-
TOFHIR2: The readout ASIC of the CMS Barrel MIP Timing Detector
Authors:
E. Albuquerque,
M. Araújo,
A. Benaglia,
A. Boletti,
R. Bugalho,
T. Coutinho,
F. De Guio,
P. Faccioli,
L. Ferramacho,
M. Firlej,
T. Fiutowski,
R. Francisco,
M. Gallinaro,
A. Ghezzi,
J. Hollar,
M. Idzik,
H. Legoinha,
N. Leonardo,
C. Leong,
M. T. Lucchini,
M. Malberti,
G. Marozzo,
G. Da Molin,
J. Moron,
T. Niknejad
, et al. (16 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
The CMS detector will be upgraded for the HL-LHC to include a MIP Timing Detector (MTD). The MTD will consist of barrel and endcap timing layers, BTL and ETL respectively, providing precision timing of charged particles. The BTL sensors are based on LYSO:Ce scintillation crystals coupled to SiPMs with TOFHIR2 ASICs for the front-end readout. A resolution of 30-60 ps for MIP signals at a rate of 2.…
▽ More
The CMS detector will be upgraded for the HL-LHC to include a MIP Timing Detector (MTD). The MTD will consist of barrel and endcap timing layers, BTL and ETL respectively, providing precision timing of charged particles. The BTL sensors are based on LYSO:Ce scintillation crystals coupled to SiPMs with TOFHIR2 ASICs for the front-end readout. A resolution of 30-60 ps for MIP signals at a rate of 2.5 Mhit/s per channel is expected along the HL-LHC lifetime. We present an overview of the TOFHIR2 requirements and design, simulation results and measurements with TOFHIR2 ASICs. The measurements of TOFHIR2 associated to sensor modules were performed in different test setups using internal test pulses or blue and UV laser pulses emulating the signals expected in the experiment. The measurements show a time resolution of 24 ps initially during Beginning of Operation (BoO) and 58 ps at End of Operation (EoO) conditions, matching well the BTL requirements. We also showed that the time resolution is stable up to the highest expected MIP rate. Extensive radiation tests were performed, both with x-rays and heavy ions, showing that TOFHIR2 is not affected by the radiation environment during the experiment lifetime.
△ Less
Submitted 1 April, 2024;
originally announced April 2024.
-
Graph Neural Networks for Low-Energy Event Classification & Reconstruction in IceCube
Authors:
R. Abbasi,
M. Ackermann,
J. Adams,
N. Aggarwal,
J. A. Aguilar,
M. Ahlers,
M. Ahrens,
J. M. Alameddine,
A. A. Alves Jr.,
N. M. Amin,
K. Andeen,
T. Anderson,
G. Anton,
C. Argüelles,
Y. Ashida,
S. Athanasiadou,
S. Axani,
X. Bai,
A. Balagopal V.,
M. Baricevic,
S. W. Barwick,
V. Basu,
R. Bay,
J. J. Beatty,
K. -H. Becker
, et al. (359 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
IceCube, a cubic-kilometer array of optical sensors built to detect atmospheric and astrophysical neutrinos between 1 GeV and 1 PeV, is deployed 1.45 km to 2.45 km below the surface of the ice sheet at the South Pole. The classification and reconstruction of events from the in-ice detectors play a central role in the analysis of data from IceCube. Reconstructing and classifying events is a challen…
▽ More
IceCube, a cubic-kilometer array of optical sensors built to detect atmospheric and astrophysical neutrinos between 1 GeV and 1 PeV, is deployed 1.45 km to 2.45 km below the surface of the ice sheet at the South Pole. The classification and reconstruction of events from the in-ice detectors play a central role in the analysis of data from IceCube. Reconstructing and classifying events is a challenge due to the irregular detector geometry, inhomogeneous scattering and absorption of light in the ice and, below 100 GeV, the relatively low number of signal photons produced per event. To address this challenge, it is possible to represent IceCube events as point cloud graphs and use a Graph Neural Network (GNN) as the classification and reconstruction method. The GNN is capable of distinguishing neutrino events from cosmic-ray backgrounds, classifying different neutrino event types, and reconstructing the deposited energy, direction and interaction vertex. Based on simulation, we provide a comparison in the 1-100 GeV energy range to the current state-of-the-art maximum likelihood techniques used in current IceCube analyses, including the effects of known systematic uncertainties. For neutrino event classification, the GNN increases the signal efficiency by 18% at a fixed false positive rate (FPR), compared to current IceCube methods. Alternatively, the GNN offers a reduction of the FPR by over a factor 8 (to below half a percent) at a fixed signal efficiency. For the reconstruction of energy, direction, and interaction vertex, the resolution improves by an average of 13%-20% compared to current maximum likelihood techniques in the energy range of 1-30 GeV. The GNN, when run on a GPU, is capable of processing IceCube events at a rate nearly double of the median IceCube trigger rate of 2.7 kHz, which opens the possibility of using low energy neutrinos in online searches for transient events.
△ Less
Submitted 11 October, 2022; v1 submitted 7 September, 2022;
originally announced September 2022.
