the DIAMANTE study, which learns to deliver text messages to encourage physical activity among the patients with diabetes and depression. We developed a new test statistic and the corresponding sample size calculator for the FlexiMRT using an approach similar to the generalized estimating equation for longitudinal data. Simulation studies were conducted to evaluate the sample size calculators and an R shiny application for the calculators was developed. △ Less

Submitted 6 July, 2023; v1 submitted 17 March, 2022; originally announced March 2022.

Comments: arXiv admin note: text overlap with arXiv:2007.13741

Making SMART decisions in prophylaxis and treatment studies

Authors: Robert K. Mahar, Katherine J. Lee, Bibhas Chakraborty, Agus Salim, Julie A. Simpson

Abstract: The optimal prophylaxis, and treatment if the prophylaxis fails, for a disease may be best evaluated using a sequential multiple assignment randomised trial (SMART). A SMART is a multi-stage study that randomises a participant to an initial treatment, observes some response to that treatment and then, depending on their observed response, randomises the same participant to an alternative treatment… ▽ More The optimal prophylaxis, and treatment if the prophylaxis fails, for a disease may be best evaluated using a sequential multiple assignment randomised trial (SMART). A SMART is a multi-stage study that randomises a participant to an initial treatment, observes some response to that treatment and then, depending on their observed response, randomises the same participant to an alternative treatment. Response adaptive randomisation may, in some settings, improve the trial participants' outcomes and expedite trial conclusions, compared to fixed randomisation. But 'myopic' response adaptive randomisation strategies, blind to multistage dynamics, may also result in suboptimal treatment assignments. We propose a 'dynamic' response adaptive randomisation strategy based on Q-learning, an approximate dynamic programming algorithm. Q-learning uses stage-wise statistical models and backward induction to incorporate late-stage 'payoffs' (i.e. clinical outcomes) into early-stage 'actions' (i.e. treatments). Our real-world example consists of a COVID-19 prophylaxis and treatment SMART with qualitatively different binary endpoints at each stage. Standard Q-learning does not work with such data because it cannot be used for sequences of binary endpoints. Sequences of qualitatively distinct endpoints may also require different weightings to ensure that the design guides participants to regimens with the highest utility. We describe how a simple decision-theoretic extension to Q-learning can be used to handle sequential binary endpoints with distinct utilities. Using simulation we show that, under a set of binary utilities, the 'dynamic' approach increases expected participant utility compared to the fixed approach, sometimes markedly, for all model parameters, whereas the 'myopic' approach can actually decrease utility. △ Less

Submitted 24 March, 2022; originally announced March 2022.

Reinforcement Learning in Modern Biostatistics: Constructing Optimal Adaptive Interventions

Authors: Nina Deliu, Joseph Jay Williams, Bibhas Chakraborty

Abstract: In recent years, reinforcement learning (RL) has acquired a prominent position in health-related sequential decision-making problems, gaining traction as a valuable tool for delivering adaptive interventions (AIs). However, in part due to a poor synergy between the methodological and the applied communities, its real-life application is still limited and its potential is still to be realized. To a… ▽ More In recent years, reinforcement learning (RL) has acquired a prominent position in health-related sequential decision-making problems, gaining traction as a valuable tool for delivering adaptive interventions (AIs). However, in part due to a poor synergy between the methodological and the applied communities, its real-life application is still limited and its potential is still to be realized. To address this gap, our work provides the first unified technical survey on RL methods, complemented with case studies, for constructing various types of AIs in healthcare. In particular, using the common methodological umbrella of RL, we bridge two seemingly different AI domains, dynamic treatment regimes and just-in-time adaptive interventions in mobile health, highlighting similarities and differences between them and discussing the implications of using RL. Open problems and considerations for future research directions are outlined. Finally, we leverage our experience in designing case studies in both areas to showcase the significant collaborative opportunities between statistical, RL, and healthcare researchers in advancing AIs. △ Less

Submitted 11 May, 2024; v1 submitted 4 March, 2022; originally announced March 2022.

