-
Novel community data in ecology -- properties and prospects
Authors:
Florian Hartig,
Nerea Abrego,
Alex Bush,
Jonathan M. Chase,
Gurutzeta Guillera-Arroita,
Mathew A. Leibold,
Otso Ovaskainen,
Loïc Pellissier,
Maximilian Pichler,
Giovanni Poggiato,
Laura Pollock,
Sara Si-Moussi,
Wilfried Thuiller,
Duarte S. Viana,
David I. Warton,
Damaris Zurell,
Douglas W. Yu
Abstract:
New technologies for acquiring biological information such as eDNA, acoustic or optical sensors, make it possible to generate spatial community observations at unprecedented scales. The potential of these novel community data to standardize community observations at high spatial, temporal, and taxonomic resolution and at large spatial scale ('many rows and many columns') has been widely discussed,…
▽ More
New technologies for acquiring biological information such as eDNA, acoustic or optical sensors, make it possible to generate spatial community observations at unprecedented scales. The potential of these novel community data to standardize community observations at high spatial, temporal, and taxonomic resolution and at large spatial scale ('many rows and many columns') has been widely discussed, but so far, there has been little integration of these data with ecological models and theory. Here, we review these developments and highlight emerging solutions, focusing on statistical methods for analyzing novel community data, in particular joint species distribution models; the new ecological questions that can be answered with these data; and the potential implications of these developments for policy and conservation.
△ Less
Submitted 19 January, 2024;
originally announced January 2024.
-
Covariate influence in spatially autocorrelated occupancy and abundance data
Authors:
David C. Bardos,
Gurutzeta Guillera-Arroita,
Brendan A. Wintle
Abstract:
The autologistic model and related auto-models, commonly applied as autocovariate regression, offer distinct advantages for analysing spatially autocorrelated ecological data. However, comparative studies by Carl and Kühn (Ecol. Model., 2007, 207, 159), Dormann (Ecol. Model., 2007, 207, 234), Dormann et al. (Ecography, 2007, 30, 609) and Beale et al. (Ecol. Lett., 2010, 13, 246) concluded that aut…
▽ More
The autologistic model and related auto-models, commonly applied as autocovariate regression, offer distinct advantages for analysing spatially autocorrelated ecological data. However, comparative studies by Carl and Kühn (Ecol. Model., 2007, 207, 159), Dormann (Ecol. Model., 2007, 207, 234), Dormann et al. (Ecography, 2007, 30, 609) and Beale et al. (Ecol. Lett., 2010, 13, 246) concluded that autocovariate regression yields anomalous covariate parameter estimates. The last three studies were based on erroneous numerical evidence, due to violation of conditions (Besag, J. R. Stat. Soc., Ser. B, 1974, 36, 192) for auto-model validity. Here we show that after correcting these technical errors, a more fundamental conceptual error remains: the comparative studies are founded on a mathematically incorrect notion of bias, involving direct comparison of parameter estimates across models differing in mathematical structure. We develop a set of simulation-based measures of covariate influence that are directly comparable across models and apply them to examples from the abovementioned studies. We find that in these cases, the effect of auto-model parameters is similar to (and consistent with) corresponding linear model effects, due to a phenomenon within auto-models that we refer to as "covariate amplification". Thus, simple comparison of parameter magnitudes between structurally different models can be highly misleading. We demonstrate that the recent critique of auto-models is entirely unfounded. Correctly applied and interpreted, autocovariate regression provides a practical approach to inference for spatially autocorrelated species distribution or abundance data, while overcoming well-known limitations of generalized linear models.
△ Less
Submitted 27 January, 2015; v1 submitted 26 January, 2015;
originally announced January 2015.
-
Valid auto-models for spatially autocorrelated occupancy and abundance data
Authors:
David C. Bardos,
Gurutzeta Guillera-Arroita,
Brendan A. Wintle
Abstract:
Auto-logistic and related auto-models, implemented approximately as autocovariate regression, provide simple and direct modelling of spatial dependence. The autologistic model has been widely applied in ecology since Augustin, Mugglestone and Buckland (J. Appl. Ecol., 1996, 33, 339) analysed red deer census data using a hybrid estimation approach, combining maximum pseudo-likelihood estimation wit…
▽ More
Auto-logistic and related auto-models, implemented approximately as autocovariate regression, provide simple and direct modelling of spatial dependence. The autologistic model has been widely applied in ecology since Augustin, Mugglestone and Buckland (J. Appl. Ecol., 1996, 33, 339) analysed red deer census data using a hybrid estimation approach, combining maximum pseudo-likelihood estimation with Gibbs sampling of missing data. However Dormann (Ecol. Model., 2007, 207, 234) questioned the validity of auto-logistic regression, giving examples of apparent underestimation of covariate parameters in analysis of simulated "snouter" data. Dormann et al. (Ecography, 2007, 30, 609) extended this analysis to auto-Poisson and auto-normal models, reporting similar anomalies. All the above studies employ neighbourhood weighting schemes inconsistent with conditions (Besag, J. R. Stat. Soc., Ser. B, 1974, 36, 192) required for auto-model validity; furthermore the auto-Poisson analysis fails to exclude cooperative interactions. We show that all "snouter" anomalies are resolved by correct auto-model implementation. Re-analysis of the red deer data shows that invalid neighbourhood weightings generate only small estimation errors for the full dataset, but larger errors occur on geographic subsamples. A substantial fraction of papers applying auto-logistic regression to ecological data use these invalid weightings, which are default options in the widely used "spdep" spatial dependence package for R. Auto-logistic analyses using invalid neighbourhood weightings will be erroneous to an extent that can vary widely. These analyses can easily be corrected by using valid neighbourhood weightings available in "spdep". The hybrid estimation approach for missing data is readily adapted for valid neighbourhood weighting schemes and is implemented here in R for application to sparse presence-absence data.
△ Less
Submitted 30 April, 2015; v1 submitted 26 January, 2015;
originally announced January 2015.
