Fast Processing and Querying of 170TB of Genomics Data via a Repeated And Merged BloOm Filter (RAMBO)
Authors:
Gaurav Gupta,
Minghao Yan,
Benjamin Coleman,
Bryce Kille,
R. A. Leo Elworth,
Tharun Medini,
Todd Treangen,
Anshumali Shrivastava
Abstract:
DNA sequencing, especially of microbial genomes and metagenomes, has been at the core of recent research advances in large-scale comparative genomics. The data deluge has resulted in exponential growth in genomic datasets over the past years and has shown no sign of slowing down. Several recent attempts have been made to tame the computational burden of sequence search on these terabyte and petaby…
▽ More
DNA sequencing, especially of microbial genomes and metagenomes, has been at the core of recent research advances in large-scale comparative genomics. The data deluge has resulted in exponential growth in genomic datasets over the past years and has shown no sign of slowing down. Several recent attempts have been made to tame the computational burden of sequence search on these terabyte and petabyte-scale datasets, including raw reads and assembled genomes. However, no known implementation provides both fast query and construction time, keeps the low false-positive requirement, and offers cheap storage of the data structure. We propose a data structure for search called RAMBO (Repeated And Merged BloOm Filter) which is significantly faster in query time than state-of-the-art genome indexing methods- COBS (Compact bit-sliced signature index), Sequence Bloom Trees, HowDeSBT, and SSBT. Furthermore, it supports insertion and query process parallelism, cheap updates for streaming inputs, has a zero false-negative rate, a low false-positive rate, and a small index size. RAMBO converts the search problem into set membership testing among $K$ documents. Interestingly, it is a count-min sketch type arrangement of a membership testing utility (Bloom Filter in our case). The simplicity of the algorithm and embarrassingly parallel architecture allows us to stream and index a 170TB whole-genome sequence dataset in a mere 9 hours on a cluster of 100 nodes while competing methods require weeks.
△ Less
Submitted 30 April, 2022; v1 submitted 10 October, 2019;
originally announced October 2019.
Advances in Computational Methods for Phylogenetic Networks in the Presence of Hybridization
Authors:
R. A. L. Elworth,
H. A. Ogilvie,
J. Zhu,
L. Nakhleh
Abstract:
Phylogenetic networks extend phylogenetic trees to allow for modeling reticulate evolutionary processes such as hybridization. They take the shape of a rooted, directed, acyclic graph, and when parameterized with evolutionary parameters, such as divergence times and population sizes, they form a generative process of molecular sequence evolution. Early work on computational methods for phylogeneti…
▽ More
Phylogenetic networks extend phylogenetic trees to allow for modeling reticulate evolutionary processes such as hybridization. They take the shape of a rooted, directed, acyclic graph, and when parameterized with evolutionary parameters, such as divergence times and population sizes, they form a generative process of molecular sequence evolution. Early work on computational methods for phylogenetic network inference focused exclusively on reticulations and sought networks with the fewest number of reticulations to fit the data. As processes such as incomplete lineage sorting (ILS) could be at play concurrently with hybridization, work in the last decade has shifted to computational approaches for phylogenetic network inference in the presence of ILS. In such a short period, significant advances have been made on develo** and implementing such computational approaches. In particular, parsimony, likelihood, and Bayesian methods have been devised for estimating phylogenetic networks and associated parameters using estimated gene trees as data. Use of those inference methods has been augmented with statistical tests for specific hypotheses of hybridization, like the D-statistic. Most recently, Bayesian approaches for inferring phylogenetic networks directly from sequence data were developed and implemented. In this chapter, we survey such advances and discuss model assumptions as well as methods' strengths and limitations. We also discuss parallel efforts in the population genetics community aimed at inferring similar structures. Finally, we highlight major directions for future research in this area.
△ Less
Submitted 26 August, 2018;
originally announced August 2018.
