Showing 1–16 of 16 results for author: Antorán, J

Improving Linear System Solvers for Hyperparameter Optimisation in Iterative Gaussian Processes

Authors: Jihao Andreas Lin, Shreyas Padhy, Bruno Mlodozeniec, Javier Antorán, José Miguel Hernández-Lobato

Abstract: Scaling hyperparameter optimisation to very large datasets remains an open problem in the Gaussian process community. This paper focuses on iterative methods, which use linear system solvers, like conjugate gradients, alternating projections or stochastic gradient descent, to construct an estimate of the marginal likelihood gradient. We discuss three key improvements which are applicable across so… ▽ More Scaling hyperparameter optimisation to very large datasets remains an open problem in the Gaussian process community. This paper focuses on iterative methods, which use linear system solvers, like conjugate gradients, alternating projections or stochastic gradient descent, to construct an estimate of the marginal likelihood gradient. We discuss three key improvements which are applicable across solvers: (i) a pathwise gradient estimator, which reduces the required number of solver iterations and amortises the computational cost of making predictions, (ii) warm starting linear system solvers with the solution from the previous step, which leads to faster solver convergence at the cost of negligible bias, (iii) early stop** linear system solvers after a limited computational budget, which synergises with warm starting, allowing solver progress to accumulate over multiple marginal likelihood steps. These techniques provide speed-ups of up to $72\times$ when solving to tolerance, and decrease the average residual norm by up to $7\times$ when stop** early. △ Less

Submitted 6 June, 2024; v1 submitted 28 May, 2024; originally announced May 2024.

Comments: Preprint. arXiv admin note: text overlap with arXiv:2405.18328

Scalable Bayesian Inference in the Era of Deep Learning: From Gaussian Processes to Deep Neural Networks

Authors: Javier Antoran

Abstract: Large neural networks trained on large datasets have become the dominant paradigm in machine learning. These systems rely on maximum likelihood point estimates of their parameters, precluding them from expressing model uncertainty. This may result in overconfident predictions and it prevents the use of deep learning models for sequential decision making. This thesis develops scalable methods to eq… ▽ More Large neural networks trained on large datasets have become the dominant paradigm in machine learning. These systems rely on maximum likelihood point estimates of their parameters, precluding them from expressing model uncertainty. This may result in overconfident predictions and it prevents the use of deep learning models for sequential decision making. This thesis develops scalable methods to equip neural networks with model uncertainty. In particular, we leverage the linearised Laplace approximation to equip pre-trained neural networks with the uncertainty estimates provided by their tangent linear models. This turns the problem of Bayesian inference in neural networks into one of Bayesian inference in conjugate Gaussian-linear models. Alas, the cost of this remains cubic in either the number of network parameters or in the number of observations times output dimensions. By assumption, neither are tractable. We address this intractability by using stochastic gradient descent (SGD) -- the workhorse algorithm of deep learning -- to perform posterior sampling in linear models and their convex duals: Gaussian processes. With this, we turn back to linearised neural networks, finding the linearised Laplace approximation to present a number of incompatibilities with modern deep learning practices -- namely, stochastic optimisation, early stop** and normalisation layers -- when used for hyperparameter learning. We resolve these and construct a sample-based EM algorithm for scalable hyperparameter learning with linearised neural networks. We apply the above methods to perform linearised neural network inference with ResNet-50 (25M parameters) trained on Imagenet (1.2M observations and 1000 output dimensions). Additionally, we apply our methods to estimate uncertainty for 3d tomographic reconstructions obtained with the deep image prior network. △ Less

Submitted 29 April, 2024; originally announced April 2024.

