Showing 1–50 of 73 results for author: Vidick, T

Expansion of higher-dimensional cubical complexes with application to quantum locally testable codes

Authors: Irit Dinur, Ting-Chun Lin, Thomas Vidick

Abstract: We introduce a high-dimensional cubical complex, for any dimension t>0, and apply it to the design of quantum locally testable codes. Our complex is a natural generalization of the constructions by Panteleev and Kalachev and by Dinur et. al of a square complex (case t=2), which have been applied to the design of classical locally testable codes (LTC) and quantum low-density parity check codes (qLD… ▽ More We introduce a high-dimensional cubical complex, for any dimension t>0, and apply it to the design of quantum locally testable codes. Our complex is a natural generalization of the constructions by Panteleev and Kalachev and by Dinur et. al of a square complex (case t=2), which have been applied to the design of classical locally testable codes (LTC) and quantum low-density parity check codes (qLDPC) respectively. We turn the geometric (cubical) complex into a chain complex by relying on constant-sized local codes $h_1,\ldots,h_t$ as gadgets. A recent result of Panteleev and Kalachev on existence of tuples of codes that are product expanding enables us to prove lower bounds on the cycle and co-cycle expansion of our chain complex. For t=4 our construction gives a new family of "almost-good" quantum LTCs -- with constant relative rate, inverse-polylogarithmic relative distance and soundness, and constant-size parity checks. Both the distance of the quantum code and its local testability are proven directly from the cycle and co-cycle expansion of our chain complex. △ Less

Submitted 11 April, 2024; v1 submitted 12 February, 2024; originally announced February 2024.

Comments: Stronger result: constant degree complexes and without product-expansion conjecture

Efficiently stable presentations from error-correcting codes

Authors: Michael Chapman, Thomas Vidick, Henry Yuen

Abstract: We introduce a notion of \emph{efficient stability} for finite presentations of groups. Informally, a finite presentation using generators $S$ and relations $R$ is \emph{stable} if any map from $S$ to unitaries that approximately satisfies the relations (in the tracial norm) is close to the restriction of a representation of $G$ to the subset $S$. This notion and variants thereof have been extensi… ▽ More We introduce a notion of \emph{efficient stability} for finite presentations of groups. Informally, a finite presentation using generators $S$ and relations $R$ is \emph{stable} if any map from $S$ to unitaries that approximately satisfies the relations (in the tracial norm) is close to the restriction of a representation of $G$ to the subset $S$. This notion and variants thereof have been extensively studied in recent years, in part motivated by connections to property testing in computer science. The novelty in our work is the focus on \emph{efficiency}, which, informally, places an onus on small presentations -- in the sense of encoding length. The goal in this setup is to achieve non-trivial tradeoffs between the presentation length and its modulus of stability. With this goal in mind we analyze various natural examples of presentations. We provide a general method for constructing presentations of $\mathbb{Z}_2^k$ from linear error-correcting codes. We observe that the resulting presentation has a weak form of stability exactly when the code is \emph{testable}. This raises the question of whether testable codes give rise to genuinely stable presentations using this method. While we cannot show that this is the case in general, we leverage recent results in the study of non-local games in quantum information theory (Ji et al., Discrete Analysis 2021) to show that a specific instantiation of our construction, based on the Reed-Muller family of codes, leads to a stable presentation of $\mathbb{Z}_2^k$ of size polylog$(k)$ only. As an application, we combine this result with recent work of de la Salle (arXiv:2204.07084) to re-derive the quantum low-degree test of Natarajan and Vidick (IEEE FOCS'18), which is a key building block in the recent refutation of Connes' Embedding Problem via complexity theory (Ji et al., arXiv:2001.04383). △ Less

Submitted 8 November, 2023; originally announced November 2023.

Comments: 49 pages

Computational Entanglement Theory

Authors: Rotem Arnon-Friedman, Zvika Brakerski, Thomas Vidick

Abstract: We initiate a rigorous study of computational entanglement theory, inspired by the emerging usefulness of ideas from quantum information theory in computational complexity. We define new operational computational measures of entanglement -- the computational one-shot entanglement cost and distillable entanglement. We then show that the computational measures are fundamentally different from their… ▽ More We initiate a rigorous study of computational entanglement theory, inspired by the emerging usefulness of ideas from quantum information theory in computational complexity. We define new operational computational measures of entanglement -- the computational one-shot entanglement cost and distillable entanglement. We then show that the computational measures are fundamentally different from their information-theoretic counterparts by presenting gaps between them. We proceed by refining and extending the definition of pseudo-entanglement, introduced by Aaronson et al., 2022, using the new operational measures; and we present constructions of pseudo-entangled states (for our new definition) based on post-quantum cryptographic assumptions. Finally, we discuss the relations between computational entanglement theory and other topics, such as quantum cryptography and notions of pseudoentropy, as well as the relevance of our new definitions to the study of the AdS/CFT correspondence. We believe that, in addition to the contributions presented in the current manuscript, our work opens multiple research directions, of relevance both to the theoretical quantum information theory community as well as for future applications of quantum networks and cryptography. △ Less

Submitted 4 October, 2023; originally announced October 2023.

Simple Tests of Quantumness Also Certify Qubits

Authors: Zvika Brakerski, Alexandru Gheorghiu, Gregory D. Kahanamoku-Meyer, Eitan Porat, Thomas Vidick

Abstract: A test of quantumness is a protocol that allows a classical verifier to certify (only) that a prover is not classical. We show that tests of quantumness that follow a certain template, which captures recent proposals such as (Kalai et al., 2022), can in fact do much more. Namely, the same protocols can be used for certifying a qubit, a building-block that stands at the heart of applications such a… ▽ More A test of quantumness is a protocol that allows a classical verifier to certify (only) that a prover is not classical. We show that tests of quantumness that follow a certain template, which captures recent proposals such as (Kalai et al., 2022), can in fact do much more. Namely, the same protocols can be used for certifying a qubit, a building-block that stands at the heart of applications such as certifiable randomness and classical delegation of quantum computation. Certifying qubits was previously only known to be possible based on the hardness of the Learning with Errors problem and the use of adaptive hardcore (Brakerski et al., 2018). Our framework allows certification of qubits based only on the existence of post-quantum trapdoor claw-free functions, or on quantum fully homomorphic encryption. These can be instantiated, for example, from Ring Learning with Errors. On the technical side, we show that the quantum soundness of any such protocol can be reduced to proving a bound on a simple algorithmic task: informally, answering ``two challenges simultaneously'' in the protocol. Our reduction formalizes the intuition that these protocols demonstrate quantumness by leveraging the impossibility of rewinding a general quantum prover. This allows us to prove tight bounds on the quantum soundness of (Kahanamoku-Meyer et al., 2021) and (Kalai et al., 2022), showing that no quantum polynomial-time prover can succeed with probability larger than $\cos^2 \fracπ{8}\approx 0.853$. Previously, only an upper bound on the success probability of classical provers, and a lower bound on the success probability of quantum provers, were known. We then extend this proof of quantum soundness to show that provers that approach the quantum soundness bound must perform almost anti-commuting measurements. This certifies that the prover holds a qubit. △ Less

Submitted 18 May, 2023; v1 submitted 2 March, 2023; originally announced March 2023.

Comments: 27 pages; small typos fixed

Group coset monogamy games and an application to device-independent continuous-variable QKD

Authors: Eric Culf, Thomas Vidick, Victor V. Albert

Abstract: We develop an extension of a recently introduced subspace coset state monogamy-of-entanglement game [Coladangelo, Liu, Liu, and Zhandry; Crypto'21] to general group coset states, which are uniform superpositions over elements of a subgroup to which has been applied a group-theoretic generalization of the quantum one-time pad. We give a general bound on the winning probability of a monogamy game co… ▽ More We develop an extension of a recently introduced subspace coset state monogamy-of-entanglement game [Coladangelo, Liu, Liu, and Zhandry; Crypto'21] to general group coset states, which are uniform superpositions over elements of a subgroup to which has been applied a group-theoretic generalization of the quantum one-time pad. We give a general bound on the winning probability of a monogamy game constructed from subgroup coset states that applies to a wide range of finite and infinite groups. To study the infinite-group case, we use and further develop a measure-theoretic formalism that allows us to express continuous-variable measurements as operator-valued generalizations of probability measures. We apply the monogamy game bound to various physically relevant groups, yielding realizations of the game in continuous-variable modes as well as in rotational states of a polyatomic molecule. We obtain explicit strong bounds in the case of specific group-space and subgroup combinations. As an application, we provide the first proof of one sided-device independent security of a squeezed-state continuous-variable quantum key distribution protocol against general coherent attacks. △ Less

Submitted 7 December, 2022; originally announced December 2022.

Comments: 65 pages, 3 figures, 2 tables

Experimental Implementation of an Efficient Test of Quantumness

Authors: Laura Lewis, Daiwei Zhu, Alexandru Gheorghiu, Crystal Noel, Or Katz, Bahaa Harraz, Qingfeng Wang, Andrew Risinger, Lei Feng, Debopriyo Biswas, Laird Egan, Thomas Vidick, Marko Cetina, Christopher Monroe

Abstract: A test of quantumness is a protocol where a classical user issues challenges to a quantum device to determine if it exhibits non-classical behavior, under certain cryptographic assumptions. Recent attempts to implement such tests on current quantum computers rely on either interactive challenges with efficient verification, or non-interactive challenges with inefficient (exponential time) verifica… ▽ More A test of quantumness is a protocol where a classical user issues challenges to a quantum device to determine if it exhibits non-classical behavior, under certain cryptographic assumptions. Recent attempts to implement such tests on current quantum computers rely on either interactive challenges with efficient verification, or non-interactive challenges with inefficient (exponential time) verification. In this paper, we execute an efficient non-interactive test of quantumness on an ion-trap quantum computer. Our results significantly exceed the bound for a classical device's success. △ Less

Submitted 28 September, 2022; originally announced September 2022.

