Showing 1–11 of 11 results for author: Camarillo, D B

Toward more accurate and generalizable brain deformation estimators for traumatic brain injury detection with unsupervised domain adaptation

Authors: Xianghao Zhan, Jiawei Sun, Yuzhe Liu, Nicholas J. Cecchi, Enora Le Flao, Olivier Gevaert, Michael M. Zeineh, David B. Camarillo

Abstract: Machine learning head models (MLHMs) are developed to estimate brain deformation for early detection of traumatic brain injury (TBI). However, the overfitting to simulated impacts and the lack of generalizability caused by distributional shift of different head impact datasets hinders the broad clinical applications of current MLHMs. We propose brain deformation estimators that integrates unsuperv… ▽ More Machine learning head models (MLHMs) are developed to estimate brain deformation for early detection of traumatic brain injury (TBI). However, the overfitting to simulated impacts and the lack of generalizability caused by distributional shift of different head impact datasets hinders the broad clinical applications of current MLHMs. We propose brain deformation estimators that integrates unsupervised domain adaptation with a deep neural network to predict whole-brain maximum principal strain (MPS) and MPS rate (MPSR). With 12,780 simulated head impacts, we performed unsupervised domain adaptation on on-field head impacts from 302 college football (CF) impacts and 457 mixed martial arts (MMA) impacts using domain regularized component analysis (DRCA) and cycle-GAN-based methods. The new model improved the MPS/MPSR estimation accuracy, with the DRCA method significantly outperforming other domain adaptation methods in prediction accuracy (p<0.001): MPS RMSE: 0.027 (CF) and 0.037 (MMA); MPSR RMSE: 7.159 (CF) and 13.022 (MMA). On another two hold-out test sets with 195 college football impacts and 260 boxing impacts, the DRCA model significantly outperformed the baseline model without domain adaptation in MPS and MPSR estimation accuracy (p<0.001). The DRCA domain adaptation reduces the MPS/MPSR estimation error to be well below TBI thresholds, enabling accurate brain deformation estimation to detect TBI in future clinical applications. △ Less

Submitted 8 June, 2023; originally announced June 2023.

Denoising instrumented mouthguard measurements of head impact kinematics with a convolutional neural network

Authors: Xianghao Zhan, Yuzhe Liu, Nicholas J. Cecchi, Ashlyn A. Callan, Enora Le Flao, Olivier Gevaert, Michael M. Zeineh, Gerald A. Grant, David B. Camarillo

Abstract: Wearable sensors for measuring head kinematics can be noisy due to imperfect interfaces with the body. Mouthguards are used to measure head kinematics during impacts in traumatic brain injury (TBI) studies, but deviations from reference kinematics can still occur due to potential looseness. In this study, deep learning is used to compensate for the imperfect interface and improve measurement accur… ▽ More Wearable sensors for measuring head kinematics can be noisy due to imperfect interfaces with the body. Mouthguards are used to measure head kinematics during impacts in traumatic brain injury (TBI) studies, but deviations from reference kinematics can still occur due to potential looseness. In this study, deep learning is used to compensate for the imperfect interface and improve measurement accuracy. A set of one-dimensional convolutional neural network (1D-CNN) models was developed to denoise mouthguard kinematics measurements along three spatial axes of linear acceleration and angular velocity. The denoised kinematics had significantly reduced errors compared to reference kinematics, and reduced errors in brain injury criteria and tissue strain and strain rate calculated via finite element modeling. The 1D-CNN models were also tested on an on-field dataset of college football impacts and a post-mortem human subject dataset, with similar denoising effects observed. The models can be used to improve detection of head impacts and TBI risk evaluation, and potentially extended to other sensors measuring kinematics. △ Less

Submitted 19 December, 2022; originally announced December 2022.

Comments: 39 pages, 9 figures, 4 tables

Data-driven decomposition of brain dynamics with principal component analysis in different types of head impacts

Authors: Xianghao Zhan, Yuzhe Liu, Nicholas J. Cecchi, Olivier Gevaert, Michael M. Zeineh, Gerald A. Grant, David B. Camarillo

