Characterization of Conventional Endovascular Devices in Treatment of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms
Authors:
Yara Alawneh,
James J. Zhou,
Alykhan Sewani,
Andrew Dueck,
M. Ali Tavallaei
Abstract:
Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms (AAA) are often repaired through an Endovascular approach known as EVAR. The success and duration of these challenging procedures are primarily attributable to the accuracy and reliability of navigating corresponding interventional devices. This study investigates the performance of conventional non-steerable and steerable catheters in endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR)…
▽ More
Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms (AAA) are often repaired through an Endovascular approach known as EVAR. The success and duration of these challenging procedures are primarily attributable to the accuracy and reliability of navigating corresponding interventional devices. This study investigates the performance of conventional non-steerable and steerable catheters in endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) procedures, focusing on two primary metrics: reachable workspace and gate cannulation success. We developed two abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) phantoms using patient CT images for our experiments. Under X-ray fluoroscopy guidance, the reachable workspace was quantified, and gate cannulation success rates, cannulation time, and fluoroscopy times were recorded for both non-steerable and steerable catheters and were compared. We were unable to observe statistically significant differences between the two catheter types in overall cannulation success rates or fluoroscopy time. However, in challenging anatomical scenarios (particularly a more challenging gate location), the steerable catheter showed statistically significant advantages in success rates and cannulation times. While there were no statistical differences in reachable workspace between non-steerable and steerable catheters when considering the whole aneurysm, segmented analysis showed that the steerable catheter performed better in the central region, and non-steerable catheters performed better in the peripheral region. This study provides a systematic method for quantifying the performance of endovascular devices. The findings suggest that while steerable catheters may offer advantages in complex anatomical conditions, non-steerable catheters are preferable in peripheral areas of the aneurysm. These insights can inform catheter selection in EVAR, potentially influencing device design and clinical practice.
△ Less
Submitted 27 June, 2024;
originally announced June 2024.
SideEye: A Side-Looking Catheter for Fenestrated Endovascular Aneurysm Repair Procedures
Authors:
Yara Alawneh,
Alykhan Sewani,
James J. Zhou,
Andrew Dueck,
M. Ali Tavallaei
Abstract:
Fenestrated endovascular aneurysm repair remains a technically challenging procedure in the presence of complex anatomy, as it increases the difficulty of target vessel cannulation and prolongs procedure time and fluoroscopy radiation exposure. This paper aims to design, develop, and assess a novel steerable catheter, the SideEye, and compare its performance with conventional catheters in a thorac…
▽ More
Fenestrated endovascular aneurysm repair remains a technically challenging procedure in the presence of complex anatomy, as it increases the difficulty of target vessel cannulation and prolongs procedure time and fluoroscopy radiation exposure. This paper aims to design, develop, and assess a novel steerable catheter, the SideEye, and compare its performance with conventional catheters in a thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm phantom model. Users were asked to perform target vessel cannulation under fluoroscopic guidance using the SideEye and conventional non-steerable and steerable catheters. The experiment was divided into two cases based on the stent graft orientation (aligned and misaligned). Total procedure times, individual target vessel cannulation times, and exposure times were analyzed and compared in each case. In the misaligned case, the average cannulation times of all target vessels were $703 \pm 274$ s using the non-steerable catheter, $517 \pm 309$ s using the steerable catheter, and $199 \pm 91.0$ s using the SideEye. The average exposure times were $12 \pm 4.6$ min using the non-steerable catheter, $8.6 \pm 4.1$ min using the steerable catheter, and $3.0 \pm 1.1$ min using the SideEye. Target vessel cannulation using the SideEye significantly reduced procedure time and overall exposure time, compared to conventional devices.
△ Less
Submitted 25 June, 2024;
originally announced June 2024.