Comments: 6 pages, 2 figures

Succinct Classical Verification of Quantum Computation

Authors: James Bartusek, Yael Tauman Kalai, Alex Lombardi, Fermi Ma, Giulio Malavolta, Vinod Vaikuntanathan, Thomas Vidick, Lisa Yang

Abstract: We construct a classically verifiable succinct interactive argument for quantum computation (BQP) with communication complexity and verifier runtime that are poly-logarithmic in the runtime of the BQP computation (and polynomial in the security parameter). Our protocol is secure assuming the post-quantum security of indistinguishability obfuscation (iO) and Learning with Errors (LWE). This is the… ▽ More We construct a classically verifiable succinct interactive argument for quantum computation (BQP) with communication complexity and verifier runtime that are poly-logarithmic in the runtime of the BQP computation (and polynomial in the security parameter). Our protocol is secure assuming the post-quantum security of indistinguishability obfuscation (iO) and Learning with Errors (LWE). This is the first succinct argument for quantum computation in the plain model; prior work (Chia-Chung-Yamakawa, TCC '20) requires both a long common reference string and non-black-box use of a hash function modeled as a random oracle. At a technical level, we revisit the framework for constructing classically verifiable quantum computation (Mahadev, FOCS '18). We give a self-contained, modular proof of security for Mahadev's protocol, which we believe is of independent interest. Our proof readily generalizes to a setting in which the verifier's first message (which consists of many public keys) is compressed. Next, we formalize this notion of compressed public keys; we view the object as a generalization of constrained/programmable PRFs and instantiate it based on indistinguishability obfuscation. Finally, we compile the above protocol into a fully succinct argument using a (sufficiently composable) succinct argument of knowledge for NP. Using our framework, we achieve several additional results, including - Succinct arguments for QMA (given multiple copies of the witness), - Succinct non-interactive arguments for BQP (or QMA) in the quantum random oracle model, and - Succinct batch arguments for BQP (or QMA) assuming post-quantum LWE (without iO). △ Less

Submitted 29 June, 2022; originally announced June 2022.

Comments: CRYPTO 2022

Good Quantum LDPC Codes with Linear Time Decoders

Authors: Irit Dinur, Min-Hsiu Hsieh, Ting-Chun Lin, Thomas Vidick

Abstract: We construct a new explicit family of good quantum low-density parity-check codes which additionally have linear time decoders. Our codes are based on a three-term chain $(\mathbb{F}_2^{m\times m})^V \quad \xrightarrow{δ^0}\quad (\mathbb{F}_2^{m})^{E} \quad\xrightarrow{δ^1} \quad \mathbb{F}_2^F$ where $V$ ($X$-checks) are the vertices, $E$ (qubits) are the edges, and $F$ ($Z$-checks) are the squar… ▽ More We construct a new explicit family of good quantum low-density parity-check codes which additionally have linear time decoders. Our codes are based on a three-term chain $(\mathbb{F}_2^{m\times m})^V \quad \xrightarrow{δ^0}\quad (\mathbb{F}_2^{m})^{E} \quad\xrightarrow{δ^1} \quad \mathbb{F}_2^F$ where $V$ ($X$-checks) are the vertices, $E$ (qubits) are the edges, and $F$ ($Z$-checks) are the squares of a left-right Cayley complex, and where the maps are defined based on a pair of constant-size random codes $C_A,C_B:\mathbb{F}_2^m\to\mathbb{F}_2^Δ$ where $Δ$ is the regularity of the underlying Cayley graphs. One of the main ingredients in the analysis is a proof of an essentially-optimal robustness property for the tensor product of two random codes. △ Less

Submitted 15 June, 2022; originally announced June 2022.

Efficient Certifiable Randomness from a Single Quantum Device

Authors: Urmila Mahadev, Umesh Vazirani, Thomas Vidick

Abstract: Brakerski et. al [BCM+18] introduced the model of cryptographic testing of a single untrusted quantum device and gave a protocol for certifiable randomness generation. We use the leakage resilience properties of the Learning With Errors problem to address a key issue left open in previous work - the rate of generation of randomness. Our new protocol can certify $Ω(n)$ fresh bits of randomness in c… ▽ More Brakerski et. al [BCM+18] introduced the model of cryptographic testing of a single untrusted quantum device and gave a protocol for certifiable randomness generation. We use the leakage resilience properties of the Learning With Errors problem to address a key issue left open in previous work - the rate of generation of randomness. Our new protocol can certify $Ω(n)$ fresh bits of randomness in constant rounds, where $n$ is a parameter of the protocol and the total communication is $O(n)$, thus achieving a nearly optimal rate. The proof that the output is statistically random is conceptually simple and technically elementary. △ Less

Submitted 24 April, 2022; originally announced April 2022.

Interactive Protocols for Classically-Verifiable Quantum Advantage

Authors: Daiwei Zhu, Gregory D. Kahanamoku-Meyer, Laura Lewis, Crystal Noel, Or Katz, Bahaa Harraz, Qingfeng Wang, Andrew Risinger, Lei Feng, Debopriyo Biswas, Laird Egan, Alexandru Gheorghiu, Yunseong Nam, Thomas Vidick, Umesh Vazirani, Norman Y. Yao, Marko Cetina, Christopher Monroe

Abstract: Achieving quantum computational advantage requires solving a classically intractable problem on a quantum device. Natural proposals rely upon the intrinsic hardness of classically simulating quantum mechanics; however, verifying the output is itself classically intractable. On the other hand, certain quantum algorithms (e.g. prime factorization via Shor's algorithm) are efficiently verifiable, but… ▽ More Achieving quantum computational advantage requires solving a classically intractable problem on a quantum device. Natural proposals rely upon the intrinsic hardness of classically simulating quantum mechanics; however, verifying the output is itself classically intractable. On the other hand, certain quantum algorithms (e.g. prime factorization via Shor's algorithm) are efficiently verifiable, but require more resources than what is available on near-term devices. One way to bridge the gap between verifiability and implementation is to use "interactions" between a prover and a verifier. By leveraging cryptographic functions, such protocols enable the classical verifier to enforce consistency in a quantum prover's responses across multiple rounds of interaction. In this work, we demonstrate the first implementation of an interactive quantum advantage protocol, using an ion trap quantum computer. We execute two complementary protocols -- one based upon the learning with errors problem and another where the cryptographic construction implements a computational Bell test. To perform multiple rounds of interaction, we implement mid-circuit measurements on a subset of trapped ion qubits, with subsequent coherent evolution. For both protocols, the performance exceeds the asymptotic bound for classical behavior; maintaining this fidelity at scale would conclusively demonstrate verifiable quantum advantage. △ Less

Submitted 21 June, 2022; v1 submitted 9 December, 2021; originally announced December 2021.

Comments: 11 pages, 3 figures; supp. info 23 pages, 4 figures

Journal ref: Nature Physics (2023)

Quantum soundness of testing tensor codes

Authors: Zhengfeng Ji, Anand Natarajan, Thomas Vidick, John Wright, Henry Yuen

Abstract: A locally testable code is an error-correcting code that admits very efficient probabilistic tests of membership. Tensor codes provide a simple family of combinatorial constructions of locally testable codes that generalize the family of Reed-Muller codes. The natural test for tensor codes, the axis-parallel line vs. point test, plays an essential role in constructions of probabilistically checkab… ▽ More A locally testable code is an error-correcting code that admits very efficient probabilistic tests of membership. Tensor codes provide a simple family of combinatorial constructions of locally testable codes that generalize the family of Reed-Muller codes. The natural test for tensor codes, the axis-parallel line vs. point test, plays an essential role in constructions of probabilistically checkable proofs. We analyze the axis-parallel line vs. point test as a two-prover game and show that the test is sound against quantum provers sharing entanglement. Our result implies the quantum-soundness of the low individual degree test, which is an essential component of the MIP* = RE theorem. Our proof also generalizes to the infinite-dimensional commuting-operator model of quantum provers. △ Less

Submitted 6 December, 2022; v1 submitted 15 November, 2021; originally announced November 2021.

Comments: v3: published version

Journal ref: Discrete Analysis, 2022:17

A monogamy-of-entanglement game for subspace coset states

Authors: Eric Culf, Thomas Vidick

Abstract: We establish a strong monogamy-of-entanglement property for subspace coset states, which are uniform superpositions of vectors in a linear subspace of $\mathbb{F}_2^n$ to which has been applied a quantum one-time pad. This property was conjectured recently by [Coladangelo, Liu, Liu, and Zhandry, Crypto'21] and shown to have applications to unclonable decryption and copy-protection of pseudorandom… ▽ More We establish a strong monogamy-of-entanglement property for subspace coset states, which are uniform superpositions of vectors in a linear subspace of $\mathbb{F}_2^n$ to which has been applied a quantum one-time pad. This property was conjectured recently by [Coladangelo, Liu, Liu, and Zhandry, Crypto'21] and shown to have applications to unclonable decryption and copy-protection of pseudorandom functions. We present two proofs, one which directly follows the method of the original paper and the other which uses an observation from [Vidick and Zhang, Eurocrypt'20] to reduce the analysis to a simpler monogamy game based on BB'84 states. Both proofs ultimately rely on the same proof technique, introduced in [Tomamichel, Fehr, Kaniewski and Wehner, New Journal of Physics '13]. △ Less

Submitted 2 August, 2022; v1 submitted 28 July, 2021; originally announced July 2021.

