-
LIGO operates with quantum noise below the Standard Quantum Limit
Authors:
Wenxuan Jia,
Victoria Xu,
Kevin Kuns,
Masayuki Nakano,
Lisa Barsotti,
Matthew Evans,
Nergis Mavalvala,
Rich Abbott,
Ibrahim Abouelfettouh,
Rana Adhikari,
Alena Ananyeva,
Stephen Appert,
Koji Arai,
Naoki Aritomi,
Stuart Aston,
Matthew Ball,
Stefan Ballmer,
David Barker,
Beverly Berger,
Joseph Betzwieser,
Dripta Bhattacharjee,
Garilynn Billingsley,
Nina Bode,
Edgard Bonilla,
Vladimir Bossilkov
, et al. (146 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
Precision measurements of space and time, like those made by the detectors of the Laser Interferometer Gravitational-wave Observatory (LIGO), are often confronted with fundamental limitations imposed by quantum mechanics. The Heisenberg uncertainty principle dictates that the position and momentum of an object cannot both be precisely measured, giving rise to an apparent limitation called the Stan…
▽ More
Precision measurements of space and time, like those made by the detectors of the Laser Interferometer Gravitational-wave Observatory (LIGO), are often confronted with fundamental limitations imposed by quantum mechanics. The Heisenberg uncertainty principle dictates that the position and momentum of an object cannot both be precisely measured, giving rise to an apparent limitation called the Standard Quantum Limit (SQL). Reducing quantum noise below the SQL in gravitational-wave detectors, where photons are used to continuously measure the positions of freely falling mirrors, has been an active area of research for decades. Here we show how the LIGO A+ upgrade reduced the detectors' quantum noise below the SQL by up to 3 dB while achieving a broadband sensitivity improvement, more than two decades after this possibility was first presented.
△ Less
Submitted 22 April, 2024;
originally announced April 2024.
-
LIGOs Quantum Response to Squeezed States
Authors:
L. McCuller,
S. E. Dwyer,
A. C. Green,
Haocun Yu,
L. Barsotti,
C. D. Blair,
D. D. Brown,
A. Effler,
M. Evans,
A. Fernandez-Galiana,
P. Fritschel,
V. V. Frolov,
N. Kijbunchoo,
G. L. Mansell,
F. Matichard,
N. Mavalvala,
D. E. McClelland,
T. McRae,
A. Mullavey,
D. Sigg,
B. J. J. Slagmolen,
M. Tse,
T. Vo,
R. L. Ward,
C. Whittle
, et al. (172 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
Gravitational Wave interferometers achieve their profound sensitivity by combining a Michelson interferometer with optical cavities, suspended masses, and now, squeezed quantum states of light. These states modify the measurement process of the LIGO, VIRGO and GEO600 interferometers to reduce the quantum noise that masks astrophysical signals; thus, improvements to squeezing are essential to furth…
▽ More
Gravitational Wave interferometers achieve their profound sensitivity by combining a Michelson interferometer with optical cavities, suspended masses, and now, squeezed quantum states of light. These states modify the measurement process of the LIGO, VIRGO and GEO600 interferometers to reduce the quantum noise that masks astrophysical signals; thus, improvements to squeezing are essential to further expand our gravitational view of the universe. Further reducing quantum noise will require both lowering decoherence from losses as well more sophisticated manipulations to counter the quantum back-action from radiation pressure. Both tasks require fully understanding the physical interactions between squeezed light and the many components of km-scale interferometers. To this end, data from both LIGO observatories in observing run three are expressed using frequency-dependent metrics to analyze each detector's quantum response to squeezed states. The response metrics are derived and used to concisely describe physical mechanisms behind squeezing's simultaneous interaction with transverse-mode selective optical cavities and the quantum radiation pressure noise of suspended mirrors. These metrics and related analysis are broadly applicable for cavity-enhanced optomechanics experiments that incorporate external squeezing, and -- for the first time -- give physical descriptions of every feature so far observed in the quantum noise of the LIGO detectors.
△ Less
Submitted 25 May, 2021;
originally announced May 2021.
-
Approaching the motional ground state of a 10 kg object
Authors:
Chris Whittle,
Evan D. Hall,
Sheila Dwyer,
Nergis Mavalvala,
Vivishek Sudhir,
R. Abbott,
A. Ananyeva,
C. Austin,
L. Barsotti,
J. Betzwieser,
C. D. Blair,
A. F. Brooks,
D. D. Brown,
A. Buikema,
C. Cahillane,
J. C. Driggers,
A. Effler,
A. Fernandez-Galiana,
P. Fritschel,
V. V. Frolov,
T. Hardwick,
M. Kasprzack,
K. Kawabe,
N. Kijbunchoo,
J. S. Kissel
, et al. (175 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
The motion of a mechanical object -- even a human-sized object -- should be governed by the rules of quantum mechanics. Coaxing them into a quantum state is, however, difficult: the thermal environment masks any quantum signature of the object's motion. Indeed, the thermal environment also masks effects of proposed modifications of quantum mechanics at large mass scales. We prepare the center-of-m…
▽ More
The motion of a mechanical object -- even a human-sized object -- should be governed by the rules of quantum mechanics. Coaxing them into a quantum state is, however, difficult: the thermal environment masks any quantum signature of the object's motion. Indeed, the thermal environment also masks effects of proposed modifications of quantum mechanics at large mass scales. We prepare the center-of-mass motion of a 10 kg mechanical oscillator in a state with an average phonon occupation of 10.8. The reduction in temperature, from room temperature to 77 nK, is commensurate with an 11 orders-of-magnitude suppression of quantum back-action by feedback -- and a 13 orders-of-magnitude increase in the mass of an object prepared close to its motional ground state. This begets the possibility of probing gravity on massive quantum systems.
