A Deep Learning Approach Utilizing Covariance Matrix Analysis for the ISBI Edited MRS Reconstruction Challenge
Authors:
Julian P. Merkofer,
Dennis M. J. van de Sande,
Sina Amirrajab,
Gerhard S. Drenthen,
Mitko Veta,
Jacobus F. A. Jansen,
Marcel Breeuwer,
Ruud J. G. van Sloun
Abstract:
This work proposes a method to accelerate the acquisition of high-quality edited magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) scans using machine learning models taking the sample covariance matrix as input. The method is invariant to the number of transients and robust to noisy input data for both synthetic as well as in-vivo scenarios.
This work proposes a method to accelerate the acquisition of high-quality edited magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) scans using machine learning models taking the sample covariance matrix as input. The method is invariant to the number of transients and robust to noisy input data for both synthetic as well as in-vivo scenarios.
△ Less
Submitted 5 June, 2023;
originally announced June 2023.
A Review of Machine Learning Applications for the Proton Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy Workflow
Authors:
Dennis M. J. van de Sande,
Julian P. Merkofer,
Sina Amirrajab,
Mitko Veta,
Ruud J. G. van Sloun,
Maarten J. Versluis,
Jacobus F. A. Jansen,
Johan S. van den Brink,
Marcel Breeuwer
Abstract:
This literature review presents a comprehensive overview of machine learning (ML) applications in proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS). As the use of ML techniques in MRS continues to grow, this review aims to provide the MRS community with a structured overview of the state-of-the-art methods. Specifically, we examine and summarize studies published between 2017 and 2023 from major journa…
▽ More
This literature review presents a comprehensive overview of machine learning (ML) applications in proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS). As the use of ML techniques in MRS continues to grow, this review aims to provide the MRS community with a structured overview of the state-of-the-art methods. Specifically, we examine and summarize studies published between 2017 and 2023 from major journals in the magnetic resonance field. We categorize these studies based on a typical MRS workflow, including data acquisition, processing, analysis, and artificial data generation. Our review reveals that ML in MRS is still in its early stages, with a primary focus on processing and analysis techniques, and less attention given to data acquisition. We also found that many studies use similar model architectures, with little comparison to alternative architectures. Additionally, the generation of artificial data is a crucial topic, with no consistent method for its generation. Furthermore, many studies demonstrate that artificial data suffers from generalization issues when tested on in-vivo data. We also conclude that risks related to ML models should be addressed, particularly for clinical applications. Therefore, output uncertainty measures and model biases are critical to investigate. Nonetheless, the rapid development of ML in MRS and the promising results from the reviewed studies justify further research in this field.
△ Less
Submitted 16 May, 2023;
originally announced May 2023.