Abstract: Strain and strain rate are effective traumatic brain injury predictors. Kinematics-based models estimating these metrics suffer from significant different distributions of both kinematics and the injury metrics across head impact types. To address this, previous studies focus on the kinematics but not the injury metrics. We have previously shown the kinematic features vary largely across head impa… ▽ More Strain and strain rate are effective traumatic brain injury predictors. Kinematics-based models estimating these metrics suffer from significant different distributions of both kinematics and the injury metrics across head impact types. To address this, previous studies focus on the kinematics but not the injury metrics. We have previously shown the kinematic features vary largely across head impact types, resulting in different patterns of brain deformation. This study analyzes the spatial distribution of brain deformation and applies principal component analysis (PCA) to extract the representative patterns of injury metrics (maximum principal strain (MPS), MPS rate (MPSR) and MPSXMPSR) in four impact types (simulation, football, mixed martial arts and car crashes). We apply PCA to decompose the patterns of the injury metrics for all impacts in each impact type, and investigate the distributions among brain regions using the first principal component (PC1). Furthermore, we developed a deep learning head model (DLHM) to predict PC1 and then inverse-transform to predict for all brain elements. PC1 explained >80% variance on the datasets. Based on PC1 coefficients, the corpus callosum and midbrain exhibit high variance on all datasets. We found MPSXMPSR the most sensitive metric on which the top 5% of severe impacts further deviates from the mean and there is a higher variance among the severe impacts. Finally, the DLHM reached mean absolute errors of <0.018 for MPS, <3.7 (1/s) for MPSR and <1.1 (1/s) for MPSXMPSR, much smaller than the injury thresholds. The brain injury metric in a dataset can be decomposed into mean components and PC1 with high explained variance. The brain dynamics decomposition enables better interpretation of the patterns in brain injury metrics and the sensitivity of brain injury metrics across impact types. The decomposition also reduces the dimensionality of DLHM. △ Less

Submitted 26 October, 2021; originally announced October 2021.

Rapidly and accurately estimating brain strain and strain rate across head impact types with transfer learning and data fusion

Authors: Xianghao Zhan, Yuzhe Liu, Nicholas J. Cecchi, Olivier Gevaert, Michael M. Zeineh, Gerald A. Grant, David B. Camarillo

Abstract: Brain strain and strain rate are effective in predicting traumatic brain injury (TBI) caused by head impacts. However, state-of-the-art finite element modeling (FEM) demands considerable computational time in the computation, limiting its application in real-time TBI risk monitoring. To accelerate, machine learning head models (MLHMs) were developed, and the model accuracy was found to decrease wh… ▽ More Brain strain and strain rate are effective in predicting traumatic brain injury (TBI) caused by head impacts. However, state-of-the-art finite element modeling (FEM) demands considerable computational time in the computation, limiting its application in real-time TBI risk monitoring. To accelerate, machine learning head models (MLHMs) were developed, and the model accuracy was found to decrease when the training/test datasets were from different head impacts types. However, the size of dataset for specific impact types may not be enough for model training. To address the computational cost of FEM, the limited strain rate prediction, and the generalizability of MLHMs to on-field datasets, we propose data fusion and transfer learning to develop a series of MLHMs to predict the maximum principal strain (MPS) and maximum principal strain rate (MPSR). We trained and tested the MLHMs on 13,623 head impacts from simulations, American football, mixed martial arts, car crash, and compared against the models trained on only simulations or only on-field impacts. The MLHMs developed with transfer learning are significantly more accurate in estimating MPS and MPSR than other models, with a mean absolute error (MAE) smaller than 0.03 in predicting MPS and smaller than 7 (1/s) in predicting MPSR on all impact datasets. The MLHMs can be applied to various head impact types for rapidly and accurately calculating brain strain and strain rate. Besides the clinical applications in real-time brain strain and strain rate monitoring, this model helps researchers estimate the brain strain and strain rate caused by head impacts more efficiently than FEM. △ Less

Submitted 30 August, 2021; originally announced August 2021.

Comments: 14 pages, 6 figures

Kinematics clustering enables head impact subty** for better traumatic brain injury prediction

Authors: Xianghao Zhan, Yiheng Li, Yuzhe Liu, Nicholas J. Cecchi, Olivier Gevaert, Michael M. Zeineh, Gerald A. Grant, David B. Camarillo