Comments: PhD Thesis, University of Cambridge

Stochastic Gradient Descent for Gaussian Processes Done Right

Authors: Jihao Andreas Lin, Shreyas Padhy, Javier Antorán, Austin Tripp, Alexander Terenin, Csaba Szepesvári, José Miguel Hernández-Lobato, David Janz

Abstract: As is well known, both sampling from the posterior and computing the mean of the posterior in Gaussian process regression reduces to solving a large linear system of equations. We study the use of stochastic gradient descent for solving this linear system, and show that when \emph{done right} -- by which we mean using specific insights from the optimisation and kernel communities -- stochastic gra… ▽ More As is well known, both sampling from the posterior and computing the mean of the posterior in Gaussian process regression reduces to solving a large linear system of equations. We study the use of stochastic gradient descent for solving this linear system, and show that when \emph{done right} -- by which we mean using specific insights from the optimisation and kernel communities -- stochastic gradient descent is highly effective. To that end, we introduce a particularly simple \emph{stochastic dual descent} algorithm, explain its design in an intuitive manner and illustrate the design choices through a series of ablation studies. Further experiments demonstrate that our new method is highly competitive. In particular, our evaluations on the UCI regression tasks and on Bayesian optimisation set our approach apart from preconditioned conjugate gradients and variational Gaussian process approximations. Moreover, our method places Gaussian process regression on par with state-of-the-art graph neural networks for molecular binding affinity prediction. △ Less

Submitted 28 April, 2024; v1 submitted 31 October, 2023; originally announced October 2023.

Online Laplace Model Selection Revisited

Authors: Jihao Andreas Lin, Javier Antorán, José Miguel Hernández-Lobato

Abstract: The Laplace approximation provides a closed-form model selection objective for neural networks (NN). Online variants, which optimise NN parameters jointly with hyperparameters, like weight decay strength, have seen renewed interest in the Bayesian deep learning community. However, these methods violate Laplace's method's critical assumption that the approximation is performed around a mode of the… ▽ More The Laplace approximation provides a closed-form model selection objective for neural networks (NN). Online variants, which optimise NN parameters jointly with hyperparameters, like weight decay strength, have seen renewed interest in the Bayesian deep learning community. However, these methods violate Laplace's method's critical assumption that the approximation is performed around a mode of the loss, calling into question their soundness. This work re-derives online Laplace methods, showing them to target a variational bound on a mode-corrected variant of the Laplace evidence which does not make stationarity assumptions. Online Laplace and its mode-corrected counterpart share stationary points where 1. the NN parameters are a maximum a posteriori, satisfying the Laplace method's assumption, and 2. the hyperparameters maximise the Laplace evidence, motivating online methods. We demonstrate that these optima are roughly attained in practise by online algorithms using full-batch gradient descent on UCI regression datasets. The optimised hyperparameters prevent overfitting and outperform validation-based early stop**. △ Less

Submitted 9 January, 2024; v1 submitted 12 July, 2023; originally announced July 2023.

Comments: Advances in Approximate Bayesian Inference 2023

Sampling from Gaussian Process Posteriors using Stochastic Gradient Descent

Authors: Jihao Andreas Lin, Javier Antorán, Shreyas Padhy, David Janz, José Miguel Hernández-Lobato, Alexander Terenin

Abstract: Gaussian processes are a powerful framework for quantifying uncertainty and for sequential decision-making but are limited by the requirement of solving linear systems. In general, this has a cubic cost in dataset size and is sensitive to conditioning. We explore stochastic gradient algorithms as a computationally efficient method of approximately solving these linear systems: we develop low-varia… ▽ More Gaussian processes are a powerful framework for quantifying uncertainty and for sequential decision-making but are limited by the requirement of solving linear systems. In general, this has a cubic cost in dataset size and is sensitive to conditioning. We explore stochastic gradient algorithms as a computationally efficient method of approximately solving these linear systems: we develop low-variance optimization objectives for sampling from the posterior and extend these to inducing points. Counterintuitively, stochastic gradient descent often produces accurate predictions, even in cases where it does not converge quickly to the optimum. We explain this through a spectral characterization of the implicit bias from non-convergence. We show that stochastic gradient descent produces predictive distributions close to the true posterior both in regions with sufficient data coverage, and in regions sufficiently far away from the data. Experimentally, stochastic gradient descent achieves state-of-the-art performance on sufficiently large-scale or ill-conditioned regression tasks. Its uncertainty estimates match the performance of significantly more expensive baselines on a large-scale Bayesian optimization task. △ Less

Submitted 15 January, 2024; v1 submitted 20 June, 2023; originally announced June 2023.

