Showing 1–31 of 31 results for author: Bärtschi, A

Potential Applications of Quantum Computing at Los Alamos National Laboratory

Authors: Andreas Bärtschi, Francesco Caravelli, Carleton Coffrin, Jonhas Colina, Stephan Eidenbenz, Abhijith Jayakumar, Scott Lawrence, Minseong Lee, Andrey Y. Lokhov, Avanish Mishra, Sidhant Misra, Zachary Morrell, Zain Mughal, Duff Neill, Andrei Piryatinski, Allen Scheie, Marc Vuffray, Yu Zhang

Abstract: The emergence of quantum computing technology over the last decade indicates the potential for a transformational impact in the study of quantum mechanical systems. It is natural to presume that such computing technologies would be valuable to large scientific institutions, such as United States national laboratories. However, detailed descriptions of what these institutions would like to use thes… ▽ More The emergence of quantum computing technology over the last decade indicates the potential for a transformational impact in the study of quantum mechanical systems. It is natural to presume that such computing technologies would be valuable to large scientific institutions, such as United States national laboratories. However, detailed descriptions of what these institutions would like to use these computers for are limited. To help provide some initial insights into this topic, this report develops detailed use cases of how quantum computing technology could be utilized to enhance a variety of quantum physics research activities at Los Alamos National Laboratory, including quantum magnetic materials, high-temperature superconductivity and nuclear astrophysics simulations. The report discusses how current high-performance computers are used for scientific discovery today and develops detailed descriptions of the types of quantum physics simulations that Los Alamos National Laboratory scientists would like to conduct, if a sufficient computing technology became available. While the report strives to highlight the breadth of potential application areas for quantum computation, this investigation has also indicated that many more use cases exist at Los Alamos National Laboratory, which could be documented in similar detail with sufficient time and effort. △ Less

Submitted 7 June, 2024; originally announced June 2024.

Report number: LA-UR-24-24966

Graph Neural Networks for Parameterized Quantum Circuits Expressibility Estimation

Authors: Shamminuj Aktar, Andreas Bärtschi, Diane Oyen, Stephan Eidenbenz, Abdel-Hameed A. Badawy

Abstract: Parameterized quantum circuits (PQCs) are fundamental to quantum machine learning (QML), quantum optimization, and variational quantum algorithms (VQAs). The expressibility of PQCs is a measure that determines their capability to harness the full potential of the quantum state space. It is thus a crucial guidepost to know when selecting a particular PQC ansatz. However, the existing technique for… ▽ More Parameterized quantum circuits (PQCs) are fundamental to quantum machine learning (QML), quantum optimization, and variational quantum algorithms (VQAs). The expressibility of PQCs is a measure that determines their capability to harness the full potential of the quantum state space. It is thus a crucial guidepost to know when selecting a particular PQC ansatz. However, the existing technique for expressibility computation through statistical estimation requires a large number of samples, which poses significant challenges due to time and computational resource constraints. This paper introduces a novel approach for expressibility estimation of PQCs using Graph Neural Networks (GNNs). We demonstrate the predictive power of our GNN model with a dataset consisting of 25,000 samples from the noiseless IBM QASM Simulator and 12,000 samples from three distinct noisy quantum backends. The model accurately estimates expressibility, with root mean square errors (RMSE) of 0.05 and 0.06 for the noiseless and noisy backends, respectively. We compare our model's predictions with reference circuits [Sim and others, QuTe'2019] and IBM Qiskit's hardware-efficient ansatz sets to further evaluate our model's performance. Our experimental evaluation in noiseless and noisy scenarios reveals a close alignment with ground truth expressibility values, highlighting the model's efficacy. Moreover, our model exhibits promising extrapolation capabilities, predicting expressibility values with low RMSE for out-of-range qubit circuits trained solely on only up to 5-qubit circuit sets. This work thus provides a reliable means of efficiently evaluating the expressibility of diverse PQCs on noiseless simulators and hardware. △ Less

Submitted 13 May, 2024; originally announced May 2024.

Trainability Barriers in Low-Depth QAOA Landscapes

Authors: Joel Rajakumar, John Golden, Andreas Bärtschi, Stephan Eidenbenz

Abstract: The Quantum Alternating Operator Ansatz (QAOA) is a prominent variational quantum algorithm for solving combinatorial optimization problems. Its effectiveness depends on identifying input parameters that yield high-quality solutions. However, understanding the complexity of training QAOA remains an under-explored area. Previous results have given analytical performance guarantees for a small, fixe… ▽ More The Quantum Alternating Operator Ansatz (QAOA) is a prominent variational quantum algorithm for solving combinatorial optimization problems. Its effectiveness depends on identifying input parameters that yield high-quality solutions. However, understanding the complexity of training QAOA remains an under-explored area. Previous results have given analytical performance guarantees for a small, fixed number of parameters. At the opposite end of the spectrum, barren plateaus are likely to emerge at $Ω(n)$ parameters for $n$ qubits. In this work, we study the difficulty of training in the intermediate regime, which is the focus of most current numerical studies and near-term hardware implementations. Through extensive numerical analysis of the quality and quantity of local minima, we argue that QAOA landscapes can exhibit a superpolynomial growth in the number of low-quality local minima even when the number of parameters scales logarithmically with $n$. This means that the common technique of gradient descent from randomly initialized parameters is doomed to fail beyond small $n$, and emphasizes the need for good initial guesses of the optimal parameters. △ Less

Submitted 15 February, 2024; originally announced February 2024.

Comments: Accepted at the 21st ACM International Conference on Computing Frontiers CF'24

Report number: LA-UR-24-20039

Hierarchical Multigrid Ansatz for Variational Quantum Algorithms

Authors: Christo Meriwether Keller, Stephan Eidenbenz, Andreas Bärtschi, Daniel O'Malley, John Golden, Satyajayant Misra

Abstract: Quantum computing is an emerging topic in engineering that promises to enhance supercomputing using fundamental physics. In the near term, the best candidate algorithms for achieving this advantage are variational quantum algorithms (VQAs). We design and numerically evaluate a novel ansatz for VQAs, focusing in particular on the variational quantum eigensolver (VQE). As our ansatz is inspired by c… ▽ More Quantum computing is an emerging topic in engineering that promises to enhance supercomputing using fundamental physics. In the near term, the best candidate algorithms for achieving this advantage are variational quantum algorithms (VQAs). We design and numerically evaluate a novel ansatz for VQAs, focusing in particular on the variational quantum eigensolver (VQE). As our ansatz is inspired by classical multigrid hierarchy methods, we call it "multigrid'' ansatz. The multigrid ansatz creates a parameterized quantum circuit for a quantum problem on $n$ qubits by successively building and optimizing circuits for smaller qubit counts $j < n$, reusing optimized parameter values as initial solutions to next level hierarchy at $j+1$. We show through numerical simulation that the multigrid ansatz outperforms the standard hardware-efficient ansatz in terms of solution quality for the Laplacian eigensolver as well as for a large class of combinatorial optimization problems with specific examples for MaxCut and Maximum $k$-Satisfiability. Our studies establish the multi-grid ansatz as a viable candidate for many VQAs and in particular present a promising alternative to the QAOA approach for combinatorial optimization problems. △ Less

Submitted 22 December, 2023; originally announced December 2023.

