-
A simple lower bound for the complexity of estimating partition functions on a quantum computer
Authors:
Zherui Chen,
Giacomo Nannicini
Abstract:
We study the complexity of estimating the partition function $\mathsf{Z}(β)=\sum_{x\inχ} e^{-βH(x)}$ for a Gibbs distribution characterized by the Hamiltonian $H(x)$. We provide a simple and natural lower bound for quantum algorithms that solve this task by relying on reflections through the coherent encoding of Gibbs states. Our primary contribution is a $\varOmega(1/ε)$ lower bound for the numbe…
▽ More
We study the complexity of estimating the partition function $\mathsf{Z}(β)=\sum_{x\inχ} e^{-βH(x)}$ for a Gibbs distribution characterized by the Hamiltonian $H(x)$. We provide a simple and natural lower bound for quantum algorithms that solve this task by relying on reflections through the coherent encoding of Gibbs states. Our primary contribution is a $\varOmega(1/ε)$ lower bound for the number of reflections needed to estimate the partition function with a quantum algorithm. The proof is based on a reduction from the problem of estimating the Hamming weight of an unknown binary string.
△ Less
Submitted 8 April, 2024; v1 submitted 2 April, 2024;
originally announced April 2024.
-
Quantum Optimization: Potential, Challenges, and the Path Forward
Authors:
Amira Abbas,
Andris Ambainis,
Brandon Augustino,
Andreas Bärtschi,
Harry Buhrman,
Carleton Coffrin,
Giorgio Cortiana,
Vedran Dunjko,
Daniel J. Egger,
Bruce G. Elmegreen,
Nicola Franco,
Filippo Fratini,
Bryce Fuller,
Julien Gacon,
Constantin Gonciulea,
Sander Gribling,
Swati Gupta,
Stuart Hadfield,
Raoul Heese,
Gerhard Kircher,
Thomas Kleinert,
Thorsten Koch,
Georgios Korpas,
Steve Lenk,
Jakub Marecek
, et al. (21 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
Recent advances in quantum computers are demonstrating the ability to solve problems at a scale beyond brute force classical simulation. As such, a widespread interest in quantum algorithms has developed in many areas, with optimization being one of the most pronounced domains. Across computer science and physics, there are a number of algorithmic approaches, often with little linkage. This is fur…
▽ More
Recent advances in quantum computers are demonstrating the ability to solve problems at a scale beyond brute force classical simulation. As such, a widespread interest in quantum algorithms has developed in many areas, with optimization being one of the most pronounced domains. Across computer science and physics, there are a number of algorithmic approaches, often with little linkage. This is further complicated by the fragmented nature of the field of mathematical optimization, where major classes of optimization problems, such as combinatorial optimization, convex optimization, non-convex optimization, and stochastic extensions, have devoted communities. With these aspects in mind, this work draws on multiple approaches to study quantum optimization. Provably exact versus heuristic settings are first explained using computational complexity theory - highlighting where quantum advantage is possible in each context. Then, the core building blocks for quantum optimization algorithms are outlined to subsequently define prominent problem classes and identify key open questions that, if answered, will advance the field. The effects of scaling relevant problems on noisy quantum devices are also outlined in detail, alongside meaningful benchmarking problems. We underscore the importance of benchmarking by proposing clear metrics to conduct appropriate comparisons with classical optimization techniques. Lastly, we highlight two domains - finance and sustainability - as rich sources of optimization problems that could be used to benchmark, and eventually validate, the potential real-world impact of quantum optimization.
△ Less
Submitted 4 December, 2023;
originally announced December 2023.