Journal ref: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 2023

Sampling-based inference for large linear models, with application to linearised Laplace

Authors: Javier Antorán, Shreyas Padhy, Riccardo Barbano, Eric Nalisnick, David Janz, José Miguel Hernández-Lobato

Abstract: Large-scale linear models are ubiquitous throughout machine learning, with contemporary application as surrogate models for neural network uncertainty quantification; that is, the linearised Laplace method. Alas, the computational cost associated with Bayesian linear models constrains this method's application to small networks, small output spaces and small datasets. We address this limitation by… ▽ More Large-scale linear models are ubiquitous throughout machine learning, with contemporary application as surrogate models for neural network uncertainty quantification; that is, the linearised Laplace method. Alas, the computational cost associated with Bayesian linear models constrains this method's application to small networks, small output spaces and small datasets. We address this limitation by introducing a scalable sample-based Bayesian inference method for conjugate Gaussian multi-output linear models, together with a matching method for hyperparameter (regularisation) selection. Furthermore, we use a classic feature normalisation method (the g-prior) to resolve a previously highlighted pathology of the linearised Laplace method. Together, these contributions allow us to perform linearised neural network inference with ResNet-18 on CIFAR100 (11M parameters, 100 outputs x 50k datapoints), with ResNet-50 on Imagenet (50M parameters, 1000 outputs x 1.2M datapoints) and with a U-Net on a high-resolution tomographic reconstruction task (2M parameters, 251k output~dimensions). △ Less

Submitted 16 March, 2023; v1 submitted 10 October, 2022; originally announced October 2022.

Comments: Published at ICLR 2023. This latest Arxiv version is extended with a demonstration of the proposed methods on the Imagenet dataset

Adapting the Linearised Laplace Model Evidence for Modern Deep Learning

Authors: Javier Antorán, David Janz, James Urquhart Allingham, Erik Daxberger, Riccardo Barbano, Eric Nalisnick, José Miguel Hernández-Lobato

Abstract: The linearised Laplace method for estimating model uncertainty has received renewed attention in the Bayesian deep learning community. The method provides reliable error bars and admits a closed-form expression for the model evidence, allowing for scalable selection of model hyperparameters. In this work, we examine the assumptions behind this method, particularly in conjunction with model selecti… ▽ More The linearised Laplace method for estimating model uncertainty has received renewed attention in the Bayesian deep learning community. The method provides reliable error bars and admits a closed-form expression for the model evidence, allowing for scalable selection of model hyperparameters. In this work, we examine the assumptions behind this method, particularly in conjunction with model selection. We show that these interact poorly with some now-standard tools of deep learning--stochastic approximation methods and normalisation layers--and make recommendations for how to better adapt this classic method to the modern setting. We provide theoretical support for our recommendations and validate them empirically on MLPs, classic CNNs, residual networks with and without normalisation layers, generative autoencoders and transformers. △ Less

Submitted 8 December, 2022; v1 submitted 17 June, 2022; originally announced June 2022.

