Showing 1–10 of 10 results for author: Seritan, S

Requirements for building effective Hamiltonians using quantum-enhanced density matrix downfolding

Authors: Shivesh Pathak, Antonio E. Russo, Stefan Seritan, Alicia B. Magann, Eric Bobrow, Andrew J. Landahl, Andrew D. Baczewski

Abstract: Density matrix downfolding (DMD) is a technique for regressing low-energy effective Hamiltonians from quantum many-body Hamiltonians. One limiting factor in the accuracy of classical implementations of DMD is the presence of difficult-to-quantify systematic errors attendant to sampling the observables of quantum many-body systems on an approximate low-energy subspace. We propose a hybrid quantum-c… ▽ More Density matrix downfolding (DMD) is a technique for regressing low-energy effective Hamiltonians from quantum many-body Hamiltonians. One limiting factor in the accuracy of classical implementations of DMD is the presence of difficult-to-quantify systematic errors attendant to sampling the observables of quantum many-body systems on an approximate low-energy subspace. We propose a hybrid quantum-classical protocol for circumventing this limitation, relying on the prospective ability of quantum computers to efficiently prepare and sample from states in well-defined low-energy subspaces with systematically improvable accuracy. We introduce three requirements for when this is possible, including a notion of compressibility that quantifies features of Hamiltonians and low-energy subspaces thereof for which quantum DMD might be efficient. Assuming that these requirements are met, we analyze design choices for our protocol and provide resource estimates for implementing quantum-enhanced DMD on both the doped 2-D Fermi-Hubbard model and an ab initio model of a cuprate superconductor. △ Less

Submitted 1 March, 2024; originally announced March 2024.

Near-Minimal Gate Set Tomography Experiment Designs

Authors: Corey Ostrove, Kenneth Rudinger, Stefan Seritan, Kevin Young, Robin Blume-Kohout

Abstract: Gate set tomography (GST) provides precise, self-consistent estimates of the noise channels for all of a quantum processor's logic gates. But GST experiments are large, involving many distinct quantum circuits. This has prevented their use on systems larger than two qubits. Here, we show how to streamline GST experiment designs by removing almost all redundancy, creating smaller and more scalable… ▽ More Gate set tomography (GST) provides precise, self-consistent estimates of the noise channels for all of a quantum processor's logic gates. But GST experiments are large, involving many distinct quantum circuits. This has prevented their use on systems larger than two qubits. Here, we show how to streamline GST experiment designs by removing almost all redundancy, creating smaller and more scalable experiments without losing precision. We do this by analyzing the "germ" subroutines at the heart of GST circuits, identifying exactly what gate set parameters they are sensitive to, and leveraging this information to remove circuits that duplicate other circuits' sensitivities. We apply this technique to two-qubit GST experiments, generating streamlined experiment designs that contain only slightly more circuits than the theoretical minimum bounds, but still achieve Heisenberg-like scaling in precision (as demonstrated via simulation and a theoretical analysis using Fisher information). In practical use, the new experiment designs can match the precision of previous GST experiments with significantly fewer circuits. We discuss the prospects and feasibility of extending GST to three-qubit systems using our techniques. △ Less

Submitted 21 September, 2023; v1 submitted 17 August, 2023; originally announced August 2023.

Comments: 11 pages, 6 figures, to be published in proceedings of 2023 IEEE International Conference on Quantum Computing and Engineering (QCE). V2: Minor edits to acknowledgements

Two-Qubit Gate Set Tomography with Fewer Circuits

Authors: Kenneth M. Rudinger, Corey I. Ostrove, Stefan K. Seritan, Matthew D. Grace, Erik Nielsen, Robin J. Blume-Kohout, Kevin C. Young

