Showing 1–15 of 15 results for author: Bailis, P

Proof: Accelerating Approximate Aggregation Queries with Expensive Predicates

Authors: Daniel Kang, John Guibas, Peter Bailis, Tatsunori Hashimoto, Yi Sun, Matei Zaharia

Abstract: Given a dataset $\mathcal{D}$, we are interested in computing the mean of a subset of $\mathcal{D}$ which matches a predicate. ABae leverages stratified sampling and proxy models to efficiently compute this statistic given a sampling budget $N$. In this document, we theoretically analyze ABae and show that the MSE of the estimate decays at rate $O(N_1^{-1} + N_2^{-1} + N_1^{1/2}N_2^{-3/2})$, where… ▽ More Given a dataset $\mathcal{D}$, we are interested in computing the mean of a subset of $\mathcal{D}$ which matches a predicate. ABae leverages stratified sampling and proxy models to efficiently compute this statistic given a sampling budget $N$. In this document, we theoretically analyze ABae and show that the MSE of the estimate decays at rate $O(N_1^{-1} + N_2^{-1} + N_1^{1/2}N_2^{-3/2})$, where $N=K \cdot N_1+N_2$ for some integer constant $K$ and $K \cdot N_1$ and $N_2$ represent the number of samples used in Stage 1 and Stage 2 of ABae respectively. Hence, if a constant fraction of the total sample budget $N$ is allocated to each stage, we will achieve a mean squared error of $O(N^{-1})$ which matches the rate of mean squared error of the optimal stratified sampling algorithm given a priori knowledge of the predicate positive rate and standard deviation per stratum. △ Less

Submitted 28 July, 2021; v1 submitted 26 July, 2021; originally announced July 2021.

Sinkhorn Label Allocation: Semi-Supervised Classification via Annealed Self-Training

Authors: Kai Sheng Tai, Peter Bailis, Gregory Valiant

Abstract: Self-training is a standard approach to semi-supervised learning where the learner's own predictions on unlabeled data are used as supervision during training. In this paper, we reinterpret this label assignment process as an optimal transportation problem between examples and classes, wherein the cost of assigning an example to a class is mediated by the current predictions of the classifier. Thi… ▽ More Self-training is a standard approach to semi-supervised learning where the learner's own predictions on unlabeled data are used as supervision during training. In this paper, we reinterpret this label assignment process as an optimal transportation problem between examples and classes, wherein the cost of assigning an example to a class is mediated by the current predictions of the classifier. This formulation facilitates a practical annealing strategy for label assignment and allows for the inclusion of prior knowledge on class proportions via flexible upper bound constraints. The solutions to these assignment problems can be efficiently approximated using Sinkhorn iteration, thus enabling their use in the inner loop of standard stochastic optimization algorithms. We demonstrate the effectiveness of our algorithm on the CIFAR-10, CIFAR-100, and SVHN datasets in comparison with FixMatch, a state-of-the-art self-training algorithm. Our code is available at https://github.com/stanford-futuredata/sinkhorn-label-allocation. △ Less

Submitted 11 June, 2021; v1 submitted 17 February, 2021; originally announced February 2021.

Comments: ICML 2021 camera ready version

Leveraging Organizational Resources to Adapt Models to New Data Modalities

Authors: Sahaana Suri, Raghuveer Chanda, Neslihan Bulut, Pradyumna Narayana, Yemao Zeng, Peter Bailis, Sugato Basu, Girija Narlikar, Christopher Re, Abishek Sethi

