-
Exploiting symmetries in nuclear Hamiltonians for ground state preparation
Authors:
Joe Gibbs,
Zoë Holmes,
Paul Stevenson
Abstract:
The Lipkin and Agassi models are simplified nuclear models that provide natural test beds for quantum simulation methods. Prior work has investigated the suitability of the Variational Quantum Eigensolver (VQE) to find the ground state of these models. There is a growing awareness that if VQE is to prove viable, we will need problem inspired ansätze that take into account the symmetry properties o…
▽ More
The Lipkin and Agassi models are simplified nuclear models that provide natural test beds for quantum simulation methods. Prior work has investigated the suitability of the Variational Quantum Eigensolver (VQE) to find the ground state of these models. There is a growing awareness that if VQE is to prove viable, we will need problem inspired ansätze that take into account the symmetry properties of the problem and use clever initialization strategies. Here, by focusing on the Lipkin and Agassi models, we investigate how to do this in the context of nuclear physics ground state problems. We further use our observations to discus the potential of new classical, but quantum-inspired, approaches to learning ground states in nuclear problems.
△ Less
Submitted 15 February, 2024;
originally announced February 2024.
-
High-fidelity dimer excitations using quantum hardware
Authors:
Norhan M. Eassa,
Joe Gibbs,
Zoe Holmes,
Andrew Sornborger,
Lukasz Cincio,
Gavin Hester,
Paul Kairys,
Mario Motta,
Jeffrey Cohn,
Arnab Banerjee
Abstract:
Many-body entangled quantum spin systems exhibit emergent phenomena such as topological quantum spin liquids with distinct excitation spectra accessed in inelastic neutron scattering (INS) experiments. Here we simulate the dynamics of a quantum spin dimer, the basic quantum unit of emergent many-body spin systems. While canonical Trotterization methods require deep circuits precluding long time-sc…
▽ More
Many-body entangled quantum spin systems exhibit emergent phenomena such as topological quantum spin liquids with distinct excitation spectra accessed in inelastic neutron scattering (INS) experiments. Here we simulate the dynamics of a quantum spin dimer, the basic quantum unit of emergent many-body spin systems. While canonical Trotterization methods require deep circuits precluding long time-scale simulations, we demonstrate 'direct' Resource-Efficient Fast-forwarding (REFF) measurements with short-depth circuits that can be used to capture longer time dynamics on quantum hardware. The temporal evolution of the 2-spin correlation coefficients enabled the calculation of the dynamical structure factor $S(\mathbf{Q},ω)$ - the key component of the neutron scattering cross-section. We simulate the triplet gap and the triplet splitting of the quantum dimer with sufficient fidelity to compare to experimental neutron data. Our results on current circuit hardware pave an important avenue to benchmark, or even predict, the outputs of the costly INS experiments.
△ Less
Submitted 12 April, 2023;
originally announced April 2023.
-
The power and limitations of learning quantum dynamics incoherently
Authors:
Sofiene Jerbi,
Joe Gibbs,
Manuel S. Rudolph,
Matthias C. Caro,
Patrick J. Coles,
Hsin-Yuan Huang,
Zoë Holmes
Abstract:
Quantum process learning is emerging as an important tool to study quantum systems. While studied extensively in coherent frameworks, where the target and model system can share quantum information, less attention has been paid to whether the dynamics of quantum systems can be learned without the system and target directly interacting. Such incoherent frameworks are practically appealing since the…
▽ More
Quantum process learning is emerging as an important tool to study quantum systems. While studied extensively in coherent frameworks, where the target and model system can share quantum information, less attention has been paid to whether the dynamics of quantum systems can be learned without the system and target directly interacting. Such incoherent frameworks are practically appealing since they open up methods of transpiling quantum processes between the different physical platforms without the need for technically challenging hybrid entanglement schemes. Here we provide bounds on the sample complexity of learning unitary processes incoherently by analyzing the number of measurements that are required to emulate well-established coherent learning strategies. We prove that if arbitrary measurements are allowed, then any efficiently representable unitary can be efficiently learned within the incoherent framework; however, when restricted to shallow-depth measurements only low-entangling unitaries can be learned. We demonstrate our incoherent learning algorithm for low entangling unitaries by successfully learning a 16-qubit unitary on \texttt{ibmq\_kolkata}, and further demonstrate the scalabilty of our proposed algorithm through extensive numerical experiments.
△ Less
Submitted 22 March, 2023;
originally announced March 2023.