Comments: Paper appearing at ICML 2022

Uncertainty Estimation for Computed Tomography with a Linearised Deep Image Prior

Authors: Javier Antorán, Riccardo Barbano, Johannes Leuschner, José Miguel Hernández-Lobato, Bangti **

Abstract: Existing deep-learning based tomographic image reconstruction methods do not provide accurate estimates of reconstruction uncertainty, hindering their real-world deployment. This paper develops a method, termed as the linearised deep image prior (DIP), to estimate the uncertainty associated with reconstructions produced by the DIP with total variation regularisation (TV). Specifically, we endow th… ▽ More Existing deep-learning based tomographic image reconstruction methods do not provide accurate estimates of reconstruction uncertainty, hindering their real-world deployment. This paper develops a method, termed as the linearised deep image prior (DIP), to estimate the uncertainty associated with reconstructions produced by the DIP with total variation regularisation (TV). Specifically, we endow the DIP with conjugate Gaussian-linear model type error-bars computed from a local linearisation of the neural network around its optimised parameters. To preserve conjugacy, we approximate the TV regulariser with a Gaussian surrogate. This approach provides pixel-wise uncertainty estimates and a marginal likelihood objective for hyperparameter optimisation. We demonstrate the method on synthetic data and real-measured high-resolution 2D $μ$CT data, and show that it provides superior calibration of uncertainty estimates relative to previous probabilistic formulations of the DIP. Our code is available at https://github.com/educating-dip/bayes_dip. △ Less

Submitted 4 November, 2022; v1 submitted 28 February, 2022; originally announced March 2022.

Deep End-to-end Causal Inference

Authors: Tomas Geffner, Javier Antoran, Adam Foster, Wenbo Gong, Chao Ma, Emre Kiciman, Amit Sharma, Angus Lamb, Martin Kukla, Nick Pawlowski, Miltiadis Allamanis, Cheng Zhang

Abstract: Causal inference is essential for data-driven decision making across domains such as business engagement, medical treatment and policy making. However, research on causal discovery has evolved separately from inference methods, preventing straight-forward combination of methods from both fields. In this work, we develop Deep End-to-end Causal Inference (DECI), a single flow-based non-linear additi… ▽ More Causal inference is essential for data-driven decision making across domains such as business engagement, medical treatment and policy making. However, research on causal discovery has evolved separately from inference methods, preventing straight-forward combination of methods from both fields. In this work, we develop Deep End-to-end Causal Inference (DECI), a single flow-based non-linear additive noise model that takes in observational data and can perform both causal discovery and inference, including conditional average treatment effect (CATE) estimation. We provide a theoretical guarantee that DECI can recover the ground truth causal graph under standard causal discovery assumptions. Motivated by application impact, we extend this model to heterogeneous, mixed-type data with missing values, allowing for both continuous and discrete treatment decisions. Our results show the competitive performance of DECI when compared to relevant baselines for both causal discovery and (C)ATE estimation in over a thousand experiments on both synthetic datasets and causal machine learning benchmarks across data-types and levels of missingness. △ Less

Submitted 20 June, 2022; v1 submitted 4 February, 2022; originally announced February 2022.

Addressing Bias in Active Learning with Depth Uncertainty Networks... or Not

Authors: Chelsea Murray, James U. Allingham, Javier Antorán, José Miguel Hernández-Lobato

Abstract: Farquhar et al. [2021] show that correcting for active learning bias with underparameterised models leads to improved downstream performance. For overparameterised models such as NNs, however, correction leads either to decreased or unchanged performance. They suggest that this is due to an "overfitting bias" which offsets the active learning bias. We show that depth uncertainty networks operate i… ▽ More Farquhar et al. [2021] show that correcting for active learning bias with underparameterised models leads to improved downstream performance. For overparameterised models such as NNs, however, correction leads either to decreased or unchanged performance. They suggest that this is due to an "overfitting bias" which offsets the active learning bias. We show that depth uncertainty networks operate in a low overfitting regime, much like underparameterised models. They should therefore see an increase in performance with bias correction. Surprisingly, they do not. We propose that this negative result, as well as the results Farquhar et al. [2021], can be explained via the lens of the bias-variance decomposition of generalisation error. △ Less

Submitted 13 December, 2021; originally announced December 2021.