-
Low Energy Event Reconstruction in IceCube DeepCore
Authors:
R. Abbasi,
M. Ackermann,
J. Adams,
J. A. Aguilar,
M. Ahlers,
M. Ahrens,
J. M. Alameddine,
A. A. Alves Jr.,
N. M. Amin,
K. Andeen,
T. Anderson,
G. Anton,
C. Argüelles,
Y. Ashida,
S. Axani,
X. Bai,
A. Balagopal V.,
S. W. Barwick,
B. Bastian,
V. Basu,
S. Baur,
R. Bay,
J. J. Beatty,
K. -H. Becker,
J. Becker Tjus
, et al. (360 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
The reconstruction of event-level information, such as the direction or energy of a neutrino interacting in IceCube DeepCore, is a crucial ingredient to many physics analyses. Algorithms to extract this high level information from the detector's raw data have been successfully developed and used for high energy events. In this work, we address unique challenges associated with the reconstruction o…
▽ More
The reconstruction of event-level information, such as the direction or energy of a neutrino interacting in IceCube DeepCore, is a crucial ingredient to many physics analyses. Algorithms to extract this high level information from the detector's raw data have been successfully developed and used for high energy events. In this work, we address unique challenges associated with the reconstruction of lower energy events in the range of a few to hundreds of GeV and present two separate, state-of-the-art algorithms. One algorithm focuses on the fast directional reconstruction of events based on unscattered light. The second algorithm is a likelihood-based multipurpose reconstruction offering superior resolutions, at the expense of larger computational cost.
△ Less
Submitted 4 March, 2022;
originally announced March 2022.
-
Single Particle Detection System for Strong-Field QED Experiments
Authors:
F. C. Salgado,
N. Cavanagh,
M. Tamburini,
D. W. Storey,
R. Beyer,
P. H. Bucksbaum,
Z. Chen,
A. Di Piazza,
E. Gerstmayr,
Harsh,
E. Isele,
A. R. Junghans,
C. H. Keitel,
S. Kuschel,
C. F. Nielsen,
D. A. Reis,
C. Roedel,
G. Sarri,
A. Seidel,
C. Schneider,
U. I. Uggerhøj,
J. Wulff,
V. Yakimenko,
C. Zepter,
S. Meuren
, et al. (1 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
Measuring signatures of strong-field quantum electrodynamics (SF-QED) processes in an intense laser field is an experimental challenge: it requires detectors to be highly sensitive to single electrons and positrons in the presence of the typically very strong x-ray and $γ$-photon background levels. In this paper, we describe a particle detector capable of diagnosing single leptons from SF-QED inte…
▽ More
Measuring signatures of strong-field quantum electrodynamics (SF-QED) processes in an intense laser field is an experimental challenge: it requires detectors to be highly sensitive to single electrons and positrons in the presence of the typically very strong x-ray and $γ$-photon background levels. In this paper, we describe a particle detector capable of diagnosing single leptons from SF-QED interactions and discuss the background level simulations for the upcoming Experiment-320 at FACET-II (SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory). The single particle detection system described here combines pixelated scintillation LYSO screens and a Cherenkov calorimeter. We detail the performance of the system using simulations and a calibration of the Cherenkov detector at the ELBE accelerator. Single 3 GeV leptons are expected to produce approximately 537 detectable photons in a single calorimeter channel. This signal is compared to Monte-Carlo simulations of the experiment. A signal-to-noise ratio of 18 in a single Cherenkov calorimeter detector is expected and a spectral resolution of 2% is achieved using the pixelated LYSO screens.
△ Less
Submitted 9 December, 2021; v1 submitted 8 July, 2021;
originally announced July 2021.
-
LeptonInjector and LeptonWeighter: A neutrino event generator and weighter for neutrino observatories
Authors:
R. Abbasi,
M. Ackermann,
J. Adams,
J. A. Aguilar,
M. Ahlers,
M. Ahrens,
C. Alispach,
A. A. Alves Jr.,
N. M. Amin,
R. An,
K. Andeen,
T. Anderson,
I. Ansseau,
G. Anton,
C. Argüelles,
S. Axani,
X. Bai,
A. Balagopal V.,
A. Barbano,
S. W. Barwick,
B. Bastian,
V. Basu,
V. Baum,
S. Baur,
R. Bay
, et al. (341 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
We present a high-energy neutrino event generator, called LeptonInjector, alongside an event weighter, called LeptonWeighter. Both are designed for large-volume Cherenkov neutrino telescopes such as IceCube. The neutrino event generator allows for quick and flexible simulation of neutrino events within and around the detector volume, and implements the leading Standard Model neutrino interaction p…
▽ More
We present a high-energy neutrino event generator, called LeptonInjector, alongside an event weighter, called LeptonWeighter. Both are designed for large-volume Cherenkov neutrino telescopes such as IceCube. The neutrino event generator allows for quick and flexible simulation of neutrino events within and around the detector volume, and implements the leading Standard Model neutrino interaction processes relevant for neutrino observatories: neutrino-nucleon deep-inelastic scattering and neutrino-electron annihilation. In this paper, we discuss the event generation algorithm, the weighting algorithm, and the main functions of the publicly available code, with examples.
△ Less
Submitted 4 May, 2021; v1 submitted 18 December, 2020;
originally announced December 2020.