-
Steven Weinberg (1933 - 2021)
Authors:
Rohini M. Godbole,
Urjit Yajnik
Abstract:
This is a homage to the memory of Prof. Steven Weinberg who passed away on 23 July 2021.
This is a homage to the memory of Prof. Steven Weinberg who passed away on 23 July 2021.
△ Less
Submitted 6 February, 2023;
originally announced February 2023.
-
The seven laws of Quantum Mechanics : banishing the bogeys
Authors:
Urjit A. Yajnik
Abstract:
The laws of quantum mechanics are couched in subtle mathematical language. The laws are not usually stated in a compact pedagogical form. Here I present a possible way to correct this. Essential facts can be distilled into seven statements that are easy to remember and easily referred back. Also, the current teaching of quantum mechanics is laden with words of negative connotations, originating as…
▽ More
The laws of quantum mechanics are couched in subtle mathematical language. The laws are not usually stated in a compact pedagogical form. Here I present a possible way to correct this. Essential facts can be distilled into seven statements that are easy to remember and easily referred back. Also, the current teaching of quantum mechanics is laden with words of negative connotations, originating as they did during the early decades of the subject when the subject was intellectually still puzzling. A wide variety of experiments in the intervening decades, not least those that were awarded the Nobel Prize of 2022 amply affirm the validity and substantial ``reality'' of Quantum Mechanics as a theory. I take a few of the inadequacies of classical framework to illustrate that some of the complaints against Quantum Mechanics are patently misplaced. Finally I discuss the bogeys such as ``wave article duality'', ``uncertainty'', ``indistinguishability'' ``statistics'' and ``entanglement'' and advocate adopting better terminology to save new learners from the old biases.
△ Less
Submitted 13 January, 2023;
originally announced January 2023.
-
The Life and Science of Thanu Padmanabhan
Authors:
Jasjeet Singh Bagla,
Krishnakanta Bhattacharya,
Sumanta Chakraborty,
Sunu Engineer,
Valerio Faraoni,
Sanved Kolekar,
Dawood Kothawala,
Kinjalk Lochan,
Sujoy Modak,
V. Parameswaran Nair,
Aseem Paranjape,
Krishnamohan Parattu,
Sarada G. Rajeev,
Bibhas Ranjan Majhi,
Tirthankar Roy Choudhury,
Mohammad Sami,
Sudipta Sarkar,
Sandipan Sengupta,
T. R. Seshadri,
S. Shankaranarayanan,
Suprit Singh,
Te**der P. Singh,
L. Sriramkumar,
Urjit Yajnik
Abstract:
Thanu Padmanabhan was a renowned Indian theoretical physicist known for his research in general relativity, cosmology, and quantum gravity. In an extraordinary career spanning forty-two years, he published more than three hundred research articles, wrote ten highly successful technical and popular books, and mentored nearly thirty graduate students and post-doctoral fellows. He is best known for h…
▽ More
Thanu Padmanabhan was a renowned Indian theoretical physicist known for his research in general relativity, cosmology, and quantum gravity. In an extraordinary career spanning forty-two years, he published more than three hundred research articles, wrote ten highly successful technical and popular books, and mentored nearly thirty graduate students and post-doctoral fellows. He is best known for his deep work investigating gravitation as an emergent thermodynamic phenomenon. He was an outstanding teacher, and an indefatigable populariser of science, who travelled very widely to motivate and inspire young students. Paddy, as he was affectionately known, was also a close friend to his students and collaborators, treating them as part of his extended academic family. On September 17, 2021 Paddy passed away very unexpectedly, at the age of sixty-four and at the height of his research career, while serving as a Distinguished Professor at the Inter-University Centre for Astronomy and Astrophysics, Pune. His untimely demise has come as a shock to his family and friends and colleagues. In this article, several of them have come together to pay their tributes and share their fond memories of Paddy.
△ Less
Submitted 7 October, 2021;
originally announced October 2021.
-
Bose's derivation, the crucial link to quantum mechanics
Authors:
Urjit A. Yajnik
Abstract:
In this brief note I address the question not frequently asked, namely, why did it take two decades between Einstein's first proposal of photons and derivation of the full Planck formula from first principles of Statistical Mechanics, albeit with a fundamental new approach to counting of states. Secondly, why did it fall to an independent inquirer, S. N. Bose, in far away Dacca to arrive at the co…
▽ More
In this brief note I address the question not frequently asked, namely, why did it take two decades between Einstein's first proposal of photons and derivation of the full Planck formula from first principles of Statistical Mechanics, albeit with a fundamental new approach to counting of states. Secondly, why did it fall to an independent inquirer, S. N. Bose, in far away Dacca to arrive at the correct derivation of this formula, arguably a most crucial one of the first half of the twentieth century? Reasonable hypotheses are proposed for answers to both. I also argue that the timing of Bose's communication to Einstein played a crucial role in Einstein's approval of de Broglie's thesis and hence the emergence of the definitive version of quantum mechanics in the late 1920's.