Abstract: Gate set tomography (GST) is a self-consistent and highly accurate method for the tomographic reconstruction of a quantum information processor's quantum logic operations, including gates, state preparations, and measurements. However, GST's experimental cost grows exponentially with qubit number. For characterizing even just two qubits, a standard GST experiment may have tens of thousands of circ… ▽ More Gate set tomography (GST) is a self-consistent and highly accurate method for the tomographic reconstruction of a quantum information processor's quantum logic operations, including gates, state preparations, and measurements. However, GST's experimental cost grows exponentially with qubit number. For characterizing even just two qubits, a standard GST experiment may have tens of thousands of circuits, making it prohibitively expensive for platforms. We show that, because GST experiments are massively overcomplete, many circuits can be discarded. This dramatically reduces GST's experimental cost while still maintaining GST's Heisenberg-like scaling in accuracy. We show how to exploit the structure of GST circuits to determine which ones are superfluous. We confirm the efficacy of the resulting experiment designs both through numerical simulations and via the Fisher information for said designs. We also explore the impact of these techniques on the prospects of three-qubit GST. △ Less

Submitted 21 September, 2023; v1 submitted 28 July, 2023; originally announced July 2023.

Comments: 46 pages, 13 figures. V2: Minor edits to acknowledgments

Assessment of error variation in high-fidelity two-qubit gates in silicon

Authors: Tuomo Tanttu, Wee Han Lim, Jonathan Y. Huang, Nard Dumoulin Stuyck, Will Gilbert, Rocky Y. Su, MengKe Feng, Jesus D. Cifuentes, Amanda E. Seedhouse, Stefan K. Seritan, Corey I. Ostrove, Kenneth M. Rudinger, Ross C. C. Leon, Wister Huang, Christopher C. Escott, Kohei M. Itoh, Nikolay V. Abrosimov, Hans-Joachim Pohl, Michael L. W. Thewalt, Fay E. Hudson, Robin Blume-Kohout, Stephen D. Bartlett, Andrea Morello, Arne Laucht, Chih Hwan Yang , et al. (2 additional authors not shown)

Abstract: Achieving high-fidelity entangling operations between qubits consistently is essential for the performance of multi-qubit systems and is a crucial factor in achieving fault-tolerant quantum processors. Solid-state platforms are particularly exposed to errors due to materials-induced variability between qubits, which leads to performance inconsistencies. Here we study the errors in a spin qubit pro… ▽ More Achieving high-fidelity entangling operations between qubits consistently is essential for the performance of multi-qubit systems and is a crucial factor in achieving fault-tolerant quantum processors. Solid-state platforms are particularly exposed to errors due to materials-induced variability between qubits, which leads to performance inconsistencies. Here we study the errors in a spin qubit processor, tying them to their physical origins. We leverage this knowledge to demonstrate consistent and repeatable operation with above 99% fidelity of two-qubit gates in the technologically important silicon metal-oxide-semiconductor (SiMOS) quantum dot platform. We undertake a detailed study of these operations by analysing the physical errors and fidelities in multiple devices through numerous trials and extended periods to ensure that we capture the variation and the most common error types. Physical error sources include the slow nuclear and electrical noise on single qubits and contextual noise. The identification of the noise sources can be used to maintain performance within tolerance as well as inform future device fabrication. Furthermore, we investigate the impact of qubit design, feedback systems, and robust gates on implementing scalable, high-fidelity control strategies. These results are achieved by using three different characterization methods, we measure entangling gate fidelities ranging from 96.8% to 99.8%. Our analysis tools identify the causes of qubit degradation and offer ways understand their physical mechanisms. These results highlight both the capabilities and challenges for the scaling up of silicon spin-based qubits into full-scale quantum processors. △ Less

Submitted 15 March, 2024; v1 submitted 7 March, 2023; originally announced March 2023.

Quantifying $T$-gate-count improvements for ground-state-energy estimation with near-optimal state preparation

Authors: Shivesh Pathak, Antonio Russo, Stefan Seritan, Andrew Baczewski

Abstract: We study the question of when investing additional quantum resources in preparing a ground state will improve the aggregate runtime associated with estimating its energy. We analyze Lin and Tong's near-optimal state preparation algorithm and show that it can reduce a proxy for the runtime, the $T$-gate count, of ground state energy estimation near quadratically. Resource estimates are provided tha… ▽ More We study the question of when investing additional quantum resources in preparing a ground state will improve the aggregate runtime associated with estimating its energy. We analyze Lin and Tong's near-optimal state preparation algorithm and show that it can reduce a proxy for the runtime, the $T$-gate count, of ground state energy estimation near quadratically. Resource estimates are provided that specify the conditions under which the added cost of state preparation is worthwhile. △ Less

Submitted 17 April, 2023; v1 submitted 19 October, 2022; originally announced October 2022.

