-
Cellular reproduction number, generation time and growth rate differ between human- and avian-adapted influenza strains
Authors:
Ada W. C. Yan,
Jie Zhou,
Catherine A. A. Beauchemin,
Colin A. Russell,
Wendy S. Barclay,
Steven Riley
Abstract:
When analysing in vitro data, growth kinetics of influenza strains are often compared by computing their growth rates, which are sometimes used as proxies for fitness. However, analogous to mechanistic epidemic models, the growth rate can be defined as a function of two parameters: the basic reproduction number (the average number of cells each infected cell infects) and the mean generation time (…
▽ More
When analysing in vitro data, growth kinetics of influenza strains are often compared by computing their growth rates, which are sometimes used as proxies for fitness. However, analogous to mechanistic epidemic models, the growth rate can be defined as a function of two parameters: the basic reproduction number (the average number of cells each infected cell infects) and the mean generation time (the average length of a replication cycle). Using a mechanistic model, previously published data from experiments in human lung cells, and newly generated data, we compared estimates of all three parameters for six influenza A strains. Using previously published data, we found that the two human-adapted strains (pre-2009 seasonal H1N1, and pandemic H1N1) had a lower basic reproduction number, shorter mean generation time and slower growth rate than the two avian-adapted strains (H5N1 and H7N9). These same differences were then observed in data from new experiments where two strains were engineered to have different internal proteins (pandemic H1N1 and H5N1), but the same surface proteins (PR8), confirming our initial findings and implying that differences between strains were driven by internal genes. Also, the model predicted that the human-adapted strains underwent more replication cycles than the avian-adapted strains by the time of peak viral load, potentially accumulating mutations more quickly. These results suggest that the in vitro reproduction number, generation time and growth rate differ between human-adapted and avian-adapted influenza strains, and thus could be used to assess host adaptation of internal proteins to inform pandemic risk assessment.
△ Less
Submitted 19 March, 2019;
originally announced March 2019.
-
Sequential infection experiments for quantifying innate and adaptive immunity during influenza infection
Authors:
Ada W. C. Yan,
Sophie G. Zaloumis,
Julie A. Simpson,
James M. McCaw
Abstract:
Laboratory models are often used to understand the interaction of related pathogens via host immunity. For example, recent experiments where ferrets were exposed to two influenza strains within a short period of time have shown how the effects of cross-immunity vary with the time between exposures and the specific strains used. On the other hand, studies of the workings of different arms of the im…
▽ More
Laboratory models are often used to understand the interaction of related pathogens via host immunity. For example, recent experiments where ferrets were exposed to two influenza strains within a short period of time have shown how the effects of cross-immunity vary with the time between exposures and the specific strains used. On the other hand, studies of the workings of different arms of the immune response, and their relative importance, typically use experiments involving a single infection. However, inferring the relative importance of different immune components from this type of data is challenging. Using simulations and mathematical modelling, here we investigate whether the sequential infection experiment design can be used not only to determine immune components contributing to cross-protection, but also to gain insight into the immune response during a single infection.
We show that virological data from sequential infection experiments can be used to accurately extract the timing and extent of cross-protection. Moreover, the broad immune components responsible for such cross-protection can be determined. Such data can also be used to infer the timing and strength of some immune components in controlling a primary infection, even in the absence of serological data. By contrast, single infection data cannot be used to reliably recover this information. Hence, sequential infection data enhances our understanding of the mechanisms underlying the control and resolution of infection, and generates new insight into how previous exposure influences the time course of a subsequent infection.
△ Less
Submitted 5 June, 2018; v1 submitted 7 September, 2017;
originally announced September 2017.
-
On the role of $\rm CD8^+$ T cells in determining recovery time from influenza virus infection
Authors:
Pengxing Cao,
Zhongfang Wang,
Ada W. C. Yan,
Jodie McVernon,
Jianqing Xu,
Jane M. Heffernan,
Katherine Kedzierska,
James M. McCaw
Abstract:
Myriad experiments have identified an important role for $\rm CD8^+$ T cell response mechanisms in determining recovery from influenza A virus infection. Animal models of influenza infection further implicate multiple elements of the immune response in defining the dynamical characteristics of viral infection. To date, influenza virus models, while capturing particular aspects of the natural infec…
▽ More
Myriad experiments have identified an important role for $\rm CD8^+$ T cell response mechanisms in determining recovery from influenza A virus infection. Animal models of influenza infection further implicate multiple elements of the immune response in defining the dynamical characteristics of viral infection. To date, influenza virus models, while capturing particular aspects of the natural infection history, have been unable to reproduce the full gamut of observed viral kinetic behaviour in a single coherent framework. Here, we introduce a mathematical model of influenza viral dynamics incorporating all major immune components (innate, humoral and cellular) and explore its properties with a particular emphasis on the role of cellular immunity. Calibrated against a range of murine data, our model is capable of recapitulating observed viral kinetics from a multitude of experiments. Importantly, the model predicts a robust exponential relationship between the level of effector $\rm CD8^+$ T cells and recovery time, whereby recovery time rapidly decreases to a fixed minimum recovery time with an increasing level of effector $\rm CD8^+$ T cells. We find support for this relationship in recent clinical data from influenza A(H7N9) hospitalised patients. The exponential relationship implies that people with a lower level of naive $\rm CD8^+$ T cells may receive significantly more benefit from induction of additional effector $\rm CD8^+$ T cells arising from immunological memory, itself established through either previous viral infection or T cell-based vaccines.
△ Less
Submitted 19 September, 2016;
originally announced September 2016.
-
Modelling cross-reactivity and memory in the cellular adaptive immune response to influenza infection in the host
Authors:
Ada W. C. Yan,
Pengxing Cao,
Jane M. Heffernan,
Jodie McVernon,
Kylie M. Quinn,
Nicole L. La Gruta,
Karen L. Laurie,
James M. McCaw
Abstract:
The cellular adaptive immune response plays a key role in resolving influenza infection. Experiments where individuals are successively infected with different strains within a short timeframe provide insight into the underlying viral dynamics and the role of a cross-reactive immune response in resolving an acute infection. We construct a mathematical model of within-host influenza viral dynamics…
▽ More
The cellular adaptive immune response plays a key role in resolving influenza infection. Experiments where individuals are successively infected with different strains within a short timeframe provide insight into the underlying viral dynamics and the role of a cross-reactive immune response in resolving an acute infection. We construct a mathematical model of within-host influenza viral dynamics including three possible factors which determine the strength of the cross-reactive cellular adaptive immune response: the initial naive T cell number, the avidity of the interaction between T cells and the epitopes presented by infected cells, and the epitope abundance per infected cell. Our model explains the experimentally observed shortening of a second infection when cross-reactivity is present, and shows that memory in the cellular adaptive immune response is necessary to protect against a second infection.
△ Less
Submitted 22 November, 2016; v1 submitted 1 June, 2016;
originally announced June 2016.