Abstract: Traumatic brain injury can be caused by various types of head impacts. However, due to different kinematic characteristics, many brain injury risk estimation models are not generalizable across the variety of impacts that humans may sustain. The current definitions of head impact subtypes are based on impact sources (e.g., football, traffic accident), which may not reflect the intrinsic kinematic… ▽ More Traumatic brain injury can be caused by various types of head impacts. However, due to different kinematic characteristics, many brain injury risk estimation models are not generalizable across the variety of impacts that humans may sustain. The current definitions of head impact subtypes are based on impact sources (e.g., football, traffic accident), which may not reflect the intrinsic kinematic similarities of impacts across the impact sources. To investigate the potential new definitions of impact subtypes based on kinematics, 3,161 head impacts from various sources including simulation, college football, mixed martial arts, and car racing were collected. We applied the K-means clustering to cluster the impacts on 16 standardized temporal features from head rotation kinematics. Then, we developed subtype-specific ridge regression models for cumulative strain damage (using the threshold of 15%), which significantly improved the estimation accuracy compared with the baseline method which mixed impacts from different sources and developed one model (R^2 from 0.7 to 0.9). To investigate the effect of kinematic features, we presented the top three critical features (maximum resultant angular acceleration, maximum angular acceleration along the z-axis, maximum linear acceleration along the y-axis) based on regression accuracy and used logistic regression to find the critical points for each feature that partitioned the subtypes. This study enables researchers to define head impact subtypes in a data-driven manner, which leads to more generalizable brain injury risk estimation. △ Less

Submitted 7 August, 2021; originally announced August 2021.

Comments: 4 figures

Machine-learning-based head impact subty** based on the spectral densities of the measurable head kinematics

Authors: Xianghao Zhan, Yiheng Li, Yuzhe Liu, Nicholas J. Cecchi, Samuel J. Raymond, Zhou Zhou, Hossein Vahid Alizadeh, Jesse Ruan, Saeed Barbat, Stephen Tiernan, Olivier Gevaert, Michael M. Zeineh, Gerald A. Grant, David B. Camarillo

Abstract: Objective: Traumatic brain injury can be caused by head impacts, but many brain injury risk estimation models are not equally accurate across the variety of impacts that patients may undergo and the characteristics of different types of impacts are not well studied. We investigated the spectral characteristics of different head impact types with kinematics classification. Methods: Data was analyze… ▽ More Objective: Traumatic brain injury can be caused by head impacts, but many brain injury risk estimation models are not equally accurate across the variety of impacts that patients may undergo and the characteristics of different types of impacts are not well studied. We investigated the spectral characteristics of different head impact types with kinematics classification. Methods: Data was analyzed from 3,262 head impacts from lab reconstruction, American football, mixed martial arts, and publicly available car crash data. A random forest classifier with spectral densities of linear acceleration and angular velocity was built to classify head impact types (e.g., football, car crash, mixed martial arts). To test the classifier robustness, another 271 lab-reconstructed impacts were obtained from 5 other instrumented mouthguards. Finally, with the classifier, type-specific, nearest-neighbor regression models were built for brain strain. Results: The classifier reached a median accuracy of 96% over 1,000 random partitions of training and test sets. The most important features in the classification included both low-frequency and high-frequency features, both linear acceleration features and angular velocity features. Different head impact types had different distributions of spectral densities in low-frequency and high-frequency ranges (e.g., the spectral densities of MMA impacts were higher in high-frequency range than in the low-frequency range). The type-specific regression showed a generally higher R^2-value than baseline models without classification. Conclusion: The machine-learning-based classifier enables a better understanding of the impact kinematics spectral density in different sports, and it can be applied to evaluate the quality of impact-simulation systems and on-field data augmentation. △ Less

Submitted 5 December, 2022; v1 submitted 19 April, 2021; originally announced April 2021.

Comments: 33 pages, 5 figures

Relationship between brain injury criteria and brain strain across different types of head impacts can be different

Authors: Xianghao Zhan, Yiheng Li, Yuzhe Liu, August G. Domel, Hossein Vahid Alizadeh, Samuel J. Raymond, Jesse Ruan, Saeed Barbat, Stephen Tiernan, Olivier Gevaert, Michael Zeineh, Gerald Grant, David B. Camarillo

Abstract: Multiple brain injury criteria (BIC) are developed to quickly quantify brain injury risks after head impacts. These BIC originated from different types of head impacts (e.g., sports and car crashes) are widely used in risk evaluation. However, the accuracy of using the BIC on brain injury risk estimation across different types of head impacts has not been evaluated. Physiologically, brain strain i… ▽ More Multiple brain injury criteria (BIC) are developed to quickly quantify brain injury risks after head impacts. These BIC originated from different types of head impacts (e.g., sports and car crashes) are widely used in risk evaluation. However, the accuracy of using the BIC on brain injury risk estimation across different types of head impacts has not been evaluated. Physiologically, brain strain is often considered the key parameter of brain injury. To evaluate the BIC's risk estimation accuracy across five datasets comprising different head impact types, linear regression was used to model 95% maximum principal strain, 95% maximum principal strain at the corpus callosum, and cumulative strain damage (15%) on each of 18 BIC respectively. The results show a significant difference in the relationship between BIC and brain strain across datasets, indicating the same BIC value may suggest different brain strain in different head impact types. The accuracy of brain strain regression is generally decreasing if the BIC regression models are fit on a dataset with a different type of head impact rather than on the dataset with the same type. Given this finding, this study raises concerns for applying BIC to estimate the brain injury risks for head impacts different from the head impacts on which the BIC was developed. △ Less