-
A quantum central path algorithm for linear optimization
Authors:
Brandon Augustino,
Jiaqi Leng,
Giacomo Nannicini,
Tamás Terlaky,
Xiaodi Wu
Abstract:
We propose a novel quantum algorithm for solving linear optimization problems by quantum-mechanical simulation of the central path. While interior point methods follow the central path with an iterative algorithm that works with successive linearizations of the perturbed KKT conditions, we perform a single simulation working directly with the nonlinear complementarity equations. Combining our appr…
▽ More
We propose a novel quantum algorithm for solving linear optimization problems by quantum-mechanical simulation of the central path. While interior point methods follow the central path with an iterative algorithm that works with successive linearizations of the perturbed KKT conditions, we perform a single simulation working directly with the nonlinear complementarity equations. Combining our approach with iterative refinement techniques, we obtain an exact solution to a linear optimization problem involving $m$ constraints and $n$ variables using at most $\mathcal{O} \left( (m + n) \text{nnz} (A) κ(\mathcal{M}) L \cdot \text{polylog} \left(m, n, κ(\mathcal{M}) \right) \right)$ elementary gates and $\mathcal{O} \left( \text{nnz} (A) L \right)$ classical arithmetic operations, where $ \text{nnz} (A)$ is the total number of non-zero elements found in the constraint matrix, $L$ denotes binary input length of the problem data, and $κ(\mathcal{M})$ is a condition number that depends only on the problem data.
△ Less
Submitted 7 November, 2023;
originally announced November 2023.
-
Solving the semidefinite relaxation of QUBOs in matrix multiplication time, and faster with a quantum computer
Authors:
Brandon Augustino,
Giacomo Nannicini,
Tamás Terlaky,
Luis Zuluaga
Abstract:
Recent works on quantum algorithms for solving semidefinite optimization (SDO) problems have leveraged a quantum-mechanical interpretation of positive semidefinite matrices to develop methods that obtain quantum speedups with respect to the dimension $n$ and number of constraints $m$. While their dependence on other parameters suggests no overall speedup over classical methodologies, some quantum…
▽ More
Recent works on quantum algorithms for solving semidefinite optimization (SDO) problems have leveraged a quantum-mechanical interpretation of positive semidefinite matrices to develop methods that obtain quantum speedups with respect to the dimension $n$ and number of constraints $m$. While their dependence on other parameters suggests no overall speedup over classical methodologies, some quantum SDO solvers provide speedups in the low-precision regime. We exploit this fact to our advantage, and present an iterative refinement scheme for the Hamiltonian Updates algorithm of Brandão et al. (Quantum 6, 625 (2022)) to exponentially improve the dependence of their algorithm on precision. As a result, we obtain a classical algorithm to solve the semidefinite relaxation of Quadratic Unconstrained Binary Optimization problems (QUBOs) in matrix multiplication time. Provided access to a quantum read/classical write random access memory (QRAM), a quantum implementation of our algorithm exhibits a worst case running time of $\mathcal{O} \left(ns + n^{1.5} \cdot \text{polylog} \left(n, \| C \|_F, \frac{1}ε \right) \right)$.
△ Less
Submitted 11 May, 2023; v1 submitted 10 January, 2023;
originally announced January 2023.