Comments: 11 pages, 9 figures

Report number: LA-UR-23-33674

JuliQAOA: Fast, Flexible QAOA Simulation

Authors: John Golden, Andreas Bärtschi, Daniel O'Malley, Elijah Pelofske, Stephan Eidenbenz

Abstract: We introduce JuliQAOA, a simulation package specifically built for the Quantum Alternating Operator Ansatz (QAOA). JuliQAOA does not require a circuit-level description of QAOA problems, or another package to simulate such circuits, instead relying on a more direct linear algebra implementation. This allows for increased QAOA-specific performance improvements, as well as improved flexibility and g… ▽ More We introduce JuliQAOA, a simulation package specifically built for the Quantum Alternating Operator Ansatz (QAOA). JuliQAOA does not require a circuit-level description of QAOA problems, or another package to simulate such circuits, instead relying on a more direct linear algebra implementation. This allows for increased QAOA-specific performance improvements, as well as improved flexibility and generality. JuliQAOA is the first QAOA package designed to aid in the study of both constrained and unconstrained combinatorial optimization problems, and can easily include novel cost functions, mixer Hamiltonians, and other variations. JuliQAOA also includes robust and extensible methods for learning optimal angles. Written in the Julia language, JuliQAOA outperforms existing QAOA software packages and scales well to HPC-level resources. JuliQAOA is available at https://github.com/lanl/JuliQAOA.jl. △ Less

Submitted 11 December, 2023; originally announced December 2023.

Quantum Optimization: Potential, Challenges, and the Path Forward

Authors: Amira Abbas, Andris Ambainis, Brandon Augustino, Andreas Bärtschi, Harry Buhrman, Carleton Coffrin, Giorgio Cortiana, Vedran Dunjko, Daniel J. Egger, Bruce G. Elmegreen, Nicola Franco, Filippo Fratini, Bryce Fuller, Julien Gacon, Constantin Gonciulea, Sander Gribling, Swati Gupta, Stuart Hadfield, Raoul Heese, Gerhard Kircher, Thomas Kleinert, Thorsten Koch, Georgios Korpas, Steve Lenk, Jakub Marecek , et al. (21 additional authors not shown)

Abstract: Recent advances in quantum computers are demonstrating the ability to solve problems at a scale beyond brute force classical simulation. As such, a widespread interest in quantum algorithms has developed in many areas, with optimization being one of the most pronounced domains. Across computer science and physics, there are a number of algorithmic approaches, often with little linkage. This is fur… ▽ More Recent advances in quantum computers are demonstrating the ability to solve problems at a scale beyond brute force classical simulation. As such, a widespread interest in quantum algorithms has developed in many areas, with optimization being one of the most pronounced domains. Across computer science and physics, there are a number of algorithmic approaches, often with little linkage. This is further complicated by the fragmented nature of the field of mathematical optimization, where major classes of optimization problems, such as combinatorial optimization, convex optimization, non-convex optimization, and stochastic extensions, have devoted communities. With these aspects in mind, this work draws on multiple approaches to study quantum optimization. Provably exact versus heuristic settings are first explained using computational complexity theory - highlighting where quantum advantage is possible in each context. Then, the core building blocks for quantum optimization algorithms are outlined to subsequently define prominent problem classes and identify key open questions that, if answered, will advance the field. The effects of scaling relevant problems on noisy quantum devices are also outlined in detail, alongside meaningful benchmarking problems. We underscore the importance of benchmarking by proposing clear metrics to conduct appropriate comparisons with classical optimization techniques. Lastly, we highlight two domains - finance and sustainability - as rich sources of optimization problems that could be used to benchmark, and eventually validate, the potential real-world impact of quantum optimization. △ Less

Submitted 4 December, 2023; originally announced December 2023.

Comments: 70 pages, 9 Figures, 4 Tables

Scaling Whole-Chip QAOA for Higher-Order Ising Spin Glass Models on Heavy-Hex Graphs

Authors: Elijah Pelofske, Andreas Bärtschi, Lukasz Cincio, John Golden, Stephan Eidenbenz

Abstract: We show through numerical simulation that the Quantum Alternating Operator Ansatz (QAOA) for higher-order, random-coefficient, heavy-hex compatible spin glass Ising models has strong parameter concentration across problem sizes from $16$ up to $127$ qubits for $p=1$ up to $p=5$, which allows for straight-forward transfer learning of QAOA angles on instance sizes where exhaustive grid-search is pro… ▽ More We show through numerical simulation that the Quantum Alternating Operator Ansatz (QAOA) for higher-order, random-coefficient, heavy-hex compatible spin glass Ising models has strong parameter concentration across problem sizes from $16$ up to $127$ qubits for $p=1$ up to $p=5$, which allows for straight-forward transfer learning of QAOA angles on instance sizes where exhaustive grid-search is prohibitive even for $p>1$. We use Matrix Product State (MPS) simulation at different bond dimensions to obtain confidence in these results, and we obtain the optimal solutions to these combinatorial optimization problems using CPLEX. In order to assess the ability of current noisy quantum hardware to exploit such parameter concentration, we execute short-depth QAOA circuits (with a CNOT depth of 6 per $p$, resulting in circuits which contain $1420$ two qubit gates for $127$ qubit $p=5$ QAOA) on $100$ higher-order (cubic term) Ising models on IBM quantum superconducting processors with $16, 27, 127$ qubits using QAOA angles learned from a single $16$-qubit instance. We show that (i) the best quantum processors generally find lower energy solutions up to $p=3$ for 27 qubit systems and up to $p=2$ for 127 qubit systems and are overcome by noise at higher values of $p$, (ii) the best quantum processors find mean energies that are about a factor of two off from the noise-free numerical simulation results. Additional insights from our experiments are that large performance differences exist among different quantum processors even of the same generation and that dynamical decoupling significantly improve performance for some, but decrease performance for other quantum processors. Lastly we show $p=1$ QAOA angle mean energy landscapes computed using up to a $414$ qubit quantum computer, showing that the mean QAOA energy landscapes remain very similar as the problem size changes. △ Less

Submitted 1 December, 2023; originally announced December 2023.

Report number: LA-UR-23-33192

Provable bounds for noise-free expectation values computed from noisy samples

Authors: Samantha V. Barron, Daniel J. Egger, Elijah Pelofske, Andreas Bärtschi, Stephan Eidenbenz, Matthis Lehmkuehler, Stefan Woerner

Abstract: In this paper, we explore the impact of noise on quantum computing, particularly focusing on the challenges when sampling bit strings from noisy quantum computers as well as the implications for optimization and machine learning applications. We formally quantify the sampling overhead to extract good samples from noisy quantum computers and relate it to the layer fidelity, a metric to determine th… ▽ More In this paper, we explore the impact of noise on quantum computing, particularly focusing on the challenges when sampling bit strings from noisy quantum computers as well as the implications for optimization and machine learning applications. We formally quantify the sampling overhead to extract good samples from noisy quantum computers and relate it to the layer fidelity, a metric to determine the performance of noisy quantum processors. Further, we show how this allows us to use the Conditional Value at Risk of noisy samples to determine provable bounds on noise-free expectation values. We discuss how to leverage these bounds for different algorithms and demonstrate our findings through experiments on a real quantum computer involving up to 127 qubits. The results show a strong alignment with theoretical predictions. △ Less

Submitted 1 December, 2023; originally announced December 2023.

