Showing 1–10 of 10 results for author: Bertolero, M A

The information content of brain states is explained by structural constraints on state energetics

Authors: Leon Weninger, Pragya Srivastava, Dale Zhou, Jason Z. Kim, Eli J. Cornblath, Maxwell A. Bertolero, Ute Habel, Dorit Merhof, Dani S. Bassett

Abstract: Signal propagation along the structural connectome of the brain induces changes in the patterns of activity. These activity patterns define global brain states and contain information in accordance with their expected probability of occurrence. The structural connectome, in conjunction with the dynamics, determines the set of possible brain states and constrains the transition between accessible s… ▽ More Signal propagation along the structural connectome of the brain induces changes in the patterns of activity. These activity patterns define global brain states and contain information in accordance with their expected probability of occurrence. The structural connectome, in conjunction with the dynamics, determines the set of possible brain states and constrains the transition between accessible states. Yet, precisely how these structural constraints on state-transitions relate to their information content remains unexplored. To address this gap in knowledge, we defined the information content as a function of the activation distribution, where statistically rare values of activation correspond to high information content. With this numerical definition in hand, we studied the spatiotemporal distribution of information content in fMRI data from the Human Connectome Project during different tasks, and report four key findings. First, information content strongly depends on the cognitive task. Second, while information content shows similarities to other measures of brain activity, it is distinct from both Neurosynth maps and task contrast maps generated by a general linear model applied to the fMRI data. Third, the brain's structural wiring constrains the cost to control its state, where the cost to transition into high information content states is larger than that to transition into low information content states. Finally, all state transitions - especially those to high information content states - are less costly than expected from random network null models, thereby indicating the brain's marked efficiency. Taken together, our findings establish an explanatory link between the information contained in a brain state and the energetic cost of attaining that state, thereby laying important groundwork for our understanding of large-scale cognitive computations. △ Less

Submitted 15 March, 2023; v1 submitted 26 October, 2021; originally announced October 2021.

Comments: 16 pages, 4 figures + supplement (5 pages, 5 figures)

MSC Class: 93-08 (primary); 92-08; 94-05 (secondary) ACM Class: G.3; H.1.1; J.3

Is the brain macroscopically linear? A system identification of resting state dynamics

Authors: Erfan Nozari, Maxwell A. Bertolero, Jennifer Stiso, Lorenzo Caciagli, Eli J. Cornblath, Xiaosong He, Arun S. Mahadevan, George J. Pappas, Dani Smith Bassett

Abstract: A central challenge in the computational modeling of neural dynamics is the trade-off between accuracy and simplicity. At the level of individual neurons, nonlinear dynamics are both experimentally established and essential for neuronal functioning. An implicit assumption has thus formed that an accurate computational model of whole-brain dynamics must also be highly nonlinear, whereas linear mode… ▽ More A central challenge in the computational modeling of neural dynamics is the trade-off between accuracy and simplicity. At the level of individual neurons, nonlinear dynamics are both experimentally established and essential for neuronal functioning. An implicit assumption has thus formed that an accurate computational model of whole-brain dynamics must also be highly nonlinear, whereas linear models may provide a first-order approximation. Here, we provide a rigorous and data-driven investigation of this hypothesis at the level of whole-brain blood-oxygen-level-dependent (BOLD) and macroscopic field potential dynamics by leveraging the theory of system identification. Using functional MRI (fMRI) and intracranial EEG (iEEG), we model the resting state activity of 700 subjects in the Human Connectome Project (HCP) and 122 subjects from the Restoring Active Memory (RAM) project using state-of-the-art linear and nonlinear model families. We assess relative model fit using predictive power, computational complexity, and the extent of residual dynamics unexplained by the model. Contrary to our expectations, linear auto-regressive models achieve the best measures across all three metrics, eliminating the trade-off between accuracy and simplicity. To understand and explain this linearity, we highlight four properties of macroscopic neurodynamics which can counteract or mask microscopic nonlinear dynamics: averaging over space, averaging over time, observation noise, and limited data samples. Whereas the latter two are technological limitations and can improve in the future, the former two are inherent to aggregated macroscopic brain activity. Our results, together with the unparalleled interpretability of linear models, can greatly facilitate our understanding of macroscopic neural dynamics and the principled design of model-based interventions for the treatment of neuropsychiatric disorders. △ Less

Submitted 11 August, 2021; v1 submitted 22 December, 2020; originally announced December 2020.