-
Quantum tomography using state-preparation unitaries
Authors:
Joran van Apeldoorn,
Arjan Cornelissen,
András Gilyén,
Giacomo Nannicini
Abstract:
We describe algorithms to obtain an approximate classical description of a $d$-dimensional quantum state when given access to a unitary (and its inverse) that prepares it. For pure states we characterize the query complexity for $\ell_q$-norm error up to logarithmic factors. As a special case, we show that it takes $\widetildeΘ(d/\varepsilon)$ applications of the unitaries to obtain an…
▽ More
We describe algorithms to obtain an approximate classical description of a $d$-dimensional quantum state when given access to a unitary (and its inverse) that prepares it. For pure states we characterize the query complexity for $\ell_q$-norm error up to logarithmic factors. As a special case, we show that it takes $\widetildeΘ(d/\varepsilon)$ applications of the unitaries to obtain an $\varepsilon$-$\ell_2$-approximation of the state. For mixed states we consider a similar model, where the unitary prepares a purification of the state. In this model we give an efficient algorithm for obtaining Schatten $q$-norm estimates of a rank-$r$ mixed state, giving query upper bounds that are close to optimal. In particular, we show that a trace-norm ($q=1$) estimate can be obtained with $\widetilde{\mathcal{O}}(dr/\varepsilon)$ queries. This improves (assuming our stronger input model) the $\varepsilon$-dependence over the algorithm of Haah et al.\ (2017) that uses a joint measurement on $\widetilde{\mathcal{O}}(dr/\varepsilon^2)$ copies of the state. To our knowledge, the most sample-efficient results for pure-state tomography come from setting the rank to $1$ in generic mixed-state tomography algorithms, which can be computationally demanding. We describe sample-optimal algorithms for pure states that are easy and fast to implement. Along the way we show that an $\ell_\infty$-norm estimate of a normalized vector induces a (slightly worse) $\ell_q$-norm estimate for that vector, without losing a dimension-dependent factor in the precision. We also develop an unbiased and symmetric version of phase estimation, where the probability distribution of the estimate is centered around the true value. Finally, we give an efficient method for estimating multiple expectation values, improving over the recent result by Huggins et al.\ (2021) when the measurement operators do not fully overlap.
△ Less
Submitted 18 July, 2022;
originally announced July 2022.
-
Quantum Interior Point Methods for Semidefinite Optimization
Authors:
Brandon Augustino,
Giacomo Nannicini,
Tamás Terlaky,
Luis F. Zuluaga
Abstract:
We present two quantum interior point methods for semidefinite optimization problems, building on recent advances in quantum linear system algorithms. The first scheme, more similar to a classical solution algorithm, computes an inexact search direction and is not guaranteed to explore only feasible points; the second scheme uses a nullspace representation of the Newton linear system to ensure fea…
▽ More
We present two quantum interior point methods for semidefinite optimization problems, building on recent advances in quantum linear system algorithms. The first scheme, more similar to a classical solution algorithm, computes an inexact search direction and is not guaranteed to explore only feasible points; the second scheme uses a nullspace representation of the Newton linear system to ensure feasibility even with inexact search directions. The second is a novel scheme that might seem impractical in the classical world, but it is well-suited for a hybrid quantum-classical setting. We show that both schemes converge to an optimal solution of the semidefinite optimization problem under standard assumptions. By comparing the theoretical performance of classical and quantum interior point methods with respect to various input parameters, we show that our second scheme obtains a speedup over classical algorithms in terms of the dimension of the problem $n$, but has worse dependence on other numerical parameters.
△ Less
Submitted 7 September, 2023; v1 submitted 11 December, 2021;
originally announced December 2021.
-
Optimal qubit assignment and routing via integer programming
Authors:
Giacomo Nannicini,
Lev S Bishop,
Oktay Gunluk,
Petar Jurcevic
Abstract:
We consider the problem of map** a logical quantum circuit onto a given hardware with limited two-qubit connectivity. We model this problem as an integer linear program, using a network flow formulation with binary variables that includes the initial allocation of qubits and their routing. We consider several cost functions: an approximation of the fidelity of the circuit, its total depth, and a…
▽ More
We consider the problem of map** a logical quantum circuit onto a given hardware with limited two-qubit connectivity. We model this problem as an integer linear program, using a network flow formulation with binary variables that includes the initial allocation of qubits and their routing. We consider several cost functions: an approximation of the fidelity of the circuit, its total depth, and a measure of cross-talk, all of which can be incorporated in the model. Numerical experiments on synthetic data and different hardware topologies indicate that the error rate and depth can be optimized simultaneously without significant loss. We test our algorithm on a large number of quantum volume circuits, optimizing for error rate and depth; our algorithm significantly reduces the number of CNOTs compared to Qiskit's default transpiler SABRE, and produces circuits that, when executed on hardware, exhibit higher fidelity.