Abstract: As applications in large organizations evolve, the machine learning (ML) models that power them must adapt the same predictive tasks to newly arising data modalities (e.g., a new video content launch in a social media application requires existing text or image models to extend to video). To solve this problem, organizations typically create ML pipelines from scratch. However, this fails to utiliz… ▽ More As applications in large organizations evolve, the machine learning (ML) models that power them must adapt the same predictive tasks to newly arising data modalities (e.g., a new video content launch in a social media application requires existing text or image models to extend to video). To solve this problem, organizations typically create ML pipelines from scratch. However, this fails to utilize the domain expertise and data they have cultivated from develo** tasks for existing modalities. We demonstrate how organizational resources, in the form of aggregate statistics, knowledge bases, and existing services that operate over related tasks, enable teams to construct a common feature space that connects new and existing data modalities. This allows teams to apply methods for training data curation (e.g., weak supervision and label propagation) and model training (e.g., forms of multi-modal learning) across these different data modalities. We study how this use of organizational resources composes at production scale in over 5 classification tasks at Google, and demonstrate how it reduces the time needed to develop models for new modalities from months to weeks to days. △ Less

Submitted 23 August, 2020; originally announced August 2020.

Journal ref: PVLDB,13(12): 3396-3410, 2020

Similarity Search for Efficient Active Learning and Search of Rare Concepts

Authors: Cody Coleman, Edward Chou, Julian Katz-Samuels, Sean Culatana, Peter Bailis, Alexander C. Berg, Robert Nowak, Roshan Sumbaly, Matei Zaharia, I. Zeki Yalniz

Abstract: Many active learning and search approaches are intractable for large-scale industrial settings with billions of unlabeled examples. Existing approaches search globally for the optimal examples to label, scaling linearly or even quadratically with the unlabeled data. In this paper, we improve the computational efficiency of active learning and search methods by restricting the candidate pool for la… ▽ More Many active learning and search approaches are intractable for large-scale industrial settings with billions of unlabeled examples. Existing approaches search globally for the optimal examples to label, scaling linearly or even quadratically with the unlabeled data. In this paper, we improve the computational efficiency of active learning and search methods by restricting the candidate pool for labeling to the nearest neighbors of the currently labeled set instead of scanning over all of the unlabeled data. We evaluate several selection strategies in this setting on three large-scale computer vision datasets: ImageNet, OpenImages, and a de-identified and aggregated dataset of 10 billion images provided by a large internet company. Our approach achieved similar mean average precision and recall as the traditional global approach while reducing the computational cost of selection by up to three orders of magnitude, thus enabling web-scale active learning. △ Less

Submitted 22 July, 2021; v1 submitted 30 June, 2020; originally announced July 2020.

Chromatic Learning for Sparse Datasets

Authors: Vladimir Feinberg, Peter Bailis

Abstract: Learning over sparse, high-dimensional data frequently necessitates the use of specialized methods such as the hashing trick. In this work, we design a highly scalable alternative approach that leverages the low degree of feature co-occurrences present in many practical settings. This approach, which we call Chromatic Learning (CL), obtains a low-dimensional dense feature representation by perform… ▽ More Learning over sparse, high-dimensional data frequently necessitates the use of specialized methods such as the hashing trick. In this work, we design a highly scalable alternative approach that leverages the low degree of feature co-occurrences present in many practical settings. This approach, which we call Chromatic Learning (CL), obtains a low-dimensional dense feature representation by performing graph coloring over the co-occurrence graph of features---an approach previously used as a runtime performance optimization for GBDT training. This color-based dense representation can be combined with additional dense categorical encoding approaches, e.g., submodular feature compression, to further reduce dimensionality. CL exhibits linear parallelizability and consumes memory linear in the size of the co-occurrence graph. By leveraging the structural properties of the co-occurrence graph, CL can compress sparse datasets, such as KDD Cup 2012, that contain over 50M features down to 1024, using an order of magnitude fewer features than frequency-based truncation and the hashing trick while maintaining the same test error for linear models. This compression further enables the use of deep networks in this wide, sparse setting, where CL similarly has favorable performance compared to existing baselines for budgeted input dimension. △ Less

Submitted 6 June, 2020; originally announced June 2020.

