Showing 1–3 of 3 results for author: J., A

Improving the query complexity of quantum spatial search in two dimensions

Authors: Abhijith J., Apoorva Patel

Abstract: The question of whether quantum spatial search in two dimensions can be made optimal has long been an open problem. We report progress towards its resolution by showing that the oracle complexity for target location can be made optimal, by increasing the number of calls to the walk operator that incorporates the graph structure by a logarithmic factor. Our algorithm does not require amplitude ampl… ▽ More The question of whether quantum spatial search in two dimensions can be made optimal has long been an open problem. We report progress towards its resolution by showing that the oracle complexity for target location can be made optimal, by increasing the number of calls to the walk operator that incorporates the graph structure by a logarithmic factor. Our algorithm does not require amplitude amplification. An important ingredient of our algorithm is the implementation of multi-step quantum walks by graph powering, using a coin space of walk-length dependent dimension, which may be of independent interest. Finally, we demonstrate how to implement quantum walks arising from powers of symmetric Markov chains using our methods. △ Less

Submitted 4 January, 2020; v1 submitted 30 October, 2018; originally announced October 2018.

Comments: 20 pages (v2) Published version. (v3) Normalisation error in Corollary 2 corrected, replacing 1/8 by 1/2. Corresponding changes by a factor of 4 occur in Eqs.(33-35) and (43-46). Results and conclusions remain unchanged

Journal ref: Quantum Information and Computation 19, 0555-0574 (2019)

Quantum Algorithm Implementations for Beginners

Authors: Abhijith J., Adetokunbo Adedoyin, John Ambrosiano, Petr Anisimov, William Casper, Gopinath Chennupati, Carleton Coffrin, Hristo Djidjev, David Gunter, Satish Karra, Nathan Lemons, Shizeng Lin, Alexander Malyzhenkov, David Mascarenas, Susan Mniszewski, Balu Nadiga, Daniel O'Malley, Diane Oyen, Scott Pakin, Lakshman Prasad, Randy Roberts, Phillip Romero, Nandakishore Santhi, Nikolai Sinitsyn, Pieter J. Swart , et al. (9 additional authors not shown)

Abstract: As quantum computers become available to the general public, the need has arisen to train a cohort of quantum programmers, many of whom have been develo** classical computer programs for most of their careers. While currently available quantum computers have less than 100 qubits, quantum computing hardware is widely expected to grow in terms of qubit count, quality, and connectivity. This review… ▽ More As quantum computers become available to the general public, the need has arisen to train a cohort of quantum programmers, many of whom have been develo** classical computer programs for most of their careers. While currently available quantum computers have less than 100 qubits, quantum computing hardware is widely expected to grow in terms of qubit count, quality, and connectivity. This review aims to explain the principles of quantum programming, which are quite different from classical programming, with straightforward algebra that makes understanding of the underlying fascinating quantum mechanical principles optional. We give an introduction to quantum computing algorithms and their implementation on real quantum hardware. We survey 20 different quantum algorithms, attempting to describe each in a succinct and self-contained fashion. We show how these algorithms can be implemented on IBM's quantum computer, and in each case, we discuss the results of the implementation with respect to differences between the simulator and the actual hardware runs. This article introduces computer scientists, physicists, and engineers to quantum algorithms and provides a blueprint for their implementations. △ Less

Submitted 26 June, 2022; v1 submitted 10 April, 2018; originally announced April 2018.

Comments: ACM Transactions on Quantum Computing

Report number: LA-UR-20-22353

Journal ref: ACM Transactions on Quantum Computing, Volume 3, Issue 4, 18 (2022)

Spatial Search on Graphs with Multiple Targets using Flip-flop Quantum Walk

Authors: Abhijith J., Apoorva Patel

Abstract: We analyse the eigenvalue and eigenvector structure of the flip-flop quantum walk on regular graphs, explicitly demonstrating how it is quadratically faster than the classical random walk. Then we use it in a controlled spatial search algorithm with multiple target states, and determine the oracle complexity as a function of the spectral gap and the number of target states. The oracle complexity i… ▽ More We analyse the eigenvalue and eigenvector structure of the flip-flop quantum walk on regular graphs, explicitly demonstrating how it is quadratically faster than the classical random walk. Then we use it in a controlled spatial search algorithm with multiple target states, and determine the oracle complexity as a function of the spectral gap and the number of target states. The oracle complexity is optimal as a function of the graph size and the number of target states, when the spectral gap of the adjacency matrix is $Θ(1)$. It is also optimal for spatial search on $D>4$ dimensional hypercubic lattices. Otherwise it matches the best result available in the literature, with a much simpler algorithm. Our results also yield bounds on the classical hitting time of random walks on regular graphs, which may be of independent interest. △ Less

Submitted 30 October, 2018; v1 submitted 4 January, 2018; originally announced January 2018.

Comments: 37 pages (v2) Revised to use Tulsi's controlled spatial search algorithm. The oracle complexity is improved, and is optimal for D>4 hypercubic lattices. Results compared to those obtained in terms of hitting time

Journal ref: Quantum Information and Computation 18, 1295-1331 (2018)