△ Less
Submitted 25 July, 2021; v1 submitted 11 June, 2021;
originally announced June 2021.
-
Quantum speedups for convex dynamic programming
Authors:
David Sutter,
Giacomo Nannicini,
Tobias Sutter,
Stefan Woerner
Abstract:
We present a quantum algorithm to solve dynamic programming problems with convex value functions. For linear discrete-time systems with a $d$-dimensional state space of size $N$, the proposed algorithm outputs a quantum-mechanical representation of the value function in time $O(T γ^{dT}\mathrm{polylog}(N,(T/\varepsilon)^{d}))$, where $\varepsilon$ is the accuracy of the solution, $T$ is the time h…
▽ More
We present a quantum algorithm to solve dynamic programming problems with convex value functions. For linear discrete-time systems with a $d$-dimensional state space of size $N$, the proposed algorithm outputs a quantum-mechanical representation of the value function in time $O(T γ^{dT}\mathrm{polylog}(N,(T/\varepsilon)^{d}))$, where $\varepsilon$ is the accuracy of the solution, $T$ is the time horizon, and $γ$ is a problem-specific parameter depending on the condition numbers of the cost functions. This allows us to evaluate the value function at any fixed state in time $O(T γ^{dT}\sqrt{N}\,\mathrm{polylog}(N,(T/\varepsilon)^{d}))$, and the corresponding optimal action can be recovered by solving a convex program. The class of optimization problems to which our algorithm can be applied includes provably hard stochastic dynamic programs. Finally, we show that the algorithm obtains a quadratic speedup (up to polylogarithmic factors) compared to the classical Bellman approach on some dynamic programs with continuous state space that have $γ=1$.
△ Less
Submitted 17 March, 2021; v1 submitted 23 November, 2020;
originally announced November 2020.
-
Simpler (classical) and faster (quantum) algorithms for Gibbs partition functions
Authors:
Srinivasan Arunachalam,
Vojtech Havlicek,
Giacomo Nannicini,
Kristan Temme,
Pawel Wocjan
Abstract:
We present classical and quantum algorithms for approximating partition functions of classical Hamiltonians at a given temperature. Our work has two main contributions: first, we modify the classical algorithm of Štefankovič, Vempala and Vigoda (\emph{J.~ACM}, 56(3), 2009) to improve its sample complexity; second, we quantize this new algorithm, improving upon the previously fastest quantum algori…
▽ More
We present classical and quantum algorithms for approximating partition functions of classical Hamiltonians at a given temperature. Our work has two main contributions: first, we modify the classical algorithm of Štefankovič, Vempala and Vigoda (\emph{J.~ACM}, 56(3), 2009) to improve its sample complexity; second, we quantize this new algorithm, improving upon the previously fastest quantum algorithm for this problem, due to Harrow and Wei (SODA 2020). The conventional approach to estimating partition functions requires approximating the means of Gibbs distributions at a set of inverse temperatures that form the so-called cooling schedule. The length of the cooling schedule directly affects the complexity of the algorithm. Combining our improved version of the algorithm of Štefankovič, Vempala and Vigoda with the paired-product estimator of Huber (\emph{Ann.\ Appl.\ Probab.}, 25(2),~2015), our new quantum algorithm uses a shorter cooling schedule than previously known. This length matches the optimal length conjectured by Štefankovič, Vempala and Vigoda. The quantum algorithm also achieves a quadratic advantage in the number of required quantum samples compared to the number of random samples drawn by the best classical algorithm, and its computational complexity has quadratically better dependence on the spectral gap of the Markov chains used to produce the quantum samples.
△ Less
Submitted 30 August, 2022; v1 submitted 23 September, 2020;
originally announced September 2020.