Broken detailed balance and entropy production in the human brain

Authors: Christopher W. Lynn, Eli J. Cornblath, Lia Papadopoulos, Maxwell A. Bertolero, Danielle S. Bassett

Abstract: Living systems break detailed balance at small scales, consuming energy and producing entropy in the environment in order to perform molecular and cellular functions. However, it remains unclear how broken detailed balance manifests at macroscopic scales, and how such dynamics support higher-order biological functions. Here we present a framework to quantify broken detailed balance by measuring en… ▽ More Living systems break detailed balance at small scales, consuming energy and producing entropy in the environment in order to perform molecular and cellular functions. However, it remains unclear how broken detailed balance manifests at macroscopic scales, and how such dynamics support higher-order biological functions. Here we present a framework to quantify broken detailed balance by measuring entropy production in macroscopic systems. We apply our method to the human brain, an organ whose immense metabolic consumption drives a diverse range of cognitive functions. Using whole-brain imaging data, we demonstrate that the brain nearly obeys detailed balance when at rest, but strongly breaks detailed balance when performing physically and cognitively demanding tasks. Using a dynamic Ising model, we show that these large-scale violations of detailed balance can emerge from fine-scale asymmetries in the interactions between elements, a known feature of neural systems. Together, these results suggest that violations of detailed balance are vital for cognition, and provide a general tool for quantifying entropy production in macroscopic systems. △ Less

Submitted 16 March, 2021; v1 submitted 5 May, 2020; originally announced May 2020.

Comments: 19 pages, 15 figures

Deep Neural Networks Carve the Brain at its Joints

Authors: Maxwell A. Bertolero, Dustin Moraczewski, Adam Thomas, Danielle S. Bassett

Abstract: How an individual's unique brain connectivity determines that individual's cognition, behavior, and risk for pathology is a fundamental question in basic and clinical neuroscience. In seeking answers, many have turned to machine learning, with some noting the particular promise of deep neural networks in modelling complex non-linear functions. However, it is not clear that complex functions actual… ▽ More How an individual's unique brain connectivity determines that individual's cognition, behavior, and risk for pathology is a fundamental question in basic and clinical neuroscience. In seeking answers, many have turned to machine learning, with some noting the particular promise of deep neural networks in modelling complex non-linear functions. However, it is not clear that complex functions actually exist between brain connectivity and behavior, and thus if deep neural networks necessarily outperform simpler linear models, or if their results would be interpretable. Here we show that, across 52 subject measures of cognition and behavior, deep neural networks fit to each brain region's connectivity outperform linear regression, particularly for the brain's connector hubs--regions with diverse brain connectivity--whereas the two approaches perform similarly when fit to brain systems. Critically, averaging deep neural network predictions across brain regions results in the most accurate predictions, demonstrating the ability of deep neural networks to easily model the various functions that exists between regional brain connectivity and behavior, carving the brain at its joints. Finally, we shine light into the black box of deep neural networks using multislice network models. We determined that the relationship between connector hubs and behavior is best captured by modular deep neural networks. Our results demonstrate that both simple and complex relationships exist between brain connectivity and behavior, and that deep neural networks can fit both. Moreover, deep neural networks are particularly powerful when they are first fit to the various functions of a system independently and then combined. Finally, deep neural networks are interpretable when their architectures are structurally characterized using multislice network models. △ Less

Submitted 9 September, 2020; v1 submitted 20 February, 2020; originally announced February 2020.

On the nature of explanations offered by network science: A perspective from and for practicing neuroscientists

Authors: Maxwell A. Bertolero, Danielle S. Bassett

Abstract: Network neuroscience represents the brain as a collection of regions and inter-regional connections. Given its ability to formalize systems-level models, network neuroscience has generated unique explanations of neural function and behavior. The mechanistic status of these explanations and how they can contribute to and fit within the field of neuroscience as a whole has received careful treatment… ▽ More Network neuroscience represents the brain as a collection of regions and inter-regional connections. Given its ability to formalize systems-level models, network neuroscience has generated unique explanations of neural function and behavior. The mechanistic status of these explanations and how they can contribute to and fit within the field of neuroscience as a whole has received careful treatment from philosophers. However, these philosophical contributions have not yet reached many neuroscientists. Here we complement formal philosophical efforts by providing an applied perspective from and for neuroscientists. We discuss the mechanistic status of the explanations offered by network neuroscience and how they contribute to, enhance, and interdigitate with other types of explanations in neuroscience. In doing so, we rely on philosophical work concerning the role of causality, scale, and mechanisms in scientific explanations. In particular, we make the distinction between an explanation and the evidence supporting that explanation, and we argue for a scale-free nature of mechanistic explanations. In the course of these discussions, we hope to provide a useful applied framework in which network neuroscience explanations can be exercised across scales and combined with other fields of neuroscience to gain deeper insights into the brain and behavior. △ Less

Submitted 12 November, 2019; originally announced November 2019.