Comments: Pages 17, Figures 6, Tables 3

Simulating Heavy-Hex Transverse Field Ising Model Magnetization Dynamics Using Programmable Quantum Annealers

Authors: Elijah Pelofske, Andreas Bärtschi, Stephan Eidenbenz

Abstract: Recently, a Hamiltonian dynamics simulation was performed on a kicked ferromagnetic 2D transverse field Ising model with a connectivity graph native to the 127 qubit heavy-hex IBM Quantum architecture using ZNE quantum error mitigation. We demonstrate that one of the observables in this Trotterized Hamiltonian dynamics simulation, namely magnetization, can be efficiently simulated on current super… ▽ More Recently, a Hamiltonian dynamics simulation was performed on a kicked ferromagnetic 2D transverse field Ising model with a connectivity graph native to the 127 qubit heavy-hex IBM Quantum architecture using ZNE quantum error mitigation. We demonstrate that one of the observables in this Trotterized Hamiltonian dynamics simulation, namely magnetization, can be efficiently simulated on current superconducting qubit-based programmable quantum annealing computers. We show this using two distinct methods: reverse quantum annealing and h-gain state encoding. This simulation is possible because the 127 qubit heavy-hex connectivity graph can be natively embedded onto the D-Wave Pegasus quantum annealer hardware graph and because there exists a direct equivalence between the energy scales of the two types of quantum computers. We derive equivalent anneal pauses in order to simulate the Trotterized quantum circuit dynamics for varying Rx rotations $θ_h \in (0, \fracπ{2}]$, using quantum annealing processors. Multiple disjoint instances of the Ising model of interest can be embedded onto the D-Wave Pegasus hardware graph, allowing for parallel quantum annealing. We report equivalent magnetization dynamics using quantum annealing for time steps of 20, 50 up to 10,000, which we find are consistent with exact classical 27 qubit heavy-hex Trotterized circuit magnetization dynamics, and we observe reasonable, albeit noisy, agreement with the existing simulations for single site magnetization at 20 Trotter steps. The quantum annealers are able to simulate equivalent magnetization dynamics for thousands of time steps, significantly out of the computational reach of the digital quantum computers on which the original Hamiltonian dynamics simulations were performed. △ Less

Submitted 26 May, 2024; v1 submitted 2 November, 2023; originally announced November 2023.

Report number: LA-UR-23-27359

Predicting Expressibility of Parameterized Quantum Circuits using Graph Neural Network

Authors: Shamminuj Aktar, Andreas Bärtschi, Abdel-Hameed A. Badawy, Diane Oyen, Stephan Eidenbenz

Abstract: Parameterized Quantum Circuits (PQCs) are essential to quantum machine learning and optimization algorithms. The expressibility of PQCs, which measures their ability to represent a wide range of quantum states, is a critical factor influencing their efficacy in solving quantum problems. However, the existing technique for computing expressibility relies on statistically estimating it through class… ▽ More Parameterized Quantum Circuits (PQCs) are essential to quantum machine learning and optimization algorithms. The expressibility of PQCs, which measures their ability to represent a wide range of quantum states, is a critical factor influencing their efficacy in solving quantum problems. However, the existing technique for computing expressibility relies on statistically estimating it through classical simulations, which requires many samples. In this work, we propose a novel method based on Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) for predicting the expressibility of PQCs. By leveraging the graph-based representation of PQCs, our GNN-based model captures intricate relationships between circuit parameters and their resulting expressibility. We train the GNN model on a comprehensive dataset of PQCs annotated with their expressibility values. Experimental evaluation on a four thousand random PQC dataset and IBM Qiskit's hardware efficient ansatz sets demonstrates the superior performance of our approach, achieving a root mean square error (RMSE) of 0.03 and 0.06, respectively. △ Less

Submitted 13 September, 2023; originally announced September 2023.

Report number: LA-UR-23-28303

Journal ref: Posters of the IEEE International Conference on Quantum Computing and Engineering (QCE), 2023, pp. 401-402

Probing Quantum Telecloning on Superconducting Quantum Processors

Authors: Elijah Pelofske, Andreas Bärtschi, Stephan Eidenbenz, Bryan Garcia, Boris Kiefer

Abstract: Quantum information can not be perfectly cloned, but approximate copies of quantum information can be generated. Quantum telecloning combines approximate quantum cloning, more typically referred as quantum cloning, and quantum teleportation. Quantum telecloning allows approximate copies of quantum information to be constructed by separate parties, using the classical results of a Bell measurement… ▽ More Quantum information can not be perfectly cloned, but approximate copies of quantum information can be generated. Quantum telecloning combines approximate quantum cloning, more typically referred as quantum cloning, and quantum teleportation. Quantum telecloning allows approximate copies of quantum information to be constructed by separate parties, using the classical results of a Bell measurement made on a prepared quantum telecloning state. Quantum telecloning can be implemented as a circuit on quantum computers using a classical co-processor to compute classical feed forward instructions using if statements based on the results of a mid-circuit Bell measurement in real time. We present universal, symmetric, optimal $1 \rightarrow M$ telecloning circuits, and experimentally demonstrate these quantum telecloning circuits for $M=2$ up to $M=10$, natively executed with real time classical control systems on IBM Quantum superconducting processors, known as dynamic circuits. We perform the cloning procedure on many different message states across the Bloch sphere, on $7$ IBM Quantum processors, optionally using the error suppression technique X-X sequence digital dynamical decoupling. Two circuit optimizations are utilized, one which removes ancilla qubits for $M=2, 3$, and one which reduces the total number of gates in the circuit but still uses ancilla qubits. Parallel single qubit tomography with MLE density matrix reconstruction is used in order to compute the mixed state density matrices of the clone qubits, and clone quality is measured using quantum fidelity. These results present one of the largest and most comprehensive NISQ computer experimental analyses on (single qubit) quantum telecloning to date. The clone fidelity sharply decreases to $0.5$ for $M > 5$, but for $M=2$ we are able to achieve a mean clone fidelity of up to $0.79$ using dynamical decoupling. △ Less

Submitted 8 May, 2024; v1 submitted 29 August, 2023; originally announced August 2023.

Report number: LA-UR-23-29397

Lower Bounds on Number of QAOA Rounds Required for Guaranteed Approximation Ratios

Authors: Naphan Benchasattabuse, Andreas Bärtschi, Luis Pedro García-Pintos, John Golden, Nathan Lemons, Stephan Eidenbenz

Abstract: The quantum alternating operator ansatz (QAOA) is a heuristic hybrid quantum-classical algorithm for finding high-quality approximate solutions to combinatorial optimization problems, such as Maximum Satisfiability. While QAOA is well-studied, theoretical results as to its runtime or approximation ratio guarantees are still relatively sparse. We provide some of the first lower bounds for the numbe… ▽ More The quantum alternating operator ansatz (QAOA) is a heuristic hybrid quantum-classical algorithm for finding high-quality approximate solutions to combinatorial optimization problems, such as Maximum Satisfiability. While QAOA is well-studied, theoretical results as to its runtime or approximation ratio guarantees are still relatively sparse. We provide some of the first lower bounds for the number of rounds (the dominant component of QAOA runtimes) required for QAOA. For our main result, (i) we leverage a connection between quantum annealing times and the angles of QAOA to derive a lower bound on the number of rounds of QAOA with respect to the guaranteed approximation ratio. We apply and calculate this bound with Grover-style mixing unitaries and (ii) show that this type of QAOA requires at least a polynomial number of rounds to guarantee any constant approximation ratios for most problems. We also (iii) show that the bound depends only on the statistical values of the objective functions, and when the problem can be modeled as a $k$-local Hamiltonian, can be easily estimated from the coefficients of the Hamiltonians. For the conventional transverse field mixer, (iv) our framework gives a trivial lower bound to all bounded occurrence local cost problems and all strictly $k$-local cost Hamiltonians matching known results that constant approximation ratio is obtainable with constant round QAOA for a few optimization problems from these classes. Using our novel proof framework, (v) we recover the Grover lower bound for unstructured search and -- with small modification -- show that our bound applies to any QAOA-style search protocol that starts in the ground state of the mixing unitaries. △ Less

Submitted 3 September, 2023; v1 submitted 29 August, 2023; originally announced August 2023.