-
Demonstration of quantum volume 64 on a superconducting quantum computing system
Authors:
Petar Jurcevic,
Ali Javadi-Abhari,
Lev S. Bishop,
Isaac Lauer,
Daniela F. Bogorin,
Markus Brink,
Lauren Capelluto,
Oktay Günlük,
Toshinari Itoko,
Naoki Kanazawa,
Abhinav Kandala,
George A. Keefe,
Kevin Krsulich,
William Landers,
Eric P. Lewandowski,
Douglas T. McClure,
Giacomo Nannicini,
Adinath Narasgond,
Hasan M. Nayfeh,
Emily Pritchett,
Mary Beth Rothwell,
Srikanth Srinivasan,
Neereja Sundaresan,
Cindy Wang,
Ken X. Wei
, et al. (6 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
We improve the quality of quantum circuits on superconducting quantum computing systems, as measured by the quantum volume, with a combination of dynamical decoupling, compiler optimizations, shorter two-qubit gates, and excited state promoted readout. This result shows that the path to larger quantum volume systems requires the simultaneous increase of coherence, control gate fidelities, measurem…
▽ More
We improve the quality of quantum circuits on superconducting quantum computing systems, as measured by the quantum volume, with a combination of dynamical decoupling, compiler optimizations, shorter two-qubit gates, and excited state promoted readout. This result shows that the path to larger quantum volume systems requires the simultaneous increase of coherence, control gate fidelities, measurement fidelities, and smarter software which takes into account hardware details, thereby demonstrating the need to continue to co-design the software and hardware stack for the foreseeable future.
△ Less
Submitted 4 September, 2020; v1 submitted 19 August, 2020;
originally announced August 2020.
-
Quantum Legendre-Fenchel Transform
Authors:
David Sutter,
Giacomo Nannicini,
Tobias Sutter,
Stefan Woerner
Abstract:
We present a quantum algorithm to compute the discrete Legendre-Fenchel transform. Given access to a convex function evaluated at $N$ points, the algorithm outputs a quantum-mechanical representation of its corresponding discrete Legendre-Fenchel transform evaluated at $K$ points in the transformed space. For a fixed regular discretization of the dual space the expected running time scales as…
▽ More
We present a quantum algorithm to compute the discrete Legendre-Fenchel transform. Given access to a convex function evaluated at $N$ points, the algorithm outputs a quantum-mechanical representation of its corresponding discrete Legendre-Fenchel transform evaluated at $K$ points in the transformed space. For a fixed regular discretization of the dual space the expected running time scales as $O(\sqrtκ\,\mathrm{polylog}(N,K))$, where $κ$ is the condition number of the function. If the discretization of the dual space is chosen adaptively with $K$ equal to $N$, the running time reduces to $O(\mathrm{polylog}(N))$. We explain how to extend the presented algorithm to the multivariate setting and prove lower bounds for the query complexity, showing that our quantum algorithm is optimal up to polylogarithmic factors. For multivariate functions with $κ=1$, the quantum algorithm computes a quantum-mechanical representation of the Legendre-Fenchel transform at $K$ points exponentially faster than any classical algorithm can compute it at a single point.
△ Less
Submitted 17 March, 2021; v1 submitted 8 June, 2020;
originally announced June 2020.
-
Fast quantum subroutines for the simplex method
Authors:
Giacomo Nannicini
Abstract:
We propose quantum subroutines for the simplex method that avoid classical computation of the basis inverse. We show how to quantize all steps of the simplex algorithm, including checking optimality, unboundedness, and identifying a pivot (i.e., pricing the columns and performing the ratio test) according to Dantzig's rule or the steepest edge rule. The quantized subroutines obtain a polynomial sp…
▽ More
We propose quantum subroutines for the simplex method that avoid classical computation of the basis inverse. We show how to quantize all steps of the simplex algorithm, including checking optimality, unboundedness, and identifying a pivot (i.e., pricing the columns and performing the ratio test) according to Dantzig's rule or the steepest edge rule. The quantized subroutines obtain a polynomial speedup in the dimension of the problem, but have worse dependence on other numerical parameters. For example, for a problem with $m$ constraints, $n$ variables, at most $d_c$ nonzero elements per column of the costraint matrix, at most $d$ nonzero elements per column or row of the basis, basis condition number $κ$, and optimality tolerance $ε$, pricing can be performed in $\tilde{O}(\frac{1}εκd \sqrt{n}(d_c n + d m))$ time, where the $\tilde{O}$ notation hides polylogarithmic factors; classically, pricing requires $O(d_c^{0.7} m^{1.9} + m^{2 + o(1)} + d_c n)$ time in the worst case using the fastest known algorithm for sparse matrix multiplication. For well-conditioned sparse problems the quantum subroutines scale better in $m$ and $n$, and may therefore have an advantage for very large problems. The running time of the quantum subroutines can be improved if the constraint matrix admits an efficient algorithmic description, or if quantum RAM is available.
