Consciousness in Artificial Intelligence: Insights from the Science of Consciousness
Authors:
Patrick Butlin,
Robert Long,
Eric Elmoznino,
Yoshua Bengio,
Jonathan Birch,
Axel Constant,
George Deane,
Stephen M. Fleming,
Chris Frith,
Xu Ji,
Ryota Kanai,
Colin Klein,
Grace Lindsay,
Matthias Michel,
Liad Mudrik,
Megan A. K. Peters,
Eric Schwitzgebel,
Jonathan Simon,
Rufin VanRullen
Abstract:
Whether current or near-term AI systems could be conscious is a topic of scientific interest and increasing public concern. This report argues for, and exemplifies, a rigorous and empirically grounded approach to AI consciousness: assessing existing AI systems in detail, in light of our best-supported neuroscientific theories of consciousness. We survey several prominent scientific theories of con…
▽ More
Whether current or near-term AI systems could be conscious is a topic of scientific interest and increasing public concern. This report argues for, and exemplifies, a rigorous and empirically grounded approach to AI consciousness: assessing existing AI systems in detail, in light of our best-supported neuroscientific theories of consciousness. We survey several prominent scientific theories of consciousness, including recurrent processing theory, global workspace theory, higher-order theories, predictive processing, and attention schema theory. From these theories we derive "indicator properties" of consciousness, elucidated in computational terms that allow us to assess AI systems for these properties. We use these indicator properties to assess several recent AI systems, and we discuss how future systems might implement them. Our analysis suggests that no current AI systems are conscious, but also suggests that there are no obvious technical barriers to building AI systems which satisfy these indicators.
△ Less
Submitted 22 August, 2023; v1 submitted 16 August, 2023;
originally announced August 2023.
Functional Parcellation of fMRI data using multistage k-means clustering
Authors:
Harshit Parmar,
Brian Nutter,
Rodney Long,
Sameer Antani,
Sunanda Mitra
Abstract:
Purpose: Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI) data acquired through resting-state studies have been used to obtain information about the spontaneous activations inside the brain. One of the approaches for analysis and interpretation of resting-state fMRI data require spatially and functionally homogenous parcellation of the whole brain based on underlying temporal fluctuations. Clustering…
▽ More
Purpose: Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI) data acquired through resting-state studies have been used to obtain information about the spontaneous activations inside the brain. One of the approaches for analysis and interpretation of resting-state fMRI data require spatially and functionally homogenous parcellation of the whole brain based on underlying temporal fluctuations. Clustering is often used to generate functional parcellation. However, major clustering algorithms, when used for fMRI data, have their limitations. Among commonly used parcellation schemes, a tradeoff exists between intra-cluster functional similarity and alignment with anatomical regions. Approach: In this work, we present a clustering algorithm for resting state and task fMRI data which is developed to obtain brain parcellations that show high structural and functional homogeneity. The clustering is performed by multistage binary k-means clustering algorithm designed specifically for the 4D fMRI data. The results from this multistage k-means algorithm show that by modifying and combining different algorithms, we can take advantage of the strengths of different techniques while overcoming their limitations. Results: The clustering output for resting state fMRI data using the multistage k-means approach is shown to be better than simple k-means or functional atlas in terms of spatial and functional homogeneity. The clusters also correspond to commonly identifiable brain networks. For task fMRI, the clustering output can identify primary and secondary activation regions and provide information about the varying hemodynamic response across different brain regions. Conclusion: The multistage k-means approach can provide functional parcellations of the brain using resting state fMRI data. The method is model-free and is data driven which can be applied to both resting state and task fMRI.
△ Less
Submitted 19 February, 2022;
originally announced February 2022.