Comments: v5: 13 pages, 1 figure. Accepted for publication in Quantum

Journal ref: Quantum 6, 791 (2022)

Almost synchronous quantum correlations

Authors: Thomas Vidick

Abstract: The study of quantum correlation sets initiated by Tsirelson in the 1980s and originally motivated by questions in the foundations of quantum mechanics has more recently been tied to questions in quantum cryptography, complexity theory, operator space theory, group theory, and more. Synchronous correlation sets introduced in [Paulsen et. al, JFA 2016] are a subclass of correlations that has proven… ▽ More The study of quantum correlation sets initiated by Tsirelson in the 1980s and originally motivated by questions in the foundations of quantum mechanics has more recently been tied to questions in quantum cryptography, complexity theory, operator space theory, group theory, and more. Synchronous correlation sets introduced in [Paulsen et. al, JFA 2016] are a subclass of correlations that has proven particularly useful to study and arises naturally in applications. We show that any correlation that is almost synchronous, in a natural $\ell_1$ sense, arises from a state and measurement operators that are well-approximated by a convex combination of projective measurements on a maximally entangled state. This extends a result of [Paulsen et. al, JFA 2016] which applies to exactly synchronous correlations. Crucially, the quality of approximation is independent of the dimension of the Hilbert spaces or of the size of the correlation. Our result allows one to reduce the analysis of many classes of nonlocal games, including rigidity properties, to the case of strategies using maximally entangled states which are generally easier to manipulate. △ Less

Submitted 7 June, 2023; v1 submitted 3 March, 2021; originally announced March 2021.

Comments: 23 pages. v3:fixed a small mistake in the proof of Corollary 3.3

Quantum soundness of the classical low individual degree test

Authors: Zhengfeng Ji, Anand Natarajan, Thomas Vidick, John Wright, Henry Yuen

Abstract: Low degree tests play an important role in classical complexity theory, serving as basic ingredients in foundational results such as $\mathsf{MIP} = \mathsf{NEXP}$ [BFL91] and the PCP theorem [AS98,ALM+98]. Over the last ten years, versions of these tests which are sound against quantum provers have found increasing applications to the study of nonlocal games and the complexity class~… ▽ More Low degree tests play an important role in classical complexity theory, serving as basic ingredients in foundational results such as $\mathsf{MIP} = \mathsf{NEXP}$ [BFL91] and the PCP theorem [AS98,ALM+98]. Over the last ten years, versions of these tests which are sound against quantum provers have found increasing applications to the study of nonlocal games and the complexity class~$\mathsf{MIP}^*$. The culmination of this line of work is the result $\mathsf{MIP}^* = \mathsf{RE}$ [arXiv:2001.04383]. One of the key ingredients in the first reported proof of $\mathsf{MIP}^* = \mathsf{RE}$ is a two-prover variant of the low degree test, initially shown to be sound against multiple quantum provers in [arXiv:1302.1242]. Unfortunately a mistake was recently discovered in the latter result, invalidating the main result of [arXiv:1302.1242] as well as its use in subsequent works, including [arXiv:2001.04383]. We analyze a variant of the low degree test called the low individual degree test. Our main result is that the two-player version of this test is sound against quantum provers. This soundness result is sufficient to re-derive several bounds on~$\mathsf{MIP}^*$ that relied on [arXiv:1302.1242], including $\mathsf{MIP}^* = \mathsf{RE}$. △ Less

Submitted 27 September, 2020; originally announced September 2020.

Simpler Proofs of Quantumness

Authors: Zvika Brakerski, Venkata Koppula, Umesh Vazirani, Thomas Vidick

Abstract: A proof of quantumness is a method for provably demonstrating (to a classical verifier) that a quantum device can perform computational tasks that a classical device with comparable resources cannot. Providing a proof of quantumness is the first step towards constructing a useful quantum computer. There are currently three approaches for exhibiting proofs of quantumness: (i) Inverting a classicall… ▽ More A proof of quantumness is a method for provably demonstrating (to a classical verifier) that a quantum device can perform computational tasks that a classical device with comparable resources cannot. Providing a proof of quantumness is the first step towards constructing a useful quantum computer. There are currently three approaches for exhibiting proofs of quantumness: (i) Inverting a classically-hard one-way function (e.g. using Shor's algorithm). This seems technologically out of reach. (ii) Sampling from a classically-hard-to-sample distribution (e.g. BosonSampling). This may be within reach of near-term experiments, but for all such tasks known verification requires exponential time. (iii) Interactive protocols based on cryptographic assumptions. The use of a trapdoor scheme allows for efficient verification, and implementation seems to require much less resources than (i), yet still more than (ii). In this work we propose a significant simplification to approach (iii) by employing the random oracle heuristic. (We note that we do not apply the Fiat-Shamir paradigm.) We give a two-message (challenge-response) proof of quantumness based on any trapdoor claw-free function. In contrast to earlier proposals we do not need an adaptive hard-core bit property. This allows the use of smaller security parameters and more diverse computational assumptions (such as Ring Learning with Errors), significantly reducing the quantum computational effort required for a successful demonstration. △ Less

Submitted 10 May, 2020; originally announced May 2020.

Comments: TQC 2020

Classical proofs of quantum knowledge

Authors: Thomas Vidick, Tina Zhang

Abstract: We define the notion of a proof of knowledge in the setting where the verifier is classical, but the prover is quantum, and where the witness that the prover holds is in general a quantum state. We establish simple properties of our definition, including that, if a nondestructive classical proof of quantum knowledge exists for some state, then that state can be cloned by an unbounded adversary, an… ▽ More We define the notion of a proof of knowledge in the setting where the verifier is classical, but the prover is quantum, and where the witness that the prover holds is in general a quantum state. We establish simple properties of our definition, including that, if a nondestructive classical proof of quantum knowledge exists for some state, then that state can be cloned by an unbounded adversary, and that, under certain conditions on the parameters in our definition, a proof of knowledge protocol for a hard-to-clone state can be used as a (destructive) quantum money verification protocol. In addition, we provide two examples of protocols (both inspired by private-key classical verification protocols for quantum money schemes) which we can show to be proofs of quantum knowledge under our definition. In so doing, we introduce techniques for the analysis of such protocols which build on results from the literature on nonlocal games. Finally, we show that, under our definition, the verification protocol introduced by Mahadev (FOCS 2018) is a classical argument of quantum knowledge for QMA relations. In all cases, we construct an explicit quantum extractor that is able to produce a quantum witness given black-box quantum (rewinding) access to the prover, the latter of which includes the ability to coherently execute the prover's black-box circuit controlled on a superposition of messages from the verifier. △ Less

Submitted 19 January, 2021; v1 submitted 4 May, 2020; originally announced May 2020.

Self-testing of a single quantum device under computational assumptions

Authors: Tony Metger, Thomas Vidick

Abstract: Self-testing is a method to characterise an arbitrary quantum system based only on its classical input-output correlations, and plays an important role in device-independent quantum information processing as well as quantum complexity theory. Prior works on self-testing require the assumption that the system's state is shared among multiple parties that only perform local measurements and cannot c… ▽ More Self-testing is a method to characterise an arbitrary quantum system based only on its classical input-output correlations, and plays an important role in device-independent quantum information processing as well as quantum complexity theory. Prior works on self-testing require the assumption that the system's state is shared among multiple parties that only perform local measurements and cannot communicate. Here, we replace the setting of multiple non-communicating parties, which is difficult to enforce in practice, by a single computationally bounded party. Specifically, we construct a protocol that allows a classical verifier to robustly certify that a single computationally bounded quantum device must have prepared a Bell pair and performed single-qubit measurements on it, up to a change of basis applied to both the device's state and measurements. This means that under computational assumptions, the verifier is able to certify the presence of entanglement, a property usually closely associated with two separated subsystems, inside a single quantum device. To achieve this, we build on techniques first introduced by Brakerski et al. (2018) and Mahadev (2018) which allow a classical verifier to constrain the actions of a quantum device assuming the device does not break post-quantum cryptography. △ Less

Submitted 17 May, 2022; v1 submitted 24 January, 2020; originally announced January 2020.

Comments: 58 pages, published in Quantum

Journal ref: Quantum 5, 544 (2021)

MIP*=RE

Authors: Zhengfeng Ji, Anand Natarajan, Thomas Vidick, John Wright, Henry Yuen

Abstract: We show that the class MIP* of languages that can be decided by a classical verifier interacting with multiple all-powerful quantum provers sharing entanglement is equal to the class RE of recursively enumerable languages. Our proof builds upon the quantum low-degree test of (Natarajan and Vidick, FOCS 2018) and the classical low-individual degree test of (Ji, et al., 2020) by integrating recent d… ▽ More We show that the class MIP* of languages that can be decided by a classical verifier interacting with multiple all-powerful quantum provers sharing entanglement is equal to the class RE of recursively enumerable languages. Our proof builds upon the quantum low-degree test of (Natarajan and Vidick, FOCS 2018) and the classical low-individual degree test of (Ji, et al., 2020) by integrating recent developments from (Natarajan and Wright, FOCS 2019) and combining them with the recursive compression framework of (Fitzsimons et al., STOC 2019). An immediate byproduct of our result is that there is an efficient reduction from the Halting Problem to the problem of deciding whether a two-player nonlocal game has entangled value $1$ or at most $1/2$. Using a known connection, undecidability of the entangled value implies a negative answer to Tsirelson's problem: we show, by providing an explicit example, that the closure $C_{qa}$ of the set of quantum tensor product correlations is strictly included in the set $C_{qc}$ of quantum commuting correlations. Following work of (Fritz, Rev. Math. Phys. 2012) and (Junge et al., J. Math. Phys. 2011) our results provide a refutation of Connes' embedding conjecture from the theory of von Neumann algebras. △ Less

Submitted 4 November, 2022; v1 submitted 13 January, 2020; originally announced January 2020.