△ Less
Submitted 11 September, 2022; v1 submitted 23 October, 2019;
originally announced October 2019.
-
Leveraging Secondary Storage to Simulate Deep 54-qubit Sycamore Circuits
Authors:
Edwin Pednault,
John A. Gunnels,
Giacomo Nannicini,
Lior Horesh,
Robert Wisnieff
Abstract:
In a recent paper, we showed that secondary storage can extend the range of quantum circuits that can be practically simulated with classical algorithms. Here we refine those techniques and apply them to the simulation of Sycamore circuits with 53 and 54 qubits, with the entanglement pattern ABCDCDAB that has proven difficult to classically simulate with other approaches. Our analysis shows that o…
▽ More
In a recent paper, we showed that secondary storage can extend the range of quantum circuits that can be practically simulated with classical algorithms. Here we refine those techniques and apply them to the simulation of Sycamore circuits with 53 and 54 qubits, with the entanglement pattern ABCDCDAB that has proven difficult to classically simulate with other approaches. Our analysis shows that on the Summit supercomputer at Oak Ridge National Laboratories, such circuits can be simulated with high fidelity to arbitrary depth in a matter of days, outputting all the amplitudes.
△ Less
Submitted 22 October, 2019; v1 submitted 21 October, 2019;
originally announced October 2019.
-
Improving Variational Quantum Optimization using CVaR
Authors:
Panagiotis Kl. Barkoutsos,
Giacomo Nannicini,
Anton Robert,
Ivano Tavernelli,
Stefan Woerner
Abstract:
Hybrid quantum/classical variational algorithms can be implemented on noisy intermediate-scale quantum computers and can be used to find solutions for combinatorial optimization problems. Approaches discussed in the literature minimize the expectation of the problem Hamiltonian for a parameterized trial quantum state. The expectation is estimated as the sample mean of a set of measurement outcomes…
▽ More
Hybrid quantum/classical variational algorithms can be implemented on noisy intermediate-scale quantum computers and can be used to find solutions for combinatorial optimization problems. Approaches discussed in the literature minimize the expectation of the problem Hamiltonian for a parameterized trial quantum state. The expectation is estimated as the sample mean of a set of measurement outcomes, while the parameters of the trial state are optimized classically. This procedure is fully justified for quantum mechanical observables such as molecular energies. In the case of classical optimization problems, which yield diagonal Hamiltonians, we argue that aggregating the samples in a different way than the expected value is more natural. In this paper we propose the Conditional Value-at-Risk as an aggregation function. We empirically show -- using classical simulation as well as quantum hardware -- that this leads to faster convergence to better solutions for all combinatorial optimization problems tested in our study. We also provide analytical results to explain the observed difference in performance between different variational algorithms.
△ Less
Submitted 13 April, 2020; v1 submitted 10 July, 2019;
originally announced July 2019.