Comments: 15 pages, 8 figures, under review

MLPerf Training Benchmark

Authors: Peter Mattson, Christine Cheng, Cody Coleman, Greg Diamos, Paulius Micikevicius, David Patterson, Hanlin Tang, Gu-Yeon Wei, Peter Bailis, Victor Bittorf, David Brooks, Dehao Chen, Debojyoti Dutta, Udit Gupta, Kim Hazelwood, Andrew Hock, Xinyuan Huang, Atsushi Ike, Bill Jia, Daniel Kang, David Kanter, Naveen Kumar, Jeffery Liao, Guokai Ma, Deepak Narayanan , et al. (12 additional authors not shown)

Abstract: Machine learning (ML) needs industry-standard performance benchmarks to support design and competitive evaluation of the many emerging software and hardware solutions for ML. But ML training presents three unique benchmarking challenges absent from other domains: optimizations that improve training throughput can increase the time to solution, training is stochastic and time to solution exhibits h… ▽ More Machine learning (ML) needs industry-standard performance benchmarks to support design and competitive evaluation of the many emerging software and hardware solutions for ML. But ML training presents three unique benchmarking challenges absent from other domains: optimizations that improve training throughput can increase the time to solution, training is stochastic and time to solution exhibits high variance, and software and hardware systems are so diverse that fair benchmarking with the same binary, code, and even hyperparameters is difficult. We therefore present MLPerf, an ML benchmark that overcomes these challenges. Our analysis quantitatively evaluates MLPerf's efficacy at driving performance and scalability improvements across two rounds of results from multiple vendors. △ Less

Submitted 2 March, 2020; v1 submitted 2 October, 2019; originally announced October 2019.

Comments: MLSys 2020

Selection via Proxy: Efficient Data Selection for Deep Learning

Authors: Cody Coleman, Christopher Yeh, Stephen Mussmann, Baharan Mirzasoleiman, Peter Bailis, Percy Liang, Jure Leskovec, Matei Zaharia

Abstract: Data selection methods, such as active learning and core-set selection, are useful tools for machine learning on large datasets. However, they can be prohibitively expensive to apply in deep learning because they depend on feature representations that need to be learned. In this work, we show that we can greatly improve the computational efficiency by using a small proxy model to perform data sele… ▽ More Data selection methods, such as active learning and core-set selection, are useful tools for machine learning on large datasets. However, they can be prohibitively expensive to apply in deep learning because they depend on feature representations that need to be learned. In this work, we show that we can greatly improve the computational efficiency by using a small proxy model to perform data selection (e.g., selecting data points to label for active learning). By removing hidden layers from the target model, using smaller architectures, and training for fewer epochs, we create proxies that are an order of magnitude faster to train. Although these small proxy models have higher error rates, we find that they empirically provide useful signals for data selection. We evaluate this "selection via proxy" (SVP) approach on several data selection tasks across five datasets: CIFAR10, CIFAR100, ImageNet, Amazon Review Polarity, and Amazon Review Full. For active learning, applying SVP can give an order of magnitude improvement in data selection runtime (i.e., the time it takes to repeatedly train and select points) without significantly increasing the final error (often within 0.1%). For core-set selection on CIFAR10, proxies that are over 10x faster to train than their larger, more accurate targets can remove up to 50% of the data without harming the final accuracy of the target, leading to a 1.6x end-to-end training time improvement. △ Less

Submitted 26 October, 2020; v1 submitted 26 June, 2019; originally announced June 2019.