Comments: 24 pages, comments welcome, v3: correct some phrasing; results stay unchanged

Report number: LA-UR-23-29376

Increasing the Measured Effective Quantum Volume with Zero Noise Extrapolation

Authors: Elijah Pelofske, Vincent Russo, Ryan LaRose, Andrea Mari, Dan Strano, Andreas Bärtschi, Stephan Eidenbenz, William J. Zeng

Abstract: Quantum Volume is a full-stack benchmark for near-term quantum computers. It quantifies the largest size of a square circuit which can be executed on the target device with reasonable fidelity. Error mitigation is a set of techniques intended to remove the effects of noise present in the computation of noisy quantum computers when computing an expectation value of interest. Effective quantum volum… ▽ More Quantum Volume is a full-stack benchmark for near-term quantum computers. It quantifies the largest size of a square circuit which can be executed on the target device with reasonable fidelity. Error mitigation is a set of techniques intended to remove the effects of noise present in the computation of noisy quantum computers when computing an expectation value of interest. Effective quantum volume is a proposed metric that applies error mitigation to the quantum volume protocol in order to evaluate the effectiveness not only of the target device but also of the error mitigation algorithm. Digital Zero-Noise Extrapolation (ZNE) is an error mitigation technique that estimates the noiseless expectation value using circuit folding to amplify errors by known scale factors and extrapolating to the zero-noise limit. Here we demonstrate that ZNE, with global and local unitary folding with fractional scale factors, in conjunction with dynamical decoupling, can increase the effective quantum volume over the vendor-measured quantum volume. Specifically, we measure the effective quantum volume of four IBM Quantum superconducting processor units, obtaining values that are larger than the vendor-measured quantum volume on each device. This is the first such increase reported. △ Less

Submitted 2 July, 2024; v1 submitted 27 June, 2023; originally announced June 2023.

Report number: LA-UR-23-26260

High-Round QAOA for MAX $k$-SAT on Trapped Ion NISQ Devices

Authors: Elijah Pelofske, Andreas Bärtschi, John Golden, Stephan Eidenbenz

Abstract: The Quantum Alternating Operator Ansatz (QAOA) is a hybrid classical-quantum algorithm that aims to sample the optimal solution(s) of discrete combinatorial optimization problems. We present optimized QAOA circuit constructions for sampling MAX $k$-SAT problems, specifically for $k=3$ and $k=4$. The novel $4$-SAT QAOA circuit construction we present uses measurement based uncomputation, followed b… ▽ More The Quantum Alternating Operator Ansatz (QAOA) is a hybrid classical-quantum algorithm that aims to sample the optimal solution(s) of discrete combinatorial optimization problems. We present optimized QAOA circuit constructions for sampling MAX $k$-SAT problems, specifically for $k=3$ and $k=4$. The novel $4$-SAT QAOA circuit construction we present uses measurement based uncomputation, followed by classical feed forward conditional operations. The QAOA circuit parameters for $3$-SAT are optimized via exact classical (noise-free) simulation, using HPC resources to simulate up to $20$ rounds on $10$ qubits. In order to explore the limits of current NISQ devices we execute these optimized QAOA circuits for random $3$-SAT test instances with clause-to-variable ratio $4$ on four trapped ion quantum computers: Quantinuum H1-1 (20 qubits), IonQ Harmony (11 qubits), IonQ Aria 1 (25 qubits), and IonQ Forte (30 qubits). The QAOA circuits that are executed include $n=10$ up to $p=20$, and $n=22$ for $p=1$ and $p=2$. The high round circuits use upwards of 9,000 individual gate instructions, making these some of the largest QAOA circuits executed on NISQ devices. Our main finding is that current NISQ devices perform best at low round counts (i.e., $p = 1,\ldots, 5$) and then -- as expected due to noise -- gradually start returning satisfiability truth assignments that are no better than randomly picked solutions as the number of QAOA rounds are further increased. △ Less

Submitted 10 August, 2023; v1 submitted 5 June, 2023; originally announced June 2023.

Report number: LA-UR-23-24237

The Quantum Alternating Operator Ansatz for Satisfiability Problems

Authors: John Golden, Andreas Bärtschi, Daniel O'Malley, Stephan Eidenbenz

Abstract: We comparatively study, through large-scale numerical simulation, the performance across a large set of Quantum Alternating Operator Ansatz (QAOA) implementations for finding approximate and optimum solutions to unconstrained combinatorial optimization problems. Our survey includes over 100 different mixing unitaries, and we combine each mixer with both the standard phase separator unitary represe… ▽ More We comparatively study, through large-scale numerical simulation, the performance across a large set of Quantum Alternating Operator Ansatz (QAOA) implementations for finding approximate and optimum solutions to unconstrained combinatorial optimization problems. Our survey includes over 100 different mixing unitaries, and we combine each mixer with both the standard phase separator unitary representing the objective function and a thresholded version. Our numerical tests for randomly chosen instances of the unconstrained optimization problems Max 2-SAT and Max 3-SAT reveal that the traditional transverse-field mixer with the standard phase separator performs best for problem sizes of 8 through 14 variables, while the recently introduced Grover mixer with thresholding wins at problems of size 6. This result (i) corrects earlier work suggesting that the Grover mixer is a superior mixer based only on results from problems of size 6, thus illustrating the need to push numerical simulation to larger problem sizes to more accurately predict performance; and (ii) it suggests that more complicated mixers and phase separators may not improve QAOA performance. △ Less

Submitted 26 January, 2023; originally announced January 2023.