-
Performance of hybrid quantum/classical variational heuristics for combinatorial optimization
Authors:
Giacomo Nannicini
Abstract:
The recent literature on near-term applications for quantum computers contains several examples of the applications of hybrid quantum/classical variational approaches. This methodology can be applied to a variety of optimization problems, but its practical performance is not well studied yet. This paper moves some steps in the direction of characterizing the practical performance of the methodolog…
▽ More
The recent literature on near-term applications for quantum computers contains several examples of the applications of hybrid quantum/classical variational approaches. This methodology can be applied to a variety of optimization problems, but its practical performance is not well studied yet. This paper moves some steps in the direction of characterizing the practical performance of the methodology, in the context of finding solutions to classical combinatorial optimization problems. Our study is based on numerical results obtained applying several classical nonlinear optimization algorithms to Hamiltonians for six combinatorial optimization problems; the experiments are conducted via noise-free classical simulation of the quantum circuits implemented in Qiskit. We empirically verify that: (1) finding the ground state is harder for Hamiltonians with many Pauli terms; (2) classical global optimization methods are more successful than local methods due to their ability of avoiding the numerous local optima; (3) there does not seem to be a clear advantage in introducing entanglement in the variational form.
△ Less
Submitted 13 December, 2018; v1 submitted 30 May, 2018;
originally announced May 2018.
-
Pareto-Efficient Quantum Circuit Simulation Using Tensor Contraction Deferral
Authors:
Edwin Pednault,
John A. Gunnels,
Giacomo Nannicini,
Lior Horesh,
Thomas Magerlein,
Edgar Solomonik,
Erik W. Draeger,
Eric T. Holland,
Robert Wisnieff
Abstract:
With the current rate of progress in quantum computing technologies, systems with more than 50 qubits will soon become reality. Computing ideal quantum state amplitudes for circuits of such and larger sizes is a fundamental step to assess both the correctness, performance, and scaling behavior of quantum algorithms and the fidelities of quantum devices. However, resource requirements for such calc…
▽ More
With the current rate of progress in quantum computing technologies, systems with more than 50 qubits will soon become reality. Computing ideal quantum state amplitudes for circuits of such and larger sizes is a fundamental step to assess both the correctness, performance, and scaling behavior of quantum algorithms and the fidelities of quantum devices. However, resource requirements for such calculations on classical computers grow exponentially. We show that deferring tensor contractions can extend the boundaries of what can be computed on classical systems. To demonstrate this technique, we present results obtained from a calculation of the complete set of output amplitudes of a universal random circuit with depth 27 in a 2D lattice of $7 \times 7$ qubits, and an arbitrarily selected slice of $2^{37}$ amplitudes of a universal random circuit with depth 23 in a 2D lattice of $8 \times 7$ qubits. Combining our methodology with other decomposition approaches found in the literature, we show that we can simulate $7 \times 7$-qubit random circuits to arbitrary depth by leveraging secondary storage. These calculations were thought to be impossible due to resource requirements.
△ Less
Submitted 27 August, 2020; v1 submitted 16 October, 2017;
originally announced October 2017.
-
An Introduction to Quantum Computing, Without the Physics
Authors:
Giacomo Nannicini
Abstract:
This paper is a gentle but rigorous introduction to quantum computing intended for discrete mathematicians. Starting from a small set of assumptions on the behavior of quantum computing devices, we analyze their main characteristics, stressing the differences with classical computers, and finally describe two well-known algorithms (Simon's algorithm and Grover's algorithm) using the formalism deve…
▽ More
This paper is a gentle but rigorous introduction to quantum computing intended for discrete mathematicians. Starting from a small set of assumptions on the behavior of quantum computing devices, we analyze their main characteristics, stressing the differences with classical computers, and finally describe two well-known algorithms (Simon's algorithm and Grover's algorithm) using the formalism developed in previous sections. This paper does not touch on the physics of the devices, and therefore does not require any notion of quantum mechanics. Numerical examples on an implementation of Grover's algorithm using open-source software are provided.
△ Less
Submitted 21 February, 2020; v1 submitted 11 August, 2017;
originally announced August 2017.