Comments: 223 pages. v3: Typos corrected, minor improvements to presentation

Non-interactive zero-knowledge arguments for QMA, with preprocessing

Authors: Andrea Coladangelo, Thomas Vidick, Tina Zhang

Abstract: We initiate the study of non-interactive zero-knowledge (NIZK) arguments for languages in QMA. Our first main result is the following: if Learning With Errors (LWE) is hard for quantum computers, then any language in QMA has an NIZK argument with preprocessing. The preprocessing in our argument system consists of (i) the generation of a CRS and (ii) a single (instance-independent) quantum message… ▽ More We initiate the study of non-interactive zero-knowledge (NIZK) arguments for languages in QMA. Our first main result is the following: if Learning With Errors (LWE) is hard for quantum computers, then any language in QMA has an NIZK argument with preprocessing. The preprocessing in our argument system consists of (i) the generation of a CRS and (ii) a single (instance-independent) quantum message from verifier to prover. The instance-dependent phase of our argument system involves only a single classical message from prover to verifier. Importantly, verification in our protocol is entirely classical, and the verifier needs not have quantum memory; its only quantum actions are in the preprocessing phase. Our second contribution is to extend the notion of a classical proof of knowledge to the quantum setting. We introduce the notions of arguments and proofs of quantum knowledge (AoQK/PoQK), and we show that our non-interactive argument system satisfies the definition of an AoQK. In particular, we explicitly construct an extractor which can recover a quantum witness from any prover which is successful in our protocol. Finally, we show that any language in QMA has an (interactive) proof of quantum knowledge. △ Less

Submitted 14 January, 2020; v1 submitted 18 November, 2019; originally announced November 2019.

Comments: 68 pages

Computationally-secure and composable remote state preparation

Authors: Alexandru Gheorghiu, Thomas Vidick

Abstract: We introduce a protocol between a classical polynomial-time verifier and a quantum polynomial-time prover that allows the verifier to securely delegate to the prover the preparation of certain single-qubit quantum states. The protocol realizes the following functionality, with computational security: the verifier chooses one of the observables $Z$, $X$, $Y$, $(X+Y)/\sqrt{2}$, $(X-Y)/\sqrt{2}$; the… ▽ More We introduce a protocol between a classical polynomial-time verifier and a quantum polynomial-time prover that allows the verifier to securely delegate to the prover the preparation of certain single-qubit quantum states. The protocol realizes the following functionality, with computational security: the verifier chooses one of the observables $Z$, $X$, $Y$, $(X+Y)/\sqrt{2}$, $(X-Y)/\sqrt{2}$; the prover receives a uniformly random eigenstate of the observable chosen by the verifier; the verifier receives a classical description of that state. The prover is unaware of which state he received and moreover, the verifier can check with high confidence whether the preparation was successful. The delegated preparation of single-qubit states is an elementary building block in many quantum cryptographic protocols. We expect our implementation of "random remote state preparation with verification", a functionality first defined in (Dunjko and Kashefi 2014), to be useful for removing the need for quantum communication in such protocols while kee** functionality. The main application that we detail is to a protocol for blind and verifiable delegated quantum computation (DQC) that builds on the work of (Fitzsimons and Kashefi 2018), who provided such a protocol with quantum communication. Recently, both blind an verifiable DQC were shown to be possible, under computational assumptions, with a classical polynomial-time client (Mahadev 2017, Mahadev 2018). Compared to the work of Mahadev, our protocol is more modular, applies to the measurement-based model of computation (instead of the Hamiltonian model) and is composable. Our proof of security builds on ideas introduced in (Brakerski et al. 2018). △ Less

Submitted 12 April, 2019; originally announced April 2019.

Comments: 43 pages

Classical zero-knowledge arguments for quantum computations

Authors: Thomas Vidick, Tina Zhang

Abstract: We show that every language in QMA admits a classical-verifier, quantum-prover zero-knowledge argument system which is sound against quantum polynomial-time provers and zero-knowledge for classical (and quantum) polynomial-time verifiers. The protocol builds upon two recent results: a computational zero-knowledge proof system for languages in QMA, with a quantum verifier, introduced by Broadbent e… ▽ More We show that every language in QMA admits a classical-verifier, quantum-prover zero-knowledge argument system which is sound against quantum polynomial-time provers and zero-knowledge for classical (and quantum) polynomial-time verifiers. The protocol builds upon two recent results: a computational zero-knowledge proof system for languages in QMA, with a quantum verifier, introduced by Broadbent et al. (FOCS 2016), and an argument system for languages in QMA, with a classical verifier, introduced by Mahadev (FOCS 2018). △ Less

Submitted 11 May, 2020; v1 submitted 13 February, 2019; originally announced February 2019.

Journal ref: Quantum 4, 266 (2020)

Trading locality for time: certifiable randomness from low-depth circuits

Authors: Matthew Coudron, Jalex Stark, Thomas Vidick

Abstract: The generation of certifiable randomness is the most fundamental information-theoretic task that meaningfully separates quantum devices from their classical counterparts. We propose a protocol for exponential certified randomness expansion using a single quantum device. The protocol calls for the device to implement a simple quantum circuit of constant depth on a 2D lattice of qubits. The output o… ▽ More The generation of certifiable randomness is the most fundamental information-theoretic task that meaningfully separates quantum devices from their classical counterparts. We propose a protocol for exponential certified randomness expansion using a single quantum device. The protocol calls for the device to implement a simple quantum circuit of constant depth on a 2D lattice of qubits. The output of the circuit can be verified classically in linear time, and is guaranteed to contain a polynomial number of certified random bits assuming that the device used to generate the output operated using a (classical or quantum) circuit of sub-logarithmic depth. This assumption contrasts with the locality assumption used for randomness certification based on Bell inequality violation or computational assumptions. To demonstrate randomness generation it is sufficient for a device to sample from the ideal output distribution within constant statistical distance. Our procedure is inspired by recent work of Bravyi et al. (Science 2018), who introduced a relational problem that can be solved by a constant-depth quantum circuit, but provably cannot be solved by any classical circuit of sub-logarithmic depth. We develop the discovery of Bravyi et al. into a framework for robust randomness expansion. Our proposal does not rest on any complexity-theoretic conjectures, but relies on the physical assumption that the adversarial device being tested implements a circuit of sub-logarithmic depth. Success on our task can be easily verified in classical linear time. Finally, our task is more noise-tolerant than most other existing proposals that can only tolerate multiplicative error, or require additional conjectures from complexity theory; in contrast, we are able to allow a small constant additive error in total variation distance between the sampled and ideal distributions. △ Less

Submitted 11 January, 2019; v1 submitted 9 October, 2018; originally announced October 2018.

Comments: 36 pages, 2 figures

Quantum proof systems for iterated exponential time, and beyond

Authors: Joseph Fitzsimons, Zhengfeng Ji, Thomas Vidick, Henry Yuen

Abstract: We show that any language in nondeterministic time $\exp(\exp(\cdots \exp(n)))$, where the number of iterated exponentials is an arbitrary function $R(n)$, can be decided by a multiprover interactive proof system with a classical polynomial-time verifier and a constant number of quantum entangled provers, with completeness $1$ and soundness $1 - \exp(-C\exp(\cdots\exp(n)))$, where the number of it… ▽ More We show that any language in nondeterministic time $\exp(\exp(\cdots \exp(n)))$, where the number of iterated exponentials is an arbitrary function $R(n)$, can be decided by a multiprover interactive proof system with a classical polynomial-time verifier and a constant number of quantum entangled provers, with completeness $1$ and soundness $1 - \exp(-C\exp(\cdots\exp(n)))$, where the number of iterated exponentials is $R(n)-1$ and $C>0$ is a universal constant. The result was previously known for $R=1$ and $R=2$; we obtain it for any time-constructible function $R$. The result is based on a compression technique for interactive proof systems with entangled provers that significantly simplifies and strengthens a protocol compression result of Ji (STOC'17). As a separate consequence of this technique we obtain a different proof of Slofstra's recent result (unpublished) on the uncomputability of the entangled value of multiprover games. Finally, we show that even minor improvements to our compression result would yield remarkable consequences in computational complexity theory and the foundations of quantum mechanics: first, it would imply that the class MIP* contains all computable languages; second, it would provide a negative resolution to a multipartite version of Tsirelson's problem on the relation between the commuting operator and tensor product models for quantum correlations. △ Less

Submitted 30 May, 2018; originally announced May 2018.

Comments: 57 pages, comments welcome

A Cryptographic Test of Quantumness and Certifiable Randomness from a Single Quantum Device

Authors: Zvika Brakerski, Paul Christiano, Urmila Mahadev, Umesh Vazirani, Thomas Vidick

Abstract: We consider a new model for the testing of untrusted quantum devices, consisting of a single polynomial-time bounded quantum device interacting with a classical polynomial-time verifier. In this model we propose solutions to two tasks - a protocol for efficient classical verification that the untrusted device is "truly quantum," and a protocol for producing certifiable randomness from a single unt… ▽ More We consider a new model for the testing of untrusted quantum devices, consisting of a single polynomial-time bounded quantum device interacting with a classical polynomial-time verifier. In this model we propose solutions to two tasks - a protocol for efficient classical verification that the untrusted device is "truly quantum," and a protocol for producing certifiable randomness from a single untrusted quantum device. Our solution relies on the existence of a new cryptographic primitive for constraining the power of an untrusted quantum device: post-quantum secure trapdoor claw-free functions which must satisfy an adaptive hardcore bit property. We show how to construct this primitive based on the hardness of the learning with errors (LWE) problem. △ Less

Submitted 4 May, 2021; v1 submitted 2 April, 2018; originally announced April 2018.

