-
A quantitative assessment of Imaging High-Z and Medium-Z materials using Muon Scattering Tomography
Authors:
A. F. Alrheli,
D. Barker,
C. De Sio,
D. Kikoła,
A. K. Kopp,
M. Mhaidra,
J. P. Stowell,
L. F. Thompson,
J. J. Velthuis,
M. J. Weekes
Abstract:
Muon Scattering Tomography (MST) has been shown to be a powerful technique for the non-invasive imaging of high-shielded objects. We present here the application of the MST technique to investigate two types of nuclear waste packages, a small-steel drum and a large nuclear waste cask, namely, a CASTOR V/52. We have developed a quantitative method using the contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) to evaluate…
▽ More
Muon Scattering Tomography (MST) has been shown to be a powerful technique for the non-invasive imaging of high-shielded objects. We present here the application of the MST technique to investigate two types of nuclear waste packages, a small-steel drum and a large nuclear waste cask, namely, a CASTOR V/52. We have developed a quantitative method using the contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) to evaluate the performance of an MST detector system in differentiating between high-, medium-, and low-Z materials inside nuclear waste packages with different shielding types. This study reveals that our MST detector system is able to differentiate between a (10 $\times$ 10 $\times$ 10 cm$^3$) uranium cube, embedded within a concrete matrix inside the small-steel drum, and regions of background signal in six hours of muon exposure time with a CNR value of 3.1$\pm$0.2. During our investigation of the highly-shielded cask, the reconstructed images of the cask contents indicated the ability of our system to detect irregular baskets, such as empty baskets, with a CNR value of 5.0$\pm$0.3 after 30 days of muon exposure. These studies were done using a Monte Carlo simulation tuned to the performance of resistive plate chambers (RPCs) based muon tomography system built by the University of Bristol, which had a reported position resolution of 350 micron.
Here we also report the dependence of the performance on the position resolution. We argue that using a combination of RPC and drift chambers (DC) detectors with 700 micron and 4 mm position resolutions respectively is able to generate tomographic images of well-shielded materials in a few hours of muon exposure time. With these position resolutions, our system needs six hours of muon exposure time to produce a good quality image of a cube of uranium with side-length of 10 cm shielded by a concrete matrix with CNR value of 2.4$\pm$0.25.
△ Less
Submitted 12 May, 2022; v1 submitted 5 January, 2022;
originally announced January 2022.
-
Material Identification in Nuclear Waste Drums using Muon Scattering Tomography and Multivariate Analysis
Authors:
M. J. Weekes,
A. F. Alrheli,
D. Barker,
D. Kikoła,
A. K. Kopp,
M. Mhaidra,
J. P. Stowell,
L. F. Thompson,
J. J. Velthuis
Abstract:
The use of muon scattering tomography for the non-invasive characterisation of nuclear waste is well established. We report here on the application of a combination of feature discriminators and multivariate analysis techniques to locate and identify materials in nuclear waste drums. After successful training and optimisation of the algorithms they are then tested on a range of material configurat…
▽ More
The use of muon scattering tomography for the non-invasive characterisation of nuclear waste is well established. We report here on the application of a combination of feature discriminators and multivariate analysis techniques to locate and identify materials in nuclear waste drums. After successful training and optimisation of the algorithms they are then tested on a range of material configurations to assess the system's performance and limitations. The system is able to correctly identify uranium, iron and lead objects on a ~few \text{cm} scale. The system's sensitivity to small uranium objects is also established as $0.90^{+0.07}_{-0.12}$, with a false positive rate of $0.12^{+0.12}_{-0.07}$.
△ Less
Submitted 24 February, 2021; v1 submitted 24 November, 2020;
originally announced December 2020.
-
Electrolytic Conversion of Bicarbonate into CO in a Flow Cell
Authors:
Tengfei Li,
Eric W. Lees,
Maxwell Goldman,
Danielle A. Salvatore,
David M. Weekes,
Curtis P. Berlinguette
Abstract:
Electrochemical CO2 reduction offers a method to use renewable electricity to convert CO2 into CO and other carbon-based chemical building blocks. While nearly all studies rely on a CO2 feed, we show herein that aqueous bicarbonate solutions can also be electrochemically converted into CO gas at meaningful rates in a flow cell. We achieved this result in a flow cell containing a bipolar membrane (…
▽ More
Electrochemical CO2 reduction offers a method to use renewable electricity to convert CO2 into CO and other carbon-based chemical building blocks. While nearly all studies rely on a CO2 feed, we show herein that aqueous bicarbonate solutions can also be electrochemically converted into CO gas at meaningful rates in a flow cell. We achieved this result in a flow cell containing a bipolar membrane (BPM) and a silver nanoparticle catalyst on a porous carbon support. Electrolysis upon a N2-saturated 3.0-M potassium bicarbonate electrolyte solution yields CO with a faradaic efficiency (F.E.CO) of 81% at 25 mA cm-2 and 37% at 100 mA cm-2. This output is comparable to the analogous experiment where the electrolyte is saturated with gaseous CO2 (faradaic efficiency for CO is 78% at 25 mA cm-2 and 35% at 100 mA cm-2). The H+ flux from the BPM is critical to this chemistry in that it reacts with the bicarbonate feed to generate CO2, which is then reduced to CO at the gas diffusion electrode. These results are important in that they show that the addition of gaseous CO2 to bicarbonate electrolytes is not necessary in order to obtain reduced carbon products with a flow cell architecture. This process offers a means of using electrolysis to bypass the thermally-intensive step of extracting CO2 from bicarbonate solutions generated in carbon capture schemes.
△ Less
Submitted 11 May, 2019;
originally announced May 2019.