△ Less
Submitted 28 May, 2019;
originally announced May 2019.
-
The comprehensive theory of light
Authors:
Urjit A. Yajnik
Abstract:
Modern attempts to understand light go back to Newton who considered light to be particles, the so called corpuscular theory, and the other school of Huygens, Young and others. Huygens and Young viewpoint emphasised the wave property. This difference of opinions persisted for close to two centuries till Maxwell theory solidly established light as a wave phenomenon associated with Electromagnetism.…
▽ More
Modern attempts to understand light go back to Newton who considered light to be particles, the so called corpuscular theory, and the other school of Huygens, Young and others. Huygens and Young viewpoint emphasised the wave property. This difference of opinions persisted for close to two centuries till Maxwell theory solidly established light as a wave phenomenon associated with Electromagnetism. A serious schism so to speak was introduced into the theory of light with the understanding of "Light gas", the so called Black Body radiation. Einstein's photon hypothesis and Bose's successful derivation of the Planck spectrum put the corpuscular theory back in place, while classical description continues to be used as well. One may then wonder if this being a classical limit may have to be corrected when dealing with quantum phenomena. To most people's surprise, the classical description was in fact a subset of the full quantum description, and the classical states of light could be shown to be subsumed within the fully quantum description without having to take the limit of Planck's constant h going to zero. This was the resolution provided by E. C. G. Sudarshan's Diagonal representation as the most general formalism for dealing with light.
△ Less
Submitted 28 May, 2019;
originally announced May 2019.
-
The conception of photons
Authors:
Urjit A. Yajnik
Abstract:
In the year 1900 Max Planck was led by experimental observations to propose a strange formula for the intensity as a function of frequency for light emitted by a cavity. It relied on peculiar properties to be obeyed by the emitters and absorbers in the cavity. I highlight the mathematically suggestive nature of the formula, accessible even to a high school student, that could have provided a clue…
▽ More
In the year 1900 Max Planck was led by experimental observations to propose a strange formula for the intensity as a function of frequency for light emitted by a cavity. It relied on peculiar properties to be obeyed by the emitters and absorbers in the cavity. I highlight the mathematically suggestive nature of the formula, accessible even to a high school student, that could have provided a clue to the physical reasoning of Planck. In 1905, Einstein made the bold photon hypothesis and was able to predict the formula for the photoelectric effect which was not fully explored then. The first part of this article concerns the period 1905 to 1923 with a possible explanation for the difficulties in acceptance of the new concept. In the second part of the article I present how S. N. Bose's 1924 paper provided a systematic derivation of Planck formula by consistently adopting the conception of photons within Boltzmann's framework. In conclusion we discuss the implications of Quantum Mechanics that eventually emerged, showing that the seeds of some of its uncanny conceptual content were already foreshadowed in Einstein's proposal.
△ Less
Submitted 25 January, 2017; v1 submitted 24 January, 2017;
originally announced January 2017.
-
Supersymmetry : A new organizing principle for the microworld?
Authors:
U. A. Yajnik
Abstract:
A glorious achievement of twentieth century Physics is the identification of the building blocks of nature. A related triumph a deep understanding of the forces of interaction. In particular, it has been possible to understand the four fundamental forces of nature in an elegant and unified mathematical framework. The paradigm for this unification has been the principle of gauge symmetry.
A new…
▽ More
A glorious achievement of twentieth century Physics is the identification of the building blocks of nature. A related triumph a deep understanding of the forces of interaction. In particular, it has been possible to understand the four fundamental forces of nature in an elegant and unified mathematical framework. The paradigm for this unification has been the principle of gauge symmetry.
A new approach to achieving further unification relies on Supersymmetry. This is a symmetry which relates particles of integer spin with those of half-integral spin and also dictates the allowed interactions among these particles. However, no data exist pointing to the presence of this symmetry; it may indeed be of no relevance to nature.
In this paper the gauge principle and unification attempts are briefly reviewed, and then Supersymmetry is introduced. The notion of "broken" symmetry is discussed, which may explain why the symmetry is difficult to observe at presently accessible energies. But a badly broken manifestation seems to remove much of the original appeal and elegance of the theory. We here propose two alternative views of the status of Supersymmetry from fundamental standpoint. There is a good reason why it is indeed a fundamental symmetry, despite badly broken. The alternative is that it is an organizing principle, somewhat like valence. This makes it valuable as a signpost to new Physics.
△ Less
Submitted 26 April, 1999;
originally announced April 1999.
