-
Topological classification of tumour-immune interactions and dynamics
Authors:
**gjie Yang,
Heidi Fang,
Jagdeep Dhesi,
Iris H. R. Yoon,
Joshua A. Bull,
Helen M. Byrne,
Heather A. Harrington,
Gillian Grindstaff
Abstract:
The complex and dynamic crosstalk between tumour and immune cells results in tumours that can exhibit distinct qualitative behaviours - elimination, equilibrium, and escape - and intricate spatial patterns, yet share similar cell configurations in the early stages. We offer a topological approach to analyse time series of spatial data of cell locations (including tumour cells and macrophages) in o…
▽ More
The complex and dynamic crosstalk between tumour and immune cells results in tumours that can exhibit distinct qualitative behaviours - elimination, equilibrium, and escape - and intricate spatial patterns, yet share similar cell configurations in the early stages. We offer a topological approach to analyse time series of spatial data of cell locations (including tumour cells and macrophages) in order to predict malignant behaviour. We propose four topological vectorisations specialised to such cell data: persistence images of Vietoris-Rips and radial filtrations at static time points, and persistence images for zigzag filtrations and persistence vineyards varying in time. To demonstrate the approach, synthetic data are generated from an agent-based model with varying parameters. We compare the performance of topological summaries in predicting - with logistic regression at various time steps - whether tumour niches surrounding blood vessels are present at the end of the simulation, as a proxy for metastasis (i.e., tumour escape). We find that both static and time-dependent methods accurately identify perivascular niche formation, significantly earlier than simpler markers such as the number of tumour cells and the macrophage phenotype ratio. We find additionally that dimension 0 persistence applied to macrophage data, representing multi-scale clusters of the spatial arrangement of macrophages, performs best at this classification task at early time steps, prior to full tumour development, and performs even better when time-dependent data are included; in contrast, topological measures capturing the shape of the tumour, such as tortuosity and punctures in the cell arrangement, perform best at intermediate and later stages. The logistic regression coefficients reveal detailed shape differences between the classes.
△ Less
Submitted 9 August, 2023;
originally announced August 2023.
-
The isometry group of phylogenetic tree space is $S_n$
Authors:
Gillian Grindstaff
Abstract:
A phylogenetic tree is an acyclic graph with distinctly labeled leaves, whose internal edges have a positive weight. Given a set of n leaves, the collection of all phylogenetic trees with this leaf set can be assembled into a metric cube complex known as phylogenetic tree space, or Billera-Holmes-Vogtmann tree space. In this largely combinatorial paper, we show that the isometry group of this spac…
▽ More
A phylogenetic tree is an acyclic graph with distinctly labeled leaves, whose internal edges have a positive weight. Given a set of n leaves, the collection of all phylogenetic trees with this leaf set can be assembled into a metric cube complex known as phylogenetic tree space, or Billera-Holmes-Vogtmann tree space. In this largely combinatorial paper, we show that the isometry group of this space is the symmetric group on n elements. This fact is relevant to distance-based analyses of phylogenetic tree sets.
△ Less
Submitted 31 March, 2019; v1 submitted 9 January, 2019;
originally announced January 2019.
-
Geometric comparison of phylogenetic trees with different leaf sets
Authors:
Gillian Grindstaff,
Megan Owen
Abstract:
The metric space of phylogenetic trees defined by Billera, Holmes, and Vogtmann, which we refer to as BHV space, provides a natural geometric setting for describing collections of trees on the same set of taxa. However, it is sometimes necessary to analyze collections of trees on non-identical taxa sets (i.e., with different numbers of leaves), and in this context it is not evident how to apply BH…
▽ More
The metric space of phylogenetic trees defined by Billera, Holmes, and Vogtmann, which we refer to as BHV space, provides a natural geometric setting for describing collections of trees on the same set of taxa. However, it is sometimes necessary to analyze collections of trees on non-identical taxa sets (i.e., with different numbers of leaves), and in this context it is not evident how to apply BHV space. Davidson et al. recently approached this problem by describing a combinatorial algorithm extending tree topologies to regions in higher dimensional tree spaces, so that one can quickly compute which topologies contain a given tree as partial data. In this paper, we refine and adapt their algorithm to work for metric trees to give a full characterization of the subspace of extensions of a subtree. We describe how to apply our algorithm to define and search a space of possible supertrees and, for a collection of tree fragments with different leaf sets, to measure their compatibility.
△ Less
Submitted 11 July, 2018;
originally announced July 2018.
