-
Learning bounded-degree polytrees with known skeleton
Authors:
Davin Choo,
Joy Qi** Yang,
Arnab Bhattacharyya,
Clément L. Canonne
Abstract:
We establish finite-sample guarantees for efficient proper learning of bounded-degree polytrees, a rich class of high-dimensional probability distributions and a subclass of Bayesian networks, a widely-studied type of graphical model. Recently, Bhattacharyya et al. (2021) obtained finite-sample guarantees for recovering tree-structured Bayesian networks, i.e., 1-polytrees. We extend their results…
▽ More
We establish finite-sample guarantees for efficient proper learning of bounded-degree polytrees, a rich class of high-dimensional probability distributions and a subclass of Bayesian networks, a widely-studied type of graphical model. Recently, Bhattacharyya et al. (2021) obtained finite-sample guarantees for recovering tree-structured Bayesian networks, i.e., 1-polytrees. We extend their results by providing an efficient algorithm which learns $d$-polytrees in polynomial time and sample complexity for any bounded $d$ when the underlying undirected graph (skeleton) is known. We complement our algorithm with an information-theoretic sample complexity lower bound, showing that the dependence on the dimension and target accuracy parameters are nearly tight.
△ Less
Submitted 21 January, 2024; v1 submitted 10 October, 2023;
originally announced October 2023.
-
Private Distribution Learning with Public Data: The View from Sample Compression
Authors:
Shai Ben-David,
Alex Bie,
Clément L. Canonne,
Gautam Kamath,
Vikrant Singhal
Abstract:
We study the problem of private distribution learning with access to public data. In this setup, which we refer to as public-private learning, the learner is given public and private samples drawn from an unknown distribution $p$ belonging to a class $\mathcal Q$, with the goal of outputting an estimate of $p$ while adhering to privacy constraints (here, pure differential privacy) only with respec…
▽ More
We study the problem of private distribution learning with access to public data. In this setup, which we refer to as public-private learning, the learner is given public and private samples drawn from an unknown distribution $p$ belonging to a class $\mathcal Q$, with the goal of outputting an estimate of $p$ while adhering to privacy constraints (here, pure differential privacy) only with respect to the private samples.
We show that the public-private learnability of a class $\mathcal Q$ is connected to the existence of a sample compression scheme for $\mathcal Q$, as well as to an intermediate notion we refer to as list learning. Leveraging this connection: (1) approximately recovers previous results on Gaussians over $\mathbb R^d$; and (2) leads to new ones, including sample complexity upper bounds for arbitrary $k$-mixtures of Gaussians over $\mathbb R^d$, results for agnostic and distribution-shift resistant learners, as well as closure properties for public-private learnability under taking mixtures and products of distributions. Finally, via the connection to list learning, we show that for Gaussians in $\mathbb R^d$, at least $d$ public samples are necessary for private learnability, which is close to the known upper bound of $d+1$ public samples.
△ Less
Submitted 14 August, 2023; v1 submitted 11 August, 2023;
originally announced August 2023.
-
Concentration Bounds for Discrete Distribution Estimation in KL Divergence
Authors:
Clément L. Canonne,
Ziteng Sun,
Ananda Theertha Suresh
Abstract:
We study the problem of discrete distribution estimation in KL divergence and provide concentration bounds for the Laplace estimator. We show that the deviation from mean scales as $\sqrt{k}/n$ when $n \ge k$, improving upon the best prior result of $k/n$. We also establish a matching lower bound that shows that our bounds are tight up to polylogarithmic factors.
We study the problem of discrete distribution estimation in KL divergence and provide concentration bounds for the Laplace estimator. We show that the deviation from mean scales as $\sqrt{k}/n$ when $n \ge k$, improving upon the best prior result of $k/n$. We also establish a matching lower bound that shows that our bounds are tight up to polylogarithmic factors.
△ Less
Submitted 12 June, 2023; v1 submitted 14 February, 2023;
originally announced February 2023.
-
Private independence testing across two parties
Authors:
Praneeth Vepakomma,
Mohammad Mohammadi Amiri,
Clément L. Canonne,
Ramesh Raskar,
Alex Pentland
Abstract:
We introduce $π$-test, a privacy-preserving algorithm for testing statistical independence between data distributed across multiple parties. Our algorithm relies on privately estimating the distance correlation between datasets, a quantitative measure of independence introduced in Székely et al. [2007]. We establish both additive and multiplicative error bounds on the utility of our differentially…
▽ More
We introduce $π$-test, a privacy-preserving algorithm for testing statistical independence between data distributed across multiple parties. Our algorithm relies on privately estimating the distance correlation between datasets, a quantitative measure of independence introduced in Székely et al. [2007]. We establish both additive and multiplicative error bounds on the utility of our differentially private test, which we believe will find applications in a variety of distributed hypothesis testing settings involving sensitive data.
△ Less
Submitted 26 September, 2023; v1 submitted 7 July, 2022;
originally announced July 2022.