Comments: ICLR 2020

CrossTrainer: Practical Domain Adaptation with Loss Reweighting

Authors: Justin Chen, Edward Gan, Kexin Rong, Sahaana Suri, Peter Bailis

Abstract: Domain adaptation provides a powerful set of model training techniques given domain-specific training data and supplemental data with unknown relevance. The techniques are useful when users need to develop models with data from varying sources, of varying quality, or from different time ranges. We build CrossTrainer, a system for practical domain adaptation. CrossTrainer utilizes loss reweighting,… ▽ More Domain adaptation provides a powerful set of model training techniques given domain-specific training data and supplemental data with unknown relevance. The techniques are useful when users need to develop models with data from varying sources, of varying quality, or from different time ranges. We build CrossTrainer, a system for practical domain adaptation. CrossTrainer utilizes loss reweighting, which provides consistently high model accuracy across a variety of datasets in our empirical analysis. However, loss reweighting is sensitive to the choice of a weight hyperparameter that is expensive to tune. We develop optimizations leveraging unique properties of loss reweighting that allow CrossTrainer to output accurate models while improving training time compared to naive hyperparameter search. △ Less

Submitted 6 May, 2019; originally announced May 2019.

MLSys: The New Frontier of Machine Learning Systems

Authors: Alexander Ratner, Dan Alistarh, Gustavo Alonso, David G. Andersen, Peter Bailis, Sarah Bird, Nicholas Carlini, Bryan Catanzaro, Jennifer Chayes, Eric Chung, Bill Dally, Jeff Dean, Inderjit S. Dhillon, Alexandros Dimakis, Pradeep Dubey, Charles Elkan, Grigori Fursin, Gregory R. Ganger, Lise Getoor, Phillip B. Gibbons, Garth A. Gibson, Joseph E. Gonzalez, Justin Gottschlich, Song Han, Kim Hazelwood , et al. (44 additional authors not shown)

Abstract: Machine learning (ML) techniques are enjoying rapidly increasing adoption. However, designing and implementing the systems that support ML models in real-world deployments remains a significant obstacle, in large part due to the radically different development and deployment profile of modern ML methods, and the range of practical concerns that come with broader adoption. We propose to foster a ne… ▽ More Machine learning (ML) techniques are enjoying rapidly increasing adoption. However, designing and implementing the systems that support ML models in real-world deployments remains a significant obstacle, in large part due to the radically different development and deployment profile of modern ML methods, and the range of practical concerns that come with broader adoption. We propose to foster a new systems machine learning research community at the intersection of the traditional systems and ML communities, focused on topics such as hardware systems for ML, software systems for ML, and ML optimized for metrics beyond predictive accuracy. To do this, we describe a new conference, MLSys, that explicitly targets research at the intersection of systems and machine learning with a program committee split evenly between experts in systems and ML, and an explicit focus on topics at the intersection of the two. △ Less

Submitted 1 December, 2019; v1 submitted 29 March, 2019; originally announced April 2019.

Equivariant Transformer Networks

Authors: Kai Sheng Tai, Peter Bailis, Gregory Valiant

Abstract: How can prior knowledge on the transformation invariances of a domain be incorporated into the architecture of a neural network? We propose Equivariant Transformers (ETs), a family of differentiable image-to-image map**s that improve the robustness of models towards pre-defined continuous transformation groups. Through the use of specially-derived canonical coordinate systems, ETs incorporate fu… ▽ More How can prior knowledge on the transformation invariances of a domain be incorporated into the architecture of a neural network? We propose Equivariant Transformers (ETs), a family of differentiable image-to-image map**s that improve the robustness of models towards pre-defined continuous transformation groups. Through the use of specially-derived canonical coordinate systems, ETs incorporate functions that are equivariant by construction with respect to these transformations. We show empirically that ETs can be flexibly composed to improve model robustness towards more complicated transformation groups in several parameters. On a real-world image classification task, ETs improve the sample efficiency of ResNet classifiers, achieving relative improvements in error rate of up to 15% in the limited data regime while increasing model parameter count by less than 1%. △ Less

Submitted 24 May, 2019; v1 submitted 25 January, 2019; originally announced January 2019.

