-
A Hybrid Deep Learning Classification of Perimetric Glaucoma Using Peripapillary Nerve Fiber Layer Reflectance and Other OCT Parameters from Three Anatomy Regions
Authors:
Ou Tan,
David S. Greenfield,
Brian A. Francis,
Rohit Varma,
Joel S. Schuman,
David Huang,
Dongseok Choi
Abstract:
Precis: A hybrid deep-learning model combines NFL reflectance and other OCT parameters to improve glaucoma diagnosis. Objective: To investigate if a deep learning model could be used to combine nerve fiber layer (NFL) reflectance and other OCT parameters for glaucoma diagnosis. Patients and Methods: This is a prospective observational study where of 106 normal subjects and 164 perimetric glaucoma…
▽ More
Precis: A hybrid deep-learning model combines NFL reflectance and other OCT parameters to improve glaucoma diagnosis. Objective: To investigate if a deep learning model could be used to combine nerve fiber layer (NFL) reflectance and other OCT parameters for glaucoma diagnosis. Patients and Methods: This is a prospective observational study where of 106 normal subjects and 164 perimetric glaucoma (PG) patients. Peripapillary NFL reflectance map, NFL thickness map, optic head analysis of disc, and macular ganglion cell complex thickness were obtained using spectral domain OCT. A hybrid deep learning model combined a fully connected network (FCN) and a convolution neural network (CNN) to develop and combine those OCT maps and parameters to distinguish normal and PG eyes. Two deep learning models were compared based on whether the NFL reflectance map was used as part of the input or not. Results: The hybrid deep learning model with reflectance achieved 0.909 sensitivity at 99% specificity and 0.926 at 95%. The overall accuracy was 0.948 with 0.893 sensitivity and 1.000 specificity, and the AROC was 0.979, which is significantly better than the logistic regression models (p < 0.001). The second best model is the hybrid deep learning model w/o reflectance, which also had significantly higher AROC than logistic regression models (p < 0.001). Logistic regression with reflectance model had slightly higher AROC or sensitivity than the other logistic regression model without reflectance (p = 0.024). Conclusions: Hybrid deep learning model significantly improved the diagnostic accuracy, without or without NFL reflectance. Hybrid deep learning model, combining reflectance/NFL thickness/GCC thickness/ONH parameter, may be a practical model for glaucoma screen purposes.
△ Less
Submitted 5 June, 2024;
originally announced June 2024.
-
Focal Loss Analysis of Peripapillary Nerve Fiber Layer Reflectance for Glaucoma Diagnosis
Authors:
Ou Tan,
Dongseok Choi,
Aiyin Chen,
David S. Greenfield,
Brian A. Francis,
Rohit Varma,
Joel S. Schuman,
David Huang,
Advanced Imaging for Glaucoma Study Group
Abstract:
Purpose: To evaluate nerve fiber layer (NFL) reflectance for glaucoma diagnosis using a large dataset. Methods: Participants were imaged with 4.9mm ONH scans using spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (OCT). The NFL reflectance map was reconstructed from 13 concentric rings of optic nerve head(ONH) scan, then processed by an azimuthal filter to reduce directional reflectance bias due to va…
▽ More
Purpose: To evaluate nerve fiber layer (NFL) reflectance for glaucoma diagnosis using a large dataset. Methods: Participants were imaged with 4.9mm ONH scans using spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (OCT). The NFL reflectance map was reconstructed from 13 concentric rings of optic nerve head(ONH) scan, then processed by an azimuthal filter to reduce directional reflectance bias due to variation of beam incidence angle. The peripapillary thickness and reflectance maps were both divided into 96 superpixels. Low-reflectance and low-thickness superpixels were defined as values below the 5th percentile normative reference for that location. Focal reflectance loss was measured by summing loss, relative to the normal reference average, in low-reflectance superpixels. Focal thickness loss was calculated in a similar fashion. The area under receiving characteristic curve (AROC) was used to assess diagnostic accuracy. Results: Fifty-three normal, 196 pre-perimetric, 132 early perimetric, and 59 moderate and advanced perimetric glaucoma participants were included from the Advanced Imaging for Glaucoma Study. Sixty-seven percent of glaucomatous reflectance maps showed characteristic contiguous wedge or diffuse defects. Focal NFL reflectance loss had significantly higher diagnostic accuracy than the best NFL thickness parameters (both map-based and profile-based): AROC 0.80 v. 0.75 (p<0.004) for distinguishing glaucoma eyes from healthy control eyes. The diagnostic sensitivity was also significantly higher at both 99% and 95% specificity operating points. Conclusions: Focal NFL reflectance loss improved glaucoma diagnostic accuracy compared to the standard NFL thickness parameters.
△ Less
Submitted 31 May, 2024;
originally announced June 2024.
-
On Identifying and Mitigating Bias in the Estimation of the COVID-19 Case Fatality Rate
Authors:
Anastasios Nikolas Angelopoulos,
Reese Pathak,
Rohit Varma,
Michael I. Jordan
Abstract:
The relative case fatality rates (CFRs) between groups and countries are key measures of relative risk that guide policy decisions regarding scarce medical resource allocation during the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic. In the middle of an active outbreak when surveillance data is the primary source of information, estimating these quantities involves compensating for competing biases in time series of…
▽ More
The relative case fatality rates (CFRs) between groups and countries are key measures of relative risk that guide policy decisions regarding scarce medical resource allocation during the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic. In the middle of an active outbreak when surveillance data is the primary source of information, estimating these quantities involves compensating for competing biases in time series of deaths, cases, and recoveries. These include time- and severity- dependent reporting of cases as well as time lags in observed patient outcomes. In the context of COVID-19 CFR estimation, we survey such biases and their potential significance. Further, we analyze theoretically the effect of certain biases, like preferential reporting of fatal cases, on naive estimators of CFR. We provide a partially corrected estimator of these naive estimates that accounts for time lag and imperfect reporting of deaths and recoveries. We show that collection of randomized data by testing the contacts of infectious individuals regardless of the presence of symptoms would mitigate bias by limiting the covariance between diagnosis and death. Our analysis is supplemented by theoretical and numerical results and a simple and fast open-source codebase at https://github.com/aangelopoulos/cfr-covid-19 .
△ Less
Submitted 15 June, 2020; v1 submitted 19 March, 2020;
originally announced March 2020.