Comments: LA-UR-23-20702

Journal ref: IEEE International Conference on Quantum Computing and Engineering (QCE), 2023, pp. 307-312

Quantum Annealing vs. QAOA: 127 Qubit Higher-Order Ising Problems on NISQ Computers

Authors: Elijah Pelofske, Andreas Bärtschi, Stephan Eidenbenz

Abstract: Quantum annealing (QA) and Quantum Alternating Operator Ansatz (QAOA) are both heuristic quantum algorithms intended for sampling optimal solutions of combinatorial optimization problems. In this article we implement a rigorous direct comparison between QA on D-Wave hardware and QAOA on IBMQ hardware. These two quantum algorithms are also compared against classical simulated annealing. The studied… ▽ More Quantum annealing (QA) and Quantum Alternating Operator Ansatz (QAOA) are both heuristic quantum algorithms intended for sampling optimal solutions of combinatorial optimization problems. In this article we implement a rigorous direct comparison between QA on D-Wave hardware and QAOA on IBMQ hardware. These two quantum algorithms are also compared against classical simulated annealing. The studied problems are instances of a class of Ising models, with variable assignments of $+1$ or $-1$, that contain cubic $ZZZ$ interactions (higher order terms) and match both the native connectivity of the Pegasus topology D-Wave chips and the heavy hexagonal lattice of the IBMQ chips. The novel QAOA implementation on the heavy hexagonal lattice has a CNOT depth of $6$ per round and allows for usage of an entire heavy hexagonal lattice. Experimentally, QAOA is executed on an ensemble of randomly generated Ising instances with a grid search over $1$ and $2$ round angles using all 127 programmable superconducting transmon qubits of ibm_washington. The error suppression technique digital dynamical decoupling is also tested on all QAOA circuits. QA is executed on the same Ising instances with the programmable superconducting flux qubit devices D-Wave Advantage_system4.1 and Advantage_system6.1 using modified annealing schedules with pauses. We find that QA outperforms QAOA on all problem instances. We also find that dynamical decoupling enables 2-round QAOA to marginally outperform 1-round QAOA, which is not the case without dynamical decoupling. △ Less

Submitted 18 March, 2023; v1 submitted 1 January, 2023; originally announced January 2023.

Comments: Accepted at ISC HPC 2023

Report number: LA-UR-22-33077

Journal ref: International Conference on High Performance Computing (ISC HPC), 2023, pp. 240--258

Optimized Telecloning Circuits: Theory and Practice of Nine NISQ Clones

Authors: Elijah Pelofske, Andreas Bärtschi, Stephan Eidenbenz

Abstract: Although perfect copying of an unknown quantum state is not possible, approximate cloning is possible in quantum mechanics. Quantum telecloning is a variant of approximate quantum cloning which uses quantum teleportation to allow for the use of classical communication to create physically separate clones of a quantum state. We present results of a of $1 \rightarrow 9$ universal, symmetric, optimal… ▽ More Although perfect copying of an unknown quantum state is not possible, approximate cloning is possible in quantum mechanics. Quantum telecloning is a variant of approximate quantum cloning which uses quantum teleportation to allow for the use of classical communication to create physically separate clones of a quantum state. We present results of a of $1 \rightarrow 9$ universal, symmetric, optimal quantum telecloning implementation on a cloud accessible quantum computer - the Quantinuum H1-1 device. The H1-1 device allows direct creation of the telecloning protocol due to real time classical if-statements that are conditional on the mid-circuit measurement outcome of a Bell measurement. In this implementation, we also provide an improvement over previous work for the circuit model description of quantum telecloning, which reduces the required gate depth and gate count for an all-to-all connectivity. The demonstration of creating $9$ approximate clones on a quantum processor is the largest number of clones that has been generated, telecloning or otherwise. △ Less

Submitted 30 November, 2022; v1 submitted 18 October, 2022; originally announced October 2022.

Report number: LA-UR-22-30899

Journal ref: IEEE International Conference on Rebooting Computing (ICRC), 2022, pp. 51--56

Scalable Experimental Bounds for Dicke and GHZ States Fidelities

Authors: Shamminuj Aktar, Andreas Bärtschi, Abdel-Hameed A. Badawy, Stephan Eidenbenz

Abstract: Estimating the state preparation fidelity of highly entangled states on noisy intermediate-scale quantum (NISQ) devices is an important task for benchmarking and application considerations. Unfortunately, exact fidelity measurements quickly become prohibitively expensive, as they scale exponentially as $O(3^N)$ for $N$-qubit states, using full state tomography with measurements in all Pauli bases… ▽ More Estimating the state preparation fidelity of highly entangled states on noisy intermediate-scale quantum (NISQ) devices is an important task for benchmarking and application considerations. Unfortunately, exact fidelity measurements quickly become prohibitively expensive, as they scale exponentially as $O(3^N)$ for $N$-qubit states, using full state tomography with measurements in all Pauli bases combinations. However, Somma and others [PhysRevA.74.052302] established that the complexity could be drastically reduced when looking at fidelity lower bounds for states that exhibit symmetries, such as Dicke States and GHZ States. For larger states, these bounds still need to be tight enough to provide reasonable estimations on NISQ devices. For the first time and more than 15 years after the theoretical introduction, we report meaningful lower bounds for the state preparation fidelity of all Dicke States up to $N=10$, and all GHZ states up to $N=20$ on Quantinuum H1 ion-trap systems using efficient implementations of recently proposed scalable circuits for these states. Our achieved lower bounds match or exceed previously reported exact fidelities on superconducting systems for much smaller states. This work provides a path forward to benchmarking entanglement as NISQ devices improve in size and quality. △ Less

Submitted 31 August, 2023; v1 submitted 6 October, 2022; originally announced October 2022.

Report number: LA-UR-22-30105

Journal ref: Proceedings of the 20th ACM International Conference on Computing Frontiers, pp. 176-184. 2023

Signatures of Open and Noisy Quantum Systems in Single-Qubit Quantum Annealing

Authors: Zachary Morrell, Marc Vuffray, Andrey Lokhov, Andreas Bärtschi, Tameem Albash, Carleton Coffrin

Abstract: We propose a quantum annealing protocol that more effectively probes the dynamics of a single qubit on D-Wave's quantum annealing hardware. This protocol uses D-Wave's h-gain schedule functionality, which allows the rapid quenching of the longitudinal magnetic field at arbitrary points during the anneal. This features enables us to distinguish between open and closed system dynamics as well as the… ▽ More We propose a quantum annealing protocol that more effectively probes the dynamics of a single qubit on D-Wave's quantum annealing hardware. This protocol uses D-Wave's h-gain schedule functionality, which allows the rapid quenching of the longitudinal magnetic field at arbitrary points during the anneal. This features enables us to distinguish between open and closed system dynamics as well as the presence or absence of longitudinal magnetic field noise. We show that both thermal and magnetic field fluctuations are key sources of noise that need to be included in an open quantum system model to reproduce the output statistics of the hardware. △ Less

Submitted 18 August, 2022; originally announced August 2022.

Comments: 10 pages, 7 figures,

Report number: LA-UR-22-28691

Journal ref: Phys.Rev.Appl. 19 (2023) 034053

Short-Depth Circuits for Dicke State Preparation

Authors: Andreas Bärtschi, Stephan Eidenbenz

Abstract: We present short-depth circuits to deterministically prepare any Dicke state |Dn,k>, which is the equal-amplitude superposition of all n-qubit computational basis states with Hamming Weight k. Dicke states are an important class of entangled quantum states with a large variety of applications, and a long history of experimental creation in physical systems. On the other hand, not much is known reg… ▽ More We present short-depth circuits to deterministically prepare any Dicke state |Dn,k>, which is the equal-amplitude superposition of all n-qubit computational basis states with Hamming Weight k. Dicke states are an important class of entangled quantum states with a large variety of applications, and a long history of experimental creation in physical systems. On the other hand, not much is known regarding efficient scalable quantum circuits for Dicke state preparation on realistic quantum computing hardware connectivities. Here we present preparation circuits for Dicke states |Dn,k> with (i) a depth of O(k log(n/k)) for All-to-All connectivity (such as on current ion trap devices); (ii) a depth of O(k sqrt(n/k)) = O(sqrt(nk) for Grid connectivity on grids of size Omega(sqrt(n/s)) x O(sqrt(ns)) with s<=k (such as on current superconducting qubit devices). Both approaches have a total gate count of O(kn), need no ancilla qubits, and generalize to both the preparation and compression of symmetric pure states in which all non-zero amplitudes correspond to states with Hamming weight at most k. Thus our work significantly improves and expands previous state-of-the art circuits which had depth O(n) on a Linear Nearest Neighbor connectivity for arbitrary k (Fundamentals of Computation Theory 2019) and depth O(log n) on All-to-All connectivity for k=1 (Advanced Quantum Technologies 2019). △ Less

Submitted 20 July, 2022; originally announced July 2022.