Benchmarking quantum logic operations relative to thresholds for fault tolerance

Authors: Akel Hashim, Stefan Seritan, Timothy Proctor, Kenneth Rudinger, Noah Goss, Ravi K. Naik, John Mark Kreikebaum, David I. Santiago, Irfan Siddiqi

Abstract: Contemporary methods for benchmarking noisy quantum processors typically measure average error rates or process infidelities. However, thresholds for fault-tolerant quantum error correction are given in terms of worst-case error rates -- defined via the diamond norm -- which can differ from average error rates by orders of magnitude. One method for resolving this discrepancy is to randomize the ph… ▽ More Contemporary methods for benchmarking noisy quantum processors typically measure average error rates or process infidelities. However, thresholds for fault-tolerant quantum error correction are given in terms of worst-case error rates -- defined via the diamond norm -- which can differ from average error rates by orders of magnitude. One method for resolving this discrepancy is to randomize the physical implementation of quantum gates, using techniques like randomized compiling (RC). In this work, we use gate set tomography to perform precision characterization of a set of two-qubit logic gates to study RC on a superconducting quantum processor. We find that, under RC, gate errors are accurately described by a stochastic Pauli noise model without coherent errors, and that spatially-correlated coherent errors and non-Markovian errors are strongly suppressed. We further show that the average and worst-case error rates are equal for randomly compiled gates, and measure a maximum worst-case error of 0.0197(3) for our gate set. Our results show that randomized benchmarks are a viable route to both verifying that a quantum processor's error rates are below a fault-tolerance threshold, and to bounding the failure rates of near-term algorithms, if -- and only if -- gates are implemented via randomization methods which tailor noise. △ Less

Submitted 1 December, 2023; v1 submitted 18 July, 2022; originally announced July 2022.

Demonstrating scalable randomized benchmarking of universal gate sets

Authors: Jordan Hines, Marie Lu, Ravi K. Naik, Akel Hashim, Jean-Loup Ville, Brad Mitchell, John Mark Kriekebaum, David I. Santiago, Stefan Seritan, Erik Nielsen, Robin Blume-Kohout, Kevin Young, Irfan Siddiqi, Birgitta Whaley, Timothy Proctor

Abstract: Randomized benchmarking (RB) protocols are the most widely used methods for assessing the performance of quantum gates. However, the existing RB methods either do not scale to many qubits or cannot benchmark a universal gate set. Here, we introduce and demonstrate a technique for scalable RB of many universal and continuously parameterized gate sets, using a class of circuits called randomized mir… ▽ More Randomized benchmarking (RB) protocols are the most widely used methods for assessing the performance of quantum gates. However, the existing RB methods either do not scale to many qubits or cannot benchmark a universal gate set. Here, we introduce and demonstrate a technique for scalable RB of many universal and continuously parameterized gate sets, using a class of circuits called randomized mirror circuits. Our technique can be applied to a gate set containing an entangling Clifford gate and the set of arbitrary single-qubit gates, as well as gate sets containing controlled rotations about the Pauli axes. We use our technique to benchmark universal gate sets on four qubits of the Advanced Quantum Testbed, including a gate set containing a controlled-S gate and its inverse, and we investigate how the observed error rate is impacted by the inclusion of non-Clifford gates. Finally, we demonstrate that our technique scales to many qubits with experiments on a 27-qubit IBM Q processor. We use our technique to quantify the impact of crosstalk on this 27-qubit device, and we find that it contributes approximately 2/3 of the total error per gate in random many-qubit circuit layers. △ Less

Submitted 10 October, 2023; v1 submitted 14 July, 2022; originally announced July 2022.