-
Robust Testing in High-Dimensional Sparse Models
Authors:
Anand Jerry George,
Clément L. Canonne
Abstract:
We consider the problem of robustly testing the norm of a high-dimensional sparse signal vector under two different observation models. In the first model, we are given $n$ i.i.d. samples from the distribution $\mathcal{N}\left(θ,I_d\right)$ (with unknown $θ$), of which a small fraction has been arbitrarily corrupted. Under the promise that $\|θ\|_0\le s$, we want to correctly distinguish whether…
▽ More
We consider the problem of robustly testing the norm of a high-dimensional sparse signal vector under two different observation models. In the first model, we are given $n$ i.i.d. samples from the distribution $\mathcal{N}\left(θ,I_d\right)$ (with unknown $θ$), of which a small fraction has been arbitrarily corrupted. Under the promise that $\|θ\|_0\le s$, we want to correctly distinguish whether $\|θ\|_2=0$ or $\|θ\|_2>γ$, for some input parameter $γ>0$. We show that any algorithm for this task requires $n=Ω\left(s\log\frac{ed}{s}\right)$ samples, which is tight up to logarithmic factors. We also extend our results to other common notions of sparsity, namely, $\|θ\|_q\le s$ for any $0 < q < 2$. In the second observation model that we consider, the data is generated according to a sparse linear regression model, where the covariates are i.i.d. Gaussian and the regression coefficient (signal) is known to be $s$-sparse. Here too we assume that an $ε$-fraction of the data is arbitrarily corrupted. We show that any algorithm that reliably tests the norm of the regression coefficient requires at least $n=Ω\left(\min(s\log d,{1}/{γ^4})\right)$ samples. Our results show that the complexity of testing in these two settings significantly increases under robustness constraints. This is in line with the recent observations made in robust mean testing and robust covariance testing.
△ Less
Submitted 4 November, 2022; v1 submitted 16 May, 2022;
originally announced May 2022.
-
Uniformity Testing in the Shuffle Model: Simpler, Better, Faster
Authors:
Clément L. Canonne,
Hongyi Lyu
Abstract:
Uniformity testing, or testing whether independent observations are uniformly distributed, is the prototypical question in distribution testing. Over the past years, a line of work has been focusing on uniformity testing under privacy constraints on the data, and obtained private and data-efficient algorithms under various privacy models such as central differential privacy (DP), local privacy (LD…
▽ More
Uniformity testing, or testing whether independent observations are uniformly distributed, is the prototypical question in distribution testing. Over the past years, a line of work has been focusing on uniformity testing under privacy constraints on the data, and obtained private and data-efficient algorithms under various privacy models such as central differential privacy (DP), local privacy (LDP), pan-privacy, and, very recently, the shuffle model of differential privacy.
In this work, we considerably simplify the analysis of the known uniformity testing algorithm in the shuffle model, and, using a recent result on "privacy amplification via shuffling," provide an alternative algorithm attaining the same guarantees with an elementary and streamlined argument.
△ Less
Submitted 18 October, 2021; v1 submitted 19 August, 2021;
originally announced August 2021.
-
The Price of Tolerance in Distribution Testing
Authors:
Clément L. Canonne,
Ayush Jain,
Gautam Kamath,
Jerry Li
Abstract:
We revisit the problem of tolerant distribution testing. That is, given samples from an unknown distribution $p$ over $\{1, \dots, n\}$, is it $\varepsilon_1$-close to or $\varepsilon_2$-far from a reference distribution $q$ (in total variation distance)? Despite significant interest over the past decade, this problem is well understood only in the extreme cases. In the noiseless setting (i.e.,…
▽ More
We revisit the problem of tolerant distribution testing. That is, given samples from an unknown distribution $p$ over $\{1, \dots, n\}$, is it $\varepsilon_1$-close to or $\varepsilon_2$-far from a reference distribution $q$ (in total variation distance)? Despite significant interest over the past decade, this problem is well understood only in the extreme cases. In the noiseless setting (i.e., $\varepsilon_1 = 0$) the sample complexity is $Θ(\sqrt{n})$, strongly sublinear in the domain size. At the other end of the spectrum, when $\varepsilon_1 = \varepsilon_2/2$, the sample complexity jumps to the barely sublinear $Θ(n/\log n)$. However, very little is known about the intermediate regime. We fully characterize the price of tolerance in distribution testing as a function of $n$, $\varepsilon_1$, $\varepsilon_2$, up to a single $\log n$ factor. Specifically, we show the sample complexity to be \[\tilde Θ\left(\frac{\sqrt{n}}{\varepsilon_2^{2}} + \frac{n}{\log n} \cdot \max \left\{\frac{\varepsilon_1}{\varepsilon_2^2},\left(\frac{\varepsilon_1}{\varepsilon_2^2}\right)^{\!\!2}\right\}\right),\] providing a smooth tradeoff between the two previously known cases. We also provide a similar characterization for the problem of tolerant equivalence testing, where both $p$ and $q$ are unknown. Surprisingly, in both cases, the main quantity dictating the sample complexity is the ratio $\varepsilon_1/\varepsilon_2^2$, and not the more intuitive $\varepsilon_1/\varepsilon_2$. Of particular technical interest is our lower bound framework, which involves novel approximation-theoretic tools required to handle the asymmetry between $\varepsilon_1$ and $\varepsilon_2$, a challenge absent from previous works.