Comments: IEEE International Conference on Quantum Computing and Engineering, QCE'22, to appear, 2022

Report number: LA-UR-22-25501

Journal ref: IEEE International Conference on Quantum Computing & Engineering (QCE), 2022, pp. 87--96

Quantum Telecloning on NISQ Computers

Authors: Elijah Pelofske, Andreas Bärtschi, Bryan Garcia, Boris Kiefer, Stephan Eidenbenz

Abstract: Due to the no-cloning theorem, generating perfect quantum clones of an arbitrary unknown quantum state is not possible, however approximate quantum clones can be constructed. Quantum telecloning is a protocol that originates from a combination of quantum teleportation and quantum cloning. Here we present $1 \rightarrow 2$ and $1 \rightarrow 3$ quantum telecloning circuits, with and without ancilla… ▽ More Due to the no-cloning theorem, generating perfect quantum clones of an arbitrary unknown quantum state is not possible, however approximate quantum clones can be constructed. Quantum telecloning is a protocol that originates from a combination of quantum teleportation and quantum cloning. Here we present $1 \rightarrow 2$ and $1 \rightarrow 3$ quantum telecloning circuits, with and without ancilla, that are theoretically optimal (meaning the clones have the highest fidelity allowed by quantum mechanics), universal (meaning the clone fidelity is independent of the state being cloned), and symmetric (meaning the clones all have the same fidelity). We implement these circuits on gate model IBMQ and Quantinuum NISQ hardware and quantify the clone fidelities using parallel single qubit state tomography. Quantum telecloning using mid-circuit measurement with classical feed-forward control (i.e. real time if statements) is demonstrated on the Quantinuum H1-2 device. Two alternative implementations of quantum telecloning, deferred measurement and post selection, are demonstrated on ibmq\_montreal, where mid-circuit measurements with real time if statements are not available. Our results show that NISQ devices can achieve near-optimal quantum telecloning fidelity; for example the Quantinuum H1-2 device running the telecloning circuits without ancilla achieved a mean clone fidelity of $0.824$ with standard deviation of $0.024$ for two clone circuits and $0.765$ with standard deviation of $0.022$ for three clone circuits. The theoretical fidelity limits are $0.8\overline{3}$ for two clones and $0.\overline{7}$ for three clones. This demonstrates the viability of performing experimental analysis of quantum information networks and quantum cryptography protocols on NISQ computers. △ Less

Submitted 1 August, 2022; v1 submitted 29 April, 2022; originally announced May 2022.

Report number: LA-UR-22-23967

Journal ref: IEEE International Conference on Quantum Computing and Engineering (QCE), 2022, pp. 605--616

Quantum Volume in Practice: What Users Can Expect from NISQ Devices

Authors: Elijah Pelofske, Andreas Bärtschi, Stephan Eidenbenz

Abstract: Quantum volume (QV) has become the de-facto standard benchmark to quantify the capability of Noisy Intermediate-Scale Quantum (NISQ) devices. While QV values are often reported by NISQ providers for their systems, we perform our own series of QV calculations on 24 NISQ devices currently offered by IBM Q, IonQ, Rigetti, Oxford Quantum Circuits, and Quantinuum (formerly Honeywell). Our approach char… ▽ More Quantum volume (QV) has become the de-facto standard benchmark to quantify the capability of Noisy Intermediate-Scale Quantum (NISQ) devices. While QV values are often reported by NISQ providers for their systems, we perform our own series of QV calculations on 24 NISQ devices currently offered by IBM Q, IonQ, Rigetti, Oxford Quantum Circuits, and Quantinuum (formerly Honeywell). Our approach characterizes the performances that an advanced user of these NISQ devices can expect to achieve with a reasonable amount of optimization, but without white-box access to the device. In particular, we compile QV circuits to standard gate sets of the vendor using compiler optimization routines where available, and we perform experiments across different qubit subsets. We find that running QV tests requires very significant compilation cycles, QV values achieved in our tests typically lag behind officially reported results and also depend significantly on the classical compilation effort invested. △ Less

Submitted 21 August, 2023; v1 submitted 7 March, 2022; originally announced March 2022.

Comments: v5: typo fixes and improved typesetting

Report number: LA-UR-22-22058

Journal ref: IEEE Transactions on Quantum Engineering, vol. 3, pp. 1-19, 2022, Art no. 3102119

Numerical Evidence for Exponential Speed-up of QAOA over Unstructured Search for Approximate Constrained Optimization

Authors: John Golden, Andreas Bärtschi, Stephan Eidenbenz, Daniel O'Malley

Abstract: Despite much recent work, the true promise and limitations of the Quantum Alternating Operator Ansatz (QAOA) are unclear. A critical question regarding QAOA is to what extent its performance scales with the input size of the problem instance, in particular the necessary growth in the number of QAOA rounds to reach a high approximation ratio. We present numerical evidence for an exponential speed-u… ▽ More Despite much recent work, the true promise and limitations of the Quantum Alternating Operator Ansatz (QAOA) are unclear. A critical question regarding QAOA is to what extent its performance scales with the input size of the problem instance, in particular the necessary growth in the number of QAOA rounds to reach a high approximation ratio. We present numerical evidence for an exponential speed-up of QAOA over Grover-style unstructured search in finding approximate solutions to constrained optimization problems. Our result provides a strong hint that QAOA is able to exploit the structure of an optimization problem and thus overcome the lower bound for unstructured search. To this end, we conduct a comprehensive numerical study on several Hamming-weight constrained optimization problems for which we include combinations of all standardly studied mixer and phase separator Hamiltonians (Ring mixer, Clique mixer, Objective Value phase separator) as well as quantum minimum-finding inspired Hamiltonians (Grover mixer, Threshold-based phase separator). We identify Clique-Objective-QAOA with an exponential speed-up over Grover-Threshold-QAOA and tie the latter's scaling to that of unstructured search, with all other QAOA combinations coming in at a distant third. Our result suggests that maximizing QAOA performance requires a judicious choice of mixer and phase separator, and should trigger further research into other QAOA variations. △ Less

Submitted 9 May, 2023; v1 submitted 1 February, 2022; originally announced February 2022.