Comments: ICML 2019

LIT: Block-wise Intermediate Representation Training for Model Compression

Authors: Animesh Koratana, Daniel Kang, Peter Bailis, Matei Zaharia

Abstract: Knowledge distillation (KD) is a popular method for reducing the computational overhead of deep network inference, in which the output of a teacher model is used to train a smaller, faster student model. Hint training (i.e., FitNets) extends KD by regressing a student model's intermediate representation to a teacher model's intermediate representation. In this work, we introduce bLock-wise Interme… ▽ More Knowledge distillation (KD) is a popular method for reducing the computational overhead of deep network inference, in which the output of a teacher model is used to train a smaller, faster student model. Hint training (i.e., FitNets) extends KD by regressing a student model's intermediate representation to a teacher model's intermediate representation. In this work, we introduce bLock-wise Intermediate representation Training (LIT), a novel model compression technique that extends the use of intermediate representations in deep network compression, outperforming KD and hint training. LIT has two key ideas: 1) LIT trains a student of the same width (but shallower depth) as the teacher by directly comparing the intermediate representations, and 2) LIT uses the intermediate representation from the previous block in the teacher model as an input to the current student block during training, avoiding unstable intermediate representations in the student network. We show that LIT provides substantial reductions in network depth without loss in accuracy -- for example, LIT can compress a ResNeXt-110 to a ResNeXt-20 (5.5x) on CIFAR10 and a VDCNN-29 to a VDCNN-9 (3.2x) on Amazon Reviews without loss in accuracy, outperforming KD and hint training in network size for a given accuracy. We also show that applying LIT to identical student/teacher architectures increases the accuracy of the student model above the teacher model, outperforming the recently-proposed Born Again Networks procedure on ResNet, ResNeXt, and VDCNN. Finally, we show that LIT can effectively compress GAN generators, which are not supported in the KD framework because GANs output pixels as opposed to probabilities. △ Less

Submitted 1 October, 2018; originally announced October 2018.

Analysis of DAWNBench, a Time-to-Accuracy Machine Learning Performance Benchmark

Authors: Cody Coleman, Daniel Kang, Deepak Narayanan, Luigi Nardi, Tian Zhao, Jian Zhang, Peter Bailis, Kunle Olukotun, Chris Re, Matei Zaharia

Abstract: Researchers have proposed hardware, software, and algorithmic optimizations to improve the computational performance of deep learning. While some of these optimizations perform the same operations faster (e.g., increasing GPU clock speed), many others modify the semantics of the training procedure (e.g., reduced precision), and can impact the final model's accuracy on unseen data. Due to a lack of… ▽ More Researchers have proposed hardware, software, and algorithmic optimizations to improve the computational performance of deep learning. While some of these optimizations perform the same operations faster (e.g., increasing GPU clock speed), many others modify the semantics of the training procedure (e.g., reduced precision), and can impact the final model's accuracy on unseen data. Due to a lack of standard evaluation criteria that considers these trade-offs, it is difficult to directly compare these optimizations. To address this problem, we recently introduced DAWNBench, a benchmark competition focused on end-to-end training time to achieve near-state-of-the-art accuracy on an unseen dataset---a combined metric called time-to-accuracy (TTA). In this work, we analyze the entries from DAWNBench, which received optimized submissions from multiple industrial groups, to investigate the behavior of TTA as a metric as well as trends in the best-performing entries. We show that TTA has a low coefficient of variation and that models optimized for TTA generalize nearly as well as those trained using standard methods. Additionally, even though DAWNBench entries were able to train ImageNet models in under 3 minutes, we find they still underutilize hardware capabilities such as Tensor Cores. Furthermore, we find that distributed entries can spend more than half of their time on communication. We show similar findings with entries to the MLPERF v0.5 benchmark. △ Less

Submitted 1 December, 2019; v1 submitted 4 June, 2018; originally announced June 2018.

