Showing 1–5 of 5 results for author: Bannick, M S

Improved convergence rates of nonparametric penalized regression under misspecified total variation

Authors: Marlena S. Bannick, Noah Simon

Abstract: Penalties that induce smoothness are common in nonparametric regression. In many settings, the amount of smoothness in the data generating function will not be known. Simon and Shojaie (2021) derived convergence rates for nonparametric estimators under misspecified smoothness. We show that their theoretical convergence rates can be improved by working with convenient approximating functions. Prope… ▽ More Penalties that induce smoothness are common in nonparametric regression. In many settings, the amount of smoothness in the data generating function will not be known. Simon and Shojaie (2021) derived convergence rates for nonparametric estimators under misspecified smoothness. We show that their theoretical convergence rates can be improved by working with convenient approximating functions. Properties of convolutions and higher-order kernels allow these approximation functions to match the true functions more closely than those used in Simon and Shojaie (2021). As a result, we obtain tighter convergence rates. △ Less

Submitted 2 August, 2023; originally announced August 2023.

A General Form of Covariate Adjustment in Randomized Clinical Trials

Authors: Marlena S. Bannick, Jun Shao, **gyi Liu, Yu Du, Yanyao Yi, Ting Ye

Abstract: In randomized clinical trials, adjusting for baseline covariates can improve credibility and efficiency for demonstrating and quantifying treatment effects. This article studies the augmented inverse propensity weighted (AIPW) estimator, which is a general form of covariate adjustment that uses linear, generalized linear, and non-parametric or machine learning models for the conditional mean of th… ▽ More In randomized clinical trials, adjusting for baseline covariates can improve credibility and efficiency for demonstrating and quantifying treatment effects. This article studies the augmented inverse propensity weighted (AIPW) estimator, which is a general form of covariate adjustment that uses linear, generalized linear, and non-parametric or machine learning models for the conditional mean of the response given covariates. Under covariate-adaptive randomization, we establish general theorems that show a complete picture of the asymptotic normality, {efficiency gain, and applicability of AIPW estimators}. In particular, we provide for the first time a rigorous theoretical justification of using machine learning methods with cross-fitting for dependent data under covariate-adaptive randomization. Based on the general theorems, we offer insights on the conditions for guaranteed efficiency gain and universal applicability {under different randomization schemes}, which also motivate a joint calibration strategy using some constructed covariates after applying AIPW. Our methods are implemented in the R package RobinCar. △ Less

Submitted 25 March, 2024; v1 submitted 16 June, 2023; originally announced June 2023.

Accounting for Inconsistent Use of Covariate Adjustment in Group Sequential Trials

Authors: Marlena S. Bannick, Sonya L. Heltshe, Noah Simon

Abstract: Group sequential designs in clinical trials allow for interim efficacy and futility monitoring. Adjustment for baseline covariates can increase power and precision of estimated effects. However, inconsistently applying covariate adjustment throughout the stages of a group sequential trial can result in inflation of type I error, biased point estimates, and anti-conservative confidence intervals. W… ▽ More Group sequential designs in clinical trials allow for interim efficacy and futility monitoring. Adjustment for baseline covariates can increase power and precision of estimated effects. However, inconsistently applying covariate adjustment throughout the stages of a group sequential trial can result in inflation of type I error, biased point estimates, and anti-conservative confidence intervals. We propose methods for performing correct interim monitoring, estimation, and inference in this setting that avoid these issues. We focus on two-arm trials with simple, balanced randomization and continuous outcomes. We study the performance of our boundary, estimation, and inference adjustments in simulation studies. We end with recommendations about the application of covariate adjustment in group sequential designs. △ Less

Submitted 9 August, 2023; v1 submitted 24 June, 2022; originally announced June 2022.

Retrospective, Observational Studies for Estimating Vaccine Effects on the Secondary Attack Rate of SARS-CoV-2

Authors: Marlena S. Bannick, Fei Gao, Elizabeth R. Brown, Holly E. Janes

Abstract: COVID-19 vaccines are highly efficacious at preventing symptomatic infection, severe disease, and death. Most of the evidence that COVID-19 vaccines also reduce transmission of SARS-CoV-2 is based on retrospective, observational studies. Specifically, an increasing number of studies are evaluating vaccine efficacy against the secondary attack rate of SARS-CoV-2 using data available in existing hea… ▽ More COVID-19 vaccines are highly efficacious at preventing symptomatic infection, severe disease, and death. Most of the evidence that COVID-19 vaccines also reduce transmission of SARS-CoV-2 is based on retrospective, observational studies. Specifically, an increasing number of studies are evaluating vaccine efficacy against the secondary attack rate of SARS-CoV-2 using data available in existing healthcare databases or contact tracing databases. Since these types of databases were designed for clinical diagnosis or management of COVID-19, they are limited in their ability to provide accurate information on infection, infection timing, and transmission events. In this manuscript, we highlight challenges with using existing databases to identify transmission units and confirm potential SARS-CoV-2 transmission events. We discuss the impact of common diagnostic testing strategies including event-prompted and infrequent testing and illustrate their potential biases in estimating vaccine efficacy against the secondary attack rate of SARS-CoV-2. We articulate the need for prospective observational studies of vaccine efficacy against the SARS-CoV-2 SAR, and we provide design and reporting considerations for studies using retrospective databases. △ Less

Submitted 12 May, 2022; originally announced June 2022.

Statistical Considerations for Cross-Sectional HIV Incidence Estimation Based on Recency Test

Authors: Fei Gao, Marlena S. Bannick

Abstract: Longitudinal cohorts to determine the incidence of HIV infection are logistically challenging, so researchers have sought alternative strategies. Recency test methods use biomarker profiles of HIV-infected subjects in a cross-sectional sample to infer whether they are "recently" infected and to estimate incidence in the population. Two main estimators have been used in practice: one that assumes a… ▽ More Longitudinal cohorts to determine the incidence of HIV infection are logistically challenging, so researchers have sought alternative strategies. Recency test methods use biomarker profiles of HIV-infected subjects in a cross-sectional sample to infer whether they are "recently" infected and to estimate incidence in the population. Two main estimators have been used in practice: one that assumes a recency test is perfectly specific, and another that allows for false-recent results. To date, these commonly used estimators have not been rigorously studied with respect to their assumptions and statistical properties. In this paper, we present a theoretical framework with which to understand these estimators and interrogate their assumptions, and perform a simulation study to assess the performance of these estimators under realistic HIV epidemiological dynamics. We conclude with recommendations for the use of these estimators in practice and a discussion of future methodological developments to improve HIV incidence estimation via recency test. △ Less

Submitted 3 June, 2021; originally announced June 2021.