-
Dynamical simulation via quantum machine learning with provable generalization
Authors:
Joe Gibbs,
Zoë Holmes,
Matthias C. Caro,
Nicholas Ezzell,
Hsin-Yuan Huang,
Lukasz Cincio,
Andrew T. Sornborger,
Patrick J. Coles
Abstract:
Much attention has been paid to dynamical simulation and quantum machine learning (QML) independently as applications for quantum advantage, while the possibility of using QML to enhance dynamical simulations has not been thoroughly investigated. Here we develop a framework for using QML methods to simulate quantum dynamics on near-term quantum hardware. We use generalization bounds, which bound t…
▽ More
Much attention has been paid to dynamical simulation and quantum machine learning (QML) independently as applications for quantum advantage, while the possibility of using QML to enhance dynamical simulations has not been thoroughly investigated. Here we develop a framework for using QML methods to simulate quantum dynamics on near-term quantum hardware. We use generalization bounds, which bound the error a machine learning model makes on unseen data, to rigorously analyze the training data requirements of an algorithm within this framework. This provides a guarantee that our algorithm is resource-efficient, both in terms of qubit and data requirements. Our numerics exhibit efficient scaling with problem size, and we simulate 20 times longer than Trotterization on IBMQ-Bogota.
△ Less
Submitted 6 September, 2022; v1 submitted 21 April, 2022;
originally announced April 2022.
-
Out-of-distribution generalization for learning quantum dynamics
Authors:
Matthias C. Caro,
Hsin-Yuan Huang,
Nicholas Ezzell,
Joe Gibbs,
Andrew T. Sornborger,
Lukasz Cincio,
Patrick J. Coles,
Zoë Holmes
Abstract:
Generalization bounds are a critical tool to assess the training data requirements of Quantum Machine Learning (QML). Recent work has established guarantees for in-distribution generalization of quantum neural networks (QNNs), where training and testing data are drawn from the same data distribution. However, there are currently no results on out-of-distribution generalization in QML, where we req…
▽ More
Generalization bounds are a critical tool to assess the training data requirements of Quantum Machine Learning (QML). Recent work has established guarantees for in-distribution generalization of quantum neural networks (QNNs), where training and testing data are drawn from the same data distribution. However, there are currently no results on out-of-distribution generalization in QML, where we require a trained model to perform well even on data drawn from a different distribution to the training distribution. Here, we prove out-of-distribution generalization for the task of learning an unknown unitary. In particular, we show that one can learn the action of a unitary on entangled states having trained only product states. Since product states can be prepared using only single-qubit gates, this advances the prospects of learning quantum dynamics on near term quantum hardware, and further opens up new methods for both the classical and quantum compilation of quantum circuits.
△ Less
Submitted 9 July, 2023; v1 submitted 21 April, 2022;
originally announced April 2022.
-
Long-time simulations with high fidelity on quantum hardware
Authors:
Joe Gibbs,
Kaitlin Gili,
Zoë Holmes,
Benjamin Commeau,
Andrew Arrasmith,
Lukasz Cincio,
Patrick J. Coles,
Andrew Sornborger
Abstract:
Moderate-size quantum computers are now publicly accessible over the cloud, opening the exciting possibility of performing dynamical simulations of quantum systems. However, while rapidly improving, these devices have short coherence times, limiting the depth of algorithms that may be successfully implemented. Here we demonstrate that, despite these limitations, it is possible to implement long-ti…
▽ More
Moderate-size quantum computers are now publicly accessible over the cloud, opening the exciting possibility of performing dynamical simulations of quantum systems. However, while rapidly improving, these devices have short coherence times, limiting the depth of algorithms that may be successfully implemented. Here we demonstrate that, despite these limitations, it is possible to implement long-time, high fidelity simulations on current hardware. Specifically, we simulate an XY-model spin chain on the Rigetti and IBM quantum computers, maintaining a fidelity of at least 0.9 for over 600 time steps. This is a factor of 150 longer than is possible using the iterated Trotter method. Our simulations are performed using a new algorithm that we call the fixed state Variational Fast Forwarding (fsVFF) algorithm. This algorithm decreases the circuit depth and width required for a quantum simulation by finding an approximate diagonalization of a short time evolution unitary. Crucially, fsVFF only requires finding a diagonalization on the subspace spanned by the initial state, rather than on the total Hilbert space as with previous methods, substantially reducing the required resources. We further demonstrate the viability of fsVFF through large numerical implementations of the algorithm, as well as an analysis of its noise resilience and the scaling of simulation errors.
△ Less
Submitted 14 July, 2021; v1 submitted 8 February, 2021;
originally announced February 2021.