Comments: arXiv admin note: substantial text overlap with arXiv:2112.06796

Depth Uncertainty Networks for Active Learning

Authors: Chelsea Murray, James U. Allingham, Javier Antorán, José Miguel Hernández-Lobato

Abstract: In active learning, the size and complexity of the training dataset changes over time. Simple models that are well specified by the amount of data available at the start of active learning might suffer from bias as more points are actively sampled. Flexible models that might be well suited to the full dataset can suffer from overfitting towards the start of active learning. We tackle this problem… ▽ More In active learning, the size and complexity of the training dataset changes over time. Simple models that are well specified by the amount of data available at the start of active learning might suffer from bias as more points are actively sampled. Flexible models that might be well suited to the full dataset can suffer from overfitting towards the start of active learning. We tackle this problem using Depth Uncertainty Networks (DUNs), a BNN variant in which the depth of the network, and thus its complexity, is inferred. We find that DUNs outperform other BNN variants on several active learning tasks. Importantly, we show that on the tasks in which DUNs perform best they present notably less overfitting than baselines. △ Less

Submitted 4 May, 2022; v1 submitted 13 December, 2021; originally announced December 2021.

Bayesian Deep Learning via Subnetwork Inference

Authors: Erik Daxberger, Eric Nalisnick, James Urquhart Allingham, Javier Antorán, José Miguel Hernández-Lobato

Abstract: The Bayesian paradigm has the potential to solve core issues of deep neural networks such as poor calibration and data inefficiency. Alas, scaling Bayesian inference to large weight spaces often requires restrictive approximations. In this work, we show that it suffices to perform inference over a small subset of model weights in order to obtain accurate predictive posteriors. The other weights ar… ▽ More The Bayesian paradigm has the potential to solve core issues of deep neural networks such as poor calibration and data inefficiency. Alas, scaling Bayesian inference to large weight spaces often requires restrictive approximations. In this work, we show that it suffices to perform inference over a small subset of model weights in order to obtain accurate predictive posteriors. The other weights are kept as point estimates. This subnetwork inference framework enables us to use expressive, otherwise intractable, posterior approximations over such subsets. In particular, we implement subnetwork linearized Laplace as a simple, scalable Bayesian deep learning method: We first obtain a MAP estimate of all weights and then infer a full-covariance Gaussian posterior over a subnetwork using the linearized Laplace approximation. We propose a subnetwork selection strategy that aims to maximally preserve the model's predictive uncertainty. Empirically, our approach compares favorably to ensembles and less expressive posterior approximations over full networks. Our proposed subnetwork (linearized) Laplace method is implemented within the laplace PyTorch library at https://github.com/AlexImmer/Laplace. △ Less

Submitted 14 March, 2022; v1 submitted 27 October, 2020; originally announced October 2020.

Comments: ICML 2021; 22 pages, extended version with supplementary material

Depth Uncertainty in Neural Networks

Authors: Javier Antorán, James Urquhart Allingham, José Miguel Hernández-Lobato

Abstract: Existing methods for estimating uncertainty in deep learning tend to require multiple forward passes, making them unsuitable for applications where computational resources are limited. To solve this, we perform probabilistic reasoning over the depth of neural networks. Different depths correspond to subnetworks which share weights and whose predictions are combined via marginalisation, yielding mo… ▽ More Existing methods for estimating uncertainty in deep learning tend to require multiple forward passes, making them unsuitable for applications where computational resources are limited. To solve this, we perform probabilistic reasoning over the depth of neural networks. Different depths correspond to subnetworks which share weights and whose predictions are combined via marginalisation, yielding model uncertainty. By exploiting the sequential structure of feed-forward networks, we are able to both evaluate our training objective and make predictions with a single forward pass. We validate our approach on real-world regression and image classification tasks. Our approach provides uncertainty calibration, robustness to dataset shift, and accuracies competitive with more computationally expensive baselines. △ Less

Submitted 7 December, 2020; v1 submitted 15 June, 2020; originally announced June 2020.

