-
Predicting Cancer Treatments Induced Cardiotoxicity of Breast Cancer Patients
Authors:
Sicheng Zhou,
Rui Zhang,
Anne Blaes,
Chetan Shenoy,
Gyorgy Simon
Abstract:
Cardiotoxicity induced by the breast cancer treatments (i.e., chemotherapy, targeted therapy and radiation therapy) is a significant problem for breast cancer patients. The cardiotoxicity risk for breast cancer patients receiving different treatments remains unclear. We developed and evaluated risk predictive models for cardiotoxicity in breast cancer patients using EHR data. The AUC scores to pre…
▽ More
Cardiotoxicity induced by the breast cancer treatments (i.e., chemotherapy, targeted therapy and radiation therapy) is a significant problem for breast cancer patients. The cardiotoxicity risk for breast cancer patients receiving different treatments remains unclear. We developed and evaluated risk predictive models for cardiotoxicity in breast cancer patients using EHR data. The AUC scores to predict the CHF, CAD, CM and MI are 0.846, 0.857, 0.858 and 0.804 respectively. After adjusting for baseline differences in cardiovascular health, patients who received chemotherapy or targeted therapy appeared to have higher risk of cardiotoxicity than patients who received radiation therapy. Due to differences in baseline cardiac health across the different breast cancer treatment groups, caution is recommended in interpreting the cardiotoxic effect of these treatments.
△ Less
Submitted 31 January, 2022;
originally announced January 2022.
-
Adversarial Attacks on Graph Classification via Bayesian Optimisation
Authors:
Xingchen Wan,
Henry Kenlay,
Binxin Ru,
Arno Blaas,
Michael A. Osborne,
Xiaowen Dong
Abstract:
Graph neural networks, a popular class of models effective in a wide range of graph-based learning tasks, have been shown to be vulnerable to adversarial attacks. While the majority of the literature focuses on such vulnerability in node-level classification tasks, little effort has been dedicated to analysing adversarial attacks on graph-level classification, an important problem with numerous re…
▽ More
Graph neural networks, a popular class of models effective in a wide range of graph-based learning tasks, have been shown to be vulnerable to adversarial attacks. While the majority of the literature focuses on such vulnerability in node-level classification tasks, little effort has been dedicated to analysing adversarial attacks on graph-level classification, an important problem with numerous real-life applications such as biochemistry and social network analysis. The few existing methods often require unrealistic setups, such as access to internal information of the victim models, or an impractically-large number of queries. We present a novel Bayesian optimisation-based attack method for graph classification models. Our method is black-box, query-efficient and parsimonious with respect to the perturbation applied. We empirically validate the effectiveness and flexibility of the proposed method on a wide range of graph classification tasks involving varying graph properties, constraints and modes of attack. Finally, we analyse common interpretable patterns behind the adversarial samples produced, which may shed further light on the adversarial robustness of graph classification models.
△ Less
Submitted 4 November, 2021;
originally announced November 2021.
-
On Invariance Penalties for Risk Minimization
Authors:
Kia Khezeli,
Arno Blaas,
Frank Soboczenski,
Nicholas Chia,
John Kalantari
Abstract:
The Invariant Risk Minimization (IRM) principle was first proposed by Arjovsky et al. [2019] to address the domain generalization problem by leveraging data heterogeneity from differing experimental conditions. Specifically, IRM seeks to find a data representation under which an optimal classifier remains invariant across all domains. Despite the conceptual appeal of IRM, the effectiveness of the…
▽ More
The Invariant Risk Minimization (IRM) principle was first proposed by Arjovsky et al. [2019] to address the domain generalization problem by leveraging data heterogeneity from differing experimental conditions. Specifically, IRM seeks to find a data representation under which an optimal classifier remains invariant across all domains. Despite the conceptual appeal of IRM, the effectiveness of the originally proposed invariance penalty has recently been brought into question. In particular, there exists counterexamples for which that invariance penalty can be arbitrarily small for non-invariant data representations. We propose an alternative invariance penalty by revisiting the Gramian matrix of the data representation. We discuss the role of its eigenvalues in the relationship between the risk and the invariance penalty, and demonstrate that it is ill-conditioned for said counterexamples. The proposed approach is guaranteed to recover an invariant representation for linear settings under mild non-degeneracy conditions. Its effectiveness is substantiated by experiments on DomainBed and InvarianceUnitTest, two extensive test beds for domain generalization.
△ Less
Submitted 17 June, 2021;
originally announced June 2021.