Comments: 45 pages

A three-player coherent state embezzlement game

Authors: Zhengfeng Ji, Debbie Leung, Thomas Vidick

Abstract: We introduce a three-player nonlocal game, with a finite number of classical questions and answers, such that the optimal success probability of $1$ in the game can only be achieved in the limit of strategies using arbitrarily high-dimensional entangled states. Precisely, there exists a constant $0 <c\leq 1$ such that to succeed with probability $1-\varepsilon$ in the game it is necessary to use a… ▽ More We introduce a three-player nonlocal game, with a finite number of classical questions and answers, such that the optimal success probability of $1$ in the game can only be achieved in the limit of strategies using arbitrarily high-dimensional entangled states. Precisely, there exists a constant $0 <c\leq 1$ such that to succeed with probability $1-\varepsilon$ in the game it is necessary to use an entangled state of at least $Ω(\varepsilon^{-c})$ qubits, and it is sufficient to use a state of at most $O(\varepsilon^{-1})$ qubits. The game is based on the coherent state exchange game of Leung et al. (CJTCS 2013). In our game, the task of the quantum verifier is delegated to a third player by a classical referee. Our results complement those of Slofstra (arXiv:1703.08618) and Dykema et al. (arXiv:1709.05032), who obtained two-player games with similar (though quantitatively weaker) properties based on the representation theory of finitely presented groups and $C^*$-algebras respectively. △ Less

Submitted 22 October, 2020; v1 submitted 13 February, 2018; originally announced February 2018.

Comments: Version published in Quantum

Journal ref: Quantum 4, 349 (2020)

Low-degree testing for quantum states, and a quantum entangled games PCP for QMA

Authors: Anand Natarajan, Thomas Vidick

Abstract: We show that given an explicit description of a multiplayer game, with a classical verifier and a constant number of players, it is QMA-hard, under randomized reductions, to distinguish between the cases when the players have a strategy using entanglement that succeeds with probability 1 in the game, or when no such strategy succeeds with probability larger than 1/2. This proves the "games quantum… ▽ More We show that given an explicit description of a multiplayer game, with a classical verifier and a constant number of players, it is QMA-hard, under randomized reductions, to distinguish between the cases when the players have a strategy using entanglement that succeeds with probability 1 in the game, or when no such strategy succeeds with probability larger than 1/2. This proves the "games quantum PCP conjecture" of Fitzsimons and the second author (ITCS'15), albeit under randomized reductions. The core component in our reduction is a construction of a family of two-player games for testing $n$-qubit maximally entangled states. For any integer $n\geq2$, we give a test in which questions from the verifier are $O(\log n)$ bits long, and answers are $\mathrm{poly}(\log\log n)$ bits long. We show that for any constant $\varepsilon\geq0$, any strategy that succeeds with probability at least $1-\varepsilon$ in the test must use a state that is within distance $O(\varepsilon^c)$ from a state that is locally equivalent to a maximally entangled state on $n$ qubits, for some universal constant $c>0$. The construction is based on the classical plane-vs-point test for multivariate low-degree polynomials of Raz and Safra (STOC'97). We extend the classical test to the quantum regime by executing independent copies of the test in the generalized Pauli $X$ and $Z$ bases over $\mathbb{F}_q$, where $q$ is a sufficiently large prime power, and combine the two through a test for the Pauli twisted commutation relations. Our main complexity-theoretic result is obtained by combining this family of games with constructions of PCPs of proximity introduced by Ben-Sasson et al. (CCC'05), and crucially relies on a linear property of such PCPs. Another consequence of our results is a deterministic reduction from the games quantum PCP conjecture to a suitable formulation of the Hamiltonian quantum PCP conjecture. △ Less

Submitted 9 April, 2018; v1 submitted 11 January, 2018; originally announced January 2018.

Comments: 59 pages. Game sized reduced from quasipolynomial to polynomial, yielding improved complexity-theoretic results

Report number: MIT-CTP/4977

Journal ref: Proc. FOCS 2018, pp. 731-742

Entanglement in non-local games and the hyperlinear profile of groups

Authors: William Slofstra, Thomas Vidick

Abstract: We relate the amount of entanglement required to play linear-system non-local games near-optimally to the hyperlinear profile of finitely-presented groups. By calculating the hyperlinear profile of a certain group, we give an example of a finite non-local game for which the amount of entanglement required to play $\varepsilon$-optimally is at least $Ω(1/\varepsilon^k)$, for some $k>0$. Since this… ▽ More We relate the amount of entanglement required to play linear-system non-local games near-optimally to the hyperlinear profile of finitely-presented groups. By calculating the hyperlinear profile of a certain group, we give an example of a finite non-local game for which the amount of entanglement required to play $\varepsilon$-optimally is at least $Ω(1/\varepsilon^k)$, for some $k>0$. Since this function approaches infinity as $\varepsilon$ approaches zero, this provides a quantitative version of a theorem of the first author. △ Less

Submitted 11 June, 2018; v1 submitted 28 November, 2017; originally announced November 2017.

Comments: 27 pages. v2: improved results based on a suggestion by N. Ozawa

Two-player entangled games are NP-hard

Authors: Anand Natarajan, Thomas Vidick

Abstract: We show that the maximum success probability of players sharing quantum entanglement in a two-player game with classical questions of logarithmic length and classical answers of constant length is NP-hard to approximate to within constant factors. As a corollary, the inclusion $\mathrm{NEXP}\subseteq\mathrm{MIP}^*$, first shown in [IV12] with three provers, holds with two provers only. The proof i… ▽ More We show that the maximum success probability of players sharing quantum entanglement in a two-player game with classical questions of logarithmic length and classical answers of constant length is NP-hard to approximate to within constant factors. As a corollary, the inclusion $\mathrm{NEXP}\subseteq\mathrm{MIP}^*$, first shown in [IV12] with three provers, holds with two provers only. The proof is based on a simpler, improved analysis of the low-degree test Raz and Safra (STOC'97) against two entangled provers. △ Less

Submitted 23 November, 2020; v1 submitted 9 October, 2017; originally announced October 2017.

Comments: The paper has been withdrawn due to an error in the proof of the main theorem, inherited from arXiv:1302.1242. For more details see http://users.cms.caltech.edu/~vidick/errata.pdf and arXiv:2009.12982

Journal ref: Proc. CCC 2018, pp. 20:1-20:18

A Quantum-Proof Non-Malleable Extractor, With Application to Privacy Amplification against Active Quantum Adversaries

Authors: Divesh Aggarwal, Kai-Min Chung, Han-Hsuan Lin, Thomas Vidick

Abstract: In privacy amplification, two mutually trusted parties aim to amplify the secrecy of an initial shared secret $X$ in order to establish a shared private key $K$ by exchanging messages over an insecure communication channel. If the channel is authenticated the task can be solved in a single round of communication using a strong randomness extractor; choosing a quantum-proof extractor allows one to… ▽ More In privacy amplification, two mutually trusted parties aim to amplify the secrecy of an initial shared secret $X$ in order to establish a shared private key $K$ by exchanging messages over an insecure communication channel. If the channel is authenticated the task can be solved in a single round of communication using a strong randomness extractor; choosing a quantum-proof extractor allows one to establish security against quantum adversaries. In the case that the channel is not authenticated, Dodis and Wichs (STOC'09) showed that the problem can be solved in two rounds of communication using a non-malleable extractor, a stronger pseudo-random construction than a strong extractor. We give the first construction of a non-malleable extractor that is secure against quantum adversaries. The extractor is based on a construction by Li (FOCS'12), and is able to extract from source of min-entropy rates larger than $1/2$. Combining this construction with a quantum-proof variant of the reduction of Dodis and Wichs, shown by Cohen and Vidick (unpublished), we obtain the first privacy amplification protocol secure against active quantum adversaries. △ Less

Submitted 14 February, 2018; v1 submitted 2 October, 2017; originally announced October 2017.

Verifier-on-a-Leash: new schemes for verifiable delegated quantum computation, with quasilinear resources

Authors: Andrea Coladangelo, Alex Grilo, Stacey Jeffery, Thomas Vidick

Abstract: The problem of reliably certifying the outcome of a computation performed by a quantum device is rapidly gaining relevance. We present two protocols for a classical verifier to verifiably delegate a quantum computation to two non-communicating but entangled quantum provers. Our protocols have near-optimal complexity in terms of the total resources employed by the verifier and the honest provers, w… ▽ More The problem of reliably certifying the outcome of a computation performed by a quantum device is rapidly gaining relevance. We present two protocols for a classical verifier to verifiably delegate a quantum computation to two non-communicating but entangled quantum provers. Our protocols have near-optimal complexity in terms of the total resources employed by the verifier and the honest provers, with the total number of operations of each party, including the number of entangled pairs of qubits required of the honest provers, scaling as $O(g\log g)$ for delegating a circuit of size $g$. This is in contrast to previous protocols, which all require a prohibitively large polynomial overhead. Our first protocol requires a number of rounds that is linear in the depth of the circuit being delegated, and is blind, meaning neither prover can learn the circuit being delegated. The second protocol is not blind, but requires only a constant number of rounds of interaction. Our main technical innovation is an efficient rigidity theorem which allows a verifier to test that two entangled provers perform measurements specified by an arbitrary $m$-qubit tensor product of single-qubit Clifford observables on their respective halves of $m$ shared EPR pairs, with a robustness that is independent of $m$. Our two-prover classical-verifier delegation protocols are obtained by combining this rigidity theorem with a single-prover quantum-verifier protocol for the verifiable delegation of a quantum computation, introduced by Broadbent (Theory of Computing, 2018). △ Less

Submitted 9 January, 2020; v1 submitted 24 August, 2017; originally announced August 2017.

Comments: 66 pages, 26 figures

Parallel DIQKD from parallel repetition

Authors: Thomas Vidick

Abstract: We give an arguably simpler and more direct proof of a recent result by Miller, Jain and Shi, who proved device-independent security of a protocol for quantum key distribution in which the devices can be used in parallel. Our proof combines existing results on immunization (Kempe et al., SICOMP 2011) and parallel repetition (Bavarian et al., STOC 2017) of entangled games. We give an arguably simpler and more direct proof of a recent result by Miller, Jain and Shi, who proved device-independent security of a protocol for quantum key distribution in which the devices can be used in parallel. Our proof combines existing results on immunization (Kempe et al., SICOMP 2011) and parallel repetition (Bavarian et al., STOC 2017) of entangled games. △ Less

Submitted 24 March, 2017; originally announced March 2017.

