-
Modeling the Risk of In-Person Instruction during the COVID-19 Pandemic
Authors:
Brian Liu,
Yujia Zhang,
Shane G. Henderson,
David B. Shmoys,
Peter I. Frazier
Abstract:
During the COVID-19 pandemic, safely implementing in-person indoor instruction was a high priority for universities nationwide. To support this effort at the University, we developed a mathematical model for estimating the risk of SARS-CoV-2 transmission in university classrooms. This model was used to evaluate combinations of feasible interventions for classrooms at the University during the pand…
▽ More
During the COVID-19 pandemic, safely implementing in-person indoor instruction was a high priority for universities nationwide. To support this effort at the University, we developed a mathematical model for estimating the risk of SARS-CoV-2 transmission in university classrooms. This model was used to evaluate combinations of feasible interventions for classrooms at the University during the pandemic and optimize the set of interventions that would allow higher occupancy levels, matching the pre-pandemic numbers of in-person courses. Importantly, we determined that requiring masking in dense classrooms with unrestricted seating with more than 90% of students vaccinated was easy to implement, incurred little logistical or financial cost, and allowed classes to be held at full capacity. A retrospective analysis at the end of the semester confirmed the model's assessment that the proposed classroom configuration would be safe. Our framework is generalizable and was used to support reopening decisions at Stanford University. In addition, our framework is flexible and applies to a wide range of indoor settings. It was repurposed for large university events and gatherings and could be used to support planning indoor space use to avoid transmission of infectious diseases across various industries, from secondary schools to movie theaters and restaurants.
△ Less
Submitted 19 February, 2024; v1 submitted 6 October, 2023;
originally announced October 2023.
-
Correlation Improves Group Testing: Capturing the Dilution Effect
Authors:
Jiayue Wan,
Yujia Zhang,
Peter I. Frazier
Abstract:
Population-wide screening to identify and isolate infectious individuals is a powerful tool for controlling COVID-19 and other infectious diseases. Group testing can enable such screening despite limited testing resources. Samples' viral loads are often positively correlated, either because prevalence and sample collection are both correlated with geography, or through intentional enhancement, e.g…
▽ More
Population-wide screening to identify and isolate infectious individuals is a powerful tool for controlling COVID-19 and other infectious diseases. Group testing can enable such screening despite limited testing resources. Samples' viral loads are often positively correlated, either because prevalence and sample collection are both correlated with geography, or through intentional enhancement, e.g., by pooling samples from people in similar risk groups. Such correlation is known to improve test efficiency in mathematical models with fixed sensitivity. In reality, however, dilution degrades a pooled test's sensitivity by an amount that varies with the number of positives in the pool. In the presence of this dilution effect, we study the impact of correlation on the most widely-used group testing procedure, the Dorfman procedure. We show that correlation's effects are significantly altered by the dilution effect. We prove that under a general correlation structure, pooling correlated samples together (called correlated pooling) achieves higher sensitivity but can degrade test efficiency compared to independently pooling the samples (called naive pooling) using the same pool size. We identify an alternative measure of test resource usage, the number of positives found per test consumed, which we argue is better aligned with infection control, and show that correlated pooling outperforms naive pooling on this measure. We build a realistic agent-based simulation to contextualize our theoretical results within an epidemic control framework. We argue that the dilution effect makes it even more important for policy-makers evaluating group testing protocols for large-scale screening to incorporate naturally arising correlation and to intentionally maximize correlation.
△ Less
Submitted 5 November, 2023; v1 submitted 14 November, 2021;
originally announced November 2021.
-
Group Testing Enables Asymptomatic Screening for COVID-19 Mitigation: Feasibility and Optimal Pool Size Selection with Dilution Effects
Authors:
Yifan Lin,
Yuxuan Ren,
**gyuan Wan,
Massey Cashore,
Jiayue Wan,
Yujia Zhang,
Peter Frazier,
Enlu Zhou
Abstract:
Repeated asymptomatic screening for SARS-CoV-2 promises to control spread of the virus but would require too many resources to implement at scale. Group testing is promising for screening more people with fewer test resources: multiple samples tested together in one pool can be excluded with one negative test result. Existing approaches to group testing design for SARS-CoV-2 asymptomatic screening…
▽ More
Repeated asymptomatic screening for SARS-CoV-2 promises to control spread of the virus but would require too many resources to implement at scale. Group testing is promising for screening more people with fewer test resources: multiple samples tested together in one pool can be excluded with one negative test result. Existing approaches to group testing design for SARS-CoV-2 asymptomatic screening, however, do not consider dilution effects: that false negatives become more common with larger pools. As a consequence, they may recommend pool sizes that are too large or misestimate the benefits of screening. Modeling dilution effects, we derive closed-form expressions for the expected number of tests and false negative/positives per person screened under two popular group testing methods: the linear and square array methods. We find that test error correlation induced by a common viral load across an individual's samples results in many fewer false negatives than would be expected from less realistic but more widely assumed independent errors. This insight also suggests that false positives can be controlled through repeated tests without significantly increasing false negatives. Using these closed-form expressions to trace a Pareto frontier over error rates and tests, we design testing protocols for repeated asymptomatic screening of a large population. We minimize disease prevalence by optimizing a time-varying pool sizes and screening frequency constrained by daily test capacity and a false positive limit. This provides a testing protocol practitioners can use for mitigating COVID-19. In a case study, we demonstrate the effectiveness of this methodology in controlling spread.
△ Less
Submitted 16 November, 2020; v1 submitted 14 August, 2020;
originally announced August 2020.