Comments: 57 pages

A Penalized Shared-parameter Algorithm for Estimating Optimal Dynamic Treatment Regimens

Authors: Palash Ghosh, Trikay Nalamada, Shruti Agarwal, Maria Jahja, Bibhas Chakraborty

Abstract: A dynamic treatment regimen (DTR) is a set of decision rules to personalize treatments for an individual using their medical history. The Q-learning based Q-shared algorithm has been used to develop DTRs that involve decision rules shared across multiple stages of intervention. We show that the existing Q-shared algorithm can suffer from non-convergence due to the use of linear models in the Q-lea… ▽ More A dynamic treatment regimen (DTR) is a set of decision rules to personalize treatments for an individual using their medical history. The Q-learning based Q-shared algorithm has been used to develop DTRs that involve decision rules shared across multiple stages of intervention. We show that the existing Q-shared algorithm can suffer from non-convergence due to the use of linear models in the Q-learning setup, and identify the condition in which Q-shared fails. Leveraging properties from expansion-constrained ordinary least-squares, we give a penalized Q-shared algorithm that not only converges in settings that violate the condition, but can outperform the original Q-shared algorithm even when the condition is satisfied. We give evidence for the proposed method in a real-world application and several synthetic simulations. △ Less

Submitted 26 May, 2022; v1 submitted 13 July, 2021; originally announced July 2021.

Sample size estimation for comparing dynamic treatment regimens in a SMART: a Monte Carlo-based approach and case study with longitudinal overdispersed count outcomes

Authors: Jamie Yap, John J. Dziak, Raju Maiti, Kevin G. Lynch, James R. McKay, Bibhas Chakraborty, Inbal Nahum-Shani

Abstract: Dynamic treatment regimens (DTRs), also known as treatment algorithms or adaptive interventions, play an increasingly important role in many health domains. DTRs are motivated to address the unique and changing needs of individuals by delivering the type of treatment needed, when needed, while minimizing unnecessary treatment. Practically, a DTR is a sequence of decision rules that specify, for ea… ▽ More Dynamic treatment regimens (DTRs), also known as treatment algorithms or adaptive interventions, play an increasingly important role in many health domains. DTRs are motivated to address the unique and changing needs of individuals by delivering the type of treatment needed, when needed, while minimizing unnecessary treatment. Practically, a DTR is a sequence of decision rules that specify, for each of several points in time, how available information about the individual's status and progress should be used in practice to decide which treatment (e.g., type or intensity) to deliver. The sequential multiple assignment randomized trial (SMART) is an experimental design widely used to empirically inform the development of DTRs. Sample size planning resources for SMARTs have been developed for continuous, binary, and survival outcomes. However, an important gap exists in sample size estimation methodology for SMARTs with longitudinal count outcomes. Further, in many health domains, count data are overdispersed - having variance greater than their mean. We propose a Monte Carlo-based approach to sample size estimation applicable to many types of longitudinal outcomes and provide a case study with longitudinal overdispersed count outcomes. A SMART for engaging alcohol and cocaine-dependent patients in treatment is used as motivation. △ Less

Submitted 8 March, 2023; v1 submitted 31 March, 2021; originally announced April 2021.

Comments: Key words: dynamic treatment regimen (DTR); longitudinal outcome; overdispersed count; sample size estimation; sequential multiple assignment randomized trial (SMART)

Multi-Level Micro-Randomized Trial: Detecting the Proximal Effect of Messages on Physical Activity

Authors: **g Xu, Xiaoxi Yan, Caroline Figueroa, Joseph Jay Williams, Bibhas Chakraborty

Abstract: Technological advancements in mobile devices have made it possible to deliver mobile health interventions to individuals. A novel intervention framework that emerges from such advancements is the just-in-time adaptive intervention (JITAI), where it aims to suggest the right support to the individual "just in time", when their needs arise, thus having proximal, near future effects. The micro-random… ▽ More Technological advancements in mobile devices have made it possible to deliver mobile health interventions to individuals. A novel intervention framework that emerges from such advancements is the just-in-time adaptive intervention (JITAI), where it aims to suggest the right support to the individual "just in time", when their needs arise, thus having proximal, near future effects. The micro-randomized trial (MRT) design was proposed recently to test the proximal effects of these JITAIs. In an MRT, participants are repeatedly randomized to one of the intervention options of various in the intervention components, at a scale of hundreds or thousands of decision time points over the course of the study. However, the extant MRT framework only tests the proximal effect of two-level intervention components (e.g. control vs intervention). In this paper, we propose a novel version of MRT design with multiple levels per intervention component, which we call "multi-level micro-randomized trial" (MLMRT) design. The MLMRT extends the existing MRT design by allowing multi-level intervention components, and the addition of more levels to the components during the study period. We apply generalized estimating equation type methodology on the longitudinal data arising from an MLMRT to develop the novel test statistics for assessing the proximal effects and deriving the associated sample size calculators. We conduct simulation studies to evaluate the sample size calculators based on both power and precision. We have developed an R shiny application of the sample size calculators. This proposed design is motivated by our involvement in the Diabetes and Mental Health Adaptive Notification Tracking and Evaluation (DIAMANTE) study. This study uses a novel mobile application, also called "DIAMANTE", which delivers adaptive text messages to encourage physical activity. △ Less

Submitted 27 July, 2020; originally announced July 2020.

