Skip to main content

Showing 1–3 of 3 results for author: Pack, K

Searching in archive quant-ph. Search in all archives.
.
  1. arXiv:2205.04829  [pdf, other

    quant-ph

    Software tool-set for automated quantum system identification and device bring up

    Authors: Anurag Saha Roy, Kevin Pack, Nicolas Wittler, Shai Machnes

    Abstract: We present a software tool-set which combines the theoretical, optimal control view of quantum devices with the practical operation and characterization tasks required for quantum computing. In the same framework, we perform model-based simulations to create control schemes, calibrate these controls in a closed-loop with the device (or in this demo - by emulating the experimental process) and fina… ▽ More

    Submitted 10 May, 2022; originally announced May 2022.

  2. Integrated tool-set for Control, Calibration and Characterization of quantum devices applied to superconducting qubits

    Authors: Nicolas Wittler, Federico Roy, Kevin Pack, Max Werninghaus, Anurag Saha Roy, Daniel J. Egger, Stefan Filipp, Frank K. Wilhelm, Shai Machnes

    Abstract: Efforts to scale-up quantum computation have reached a point where the principal limiting factor is not the number of qubits, but the entangling gate infidelity. However, the highly detailed system characterization required to understand the underlying error sources is an arduous process and impractical with increasing chip size. Open-loop optimal control techniques allow for the improvement of ga… ▽ More

    Submitted 2 December, 2022; v1 submitted 21 September, 2020; originally announced September 2020.

    Comments: Source code available at http://q-optimize.org; added references; updated with journal version; updated references

    Journal ref: Phys. Rev. Applied 15, 034080 (2021)

  3. Adaptive identification of coherent states

    Authors: Markku P. V. Stenberg, Kevin Pack, Frank K. Wilhelm

    Abstract: We present methods for efficient characterization of an optical coherent state $|α\rangle$. We choose measurement settings adaptively and stochastically, based on data while it is collected. Our algorithm divides the estimation into two distinct steps: (i) before the first detection of a vacuum state, the probability of choosing a measurement setting is proportional to detecting vacuum with the se… ▽ More

    Submitted 7 January, 2016; v1 submitted 18 August, 2015; originally announced August 2015.

    Comments: 6 pages, 5 figures

    Journal ref: Phys. Rev. A 92, 063852 (2015)