Comments: 4 pages

Implementation of rigorous renormalization group method for ground space and low-energy states of local Hamiltonians

Authors: Brenden Roberts, Thomas Vidick, Olexei I. Motrunich

Abstract: The practical success of polynomial-time tensor network methods for computing ground states of certain quantum local Hamiltonians has recently been given a sound theoretical basis by Arad, Landau, Vazirani, and Vidick. The convergence proof, however, relies on "rigorous renormalization group" (RRG) techniques which differ fundamentally from existing algorithms. We introduce an efficient implementa… ▽ More The practical success of polynomial-time tensor network methods for computing ground states of certain quantum local Hamiltonians has recently been given a sound theoretical basis by Arad, Landau, Vazirani, and Vidick. The convergence proof, however, relies on "rigorous renormalization group" (RRG) techniques which differ fundamentally from existing algorithms. We introduce an efficient implementation of the theoretical RRG procedure which finds MPS ansatz approximations to the ground spaces and low-lying excited spectra of local Hamiltonians in situations of practical interest. In contrast to other schemes, RRG does not utilize variational methods on tensor networks. Rather, it operates on subsets of the system Hilbert space by constructing approximations to the global ground space in a tree-like manner. We evaluate the algorithm numerically, finding similar performance to DMRG in the case of a gapped nondegenerate Hamiltonian. Even in challenging situations of criticality, or large ground-state degeneracy, or long-range entanglement, RRG remains able to identify candidate states having large overlap with ground and low-energy eigenstates, outperforming DMRG in some cases. △ Less

Submitted 13 February, 2018; v1 submitted 6 March, 2017; originally announced March 2017.

Comments: 13 pages, 10 figures

Journal ref: Phys. Rev. B 96, 214203 (2017)

Overlap** qubits

Authors: Rui Chao, Ben W. Reichardt, Chris Sutherland, Thomas Vidick

Abstract: An ideal system of $n$ qubits has $2^n$ dimensions. This exponential grants power, but also hinders characterizing the system's state and dynamics. We study a new problem: the qubits in a physical system might not be independent. They can "overlap," in the sense that an operation on one qubit slightly affects the others. We show that allowing for slight overlaps, $n$ qubits can fit in just polyn… ▽ More An ideal system of $n$ qubits has $2^n$ dimensions. This exponential grants power, but also hinders characterizing the system's state and dynamics. We study a new problem: the qubits in a physical system might not be independent. They can "overlap," in the sense that an operation on one qubit slightly affects the others. We show that allowing for slight overlaps, $n$ qubits can fit in just polynomially many dimensions. (Defined in a natural way, all pairwise overlaps can be $\leq ε$ in $n^{O(1/ε^2)}$ dimensions.) Thus, even before considering issues like noise, a real system of $n$ qubits might inherently lack any potential for exponential power. On the other hand, we also provide an efficient test to certify exponential dimensionality. Unfortunately, the test is sensitive to noise. It is important to devise more robust tests on the arrangements of qubits in quantum devices. △ Less

Submitted 4 January, 2017; originally announced January 2017.

Comments: 22 pages, 3 figures

QCMA hardness of ground space connectivity for commuting Hamiltonians

Authors: David Gosset, Jenish C. Mehta, Thomas Vidick

Abstract: In this work we consider the ground space connectivity problem for commuting local Hamiltonians. The ground space connectivity problem asks whether it is possible to go from one (efficiently preparable) state to another by applying a polynomial length sequence of 2-qubit unitaries while remaining at all times in a state with low energy for a given Hamiltonian $H$. It was shown in [Gharibian and Si… ▽ More In this work we consider the ground space connectivity problem for commuting local Hamiltonians. The ground space connectivity problem asks whether it is possible to go from one (efficiently preparable) state to another by applying a polynomial length sequence of 2-qubit unitaries while remaining at all times in a state with low energy for a given Hamiltonian $H$. It was shown in [Gharibian and Sikora, ICALP'15] that this problem is QCMA-complete for general local Hamiltonians, where QCMA is defined as QMA with a classical witness and BQP verifier. Here we show that the commuting version of the problem is also QCMA-complete. This provides one of the first examples where commuting local Hamiltonians exhibit complexity theoretic hardness equivalent to general local Hamiltonians. △ Less

Submitted 12 July, 2017; v1 submitted 11 October, 2016; originally announced October 2016.

Comments: 14 pages, Quantum journal version

Journal ref: Quantum 1, 16 (2017)

Robust self-testing of many-qubit states

Authors: Anand Natarajan, Thomas Vidick

Abstract: We introduce a simple two-player test which certifies that the players apply tensor products of Pauli $σ_X$ and $σ_Z$ observables on the tensor product of $n$ EPR pairs. The test has constant robustness: any strategy achieving success probability within an additive $\varepsilon$ of the optimal must be $\mathrm{poly}(\varepsilon)$-close, in the appropriate distance measure, to the honest $n$-qubit… ▽ More We introduce a simple two-player test which certifies that the players apply tensor products of Pauli $σ_X$ and $σ_Z$ observables on the tensor product of $n$ EPR pairs. The test has constant robustness: any strategy achieving success probability within an additive $\varepsilon$ of the optimal must be $\mathrm{poly}(\varepsilon)$-close, in the appropriate distance measure, to the honest $n$-qubit strategy. The test involves $2n$-bit questions and $2$-bit answers. The key technical ingredient is a quantum version of the classical linearity test of Blum, Luby, and Rubinfeld. As applications of our result we give (i) the first robust self-test for $n$ EPR pairs; (ii) a quantum multiprover interactive proof system for the local Hamiltonian problem with a constant number of provers and classical questions and answers, and a constant completeness-soundness gap independent of system size; (iii) a robust protocol for delegated quantum computation. △ Less

Submitted 11 October, 2016; originally announced October 2016.

Comments: 36 pages. Improves upon and supersedes our earlier submission arXiv:1512.02090

Report number: MIT-CTP/4846

Journal ref: Proc. of STOC '17, pp. 1003-1015 (2017)

Quantum Proofs

Authors: Thomas Vidick, John Watrous

Abstract: Quantum information and computation provide a fascinating twist on the notion of proofs in computational complexity theory. For instance, one may consider a quantum computational analogue of the complexity class \class{NP}, known as QMA, in which a quantum state plays the role of a proof (also called a certificate or witness), and is checked by a polynomial-time quantum computation. For some probl… ▽ More Quantum information and computation provide a fascinating twist on the notion of proofs in computational complexity theory. For instance, one may consider a quantum computational analogue of the complexity class \class{NP}, known as QMA, in which a quantum state plays the role of a proof (also called a certificate or witness), and is checked by a polynomial-time quantum computation. For some problems, the fact that a quantum proof state could be a superposition over exponentially many classical states appears to offer computational advantages over classical proof strings. In the interactive proof system setting, one may consider a verifier and one or more provers that exchange and process quantum information rather than classical information during an interaction for a given input string, giving rise to quantum complexity classes such as QIP, QSZK, and QMIP* that represent natural quantum analogues of IP, SZK, and MIP. While quantum interactive proof systems inherit some properties from their classical counterparts, they also possess distinct and uniquely quantum features that lead to an interesting landscape of complexity classes based on variants of this model. In this survey we provide an overview of many of the known results concerning quantum proofs, computational models based on this concept, and properties of the complexity classes they define. In particular, we discuss non-interactive proofs and the complexity class QMA, single-prover quantum interactive proof systems and the complexity class QIP, statistical zero-knowledge quantum interactive proof systems and the complexity class \class{QSZK}, and multiprover interactive proof systems and the complexity classes QMIP, QMIP*, and MIP*. △ Less

Submitted 5 October, 2016; originally announced October 2016.

Comments: Survey published by NOW publishers

Journal ref: Foundations and Trends in Theoretical Computer Science, Vol. 11, No. 1-2 (2015) 1-215

Test for a large amount of entanglement, using few measurements

Authors: Rui Chao, Ben W. Reichardt, Chris Sutherland, Thomas Vidick

Abstract: Bell-inequality violations establish that two systems share some quantum entanglement. We give a simple test to certify that two systems share an asymptotically large amount of entanglement, n EPR states. The test is efficient: unlike earlier tests that play many games, in sequence or in parallel, our test requires only one or two CHSH games. One system is directed to play a CHSH game on a random… ▽ More Bell-inequality violations establish that two systems share some quantum entanglement. We give a simple test to certify that two systems share an asymptotically large amount of entanglement, n EPR states. The test is efficient: unlike earlier tests that play many games, in sequence or in parallel, our test requires only one or two CHSH games. One system is directed to play a CHSH game on a random specified qubit i, and the other is told to play games on qubits {i,j}, without knowing which index is i. The test is robust: a success probability within delta of optimal guarantees distance O(n^{5/2} sqrt{delta}) from n EPR states. However, the test does not tolerate constant delta; it breaks down for delta = Omega~(1/sqrt{n}). We give an adversarial strategy that succeeds within delta of the optimum probability using only O~(delta^{-2}) EPR states. △ Less

Submitted 29 August, 2018; v1 submitted 3 October, 2016; originally announced October 2016.