Estimating the Optimal Linear Combination of Biomarkers using Spherically Constrained Optimization

Authors: Priyam Das, Debsurya De, Raju Maiti, Mona Kamal, Katherine A. Hutcheson, Clifton D. Fuller, Bibhas Chakraborty, Christine B. Peterson

Abstract: In the context of a binary classification problem, the optimal linear combination of continuous predictors can be estimated by maximizing an empirical estimate of the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC). For multi-category responses, the optimal predictor combination can similarly be obtained by maximization of the empirical hypervolume under the manifold (HUM). This… ▽ More In the context of a binary classification problem, the optimal linear combination of continuous predictors can be estimated by maximizing an empirical estimate of the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC). For multi-category responses, the optimal predictor combination can similarly be obtained by maximization of the empirical hypervolume under the manifold (HUM). This problem is particularly relevant to medical research, where it may be of interest to diagnose a disease with various subtypes or predict a multi-category outcome. Since the empirical HUM is discontinuous, non-differentiable, and possibly multi-modal, solving this maximization problem requires a global optimization technique. Estimation of the optimal coefficient vector using existing global optimization techniques is computationally expensive, becoming prohibitive as the number of predictors and the number of outcome categories increases. We propose an efficient derivative-free black-box optimization technique based on pattern search to solve this problem. Through extensive simulation studies, we demonstrate that the proposed method achieves better performance compared to existing methods including the step-down algorithm. Finally, we illustrate the proposed method to predict swallowing difficulty after radiation therapy for oropharyngeal cancer based on radiation dose to various structures in the head and neck. △ Less

Submitted 7 January, 2021; v1 submitted 6 September, 2019; originally announced September 2019.

A distribution-free smoothed combination method of biomarkers to improve diagnostic accuracy in multi-category classification

Authors: Raju Maiti, Jialiang Li, Priyam Das, Lei Feng, Derek Hausenloy, Bibhas Chakraborty

Abstract: Results from multiple diagnostic tests are usually combined to improve the overall diagnostic accuracy. For binary classification, maximization of the empirical estimate of the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve is widely adopted to produce the optimal linear combination of multiple biomarkers. In the presence of large number of biomarkers, this method proves to be comput… ▽ More Results from multiple diagnostic tests are usually combined to improve the overall diagnostic accuracy. For binary classification, maximization of the empirical estimate of the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve is widely adopted to produce the optimal linear combination of multiple biomarkers. In the presence of large number of biomarkers, this method proves to be computationally expensive and difficult to implement since it involves maximization of a discontinuous, non-smooth function for which gradient-based methods cannot be used directly. Complexity of this problem increases when the classification problem becomes multi-category. In this article, we develop a linear combination method that maximizes a smooth approximation of the empirical Hypervolume Under Manifolds (HUM) for multi-category outcome. We approximate HUM by replacing the indicator function with the sigmoid function or normal cumulative distribution function (CDF). With the above smooth approximations, efficient gradient-based algorithms can be employed to obtain better solution with less computing time. We show that under some regularity conditions, the proposed method yields consistent estimates of the coefficient parameters. We also derive the asymptotic normality of the coefficient estimates. We conduct extensive simulations to examine our methods. Under different simulation scenarios, the proposed methods are compared with other existing methods and are shown to outperform them in terms of diagnostic accuracy. The proposed method is illustrated using two real medical data sets. △ Less

Submitted 22 April, 2019; originally announced April 2019.

SMARTp: A SMART design for non-surgical treatments of chronic periodontitis with spatially-referenced and non-randomly missing skewed outcomes

Authors: **g Xu, Dipankar Bandyopadhyay, Sedigheh Mirzaei, Bryan Michalowicz, Bibhas Chakraaborty

Abstract: This paper proposes dynamic treatment regimes for choosing individualized effective treatment strategies of chronic periodontal disease. R codes for implementing the proposed sample size formula are available in GitHub. This paper proposes dynamic treatment regimes for choosing individualized effective treatment strategies of chronic periodontal disease. R codes for implementing the proposed sample size formula are available in GitHub. △ Less

Submitted 25 February, 2019; originally announced February 2019.

