-
EM and XRM Connectomics Imaging and Experimental Metadata Standards
Authors:
Miguel E. Wimbish,
Nicole K. Guittari,
Victoria A. Rose,
Jorge L. Rivera Jr,
Patricia K. Rivlin,
Mark A. Hinton,
Jordan K. Matelsky,
Nicole E. Stock,
Brock A. Wester,
Erik C. Johnson,
William R. Gray-Roncal
Abstract:
High resolution volumetric neuroimaging datasets from electron microscopy (EM) and x-ray micro and holographic-nano tomography (XRM/XHN) are being generated at an increasing rate and by a growing number of research teams. These datasets are derived from an increasing number of species, in an increasing number of brain regions, and with an increasing number of techniques. Each of these large-scale…
▽ More
High resolution volumetric neuroimaging datasets from electron microscopy (EM) and x-ray micro and holographic-nano tomography (XRM/XHN) are being generated at an increasing rate and by a growing number of research teams. These datasets are derived from an increasing number of species, in an increasing number of brain regions, and with an increasing number of techniques. Each of these large-scale datasets, often surpassing petascale levels, is typically accompanied by a unique and varied set of metadata. These datasets can be used to derive connectomes, or neuron-synapse level connectivity diagrams, to investigate the fundamental organization of neural circuitry, neuronal development, and neurodegenerative disease. Standardization is essential to facilitate comparative connectomics analysis and enhance data utilization. Although the neuroinformatics community has successfully established and adopted data standards for many modalities, this effort has not yet encompassed EM and XRM/ XHN connectomics data. This lack of standardization isolates these datasets, hindering their integration and comparison with other research performed in the field. Towards this end, our team formed a working group consisting of community stakeholders to develop Image and Experimental Metadata Standards for EM and XRM/XHN data to ensure the scientific impact and further motivate the generation and sharing of these data. This document addresses version 1.1 of these standards, aiming to support metadata services and future software designs for community collaboration. Standards for derived annotations are described in a companion document. Standards definitions are available on a community github page. We hope these standards will enable comparative analysis, improve interoperability between connectomics software tools, and continue to be refined and improved by the neuroinformatics community.
△ Less
Submitted 26 January, 2024;
originally announced January 2024.
-
Large-scale EM Analysis of the Drosophila Antennal Lobe with Automatically Computed Synapse Point Clouds
Authors:
Ting Zhao,
Shin-ya Takemura,
Gary B. Huang,
Jane Anne Horne,
William T. Katz,
Kazunori Shinomiya,
Louis K. Scheffer,
Ian A. Meinertzhagen,
Patricia K. Rivlin,
Stephen M. Plaza
Abstract:
The promise of extracting connectomes and performing useful analysis on large electron microscopy (EM) datasets has been an elusive dream for many years. Tracing in even the smallest portions of neuropil requires copious human annotation, the rate-limiting step for generating a connectome. While a combination of improved imaging and automatic segmentation will lead to the analysis of increasingly…
▽ More
The promise of extracting connectomes and performing useful analysis on large electron microscopy (EM) datasets has been an elusive dream for many years. Tracing in even the smallest portions of neuropil requires copious human annotation, the rate-limiting step for generating a connectome. While a combination of improved imaging and automatic segmentation will lead to the analysis of increasingly large volumes, machines still fail to reach the quality of human tracers. Unfortunately, small errors in image segmentation can lead to catastrophic distortions of the connectome.
In this paper, to analyze very large datasets, we explore different mechanisms that are less sensitive to errors in automation. Namely, we advocate and deploy extensive synapse detection on the entire antennal lobe (AL) neuropil in the brain of the fruit fly Drosophila, a region much larger than any densely annotated to date. The resulting synapse point cloud produced is invaluable for determining compartment boundaries in the AL and choosing specific regions for subsequent analysis. We introduce our methodology in this paper for region selection and show both manual and automatic synapse annotation results. Finally, we note the correspondence between image datasets obtained using the synaptic marker, antibody nc82, and our datasets enabling registration between light and EM image modalities.
△ Less
Submitted 25 August, 2015;
originally announced August 2015.
-
Annotating Synapses in Large EM Datasets
Authors:
Stephen M. Plaza,
Toufiq Parag,
Gary B. Huang,
Donald J. Olbris,
Mathew A. Saunders,
Patricia K. Rivlin
Abstract:
Reconstructing neuronal circuits at the level of synapses is a central problem in neuroscience and becoming a focus of the emerging field of connectomics. To date, electron microscopy (EM) is the most proven technique for identifying and quantifying synaptic connections. As advances in EM make acquiring larger datasets possible, subsequent manual synapse identification ({\em i.e.}, proofreading) f…
▽ More
Reconstructing neuronal circuits at the level of synapses is a central problem in neuroscience and becoming a focus of the emerging field of connectomics. To date, electron microscopy (EM) is the most proven technique for identifying and quantifying synaptic connections. As advances in EM make acquiring larger datasets possible, subsequent manual synapse identification ({\em i.e.}, proofreading) for deciphering a connectome becomes a major time bottleneck. Here we introduce a large-scale, high-throughput, and semi-automated methodology to efficiently identify synapses. We successfully applied our methodology to the Drosophila medulla optic lobe, annotating many more synapses than previous connectome efforts. Our approaches are extensible and will make the often complicated process of synapse identification accessible to a wider-community of potential proofreaders.
△ Less
Submitted 4 December, 2014; v1 submitted 5 September, 2014;
originally announced September 2014.