Comments: 15 pages + appendices. v2: Corrected error in Section IIIA step 3 + minor edits. v3: Added new theory results

Journal ref: Phys. Rev. X 13, 041030 (2023)

Establishing trust in quantum computations

Authors: Timothy Proctor, Stefan Seritan, Erik Nielsen, Kenneth Rudinger, Kevin Young, Robin Blume-Kohout, Mohan Sarovar

Abstract: Real-world quantum computers have grown sufficiently complex that they can no longer be simulated by classical supercomputers, but their computational power remains limited by errors. These errors corrupt the results of quantum algorithms, and it is no longer always feasible to use classical simulations to directly check the correctness of quantum computations. Without practical methods for quanti… ▽ More Real-world quantum computers have grown sufficiently complex that they can no longer be simulated by classical supercomputers, but their computational power remains limited by errors. These errors corrupt the results of quantum algorithms, and it is no longer always feasible to use classical simulations to directly check the correctness of quantum computations. Without practical methods for quantifying the accuracy with which a quantum algorithm has been executed, it is difficult to establish trust in the results of a quantum computation. Here we solve this problem, by introducing a simple and efficient technique for measuring the fidelity with which an as-built quantum computer can execute an algorithm. Our technique converts the algorithm's quantum circuits into a set of closely related circuits whose success rates can be efficiently measured. It enables measuring the fidelity of quantum algorithm executions both in the near-term, with algorithms run on hundreds or thousands of physical qubits, and into the future, with algorithms run on logical qubits protected by quantum error correction. △ Less

Submitted 15 April, 2022; originally announced April 2022.

Comments: 6 pages + Appendices. Comments welcome!

Scalable randomized benchmarking of quantum computers using mirror circuits

Authors: Timothy Proctor, Stefan Seritan, Kenneth Rudinger, Erik Nielsen, Robin Blume-Kohout, Kevin Young

Abstract: The performance of quantum gates is often assessed using some form of randomized benchmarking. However, the existing methods become infeasible for more than approximately five qubits. Here we show how to use a simple and customizable class of circuits -- randomized mirror circuits -- to perform scalable, robust, and flexible randomized benchmarking of Clifford gates. We show that this technique ap… ▽ More The performance of quantum gates is often assessed using some form of randomized benchmarking. However, the existing methods become infeasible for more than approximately five qubits. Here we show how to use a simple and customizable class of circuits -- randomized mirror circuits -- to perform scalable, robust, and flexible randomized benchmarking of Clifford gates. We show that this technique approximately estimates the infidelity of an average many-qubit logic layer, and we use simulations of up to 225 qubits with physically realistic error rates in the range 0.1-1% to demonstrate its scalability. We then use up to 16 physical qubits of a cloud quantum computing platform to demonstrate that our technique can reveal and quantify crosstalk errors in many-qubit circuits. △ Less

Submitted 10 October, 2022; v1 submitted 18 December, 2021; originally announced December 2021.

Comments: small changes from v1; close to published version; 4 pages

Journal ref: Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 150502 (2022)

Experimental Characterization of Crosstalk Errors with Simultaneous Gate Set Tomography

Authors: Kenneth Rudinger, Craig W. Hogle, Ravi K. Naik, Akel Hashim, Daniel Lobser, David I. Santiago, Matthew D. Grace, Erik Nielsen, Timothy Proctor, Stefan Seritan, Susan M. Clark, Robin Blume-Kohout, Irfan Siddiqi, Kevin C. Young

Abstract: Crosstalk is a leading source of failure in multiqubit quantum information processors. It can arise from a wide range of disparate physical phenomena, and can introduce subtle correlations in the errors experienced by a device. Several hardware characterization protocols are able to detect the presence of crosstalk, but few provide sufficient information to distinguish various crosstalk errors fro… ▽ More Crosstalk is a leading source of failure in multiqubit quantum information processors. It can arise from a wide range of disparate physical phenomena, and can introduce subtle correlations in the errors experienced by a device. Several hardware characterization protocols are able to detect the presence of crosstalk, but few provide sufficient information to distinguish various crosstalk errors from one another. In this article we describe how gate set tomography, a protocol for detailed characterization of quantum operations, can be used to identify and characterize crosstalk errors in quantum information processors. We demonstrate our methods on a two-qubit trapped-ion processor and a two-qubit subsystem of a superconducting transmon processor. △ Less

Submitted 17 March, 2021; originally announced March 2021.

Comments: 20 pages, 8 figures, 6 tables

Journal ref: PRX Quantum 2, 040338 (2021)