Multi-directional dynamic model for traumatic brain injury detection
Authors:
Kaveh Laksari,
Michael Fanton,
Lyndia C. Wu,
Taylor H. Nguyen,
Mehmet Kurt,
Chiara Giordano,
Eoin Kelly,
Eoin O'Keeffe,
Eugene Wallace,
Colin Doherty,
Matthew Campbell,
Stephen Tiernan,
Gerald Grant,
Jesse Ruan,
Saeed Barbat,
David B. Camarillo
Abstract:
Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a complex injury that is hard to predict and diagnose, with many studies focused on associating head kinematics to brain injury risk. Recently, there has been a push towards using computationally expensive finite element (FE) models of the brain to create tissue deformation metrics of brain injury. Here, we developed a 3 degree-of-freedom lumped-parameter brain mode…
▽ More
Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a complex injury that is hard to predict and diagnose, with many studies focused on associating head kinematics to brain injury risk. Recently, there has been a push towards using computationally expensive finite element (FE) models of the brain to create tissue deformation metrics of brain injury. Here, we developed a 3 degree-of-freedom lumped-parameter brain model, built based on the measured natural frequencies of a FE brain model simulated with live human impact data, to be used to rapidly estimate peak brain strains experienced during head rotational accelerations. On our dataset, the simplified model correlates with peak principal FE strain by an R2 of 0.80. Further, coronal and axial model displacement correlated with fiber-oriented peak strain in the corpus callosum with an R2 of 0.77. Using the maximum displacement predicted by our brain model, we propose an injury criteria and compare it against a number of existing rotational and translational kinematic injury metrics on a dataset of head kinematics from 27 clinically diagnosed injuries and 887 non-injuries. We found that our proposed metric performed comparably to peak angular acceleration, linear acceleration, and angular velocity in classifying injury and non-injury events. Metrics which separated time traces into their directional components had improved deviance to those which combined components into a single time trace magnitude. Our brain model can be used in future work as a computationally efficient alternative to FE models for classifying injuries over a wide range of loading conditions.
△ Less
Submitted 2 April, 2019; v1 submitted 18 December, 2018;
originally announced December 2018.
A simplified derivation of the Linear Noise Approximation
Authors:
Edward W. J. Wallace
Abstract:
Given a discrete stochastic process, for example a chemical reaction system or a birth and death process, we often want to find a continuous stochastic approximation so that the techniques of stochastic differential equations may be brought to bear. One powerful and useful way to do this is the system size expansion of van Kampen to express a trajectory as a small stochastic perturbation to a dete…
▽ More
Given a discrete stochastic process, for example a chemical reaction system or a birth and death process, we often want to find a continuous stochastic approximation so that the techniques of stochastic differential equations may be brought to bear. One powerful and useful way to do this is the system size expansion of van Kampen to express a trajectory as a small stochastic perturbation to a deterministic trajectory, using a small parameter related to the volume of the system in question. This is usually pursued only up to first order, called the Linear Noise Approximation. The usual derivation of this proceeds via the master equation of the discrete process and derives a Fokker-Planck equation for the stochastic perturbation, both of which are equations for the evolution of probability distributions. Here we present a derivation using stochastic difference equations for the discrete process and leading, via the chemical Langevin equation of Gillespie, directly to a stochastic differential equation for the stochastic perturbation. The new derivation, which does not yield the full system size expansion, draws more explicitly on the intuition of ordinary differential equations so may be more easily digestible for some audiences.
△ Less
Submitted 28 September, 2010; v1 submitted 24 April, 2010;
originally announced April 2010.