△ Less
Submitted 8 November, 2021; v1 submitted 24 June, 2021;
originally announced June 2021.
-
The Discrete Gaussian for Differential Privacy
Authors:
Clément L. Canonne,
Gautam Kamath,
Thomas Steinke
Abstract:
A key tool for building differentially private systems is adding Gaussian noise to the output of a function evaluated on a sensitive dataset. Unfortunately, using a continuous distribution presents several practical challenges. First and foremost, finite computers cannot exactly represent samples from continuous distributions, and previous work has demonstrated that seemingly innocuous numerical e…
▽ More
A key tool for building differentially private systems is adding Gaussian noise to the output of a function evaluated on a sensitive dataset. Unfortunately, using a continuous distribution presents several practical challenges. First and foremost, finite computers cannot exactly represent samples from continuous distributions, and previous work has demonstrated that seemingly innocuous numerical errors can entirely destroy privacy. Moreover, when the underlying data is itself discrete (e.g., population counts), adding continuous noise makes the result less interpretable.
With these shortcomings in mind, we introduce and analyze the discrete Gaussian in the context of differential privacy. Specifically, we theoretically and experimentally show that adding discrete Gaussian noise provides essentially the same privacy and accuracy guarantees as the addition of continuous Gaussian noise. We also present an simple and efficient algorithm for exact sampling from this distribution. This demonstrates its applicability for privately answering counting queries, or more generally, low-sensitivity integer-valued queries.
△ Less
Submitted 18 January, 2021; v1 submitted 31 March, 2020;
originally announced April 2020.
-
Private Identity Testing for High-Dimensional Distributions
Authors:
Clément L. Canonne,
Gautam Kamath,
Audra McMillan,
Jonathan Ullman,
Lydia Zakynthinou
Abstract:
In this work we present novel differentially private identity (goodness-of-fit) testers for natural and widely studied classes of multivariate product distributions: Gaussians in $\mathbb{R}^d$ with known covariance and product distributions over $\{\pm 1\}^{d}$. Our testers have improved sample complexity compared to those derived from previous techniques, and are the first testers whose sample c…
▽ More
In this work we present novel differentially private identity (goodness-of-fit) testers for natural and widely studied classes of multivariate product distributions: Gaussians in $\mathbb{R}^d$ with known covariance and product distributions over $\{\pm 1\}^{d}$. Our testers have improved sample complexity compared to those derived from previous techniques, and are the first testers whose sample complexity matches the order-optimal minimax sample complexity of $O(d^{1/2}/α^2)$ in many parameter regimes. We construct two types of testers, exhibiting tradeoffs between sample complexity and computational complexity. Finally, we provide a two-way reduction between testing a subclass of multivariate product distributions and testing univariate distributions, and thereby obtain upper and lower bounds for testing this subclass of product distributions.
△ Less
Submitted 3 March, 2022; v1 submitted 28 May, 2019;
originally announced May 2019.
-
The Structure of Optimal Private Tests for Simple Hypotheses
Authors:
Clément L. Canonne,
Gautam Kamath,
Audra McMillan,
Adam Smith,
Jonathan Ullman
Abstract:
Hypothesis testing plays a central role in statistical inference, and is used in many settings where privacy concerns are paramount. This work answers a basic question about privately testing simple hypotheses: given two distributions $P$ and $Q$, and a privacy level $\varepsilon$, how many i.i.d. samples are needed to distinguish $P$ from $Q$ subject to $\varepsilon$-differential privacy, and wha…
▽ More
Hypothesis testing plays a central role in statistical inference, and is used in many settings where privacy concerns are paramount. This work answers a basic question about privately testing simple hypotheses: given two distributions $P$ and $Q$, and a privacy level $\varepsilon$, how many i.i.d. samples are needed to distinguish $P$ from $Q$ subject to $\varepsilon$-differential privacy, and what sort of tests have optimal sample complexity? Specifically, we characterize this sample complexity up to constant factors in terms of the structure of $P$ and $Q$ and the privacy level $\varepsilon$, and show that this sample complexity is achieved by a certain randomized and clamped variant of the log-likelihood ratio test. Our result is an analogue of the classical Neyman-Pearson lemma in the setting of private hypothesis testing. We also give an application of our result to the private change-point detection. Our characterization applies more generally to hypothesis tests satisfying essentially any notion of algorithmic stability, which is known to imply strong generalization bounds in adaptive data analysis, and thus our results have applications even when privacy is not a primary concern.
△ Less
Submitted 2 April, 2019; v1 submitted 27 November, 2018;
originally announced November 2018.