Submitted 19 April, 2021; v1 submitted 17 December, 2020; originally announced December 2020.

Comments: 28 pages, 11 figures

Deep Learning Head Model for Real-time Estimation of Entire Brain Deformation in Concussion

Authors: Xianghao Zhan, Yuzhe Liu, Samuel J. Raymond, Hossein Vahid Alizadeh, August G. Domel, Olivier Gevaert, Michael Zeineh, Gerald Grant, David B. Camarillo

Abstract: Objective: Many recent studies have suggested that brain deformation resulting from a head impact is linked to the corresponding clinical outcome, such as mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI). Even though several finite element (FE) head models have been developed and validated to calculate brain deformation based on impact kinematics, the clinical application of these FE head models is limited due… ▽ More Objective: Many recent studies have suggested that brain deformation resulting from a head impact is linked to the corresponding clinical outcome, such as mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI). Even though several finite element (FE) head models have been developed and validated to calculate brain deformation based on impact kinematics, the clinical application of these FE head models is limited due to the time-consuming nature of FE simulations. This work aims to accelerate the process of brain deformation calculation and thus improve the potential for clinical applications. Methods: We propose a deep learning head model with a five-layer deep neural network and feature engineering, and trained and tested the model on 1803 total head impacts from a combination of head model simulations and on-field college football and mixed martial arts impacts. Results: The proposed deep learning head model can calculate the maximum principal strain for every element in the entire brain in less than 0.001s (with an average root mean squared error of 0.025, and with a standard deviation of 0.002 over twenty repeats with random data partition and model initialization). The contributions of various features to the predictive power of the model were investigated, and it was noted that the features based on angular acceleration were found to be more predictive than the features based on angular velocity. Conclusion: Trained using the dataset of 1803 head impacts, this model can be applied to various sports in the calculation of brain strain with accuracy, and its applicability can even further be extended by incorporating data from other types of head impacts. Significance: In addition to the potential clinical application in real-time brain deformation monitoring, this model will help researchers estimate the brain strain from a large number of head impacts more efficiently than using FE models. △ Less

Submitted 20 October, 2020; v1 submitted 16 October, 2020; originally announced October 2020.

Comments: 12 pages, 6 figures, IEEE journal

MSC Class: 92-08

Prevention of Traumatic Brain Injury with Liquid Shock Absorption

Authors: Hossein Vahid Alizadeh, Michael G. Fanton, August G. Domel, Gerald Grant, David Benjamin Camarillo

Abstract: The discovery that repetitive mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) can result in chronic traumatic encephalopathy (CTE) in high risk contact sports has led to increased scrutiny of head protective gear. In this work, we asked if it was physically possible to prevent mTBI in American football with helmets alone. Here, we show that modern helmets of several types are unlikely to prevent mTBI from high… ▽ More The discovery that repetitive mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) can result in chronic traumatic encephalopathy (CTE) in high risk contact sports has led to increased scrutiny of head protective gear. In this work, we asked if it was physically possible to prevent mTBI in American football with helmets alone. Here, we show that modern helmets of several types are unlikely to prevent mTBI from high speed collisions as might be seen in the NFL, but that introducing liquid as an energy absorbing medium can dramatically reduce the forces of impact across a spectrum of impact severities. We hypothesized that a helmet which transmits a nearly constant force during football impacts is sufficient to reduce biomechanical loading in the brain below the threshold of mTBI. To test this hypothesis, we first show that the optimal impact force transmitted to the head, in terms of brain strain, is in fact a constant force profile. Then, to generate a constant force with a helmet, we implement a computational model of a fluid-based shock absorber that adapts passively to any given impact speed. Computer simulation of head impacts with liquid shock absorption indicate that, at the highest impact speed, the average brain tissue strain is reduced by 27.6% $\pm$ 9.3 compared to existing helmet padding that is available on the market. These simulations are based on the NFL's helmet test protocol and predict that adding liquid shock absorbers could reduce the number of concussions by at least 75%. Taken together, these results suggest that the majority of mTBI in football could be prevented with more efficient helmet technology. △ Less

Submitted 17 October, 2019; originally announced October 2019.