Comments: 17 pages, 2 figures. Journal version

Journal ref: Quantum 2, 92 (2018)

Entanglement of approximate quantum strategies in XOR games

Authors: Dimiter Ostrev, Thomas Vidick

Abstract: We show that for any $\varepsilon>0$ there is an XOR game $G=G(\varepsilon)$ with $Θ(\varepsilon^{-1/5})$ inputs for one player and $Θ(\varepsilon^{-2/5})$ inputs for the other player such that $Ω(\varepsilon^{-1/5})$ ebits are required for any strategy achieving bias that is at least a multiplicative factor $(1-\varepsilon)$ from optimal. This gives an exponential improvement in both the number o… ▽ More We show that for any $\varepsilon>0$ there is an XOR game $G=G(\varepsilon)$ with $Θ(\varepsilon^{-1/5})$ inputs for one player and $Θ(\varepsilon^{-2/5})$ inputs for the other player such that $Ω(\varepsilon^{-1/5})$ ebits are required for any strategy achieving bias that is at least a multiplicative factor $(1-\varepsilon)$ from optimal. This gives an exponential improvement in both the number of inputs or outputs and the noise tolerance of any previously-known self-test for highly entangled states. Up to the exponent $-1/5$ the scaling of our bound with $\varepsilon$ is tight: for any XOR game there is an $\varepsilon$-optimal strategy using $\lceil \varepsilon^{-1} \rceil$ ebits, irrespective of the number of questions in the game. △ Less

Submitted 6 September, 2016; originally announced September 2016.

Privacy Amplification Against Active Quantum Adversaries

Authors: Gil Cohen, Thomas Vidick

Abstract: Privacy amplification is the task by which two cooperating parties transform a shared weak secret, about which an eavesdropper may have side information, into a uniformly random string uncorrelated from the eavesdropper. Privacy amplification against passive adversaries, where it is assumed that the communication is over a public but authenticated channel, can be achieved in the presence of classi… ▽ More Privacy amplification is the task by which two cooperating parties transform a shared weak secret, about which an eavesdropper may have side information, into a uniformly random string uncorrelated from the eavesdropper. Privacy amplification against passive adversaries, where it is assumed that the communication is over a public but authenticated channel, can be achieved in the presence of classical as well as quantum side information by a single-message protocol based on strong extractors. In 2009 Dodis and Wichs devised a two-message protocol to achieve privacy amplification against active adversaries, where the public communication channel is no longer assumed to be authenticated, through the use of a strengthening of strong extractors called non-malleable extractors which they introduced. Dodis and Wichs only analyzed the case of classical side information. We consider the task of privacy amplification against active adversaries with quantum side information. Our main result is showing that the Dodis-Wichs protocol remains secure in this scenario provided its main building block, the non-malleable extractor, satisfies a notion of quantum-proof non-malleability which we introduce. We show that an adaptation of a recent construction of non-malleable extractors due to Chattopadhyay et al. is quantum proof, thereby providing the first protocol for privacy amplification that is secure against active quantum adversaries. Our protocol is quantitatively comparable to the near-optimal protocols known in the classical setting. △ Less

Submitted 3 September, 2017; v1 submitted 22 August, 2016; originally announced August 2016.

Comments: The result is invalidated due to a mistake, pointed out by an anonymous referee, in the use of the Markov condition at the beginning of the proof of Theorem 31

A simple proof of Renner's exponential de Finetti theorem

Authors: Thomas Vidick, Henry Yuen

Abstract: We give a simple proof of the exponential de Finetti theorem due to Renner. Like Renner's proof, ours combines the post-selection de Finetti theorem, the Gentle Measurement lemma, and the Chernoff bound, but avoids virtually all calculations, including any use of the theory of types. We give a simple proof of the exponential de Finetti theorem due to Renner. Like Renner's proof, ours combines the post-selection de Finetti theorem, the Gentle Measurement lemma, and the Chernoff bound, but avoids virtually all calculations, including any use of the theory of types. △ Less

Submitted 19 August, 2016; v1 submitted 16 August, 2016; originally announced August 2016.

Comments: 4 pages

Simple and tight device-independent security proofs

Authors: Rotem Arnon-Friedman, Renato Renner, Thomas Vidick

Abstract: Device-independent security is the gold standard for quantum cryptography: not only is security based entirely on the laws of quantum mechanics, but it holds irrespective of any a priori assumptions on the quantum devices used in a protocol, making it particularly applicable in a quantum-wary environment. While the existence of device-independent protocols for tasks such as randomness expansion an… ▽ More Device-independent security is the gold standard for quantum cryptography: not only is security based entirely on the laws of quantum mechanics, but it holds irrespective of any a priori assumptions on the quantum devices used in a protocol, making it particularly applicable in a quantum-wary environment. While the existence of device-independent protocols for tasks such as randomness expansion and quantum key distribution has recently been established, the underlying proofs of security remain very challenging, yield rather poor key rates, and demand very high-quality quantum devices, thus making them all but impossible to implement in practice. We introduce a technique for the analysis of device-independent cryptographic protocols. We provide a flexible protocol and give a security proof that provides quantitative bounds that are asymptotically tight, even in the presence of general quantum adversaries. At a high level our approach amounts to establishing a reduction to the scenario in which the untrusted device operates in an identical and independent way in each round of the protocol. This is achieved by leveraging the sequential nature of the protocol, and makes use of a newly developed tool, the "entropy accumulation theorem" of Dupuis et al. As concrete applications we give simple and modular security proofs for device-independent quantum key distribution and randomness expansion protocols based on the CHSH inequality. For both tasks we establish essentially optimal asymptotic key rates and noise tolerance. In view of recent experimental progress, which has culminated in loophole-free Bell tests, it is likely that these protocols can be practically implemented in the near future. △ Less

Submitted 26 March, 2019; v1 submitted 6 July, 2016; originally announced July 2016.

Comments: Published version

Journal ref: SIAM Journal on Computing 48.1 (2019): 181-225

Quantum-Proof Extractors: Optimal up to Constant Factors

Authors: Kai-Min Chung, Gil Cohen, Thomas Vidick, Xiaodi Wu

Abstract: We give the first construction of a family of quantum-proof extractors that has optimal seed length dependence $O(\log(n/\varepsilon))$ on the input length $n$ and error $\varepsilon$. Our extractors support any min-entropy $k=Ω(\log{n} + \log^{1+α}(1/\varepsilon))$ and extract $m=(1-α)k$ bits that are $\varepsilon$-close to uniform, for any desired constant $α> 0$. Previous constructions had a qu… ▽ More We give the first construction of a family of quantum-proof extractors that has optimal seed length dependence $O(\log(n/\varepsilon))$ on the input length $n$ and error $\varepsilon$. Our extractors support any min-entropy $k=Ω(\log{n} + \log^{1+α}(1/\varepsilon))$ and extract $m=(1-α)k$ bits that are $\varepsilon$-close to uniform, for any desired constant $α> 0$. Previous constructions had a quadratically worse seed length or were restricted to very large input min-entropy or very few output bits. Our result is based on a generic reduction showing that any strong classical condenser is automatically quantum-proof, with comparable parameters. The existence of such a reduction for extractors is a long-standing open question, here we give an affirmative answer for condensers. Once this reduction is established, to obtain our quantum-proof extractors one only needs to consider high entropy sources. We construct quantum-proof extractors with the desired parameters for such sources by extending a classical approach to extractor construction, based on the use of block-sources and sampling, to the quantum setting. Our extractors can be used to obtain improved protocols for device-independent randomness expansion and for privacy amplification. △ Less

Submitted 31 July, 2016; v1 submitted 13 May, 2016; originally announced May 2016.

Comments: The paper has been withdrawn due to an error in the proof of Lemma 3.4 (step going from second-last to last centered equations), which invalidates the main result

Parallel repetition via fortification: analytic view and the quantum case

Authors: Mohammad Bavarian, Thomas Vidick, Henry Yuen

Abstract: In a recent work, Moshkovitz [FOCS '14] presented a transformation on two-player games called "fortification", and gave an elementary proof of an (exponential decay) parallel repetition theorem for fortified two-player projection games. In this paper, we give an analytic reformulation of Moshkovitz's fortification framework, which was originally cast in combinatorial terms. This reformulation allo… ▽ More In a recent work, Moshkovitz [FOCS '14] presented a transformation on two-player games called "fortification", and gave an elementary proof of an (exponential decay) parallel repetition theorem for fortified two-player projection games. In this paper, we give an analytic reformulation of Moshkovitz's fortification framework, which was originally cast in combinatorial terms. This reformulation allows us to expand the scope of the fortification method to new settings. First, we show any game (not just projection games) can be fortified, and give a simple proof of parallel repetition for general fortified games. Then, we prove parallel repetition and fortification theorems for games with players sharing quantum entanglement, as well as games with more than two players. This gives a new gap amplification method for general games in the quantum and multiplayer settings, which has recently received much interest. An important component of our work is a variant of the fortification transformation, called "ordered fortification", that preserves the entangled value of a game. The original fortification of Moshkovitz does not in general preserve the entangled value of a game, and this was a barrier to extending the fortification framework to the quantum setting. △ Less

Submitted 16 March, 2016; originally announced March 2016.

Comments: 35 pages

Rigorous RG algorithms and area laws for low energy eigenstates in 1D

Authors: Itai Arad, Zeph Landau, Umesh Vazirani, Thomas Vidick

Abstract: One of the central challenges in the study of quantum many-body systems is the complexity of simulating them on a classical computer. A recent advance of Landau et al. gave a polynomial time algorithm to actually compute a succinct classical description for unique ground states of gapped 1D quantum systems. Despite this progress many questions remained unresolved, including whether there exist rig… ▽ More One of the central challenges in the study of quantum many-body systems is the complexity of simulating them on a classical computer. A recent advance of Landau et al. gave a polynomial time algorithm to actually compute a succinct classical description for unique ground states of gapped 1D quantum systems. Despite this progress many questions remained unresolved, including whether there exist rigorous efficient algorithms when the ground space is degenerate (and poly($n$) dimensional), or for the poly($n$) lowest energy states for 1D systems, or even whether such states admit succinct classical descriptions or area laws. In this paper we give a new algorithm for finding low energy states for 1D systems, based on a rigorously justified RG type transformation. In the process we resolve some of the aforementioned open questions, including giving a polynomial time algorithm for poly($n$) degenerate ground spaces and an $n^{O(\log n)}$ algorithm for the poly($n$) lowest energy states for 1D systems (under a mild density condition). We note that for these classes of systems the existence of a succinct classical description and area laws were not rigorously proved before this work. The algorithms are natural and efficient, and for the case of finding unique ground states for frustration-free Hamiltonians the running time is $\tilde{O}(nM(n))$, where $M(n)$ is the time required to multiply two $n\times n$ matrices. △ Less

Submitted 20 June, 2017; v1 submitted 29 February, 2016; originally announced February 2016.