Sketching Linear Classifiers over Data Streams

Authors: Kai Sheng Tai, Vatsal Sharan, Peter Bailis, Gregory Valiant

Abstract: We introduce a new sub-linear space sketch---the Weight-Median Sketch---for learning compressed linear classifiers over data streams while supporting the efficient recovery of large-magnitude weights in the model. This enables memory-limited execution of several statistical analyses over streams, including online feature selection, streaming data explanation, relative deltoid detection, and stream… ▽ More We introduce a new sub-linear space sketch---the Weight-Median Sketch---for learning compressed linear classifiers over data streams while supporting the efficient recovery of large-magnitude weights in the model. This enables memory-limited execution of several statistical analyses over streams, including online feature selection, streaming data explanation, relative deltoid detection, and streaming estimation of pointwise mutual information. Unlike related sketches that capture the most frequently-occurring features (or items) in a data stream, the Weight-Median Sketch captures the features that are most discriminative of one stream (or class) compared to another. The Weight-Median Sketch adopts the core data structure used in the Count-Sketch, but, instead of sketching counts, it captures sketched gradient updates to the model parameters. We provide a theoretical analysis that establishes recovery guarantees for batch and online learning, and demonstrate empirical improvements in memory-accuracy trade-offs over alternative memory-budgeted methods, including count-based sketches and feature hashing. △ Less

Submitted 6 April, 2018; v1 submitted 7 November, 2017; originally announced November 2017.

Comments: Full version of paper appearing at SIGMOD 2018 with more detailed proofs of theoretical results. Code available at https://github.com/stanford-futuredata/wmsketch

Compressed Factorization: Fast and Accurate Low-Rank Factorization of Compressively-Sensed Data

Authors: Vatsal Sharan, Kai Sheng Tai, Peter Bailis, Gregory Valiant

Abstract: What learning algorithms can be run directly on compressively-sensed data? In this work, we consider the question of accurately and efficiently computing low-rank matrix or tensor factorizations given data compressed via random projections. We examine the approach of first performing factorization in the compressed domain, and then reconstructing the original high-dimensional factors from the reco… ▽ More What learning algorithms can be run directly on compressively-sensed data? In this work, we consider the question of accurately and efficiently computing low-rank matrix or tensor factorizations given data compressed via random projections. We examine the approach of first performing factorization in the compressed domain, and then reconstructing the original high-dimensional factors from the recovered (compressed) factors. In both the matrix and tensor settings, we establish conditions under which this natural approach will provably recover the original factors. While it is well-known that random projections preserve a number of geometric properties of a dataset, our work can be viewed as showing that they can also preserve certain solutions of non-convex, NP-Hard problems like non-negative matrix factorization. We support these theoretical results with experiments on synthetic data and demonstrate the practical applicability of compressed factorization on real-world gene expression and EEG time series datasets. △ Less

Submitted 27 May, 2019; v1 submitted 25 June, 2017; originally announced June 2017.

Comments: Updates for ICML'19 camera-ready

Infrastructure for Usable Machine Learning: The Stanford DAWN Project

Authors: Peter Bailis, Kunle Olukotun, Christopher Re, Matei Zaharia

Abstract: Despite incredible recent advances in machine learning, building machine learning applications remains prohibitively time-consuming and expensive for all but the best-trained, best-funded engineering organizations. This expense comes not from a need for new and improved statistical models but instead from a lack of systems and tools for supporting end-to-end machine learning application developmen… ▽ More Despite incredible recent advances in machine learning, building machine learning applications remains prohibitively time-consuming and expensive for all but the best-trained, best-funded engineering organizations. This expense comes not from a need for new and improved statistical models but instead from a lack of systems and tools for supporting end-to-end machine learning application development, from data preparation and labeling to productionization and monitoring. In this document, we outline opportunities for infrastructure supporting usable, end-to-end machine learning applications in the context of the nascent DAWN (Data Analytics for What's Next) project at Stanford. △ Less

Submitted 8 June, 2017; v1 submitted 21 May, 2017; originally announced May 2017.