Comments: Published at NeurIPS 2020

Getting a CLUE: A Method for Explaining Uncertainty Estimates

Authors: Javier Antorán, Umang Bhatt, Tameem Adel, Adrian Weller, José Miguel Hernández-Lobato

Abstract: Both uncertainty estimation and interpretability are important factors for trustworthy machine learning systems. However, there is little work at the intersection of these two areas. We address this gap by proposing a novel method for interpreting uncertainty estimates from differentiable probabilistic models, like Bayesian Neural Networks (BNNs). Our method, Counterfactual Latent Uncertainty Expl… ▽ More Both uncertainty estimation and interpretability are important factors for trustworthy machine learning systems. However, there is little work at the intersection of these two areas. We address this gap by proposing a novel method for interpreting uncertainty estimates from differentiable probabilistic models, like Bayesian Neural Networks (BNNs). Our method, Counterfactual Latent Uncertainty Explanations (CLUE), indicates how to change an input, while kee** it on the data manifold, such that a BNN becomes more confident about the input's prediction. We validate CLUE through 1) a novel framework for evaluating counterfactual explanations of uncertainty, 2) a series of ablation experiments, and 3) a user study. Our experiments show that CLUE outperforms baselines and enables practitioners to better understand which input patterns are responsible for predictive uncertainty. △ Less

Submitted 18 March, 2021; v1 submitted 11 June, 2020; originally announced June 2020.

Comments: Accepted as an oral presentation at ICLR 2021

Variational Depth Search in ResNets

Authors: Javier Antorán, James Urquhart Allingham, José Miguel Hernández-Lobato

Abstract: One-shot neural architecture search allows joint learning of weights and network architecture, reducing computational cost. We limit our search space to the depth of residual networks and formulate an analytically tractable variational objective that allows for obtaining an unbiased approximate posterior over depths in one-shot. We propose a heuristic to prune our networks based on this distributi… ▽ More One-shot neural architecture search allows joint learning of weights and network architecture, reducing computational cost. We limit our search space to the depth of residual networks and formulate an analytically tractable variational objective that allows for obtaining an unbiased approximate posterior over depths in one-shot. We propose a heuristic to prune our networks based on this distribution. We compare our proposed method against manual search over network depths on the MNIST, Fashion-MNIST, SVHN datasets. We find that pruned networks do not incur a loss in predictive performance, obtaining accuracies competitive with unpruned networks. Marginalising over depth allows us to obtain better-calibrated test-time uncertainty estimates than regular networks, in a single forward pass. △ Less

Submitted 1 April, 2020; v1 submitted 6 February, 2020; originally announced February 2020.

Comments: Appearing at the 1st ICLR workshop on Neural Architecture Search 2020

Disentangling and Learning Robust Representations with Natural Clustering

Authors: Javier Antoran, Antonio Miguel

Abstract: Learning representations that disentangle the underlying factors of variability in data is an intuitive way to achieve generalization in deep models. In this work, we address the scenario where generative factors present a multimodal distribution due to the existence of class distinction in the data. We propose N-VAE, a model which is capable of separating factors of variation which are exclusive… ▽ More Learning representations that disentangle the underlying factors of variability in data is an intuitive way to achieve generalization in deep models. In this work, we address the scenario where generative factors present a multimodal distribution due to the existence of class distinction in the data. We propose N-VAE, a model which is capable of separating factors of variation which are exclusive to certain classes from factors that are shared among classes. This model implements an explicitly compositional latent variable structure by defining a class-conditioned latent space and a shared latent space. We show its usefulness for detecting and disentangling class-dependent generative factors as well as its capacity to generate artificial samples which contain characteristics unseen in the training data. △ Less

Submitted 5 November, 2019; v1 submitted 27 January, 2019; originally announced January 2019.

Comments: Accepted at ICMLA 2019