-
Deep Learning for Quality Control of Subcortical Brain 3D Shape Models
Authors:
Dmitry Petrov,
Boris A. Gutman Egor Kuznetsov,
Theo G. M. van Erp,
Jessica A. Turner,
Lianne Schmaal,
Dick Veltman,
Lei Wang,
Kathryn Alpert,
Dmitry Isaev,
Artemis Zavaliangos-Petropulu,
Christopher R. K. Ching,
Vince Calhoun,
David Glahn,
Theodore D. Satterthwaite,
Ole Andreas Andreassen,
Stefan Borgwardt,
Fleur Howells,
Nynke Groenewold,
Aristotle Voineskos,
Joaquim Radua,
Steven G. Potkin,
Benedicto Crespo-Facorro,
Diana Tordesillas-Gutierrez,
Li Shen,
Irina Lebedeva
, et al. (48 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
We present several deep learning models for assessing the morphometric fidelity of deep grey matter region models extracted from brain MRI. We test three different convolutional neural net architectures (VGGNet, ResNet and Inception) over 2D maps of geometric features. Further, we present a novel geometry feature augmentation technique based on a parametric spherical map**. Finally, we present a…
▽ More
We present several deep learning models for assessing the morphometric fidelity of deep grey matter region models extracted from brain MRI. We test three different convolutional neural net architectures (VGGNet, ResNet and Inception) over 2D maps of geometric features. Further, we present a novel geometry feature augmentation technique based on a parametric spherical map**. Finally, we present an approach for model decision visualization, allowing human raters to see the areas of subcortical shapes most likely to be deemed of failing quality by the machine. Our training data is comprised of 5200 subjects from the ENIGMA Schizophrenia MRI cohorts, and our test dataset contains 1500 subjects from the ENIGMA Major Depressive Disorder cohorts. Our final models reduce human rater time by 46-70%. ResNet outperforms VGGNet and Inception for all of our predictive tasks.
△ Less
Submitted 4 September, 2018; v1 submitted 30 August, 2018;
originally announced August 2018.
-
Machine Learning for Large-Scale Quality Control of 3D Shape Models in Neuroimaging
Authors:
Dmitry Petrov,
Boris A. Gutman,
Shih-Hua,
Yu,
Theo G. M. van Erp,
Jessica A. Turner,
Lianne Schmaal,
Dick Veltman,
Lei Wang,
Kathryn Alpert,
Dmitry Isaev,
Artemis Zavaliangos-Petropulu,
Christopher R. K. Ching,
Vince Calhoun,
David Glahn,
Theodore D. Satterthwaite,
Ole Andreas Andreasen,
Stefan Borgwardt,
Fleur Howells,
Nynke Groenewold,
Aristotle Voineskos,
Joaquim Radua,
Steven G. Potkin,
Benedicto Crespo-Facorro,
Diana Tordesillas-Gutierrez
, et al. (50 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
As very large studies of complex neuroimaging phenotypes become more common, human quality assessment of MRI-derived data remains one of the last major bottlenecks. Few attempts have so far been made to address this issue with machine learning. In this work, we optimize predictive models of quality for meshes representing deep brain structure shapes. We use standard vertex-wise and global shape fe…
▽ More
As very large studies of complex neuroimaging phenotypes become more common, human quality assessment of MRI-derived data remains one of the last major bottlenecks. Few attempts have so far been made to address this issue with machine learning. In this work, we optimize predictive models of quality for meshes representing deep brain structure shapes. We use standard vertex-wise and global shape features computed homologously across 19 cohorts and over 7500 human-rated subjects, training kernelized Support Vector Machine and Gradient Boosted Decision Trees classifiers to detect meshes of failing quality. Our models generalize across datasets and diseases, reducing human workload by 30-70\%, or equivalently hundreds of human rater hours for datasets of comparable size, with recall rates approaching inter-rater reliability.
△ Less
Submitted 7 August, 2017; v1 submitted 19 July, 2017;
originally announced July 2017.
-
Towards structured sharing of raw and derived neuroimaging data across existing resources
Authors:
D. B. Keator,
K. Helmer,
J. Steffener,
J. A. Turner,
T. G. M. Van Erp,
S. Gadde,
N. Ashish,
G. A. Burns,
B. N. Nichols,
S. S. Ghosh
Abstract:
Data sharing efforts increasingly contribute to the acceleration of scientific discovery. Neuroimaging data is accumulating in distributed domain-specific databases and there is currently no integrated access mechanism nor an accepted format for the critically important meta-data that is necessary for making use of the combined, available neuroimaging data. In this manuscript, we present work from…
▽ More
Data sharing efforts increasingly contribute to the acceleration of scientific discovery. Neuroimaging data is accumulating in distributed domain-specific databases and there is currently no integrated access mechanism nor an accepted format for the critically important meta-data that is necessary for making use of the combined, available neuroimaging data. In this manuscript, we present work from the Derived Data Working Group, an open-access group sponsored by the Biomedical Informatics Research Network (BIRN) and the International Neuroimaging Coordinating Facility (INCF) focused on practical tools for distributed access to neuroimaging data. The working group develops models and tools facilitating the structured interchange of neuroimaging meta-data and is making progress towards a unified set of tools for such data and meta-data exchange. We report on the key components required for integrated access to raw and derived neuroimaging data as well as associated meta-data and provenance across neuroimaging resources. The components include (1) a structured terminology that provides semantic context to data, (2) a formal data model for neuroimaging with robust tracking of data provenance, (3) a web service-based application programming interface (API) that provides a consistent mechanism to access and query the data model, and (4) a provenance library that can be used for the extraction of provenance data by image analysts and imaging software developers. We believe that the framework and set of tools outlined in this manuscript have great potential for solving many of the issues the neuroimaging community faces when sharing raw and derived neuroimaging data across the various existing database systems for the purpose of accelerating scientific discovery.
△ Less
Submitted 6 March, 2013; v1 submitted 26 September, 2012;
originally announced September 2012.