Report number: LA-UR-22-20645

Journal ref: IEEE International Conference on Quantum Computing and Engineering (QCE), 2023, pp. 496-505

A Divide-and-Conquer Approach to Dicke State Preparation

Authors: Shamminuj Aktar, Andreas Bärtschi, Abdel-Hameed A. Badawy, Stephan Eidenbenz

Abstract: We present a divide-and-conquer approach to deterministically prepare Dicke states $\lvert D_k^n\rangle$ (i.e., equal-weight superpositions of all $n$-qubit states with Hamming Weight $k$) on quantum computers. In an experimental evaluation for up to $n=6$ qubits on IBM Quantum Sydney and Montreal devices, we achieve significantly higher state fidelity compared to previous results [Mukherjee and o… ▽ More We present a divide-and-conquer approach to deterministically prepare Dicke states $\lvert D_k^n\rangle$ (i.e., equal-weight superpositions of all $n$-qubit states with Hamming Weight $k$) on quantum computers. In an experimental evaluation for up to $n=6$ qubits on IBM Quantum Sydney and Montreal devices, we achieve significantly higher state fidelity compared to previous results [Mukherjee and others, TQE'2020], [Cruz and others, QuTe'2019]. The fidelity gains are achieved through several techniques: Our circuits first "divide" the Hamming weight between blocks of $n/2$ qubits, and then "conquer" those blocks with improved versions of Dicke state unitaries [Bärtschi and others, FCT'2019]. Due to the sparse connectivity on IBM's heavy-hex-architectures, these circuits are implemented for linear nearest neighbor topologies. Further gains in (estimating) the state fidelity are due to our use of measurement error mitigation and hardware progress. △ Less

Submitted 9 June, 2022; v1 submitted 23 December, 2021; originally announced December 2021.

Report number: LA-UR-21-31138

Journal ref: IEEE Transactions on Quantum Engineering, vol. 3, pp. 1-16, 2022, Art no. 3101816

Sampling on NISQ Devices: "Who's the Fairest One of All?"

Authors: Elijah Pelofske, John Golden, Andreas Bärtschi, Daniel O'Malley, Stephan Eidenbenz

Abstract: Modern NISQ devices are subject to a variety of biases and sources of noise that degrade the solution quality of computations carried out on these devices. A natural question that arises in the NISQ era, is how fairly do these devices sample ground state solutions. To this end, we run five fair sampling problems (each with at least three ground state solutions) that are based both on quantum annea… ▽ More Modern NISQ devices are subject to a variety of biases and sources of noise that degrade the solution quality of computations carried out on these devices. A natural question that arises in the NISQ era, is how fairly do these devices sample ground state solutions. To this end, we run five fair sampling problems (each with at least three ground state solutions) that are based both on quantum annealing and on the Grover Mixer-QAOA algorithm for gate-based NISQ hardware. In particular, we use seven IBM~Q devices, the Aspen-9 Rigetti device, the IonQ device, and three D-Wave quantum annealers. For each of the fair sampling problems, we measure the ground state probability, the relative fairness of the frequency of each ground state solution with respect to the other ground state solutions, and the aggregate error as given by each hardware provider. Overall, our results show that NISQ devices do not achieve fair sampling yet. We also observe differences in the software stack with a particular focus on compilation techniques that illustrate what work will still need to be done to achieve a seamless integration of frontend (i.e. quantum circuit description) and backend compilation. △ Less

Submitted 13 July, 2021; originally announced July 2021.

Comments: 11 pages

Report number: LA-UR-25803

Journal ref: IEEE International Conference on Quantum Computing and Engineering, QCE'21, 207-217, 2021

Threshold-Based Quantum Optimization

Authors: John Golden, Andreas Bärtschi, Daniel O'Malley, Stephan Eidenbenz

Abstract: We propose and study Th-QAOA (pronounced Threshold QAOA), a variation of the Quantum Alternating Operator Ansatz (QAOA) that replaces the standard phase separator operator, which encodes the objective function, with a threshold function that returns a value $1$ for solutions with an objective value above the threshold and a $0$ otherwise. We vary the threshold value to arrive at a quantum optimiza… ▽ More We propose and study Th-QAOA (pronounced Threshold QAOA), a variation of the Quantum Alternating Operator Ansatz (QAOA) that replaces the standard phase separator operator, which encodes the objective function, with a threshold function that returns a value $1$ for solutions with an objective value above the threshold and a $0$ otherwise. We vary the threshold value to arrive at a quantum optimization algorithm. We focus on a combination with the Grover Mixer operator; the resulting GM-Th-QAOA can be viewed as a generalization of Grover's quantum search algorithm and its minimum/maximum finding cousin to approximate optimization. Our main findings include: (i) we provide intuitive arguments and show empirically that the optimum parameter values of GM-Th-QAOA (angles and threshold value) can be found with $O(\log(p) \times \log M)$ iterations of the classical outer loop, where $p$ is the number of QAOA rounds and $M$ is an upper bound on the solution value (often the number of vertices or edges in an input graph), thus eliminating the notorious outer-loop parameter finding issue of other QAOA algorithms; (ii) GM-Th-QAOA can be simulated classically with little effort up to 100 qubits through a set of tricks that cut down memory requirements; (iii) somewhat surprisingly, GM-Th-QAOA outperforms non-thresholded GM-QAOA in terms of approximation ratios achieved. This third result holds across a range of optimization problems (MaxCut, Max k-VertexCover, Max k-DensestSubgraph, MaxBisection) and various experimental design parameters, such as different input edge densities and constraint sizes. △ Less

Submitted 23 August, 2021; v1 submitted 25 June, 2021; originally announced June 2021.

Comments: V2

Report number: LA-UR-21-25835

Journal ref: IEEE International Conference on Quantum Computing and Engineering, QCE'21, 137-147, 2021

Fair Sampling Error Analysis on NISQ Devices

Authors: John Golden, Andreas Bärtschi, Daniel O'Malley, Stephan Eidenbenz

Abstract: We study the status of fair sampling on Noisy Intermediate Scale Quantum (NISQ) devices, in particular the IBM Q family of backends. Using the recently introduced Grover Mixer-QAOA algorithm for discrete optimization, we generate fair sampling circuits to solve six problems of varying difficulty, each with several optimal solutions, which we then run on twenty backends across the IBM Q system. For… ▽ More We study the status of fair sampling on Noisy Intermediate Scale Quantum (NISQ) devices, in particular the IBM Q family of backends. Using the recently introduced Grover Mixer-QAOA algorithm for discrete optimization, we generate fair sampling circuits to solve six problems of varying difficulty, each with several optimal solutions, which we then run on twenty backends across the IBM Q system. For a given circuit evaluated on a specific set of qubits, we evaluate: how frequently the qubits return an optimal solution to the problem, the fairness with which the qubits sample from all optimal solutions, and the reported hardware error rate of the qubits. To quantify fairness, we define a novel metric based on Pearson's $χ^2$ test. We find that fairness is relatively high for circuits with small and large error rates, but drops for circuits with medium error rates. This indicates that structured errors dominate in this regime, while unstructured errors, which are random and thus inherently fair, dominate in noisier qubits and longer circuits. Our results show that fairness can be a powerful tool for understanding the intricate web of errors affecting current NISQ hardware. △ Less

Submitted 11 June, 2022; v1 submitted 8 January, 2021; originally announced January 2021.