Comments: This article is part a forthcoming Topics in Cognitive Science Special Issue: "Levels of Explanation in Cognitive Science: From Molecules to Culture," Matteo Colombo and Markus Knauff (Topic Editors)

The human brain's network architecture is genetically encoded by modular pleiotropy

Authors: Maxwell A. Bertolero, Ann Sizemore Blevins, Graham L. Baum, Ruben C. Gur, Raquel E. Gur, David R. Roalf, Theodore D. Satterthwaite, Danielle S. Bassett

Abstract: For much of biology, the manner in which genotype maps to phenotype remains a fundamental mystery. The few maps that are known tend to show modular pleiotropy: sets of phenotypes are determined by distinct sets of genes. One key map that has evaded discovery is that of the human brain's network architecture. Here, we determine the form of this map for gene coexpression and single nucleotide polymo… ▽ More For much of biology, the manner in which genotype maps to phenotype remains a fundamental mystery. The few maps that are known tend to show modular pleiotropy: sets of phenotypes are determined by distinct sets of genes. One key map that has evaded discovery is that of the human brain's network architecture. Here, we determine the form of this map for gene coexpression and single nucleotide polymorphisms. We discover that mostly non-overlap** sets of genes encode the connectivity of brain network modules (or so-called communities), suggesting that brain network communities demarcate genetic transitions. We find that these clean boundaries break down at connector hubs, whose integrative connectivity is encoded by pleiotropic genes from mostly non-overlap** sets. Broadly, this study opens fundamentally new directions in the study of genetic encoding of brain development, evolution, and disease. △ Less

Submitted 3 November, 2019; v1 submitted 18 May, 2019; originally announced May 2019.

Multiscale and multimodal network dynamics underpinning working memory

Authors: Andrew C. Murphy, Maxwell A. Bertolero, Lia Papadopoulos, David M. Lydon-Staley, Danielle S. Bassett

Abstract: Working memory (WM) allows information to be stored and manipulated over short time scales. Performance on WM tasks is thought to be supported by the frontoparietal system (FPS), the default mode system (DMS), and interactions between them. Yet little is known about how these systems and their interactions relate to individual differences in WM performance. We address this gap in knowledge using f… ▽ More Working memory (WM) allows information to be stored and manipulated over short time scales. Performance on WM tasks is thought to be supported by the frontoparietal system (FPS), the default mode system (DMS), and interactions between them. Yet little is known about how these systems and their interactions relate to individual differences in WM performance. We address this gap in knowledge using functional MRI data acquired during the performance of a 2-back WM task, as well as diffusion tensor imaging data collected in the same individuals. We show that the strength of functional interactions between the FPS and DMS during task engagement is inversely correlated with WM performance, and that this strength is modulated by the activation of FPS regions but not DMS regions. Next, we use a clustering algorithm to identify two distinct subnetworks of the FPS, and find that these subnetworks display distinguishable patterns of gene expression. Activity in one subnetwork is positively associated with the strength of FPS-DMS functional interactions, while activity in the second subnetwork is negatively associated. Further, the pattern of structural linkages of these subnetworks explains their differential capacity to influence the strength of FPS-DMS functional interactions. To determine whether these observations could provide a mechanistic account of large-scale neural underpinnings of WM, we build a computational model of the system composed of coupled oscillators. Modulating the amplitude of the subnetworks in the model causes the expected change in the strength of FPS-DMS functional interactions, thereby offering support for a mechanism in which subnetwork activity tunes functional interactions. Broadly, our study presents a holistic account of how regional activity, functional interactions, and structural linkages together support individual differences in WM in humans. △ Less

Submitted 19 January, 2019; originally announced January 2019.

