Theoretical analysis of the role of chromatin interactions in long-range action of enhancers and insulators
Authors:
Swagatam Mukhopadhyay,
Paul D. Schedl,
Vasily M. Studitsky,
Anirvan M. Sengupta
Abstract:
Long-distance regulatory interactions between enhancers and their target genes are commonplace in higher eukaryotes. Interposed boundaries or insulators are able to block these long distance regulatory interactions. The mechanistic basis for insulator activity and how it relates to enhancer action-at-a-distance remains unclear. Here we explore the idea that topological loops could simultaneously a…
▽ More
Long-distance regulatory interactions between enhancers and their target genes are commonplace in higher eukaryotes. Interposed boundaries or insulators are able to block these long distance regulatory interactions. The mechanistic basis for insulator activity and how it relates to enhancer action-at-a-distance remains unclear. Here we explore the idea that topological loops could simultaneously account for regulatory interactions of distal enhancers and the insulating activity of boundary elements. We show that while loop formation is not in itself sufficient to explain action at a distance, incorporating transient non-specific and moderate attractive interactions between the chromatin fibers strongly enhances long-distance regulatory interactions and is sufficient to generate a euchromatin-like state. Under these same conditions, the subdivision of the loop into two topologically independent loops by insulators inhibits inter-domain interactions. The underlying cause of this effect is a suppression of crossings in the contact map at intermediate distances. Thus our model simultaneously accounts for regulatory interactions at a distance and the insulator activity of boundary elements. This unified model of the regulatory roles of chromatin loops makes several testable predictions that could be confronted with \emph{in vitro} experiments, as well as genomic chromatin conformation capture and fluorescent microscopic approaches.
△ Less
Submitted 14 March, 2011;
originally announced March 2011.
Extrinsic and intrinsic nucleosome positioning signals
Authors:
Alexandre V. Morozov,
Karissa Fortney,
Daria A. Gaykalova,
Vasily M. Studitsky,
Jonathan Widom,
Eric D. Siggia
Abstract:
In eukaryotic genomes, nucleosomes function to compact DNA and to regulate access to it both by simple physical occlusion and by providing the substrate for numerous covalent epigenetic tags. While nucleosome positions in vitro are determined by sequence alone, in vivo competition with other DNA-binding factors and action of chromatin remodeling enzymes play a role that needs to be quantified. W…
▽ More
In eukaryotic genomes, nucleosomes function to compact DNA and to regulate access to it both by simple physical occlusion and by providing the substrate for numerous covalent epigenetic tags. While nucleosome positions in vitro are determined by sequence alone, in vivo competition with other DNA-binding factors and action of chromatin remodeling enzymes play a role that needs to be quantified. We developed a biophysical model for the sequence dependence of DNA bending energies, and validated it against a collection of in vitro free energies of nucleosome formation and a nucleosome crystal structure; we also successfully designed both strong and poor histone binding sequences ab initio. For in vivo data from S.cerevisiae, the strongest positioning signal came from the competition with other factors. Based on sequence alone, our model predicts that functional transcription factor binding sites have a tendency to be covered by nucleosomes, but are uncovered in vivo because functional sites cluster within a single nucleosome footprint, making transcription factors bind cooperatively. Similarly a weak enhancement of nucleosome binding in the TATA region for naked DNA becomes a strong depletion when the TATA-binding protein is included, in quantitative agreement with experiment. Predictions at specific loci were also greatly enhanced by including competing factors. Our physically grounded model distinguishes multiple ways in which genomic sequence can influence nucleosome positions and thus provides an alternative explanation for several important experimental findings.
△ Less
Submitted 27 May, 2008;
originally announced May 2008.