A Sequential Significance Test for Treatment by Covariate Interactions

Authors: Min Qian, Bibhas Chakraborty, Raju Maiti, Ying Kuen Cheung

Abstract: Due to patient heterogeneity in response to various aspects of any treatment program, biomedical and clinical research is gradually shifting from the traditional "one-size-fits-all" approach to the new paradigm of personalized medicine. An important step in this direction is to identify the treatment by covariate interactions. We consider the setting in which there are potentially a large number o… ▽ More Due to patient heterogeneity in response to various aspects of any treatment program, biomedical and clinical research is gradually shifting from the traditional "one-size-fits-all" approach to the new paradigm of personalized medicine. An important step in this direction is to identify the treatment by covariate interactions. We consider the setting in which there are potentially a large number of covariates of interest. Although a number of novel machine learning methodologies have been developed in recent years to aid in treatment selection in this setting, few, if any, have adopted formal hypothesis testing procedures. In this article, we present a novel testing procedure based on m-out-of-n bootstrap that can be used to sequentially identify variables that interact with treatment. We study the theoretical properties of the method and show that it is more effective in controlling the type I error rate and achieving a satisfactory power as compared to competing methods, via extensive simulations. Furthermore, the usefulness of the proposed method is illustrated using real data examples, both from a randomized trial and from an observational study. △ Less

Submitted 19 November, 2019; v1 submitted 24 January, 2019; originally announced January 2019.

A Novel Approach To Assess Dynamic Treatment Regimes Embedded In A Smart With An Ordinal Outcome

Authors: Palash Ghosh, Xiaoxi Yan, Bibhas Chakraborty

Abstract: Sequential multiple assignment randomized trials (SMARTs) are used to construct data-driven optimal intervention strategies for subjects based on their intervention and covariate histories in different branches of health and behavioral sciences where a sequence of interventions is given to a participant. Sequential intervention strategies are often called dynamic treatment regimes (DTR). In the ex… ▽ More Sequential multiple assignment randomized trials (SMARTs) are used to construct data-driven optimal intervention strategies for subjects based on their intervention and covariate histories in different branches of health and behavioral sciences where a sequence of interventions is given to a participant. Sequential intervention strategies are often called dynamic treatment regimes (DTR). In the existing literature, the majority of the analysis methodologies for SMART data assume a continuous primary outcome. However, ordinal outcomes are also quite common in clinical practice. In this work, first, we introduce the notion of generalized odds ratio (GOR) to compare two DTRs embedded in a SMART with an ordinal outcome and discuss some combinatorial properties of this measure. Next, we propose a likelihood-based approach to estimate GOR from SMART data, and derive the asymptotic properties of its estimate. We discuss alternative ways to estimate GOR using concordant-discordant pairs and two-sample U-statistic. We derive the required sample size formula for designing SMARTs with ordinal outcomes based on GOR. A simulation study shows the performance of the estimated GOR in terms of the estimated power corresponding to the derived sample size. The methodology is applied to analyze data from the SMART+ study, conducted in the UK, to improve carbohydrate periodization behavior in athletes using a menu planner mobile application, Hexis Performance. A freely available Shiny web app using R is provided to make the proposed methodology accessible to other researchers and practitioners. △ Less

Submitted 27 April, 2022; v1 submitted 22 August, 2018; originally announced August 2018.

Non-Inferiority and Equivalence Tests in A Sequential Multiple-Assignment Randomized Trial (SMART)

Authors: Palash Ghosh, Inbal Nahum-Shani, Bonnie Spring, Bibhas Chakraborty

Abstract: Adaptive interventions (AIs) are increasingly becoming popular in medical and behavioral sciences. An AI is a sequence of individualized intervention options that specify for whom and under what conditions different intervention options should be offered, in order to address the changing needs of individuals as they progress over time. The sequential, multiple assignment, randomized trial (SMART)… ▽ More Adaptive interventions (AIs) are increasingly becoming popular in medical and behavioral sciences. An AI is a sequence of individualized intervention options that specify for whom and under what conditions different intervention options should be offered, in order to address the changing needs of individuals as they progress over time. The sequential, multiple assignment, randomized trial (SMART) is a novel trial design that was developed to aid in empirically constructing effective AIs. The sequential randomizations in a SMART often yield multiple AIs that are embedded in the trial by design. Many SMARTs are motivated by scientific questions pertaining to the comparison of such embedded AIs. Existing data analytic methods and sample size planning resources for SMARTs are suitable for superiority testing, namely for testing whether one embedded AI yields better primary outcomes on average than another. This represents a major scientific gap since AIs are often motivated by the need to deliver support/care in a less costly or less burdensome manner, while still yielding benefits that are equivalent or non-inferior to those produced by a more costly/burdensome standard of care. Here, we develop data analytic methods and sample size formulas for SMART studies aiming to test the non-inferiority or equivalence of one AI over another. Sample size and power considerations are discussed with supporting simulations, and online sample size planning resources are provided. For illustration, we use an example from a SMART study aiming to develop an AI for promoting weight loss among overweight/obese adults. △ Less

Submitted 14 December, 2018; v1 submitted 4 May, 2017; originally announced May 2017.