Multi-directional dynamic model for traumatic brain injury detection

Authors: Kaveh Laksari, Michael Fanton, Lyndia C. Wu, Taylor H. Nguyen, Mehmet Kurt, Chiara Giordano, Eoin Kelly, Eoin O'Keeffe, Eugene Wallace, Colin Doherty, Matthew Campbell, Stephen Tiernan, Gerald Grant, Jesse Ruan, Saeed Barbat, David B. Camarillo

Abstract: Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a complex injury that is hard to predict and diagnose, with many studies focused on associating head kinematics to brain injury risk. Recently, there has been a push towards using computationally expensive finite element (FE) models of the brain to create tissue deformation metrics of brain injury. Here, we developed a 3 degree-of-freedom lumped-parameter brain mode… ▽ More Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a complex injury that is hard to predict and diagnose, with many studies focused on associating head kinematics to brain injury risk. Recently, there has been a push towards using computationally expensive finite element (FE) models of the brain to create tissue deformation metrics of brain injury. Here, we developed a 3 degree-of-freedom lumped-parameter brain model, built based on the measured natural frequencies of a FE brain model simulated with live human impact data, to be used to rapidly estimate peak brain strains experienced during head rotational accelerations. On our dataset, the simplified model correlates with peak principal FE strain by an R2 of 0.80. Further, coronal and axial model displacement correlated with fiber-oriented peak strain in the corpus callosum with an R2 of 0.77. Using the maximum displacement predicted by our brain model, we propose an injury criteria and compare it against a number of existing rotational and translational kinematic injury metrics on a dataset of head kinematics from 27 clinically diagnosed injuries and 887 non-injuries. We found that our proposed metric performed comparably to peak angular acceleration, linear acceleration, and angular velocity in classifying injury and non-injury events. Metrics which separated time traces into their directional components had improved deviance to those which combined components into a single time trace magnitude. Our brain model can be used in future work as a computationally efficient alternative to FE models for classifying injuries over a wide range of loading conditions. △ Less

Submitted 2 April, 2019; v1 submitted 18 December, 2018; originally announced December 2018.

Comments: 10 figures, 3 tables

In vivo evaluation of wearable head impact sensors

Authors: Lyndia C. Wu, Vaibhav Nangia, Kevin Bui, Bradley Hammoor, Mehmet Kurt, Fidel Hernandez, Calvin Kuo, David B. Camarillo

Abstract: Inertial sensors are commonly used to measure human head motion. Some sensors have been validated with dummy or cadaver experiments, but methods to evaluate sensors in vivo are lacking. Here we present an in vivo method using high speed video to evaluate teeth-mounted (mouthguard), soft tissue-mounted (skin patch), and headgear-mounted (skull cap) sensors during 6-13g sagittal soccer head impacts.… ▽ More Inertial sensors are commonly used to measure human head motion. Some sensors have been validated with dummy or cadaver experiments, but methods to evaluate sensors in vivo are lacking. Here we present an in vivo method using high speed video to evaluate teeth-mounted (mouthguard), soft tissue-mounted (skin patch), and headgear-mounted (skull cap) sensors during 6-13g sagittal soccer head impacts. Sensor coupling to the skull is quantified by displacement from an ear-canal reference. Mouthguard displacements were within video measurement error (<1mm), while the skin patch and skull cap displaced up to 4mm and 13mm from the ear-canal reference, respectively. We used the mouthguard, which had the least displacement from skull, as the reference to assess 6-degree-of-freedom skin patch and skull cap measurements. Linear and rotational acceleration magnitudes were over-predicted by both the skin patch (with 120% NRMS error for a_mag, 290% for alpha_mag) and the skull cap (320% NRMS error for a_mag, 500% for alpha_mag). Such over-predictions were largely due to out-of-plane motion. To model sensor error, we found that in-plane acceleration peaks from the skin patch in the anterior-posterior direction could be modeled by an underdamped viscoelastic system. In summary, the mouthguard showed tighter skull coupling in vivo than the other sensors. Furthermore, the in vivo methods presented are valuable for investigating skull acceleration sensor technologies. △ Less

Submitted 20 August, 2015; v1 submitted 13 March, 2015; originally announced March 2015.