Real-time Geoinformation Systems to Improve the Quality, Scalability, and Cost of Internet of Things for Agri-environment Research
Authors:
Bryan C. Runck,
Bobby Schulz,
Jeff Bishop,
Nathan Carlson,
Bryan Chantigian,
Gary Deters,
Jesse Erdmann,
Patrick M. Ewing,
Michael Felzan,
Xiao Fu,
Jan Greyling,
Christopher J. Hogan,
Andrew Hollman,
Ali Joglekar,
Kris Junker,
Michael Kantar,
Lumbani Kaunda,
Mohana Krishna,
Benjamin Lynch,
Peter Marchetto,
Megan Marsolek,
Troy McKay,
Brad Morris,
Ali Rashid Niaghi,
Keerthi Pamulaparthy
, et al. (19 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
With the increasing emphasis on machine learning and artificial intelligence to drive knowledge discovery in the agricultural sciences, spatial internet of things (IoT) technologies have become increasingly important for collecting real-time, high resolution data for these models. However, managing large fleets of devices while maintaining high data quality remains an ongoing challenge as scientis…
▽ More
With the increasing emphasis on machine learning and artificial intelligence to drive knowledge discovery in the agricultural sciences, spatial internet of things (IoT) technologies have become increasingly important for collecting real-time, high resolution data for these models. However, managing large fleets of devices while maintaining high data quality remains an ongoing challenge as scientists iterate from prototype to mature end-to-end applications. Here, we provide a set of case studies using the framework of technology readiness levels for an open source spatial IoT system. The spatial IoT systems underwent 3 major and 14 minor system versions, had over 2,727 devices manufactured both in academic and commercial contexts, and are either in active or planned deployment across four continents. Our results show the evolution of a generalizable, open source spatial IoT system designed for agricultural scientists, and provide a model for academic researchers to overcome the challenges that exist in going from one-off prototypes to thousands of internet-connected devices.
△ Less
Submitted 2 April, 2024; v1 submitted 28 March, 2024;
originally announced March 2024.
Learning Equations from Biological Data with Limited Time Samples
Authors:
John T. Nardini,
John H. Lagergren,
Andrea Hawkins-Daarud,
Lee Curtin,
Bethan Morris,
Erica M. Rutter,
Kristin R. Swanson,
Kevin B. Flores
Abstract:
Equation learning methods present a promising tool to aid scientists in the modeling process for biological data. Previous equation learning studies have demonstrated that these methods can infer models from rich datasets, however, the performance of these methods in the presence of common challenges from biological data has not been thoroughly explored. We present an equation learning methodology…
▽ More
Equation learning methods present a promising tool to aid scientists in the modeling process for biological data. Previous equation learning studies have demonstrated that these methods can infer models from rich datasets, however, the performance of these methods in the presence of common challenges from biological data has not been thoroughly explored. We present an equation learning methodology comprised of data denoising, equation learning, model selection and post-processing steps that infers a dynamical systems model from noisy spatiotemporal data. The performance of this methodology is thoroughly investigated in the face of several common challenges presented by biological data, namely, sparse data sampling, large noise levels, and heterogeneity between datasets. We find that this methodology can accurately infer the correct underlying equation and predict unobserved system dynamics from a small number of time samples when the data is sampled over a time interval exhibiting both linear and nonlinear dynamics. Our findings suggest that equation learning methods can be used for model discovery and selection in many areas of biology when an informative dataset is used. We focus on glioblastoma multiforme modeling as a case study in this work to highlight how these results are informative for data-driven modeling-based tumor invasion predictions.
△ Less
Submitted 19 May, 2020;
originally announced May 2020.