-
Adversarial Robustness Guarantees for Gaussian Processes
Authors:
Andrea Patane,
Arno Blaas,
Luca Laurenti,
Luca Cardelli,
Stephen Roberts,
Marta Kwiatkowska
Abstract:
Gaussian processes (GPs) enable principled computation of model uncertainty, making them attractive for safety-critical applications. Such scenarios demand that GP decisions are not only accurate, but also robust to perturbations. In this paper we present a framework to analyse adversarial robustness of GPs, defined as invariance of the model's decision to bounded perturbations. Given a compact su…
▽ More
Gaussian processes (GPs) enable principled computation of model uncertainty, making them attractive for safety-critical applications. Such scenarios demand that GP decisions are not only accurate, but also robust to perturbations. In this paper we present a framework to analyse adversarial robustness of GPs, defined as invariance of the model's decision to bounded perturbations. Given a compact subset of the input space $T\subseteq \mathbb{R}^d$, a point $x^*$ and a GP, we provide provable guarantees of adversarial robustness of the GP by computing lower and upper bounds on its prediction range in $T$. We develop a branch-and-bound scheme to refine the bounds and show, for any $ε> 0$, that our algorithm is guaranteed to converge to values $ε$-close to the actual values in finitely many iterations. The algorithm is anytime and can handle both regression and classification tasks, with analytical formulation for most kernels used in practice. We evaluate our methods on a collection of synthetic and standard benchmark datasets, including SPAM, MNIST and FashionMNIST. We study the effect of approximate inference techniques on robustness and demonstrate how our method can be used for interpretability. Our empirical results suggest that the adversarial robustness of GPs increases with accurate posterior estimation.
△ Less
Submitted 7 April, 2021;
originally announced April 2021.
-
The Effect of Prior Lipschitz Continuity on the Adversarial Robustness of Bayesian Neural Networks
Authors:
Arno Blaas,
Stephen J. Roberts
Abstract:
It is desirable, and often a necessity, for machine learning models to be robust against adversarial attacks. This is particularly true for Bayesian models, as they are well-suited for safety-critical applications, in which adversarial attacks can have catastrophic outcomes. In this work, we take a deeper look at the adversarial robustness of Bayesian Neural Networks (BNNs). In particular, we cons…
▽ More
It is desirable, and often a necessity, for machine learning models to be robust against adversarial attacks. This is particularly true for Bayesian models, as they are well-suited for safety-critical applications, in which adversarial attacks can have catastrophic outcomes. In this work, we take a deeper look at the adversarial robustness of Bayesian Neural Networks (BNNs). In particular, we consider whether the adversarial robustness of a BNN can be increased by model choices, particularly the Lipschitz continuity induced by the prior. Conducting in-depth analysis on the case of i.i.d., zero-mean Gaussian priors and posteriors approximated via mean-field variational inference, we find evidence that adversarial robustness is indeed sensitive to the prior variance.
△ Less
Submitted 7 January, 2021;
originally announced January 2021.
-
Adversarial Robustness Guarantees for Classification with Gaussian Processes
Authors:
Arno Blaas,
Andrea Patane,
Luca Laurenti,
Luca Cardelli,
Marta Kwiatkowska,
Stephen Roberts
Abstract:
We investigate adversarial robustness of Gaussian Process Classification (GPC) models. Given a compact subset of the input space $T\subseteq \mathbb{R}^d$ enclosing a test point $x^*$ and a GPC trained on a dataset $\mathcal{D}$, we aim to compute the minimum and the maximum classification probability for the GPC over all the points in $T$. In order to do so, we show how functions lower- and upper…
▽ More
We investigate adversarial robustness of Gaussian Process Classification (GPC) models. Given a compact subset of the input space $T\subseteq \mathbb{R}^d$ enclosing a test point $x^*$ and a GPC trained on a dataset $\mathcal{D}$, we aim to compute the minimum and the maximum classification probability for the GPC over all the points in $T$. In order to do so, we show how functions lower- and upper-bounding the GPC output in $T$ can be derived, and implement those in a branch and bound optimisation algorithm. For any error threshold $ε> 0$ selected a priori, we show that our algorithm is guaranteed to reach values $ε$-close to the actual values in finitely many iterations. We apply our method to investigate the robustness of GPC models on a 2D synthetic dataset, the SPAM dataset and a subset of the MNIST dataset, providing comparisons of different GPC training techniques, and show how our method can be used for interpretability analysis. Our empirical analysis suggests that GPC robustness increases with more accurate posterior estimation.
△ Less
Submitted 11 March, 2020; v1 submitted 28 May, 2019;
originally announced May 2019.