△ Less
Submitted 9 July, 2021; v1 submitted 24 February, 2021;
originally announced February 2021.
-
Quantum correlations between the light and kilogram-mass mirrors of LIGO
Authors:
Haocun Yu,
L. McCuller,
M. Tse,
L. Barsotti,
N. Mavalvala,
J. Betzwieser,
C. D. Blair,
S. E. Dwyer,
A. Effler,
M. Evans,
A. Fernandez-Galiana,
P. Fritschel,
V. V. Frolov,
N. Kijbunchoo,
F. Matichard,
D. E. McClelland,
T. McRae,
A. Mullavey,
D. Sigg,
B. J. J. Slagmolen,
C. Whittle,
A. Buikema,
Y. Chen,
T. R. Corbitt,
R. Schnabel
, et al. (174 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
Measurement of minuscule forces and displacements with ever greater precision encounters a limit imposed by a pillar of quantum mechanics: the Heisenberg uncertainty principle. A limit to the precision with which the position of an object can be measured continuously is known as the standard quantum limit (SQL). When light is used as the probe, the SQL arises from the balance between the uncertain…
▽ More
Measurement of minuscule forces and displacements with ever greater precision encounters a limit imposed by a pillar of quantum mechanics: the Heisenberg uncertainty principle. A limit to the precision with which the position of an object can be measured continuously is known as the standard quantum limit (SQL). When light is used as the probe, the SQL arises from the balance between the uncertainties of photon radiation pressure imposed on the object and of the photon number in the photoelectric detection. The only possibility surpassing the SQL is via correlations within the position/momentum uncertainty of the object and the photon number/phase uncertainty of the light it reflects. Here, we experimentally prove the theoretical prediction that this type of quantum correlation is naturally produced in the Laser Interferometer Gravitational-wave Observatory (LIGO). Our measurements show that the quantum mechanical uncertainties in the phases of the 200 kW laser beams and in the positions of the 40 kg mirrors of the Advanced LIGO detectors yield a joint quantum uncertainty a factor of 1.4 (3dB) below the SQL. We anticipate that quantum correlations will not only improve gravitational wave (GW) observatories but all types of measurements in future.
△ Less
Submitted 4 February, 2020;
originally announced February 2020.
-
Quantum correlation measurements in interferometric gravitational wave detectors
Authors:
D. V. Martynov,
V. V. Frolov,
S. Kandhasamy,
K. Izumi,
H. Miao,
N. Mavalvala,
E. D. Hall,
R. Lanza,
B. P. Abbott,
R. Abbott,
T. D. Abbott,
C. Adams,
R. X. Adhikari,
S. B. Anderson,
A. Ananyeva,
S. Appert,
K. Arai,
S. M. Aston,
S. W. Ballmer,
D. Barker,
B. Barr,
L. Barsotti,
J. Bartlett,
I. Bartos,
J. C. Batch
, et al. (177 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
Quantum fluctuations in the phase and amplitude quadratures of light set limitations on the sensitivity of modern optical instruments. The sensitivity of the interferometric gravitational wave detectors, such as the Advanced Laser Interferometer Gravitational wave Observatory (LIGO), is limited by quantum shot noise, quantum radiation pressure noise, and a set of classical noises. We show how the…
▽ More
Quantum fluctuations in the phase and amplitude quadratures of light set limitations on the sensitivity of modern optical instruments. The sensitivity of the interferometric gravitational wave detectors, such as the Advanced Laser Interferometer Gravitational wave Observatory (LIGO), is limited by quantum shot noise, quantum radiation pressure noise, and a set of classical noises. We show how the quantum properties of light can be used to distinguish these noises using correlation techniques. Particularly, in the first part of the paper we show estimations of the coating thermal noise and gas phase noise, hidden below the quantum shot noise in the Advanced LIGO sensitivity curve. We also make projections on the observatory sensitivity during the next science runs. In the second part of the paper we discuss the correlation technique that reveals the quantum radiation pressure noise from the background of classical noises and shot noise. We apply this technique to the Advanced LIGO data, collected during the first science run, and experimentally estimate the quantum correlations and quantum radiation pressure noise in the interferometer for the first time.
△ Less
Submitted 10 February, 2017;
originally announced February 2017.