Learning differentially reorganizes brain activity and connectivity

Authors: Maxwell A Bertolero, Azeez Adebimpe, Ankit N. Khambhati, Marcelo G. Mattar, Daniel Romer, Sharon L. Thompson-Schill, Danielle S. Bassett

Abstract: Human learning is a complex process in which future behavior is altered via the reorganization of brain activity and connectivity. It remains unknown whether activity and connectivity differentially reorganize during learning, and, if so, how that differential reorganization tracks stages of learning across distinct brain areas. Here, we address this gap in knowledge by measuring brain activity an… ▽ More Human learning is a complex process in which future behavior is altered via the reorganization of brain activity and connectivity. It remains unknown whether activity and connectivity differentially reorganize during learning, and, if so, how that differential reorganization tracks stages of learning across distinct brain areas. Here, we address this gap in knowledge by measuring brain activity and functional connectivity in a longitudinal fMRI experiment in which healthy adult human participants learn the values of novel objects over the course of four days. An increasing similarity in activity or functional connectivity across subjects during learning reflects reorganization toward a common functional architecture. We assessed the presence of reorganization in activity and connectivity both during value learning and during the resting-state, allowing us to differentiate common elicited processes from intrinsic processes. We found a complex and dynamic reorganization of brain connectivity and activity--as a function of time, space, and performance--that occurs while subjects learn. Spatially localized brain activity reorganizes across the brain to a common functional architecture early in learning, and this reorganization tracks early learning performance. In contrast, spatially distributed connectivity reorganizes across the brain to a common functional architecture as training progresses, and this reorganization tracks later learning performance. Particularly good performance is associated with a sticky connectivity, that persists into the resting state. Broadly, our work uncovers distinct principles of reorganization in activity and connectivity at different phases of value learning, which inform the ongoing study of learning processes more generally. △ Less

Submitted 10 September, 2020; v1 submitted 20 October, 2018; originally announced October 2018.

A mechanistic model of connector hubs, modularity, and cognition

Authors: Maxwell A. Bertolero, B. T. T. Yeo, Danielle S. Bassett, Mark D'Esposito

Abstract: The human brain network is modular--comprised of communities of tightly interconnected nodes. This network contains local hubs, which have many connections within their own communities, and connector hubs, which have connections diversely distributed across communities. A mechanistic understanding of these hubs and how they support cognition has not been demonstrated. Here, we leveraged individual… ▽ More The human brain network is modular--comprised of communities of tightly interconnected nodes. This network contains local hubs, which have many connections within their own communities, and connector hubs, which have connections diversely distributed across communities. A mechanistic understanding of these hubs and how they support cognition has not been demonstrated. Here, we leveraged individual differences in hub connectivity and cognition. We show that a model of hub connectivity accurately predicts the cognitive performance of 476 individuals in four distinct tasks. Moreover, there is a general optimal network structure for cognitive performance--individuals with diversely connected hubs and consequent modular brain networks exhibit increased cognitive performance, regardless of the task. Critically, we find evidence consistent with a mechanistic model in which connector hubs tune the connectivity of their neighbors to be more modular while allowing for task appropriate information integration across communities, which increases global modularity and cognitive performance. △ Less

Submitted 9 August, 2018; v1 submitted 21 March, 2018; originally announced March 2018.

Journal ref: Bertolero, M. A., Yeo, B. T. T., Bassett, D. S., & D'Esposito, M. (2018). A mechanistic model of connector hubs, modularity and cognition. Nature Human Behaviour, 2(10), 765-777

The Diverse Club: The Integrative Core of Complex Networks

Authors: M. A. Bertolero, B. T. T. Yeo, M. D'Esposito

Abstract: A complex system can be represented and analyzed as a network, where nodes represent the units of the network and edges represent connections between those units. For example, a brain network represents neurons as nodes and axons between neurons as edges. In many networks, some nodes have a disproportionately high number of edges. These nodes also have many edges between each other, and are referr… ▽ More A complex system can be represented and analyzed as a network, where nodes represent the units of the network and edges represent connections between those units. For example, a brain network represents neurons as nodes and axons between neurons as edges. In many networks, some nodes have a disproportionately high number of edges. These nodes also have many edges between each other, and are referred to as the rich club. In many different networks, the nodes of this club are assumed to support global network integration. However, another set of nodes potentially exhibits a connectivity structure that is more advantageous to global network integration. Here, in a myriad of different biological and man-made networks, we discover the diverse club--a set of nodes that have edges diversely distributed across the network. The diverse club exhibits, to a greater extent than the rich club, properties consistent with an integrative network function--these nodes are more highly interconnected and their edges are more critical for efficient global integration. Moreover, we present a generative evolutionary network model that produces networks with a diverse club but not a rich club, thus demonstrating that these two clubs potentially evolved via distinct selection pressures. Given the variety of different networks that we analyzed--the c. elegans, the macaque brain, the human brain, the United States power grid, and global air traffic--the diverse club appears to be ubiquitous in complex networks. These results warrant the distinction and analysis of two critical clubs of nodes in all complex systems. △ Less

Submitted 27 June, 2017; v1 submitted 4 January, 2017; originally announced January 2017.