Comments: Multiple improvements in presentation; results unchanged. To appear in Comm. Math. Phys

A simple proof of the detectability lemma and spectral gap amplification

Authors: Anurag Anshu, Itai Arad, Thomas Vidick

Abstract: The detectability lemma is a useful tool for probing the structure of gapped ground states of frustration-free Hamiltonians of lattice spin models. The lemma provides an estimate on the error incurred by approximating the ground space projector with a product of local projectors. We provide a new, simpler proof for the detectability lemma, which applies to an arbitrary ordering of the local projec… ▽ More The detectability lemma is a useful tool for probing the structure of gapped ground states of frustration-free Hamiltonians of lattice spin models. The lemma provides an estimate on the error incurred by approximating the ground space projector with a product of local projectors. We provide a new, simpler proof for the detectability lemma, which applies to an arbitrary ordering of the local projectors, and show that it is tight up to a constant factor. As an application we show how the lemma can be combined with a strong converse by Gao to obtain local spectral gap amplification: we show that by coarse-graining a local frustration-free Hamiltonian with a spectral gap $γ>0$ to a length scale $O(γ^{-1/2})$, one gets an Hamiltonian with an $Ω(1)$ spectral gap. △ Less

Submitted 23 May, 2016; v1 submitted 3 February, 2016; originally announced February 2016.

Comments: 9 pages, plain LaTex, 3 figures. Replaced the converse of the DL by a recent result by J. Gao, and added a new tightness result

Journal ref: Phys. Rev. B 93, 205142 (2016)

Constant-Soundness Interactive Proofs for Local Hamiltonians

Authors: Anand Natarajan, Thomas Vidick

Abstract: $ \newcommand{\Xlin}{\mathcal{X}} \newcommand{\Zlin}{\mathcal{Z}} \newcommand{\C}{\mathbb{C}}… ▽ More $ \newcommand{\Xlin}{\mathcal{X}} \newcommand{\Zlin}{\mathcal{Z}} \newcommand{\C}{\mathbb{C}} $We give a quantum multiprover interactive proof system for the local Hamiltonian problem in which there is a constant number of provers, questions are classical of length polynomial in the number of qubits, and answers are of constant length. The main novelty of our protocol is that the gap between completeness and soundness is directly proportional to the promise gap on the (normalized) ground state energy of the Hamiltonian. This result can be interpreted as a concrete step towards a quantum PCP theorem giving entangled-prover interactive proof systems for QMA-complete problems. The key ingredient is a quantum version of the classical linearity test of Blum, Luby, and Rubinfeld, where the function $f:\{0,1\}^n\to\{0,1\}$ is replaced by a pair of functions $\Xlin, \Zlin:\{0,1\}^n\to \text{Obs}_d(\C)$, the set of $d$-dimensional Hermitian matrices that square to identity. The test enforces that (i) each function is exactly linear, $\Xlin(a)\Xlin(b)=\Xlin(a+b)$ and $\Zlin(a) \Zlin(b)=\Zlin(a+b)$, and (ii) the two functions are approximately complementary, $\Xlin(a)\Zlin(b)\approx (-1)^{a\cdot b} \Zlin(b)\Xlin(a)$. △ Less

Submitted 7 December, 2015; originally announced December 2015.

Comments: 33 pages

Survey on Nonlocal Games and Operator Space Theory

Authors: Carlos Palazuelos, Thomas Vidick

Abstract: This review article is concerned with a recently uncovered connection between operator spaces, a noncommutative extension of Banach spaces, and quantum nonlocality, a striking phenomenon which underlies many of the applications of quantum mechanics to information theory, cryptography and algorithms. Using the framework of nonlocal games, we relate measures of the nonlocality of quantum mechanics t… ▽ More This review article is concerned with a recently uncovered connection between operator spaces, a noncommutative extension of Banach spaces, and quantum nonlocality, a striking phenomenon which underlies many of the applications of quantum mechanics to information theory, cryptography and algorithms. Using the framework of nonlocal games, we relate measures of the nonlocality of quantum mechanics to certain norms in the Banach and operator space categories. We survey recent results that exploit this connection to derive large violations of Bell inequalities, study the complexity of the classical and quantum values of games and their relation to Grothendieck inequalities, and quantify the nonlocality of different classes of entangled states. △ Less

Submitted 1 December, 2015; originally announced December 2015.

Comments: 48 pages, comments welcome

Interactive proofs with approximately commuting provers

Authors: Matthew Coudron, Thomas Vidick

Abstract: The class $\MIP^*$ of promise problems that can be decided through an interactive proof system with multiple entangled provers provides a complexity-theoretic framework for the exploration of the nonlocal properties of entanglement. Little is known about the power of this class. The only proposed approach for establishing upper bounds is based on a hierarchy of semidefinite programs introduced ind… ▽ More The class $\MIP^*$ of promise problems that can be decided through an interactive proof system with multiple entangled provers provides a complexity-theoretic framework for the exploration of the nonlocal properties of entanglement. Little is known about the power of this class. The only proposed approach for establishing upper bounds is based on a hierarchy of semidefinite programs introduced independently by Pironio et al. and Doherty et al. This hierarchy converges to a value that is only known to coincide with the provers' maximum success probability in a given proof system under a plausible but difficult mathematical conjecture, Connes' embedding conjecture. No bounds on the rate of convergence are known. We introduce a rounding scheme for the hierarchy, establishing that any solution to its $N$-th level can be mapped to a strategy for the provers in which measurement operators associated with distinct provers have pairwise commutator bounded by $O(\ell^2/\sqrt{N})$ in operator norm, where $\ell$ is the number of possible answers per prover. Our rounding scheme motivates the introduction of a variant of $\MIP^*$, called $\MIP_δ^*$, in which the soundness property is required to hold as long as the commutator of operations performed by distinct provers has norm at most $δ$. Our rounding scheme implies the upper bound $\MIP_δ^* \subseteq \DTIME(\exp(\exp(\poly)/δ^2))$. In terms of lower bounds we establish that $\MIP^*_{2^{-\poly}}$, with completeness $1$ and soundness $1-2^{-\poly}$, contains $\NEXP$. The relationship of $\MIP_δ^*$ to $\MIPstar$ has connections with the mathematical literature on approximate commutation. Our rounding scheme gives an elementary proof that the Strong Kirchberg Conjecture implies that $\MIPstar$ is computable. We discuss applications to device-independent cryptography. △ Less

Submitted 30 September, 2015; originally announced October 2015.

Anchored parallel repetition for nonlocal games

Authors: Mohammad Bavarian, Thomas Vidick, Henry Yuen

Abstract: We introduce a simple transformation on two-player nonlocal games, called "anchoring", and prove an exponential-decay parallel repetition theorem for all anchored games in the setting of quantum entangled players. This transformation is inspired in part by the Feige-Kilian transformation (SICOMP 2000), and has the property that if the quantum value of the original game $G$ is $v$ then the quantum… ▽ More We introduce a simple transformation on two-player nonlocal games, called "anchoring", and prove an exponential-decay parallel repetition theorem for all anchored games in the setting of quantum entangled players. This transformation is inspired in part by the Feige-Kilian transformation (SICOMP 2000), and has the property that if the quantum value of the original game $G$ is $v$ then the quantum value of the anchored game $G_\bot$ is $1 - (1 - α)^2 \cdot (1 - v)$ where $α$ is a parameter of the transformation. In particular the anchored game has quantum value $1$ if and only if the original game $G$ has quantum value $1$. This provides the first gap amplification technique for general two-player nonlocal games that achieves exponential decay of the quantum value. △ Less

Submitted 7 March, 2021; v1 submitted 24 September, 2015; originally announced September 2015.

Comments: 42 pages. Original version was published as "Hardness amplification for entangled games via anchoring" in the proceedings of Symposium on Theory of Computing 2017. This version is a revision to give more details on the proof of the quantum parallel repetition result. Classical multiplayer parallel repetition results no longer included, but can still be found in arXiv:1509.07466v1

Non-signalling parallel repetition using de Finetti reductions

Authors: Rotem Arnon-Friedman, Renato Renner, Thomas Vidick

Abstract: In the context of multiplayer games, the parallel repetition problem can be phrased as follows: given a game $G$ with optimal winning probability $1-α$ and its repeated version $G^n$ (in which $n$ games are played together, in parallel), can the players use strategies that are substantially better than ones in which each game is played independently? This question is relevant in physics for the st… ▽ More In the context of multiplayer games, the parallel repetition problem can be phrased as follows: given a game $G$ with optimal winning probability $1-α$ and its repeated version $G^n$ (in which $n$ games are played together, in parallel), can the players use strategies that are substantially better than ones in which each game is played independently? This question is relevant in physics for the study of correlations and plays an important role in computer science in the context of complexity and cryptography. In this work the case of multiplayer non-signalling games is considered, i.e., the only restriction on the players is that they are not allowed to communicate during the game. For complete-support games (games where all possible combinations of questions have non-zero probability to be asked) with any number of players we prove a threshold theorem stating that the probability that non-signalling players win more than a fraction $1-α+β$ of the $n$ games is exponentially small in $nβ^2$, for every $0\leq β\leq α$. For games with incomplete support we derive a similar statement, for a slightly modified form of repetition. The result is proved using a new technique, based on a recent de Finetti theorem, which allows us to avoid central technical difficulties that arise in standard proofs of parallel repetition theorems. △ Less

Submitted 6 November, 2014; originally announced November 2014.