Report number: LA-UR-21-20101

Journal ref: ACM Transactions on Quantum Computing, Volume 3, Issue 2, 8 (2022)

Grover Mixers for QAOA: Shifting Complexity from Mixer Design to State Preparation

Authors: Andreas Bärtschi, Stephan Eidenbenz

Abstract: We propose GM-QAOA, a variation of the Quantum Alternating Operator Ansatz (QAOA) that uses Grover-like selective phase shift mixing operators. GM-QAOA works on any NP optimization problem for which it is possible to efficiently prepare an equal superposition of all feasible solutions; it is designed to perform particularly well for constraint optimization problems, where not all possible variable… ▽ More We propose GM-QAOA, a variation of the Quantum Alternating Operator Ansatz (QAOA) that uses Grover-like selective phase shift mixing operators. GM-QAOA works on any NP optimization problem for which it is possible to efficiently prepare an equal superposition of all feasible solutions; it is designed to perform particularly well for constraint optimization problems, where not all possible variable assignments are feasible solutions. GM-QAOA has the following features: (i) It is not susceptible to Hamiltonian Simulation error (such as Trotterization errors) as its operators can be implemented exactly using standard gate sets and (ii) Solutions with the same objective value are always sampled with the same amplitude. We illustrate the potential of GM-QAOA on several optimization problem classes: for permutation-based optimization problems such as the Traveling Salesperson Problem, we present an efficient algorithm to prepare a superposition of all possible permutations of $n$ numbers, defined on $O(n^2)$ qubits; for the hard constraint $k$-Vertex-Cover problem, and for an application to Discrete Portfolio Rebalancing, we show that GM-QAOA outperforms existing QAOA approaches. △ Less

Submitted 2 October, 2020; v1 submitted 30 May, 2020; originally announced June 2020.

Report number: LA-UR-20-23893

Journal ref: IEEE International Conference on Quantum Computing and Engineering, QCE'20, 72-82, 2020

The Quantum Alternating Operator Ansatz on Maximum k-Vertex Cover

Authors: Jeremy Cook, Stephan Eidenbenz, Andreas Bärtschi

Abstract: The Quantum Alternating Operator Ansatz is a generalization of the Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm (QAOA) designed for finding approximate solutions to combinatorial optimization problems with hard constraints. In this paper, we study Maximum $k$-Vertex Cover under this ansatz due to its modest complexity, while still being more complex than the well studied problems of Max-Cut and Max… ▽ More The Quantum Alternating Operator Ansatz is a generalization of the Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm (QAOA) designed for finding approximate solutions to combinatorial optimization problems with hard constraints. In this paper, we study Maximum $k$-Vertex Cover under this ansatz due to its modest complexity, while still being more complex than the well studied problems of Max-Cut and Max E3-LIN2. Our approach includes (i) a performance comparison between easy-to-prepare classical states and Dicke states as starting states, (ii) a performance comparison between two $XY$-Hamiltonian mixing operators: the ring mixer and the complete graph mixer, (iii) an analysis of the distribution of solutions via Monte Carlo sampling, and (iv) the exploration of efficient angle selection strategies. Our results are: (i) Dicke states improve performance compared to easy-to-prepare classical states, (ii) an upper bound on the simulation of the complete graph mixer, (iii) the complete graph mixer improves performance relative to the ring mixer, (iv) numerical results indicating the standard deviation of the distribution of solutions decreases exponentially in $p$ (the number of rounds in the algorithm), requiring an exponential number of random samples to find a better solution in the next round, and (v) a correlation of angle parameters which exhibit high quality solutions that behave similarly to a discretized version of the Quantum Adiabatic Algorithm. △ Less

Submitted 2 October, 2020; v1 submitted 29 October, 2019; originally announced October 2019.

Report number: LA-UR-19-31473

Journal ref: IEEE International Conference on Quantum Computing and Engineering, QCE'20, 83-92, 2020

Deterministic Preparation of Dicke States

Authors: Andreas Bärtschi, Stephan Eidenbenz

Abstract: The Dicke state $|D_k^n\rangle$ is an equal-weight superposition of all $n$-qubit states with Hamming Weight $k$ (i.e. all strings of length $n$ with exactly $k$ ones over a binary alphabet). Dicke states are an important class of entangled quantum states that among other things serve as starting states for combinatorial optimization quantum algorithms. We present a deterministic quantum algorit… ▽ More The Dicke state $|D_k^n\rangle$ is an equal-weight superposition of all $n$-qubit states with Hamming Weight $k$ (i.e. all strings of length $n$ with exactly $k$ ones over a binary alphabet). Dicke states are an important class of entangled quantum states that among other things serve as starting states for combinatorial optimization quantum algorithms. We present a deterministic quantum algorithm for the preparation of Dicke states. Implemented as a quantum circuit, our scheme uses $O(kn)$ gates, has depth $O(n)$ and needs no ancilla qubits. The inductive nature of our approach allows for linear-depth preparation of arbitrary symmetric pure states and -- used in reverse -- yields a quasilinear-depth circuit for efficient compression of quantum information in the form of symmetric pure states, improving on existing work requiring quadratic depth. All of these properties even hold for Linear Nearest Neighbor architectures. △ Less

Submitted 15 April, 2019; originally announced April 2019.

Report number: LA-UR-19-22718

Journal ref: 22nd International Symposium on Fundamentals of Computation Theory, FCT'19, 126-139, 2019

Quantum Algorithm Implementations for Beginners

Authors: Abhijith J., Adetokunbo Adedoyin, John Ambrosiano, Petr Anisimov, William Casper, Gopinath Chennupati, Carleton Coffrin, Hristo Djidjev, David Gunter, Satish Karra, Nathan Lemons, Shizeng Lin, Alexander Malyzhenkov, David Mascarenas, Susan Mniszewski, Balu Nadiga, Daniel O'Malley, Diane Oyen, Scott Pakin, Lakshman Prasad, Randy Roberts, Phillip Romero, Nandakishore Santhi, Nikolai Sinitsyn, Pieter J. Swart , et al. (9 additional authors not shown)

Abstract: As quantum computers become available to the general public, the need has arisen to train a cohort of quantum programmers, many of whom have been develo** classical computer programs for most of their careers. While currently available quantum computers have less than 100 qubits, quantum computing hardware is widely expected to grow in terms of qubit count, quality, and connectivity. This review… ▽ More As quantum computers become available to the general public, the need has arisen to train a cohort of quantum programmers, many of whom have been develo** classical computer programs for most of their careers. While currently available quantum computers have less than 100 qubits, quantum computing hardware is widely expected to grow in terms of qubit count, quality, and connectivity. This review aims to explain the principles of quantum programming, which are quite different from classical programming, with straightforward algebra that makes understanding of the underlying fascinating quantum mechanical principles optional. We give an introduction to quantum computing algorithms and their implementation on real quantum hardware. We survey 20 different quantum algorithms, attempting to describe each in a succinct and self-contained fashion. We show how these algorithms can be implemented on IBM's quantum computer, and in each case, we discuss the results of the implementation with respect to differences between the simulator and the actual hardware runs. This article introduces computer scientists, physicists, and engineers to quantum algorithms and provides a blueprint for their implementations. △ Less

Submitted 26 June, 2022; v1 submitted 10 April, 2018; originally announced April 2018.

Comments: ACM Transactions on Quantum Computing

Report number: LA-UR-20-22353

Journal ref: ACM Transactions on Quantum Computing, Volume 3, Issue 4, 18 (2022)