Influencing factors on false positive rates when classifying tumor cell line response to drug treatment
Authors:
Priyanka Vasanthakumari,
Thomas Brettin,
Yitan Zhu,
Hyunseung Yoo,
Maulik Shukla,
Alexander Partin,
Fangfang Xia,
Oleksandr Narykov,
Rick L. Stevens
Abstract:
Informed selection of drug candidates for laboratory experimentation provides an efficient means of identifying suitable anti-cancer treatments. The advancement of artificial intelligence has led to the development of computational models to predict cancer cell line response to drug treatment. It is important to analyze the false positive rate (FPR) of the models, to increase the number of effecti…
▽ More
Informed selection of drug candidates for laboratory experimentation provides an efficient means of identifying suitable anti-cancer treatments. The advancement of artificial intelligence has led to the development of computational models to predict cancer cell line response to drug treatment. It is important to analyze the false positive rate (FPR) of the models, to increase the number of effective treatments identified and to minimize unnecessary laboratory experimentation. Such analysis will also aid in identifying drugs or cancer types that require more data collection to improve model predictions. This work uses an attention based neural network classification model to identify responsive/non-responsive drug treatments across multiple types of cancer cell lines. Two data filtering techniques have been applied to generate 10 data subsets, including removing samples for which dose response curves are poorly fitted and removing samples whose area under the dose response curve (AUC) values are marginal around 0.5 from the training set. One hundred trials of 10-fold cross-validation analysis is performed to test the model prediction performance on all the data subsets and the subset with the best model prediction performance is selected for further analysis. Several error analysis metrics such as the false positive rate (FPR), and the prediction uncertainty are evaluated, and the results are summarized by cancer type and drug mechanism of action (MoA) category. The FPR of cancer type spans between 0.262 and 0.5189, while that of drug MoA category spans almost the full range of [0, 1]. This study identifies cancer types and drug MoAs with high FPRs. Additional drug screening data of these cancer and drug categories may improve response modeling. Our results also demonstrate that the two data filtering approaches help improve the drug response prediction performance.
△ Less
Submitted 17 October, 2023;
originally announced October 2023.
Deep learning methods for drug response prediction in cancer: predominant and emerging trends
Authors:
Alexander Partin,
Thomas S. Brettin,
Yitan Zhu,
Oleksandr Narykov,
Austin Clyde,
Jamie Overbeek,
Rick L. Stevens
Abstract:
Cancer claims millions of lives yearly worldwide. While many therapies have been made available in recent years, by in large cancer remains unsolved. Exploiting computational predictive models to study and treat cancer holds great promise in improving drug development and personalized design of treatment plans, ultimately suppressing tumors, alleviating suffering, and prolonging lives of patients.…
▽ More
Cancer claims millions of lives yearly worldwide. While many therapies have been made available in recent years, by in large cancer remains unsolved. Exploiting computational predictive models to study and treat cancer holds great promise in improving drug development and personalized design of treatment plans, ultimately suppressing tumors, alleviating suffering, and prolonging lives of patients. A wave of recent papers demonstrates promising results in predicting cancer response to drug treatments while utilizing deep learning methods. These papers investigate diverse data representations, neural network architectures, learning methodologies, and evaluations schemes. However, deciphering promising predominant and emerging trends is difficult due to the variety of explored methods and lack of standardized framework for comparing drug response prediction models. To obtain a comprehensive landscape of deep learning methods, we conducted an extensive search and analysis of deep learning models that predict the response to single drug treatments. A total of 60 deep learning-based models have been curated and summary plots were generated. Based on the analysis, observable patterns and prevalence of methods have been revealed. This review allows to better understand the current state of the field and identify major challenges and promising solution paths.
△ Less
Submitted 17 November, 2022;
originally announced November 2022.
