-
Minimum-dissipation model for large-eddy simulation using symmetry-preserving discretization in OpenFOAM
Authors:
J Sun,
R. W. C. P Verstappen
Abstract:
The minimum-dissipation model is applied to channel flow up to $Re_τ= 2000$, flow past a circular cylinder at $Re=3900$, and flow over periodic hills at $Re=10595$. Numerical simulations were performed in OpenFOAM which is based on the finite volume methods. We used both symmetry-preserving and standard second-order accurate discretization methods in OpenFOAM on structured meshes. The results are…
▽ More
The minimum-dissipation model is applied to channel flow up to $Re_τ= 2000$, flow past a circular cylinder at $Re=3900$, and flow over periodic hills at $Re=10595$. Numerical simulations were performed in OpenFOAM which is based on the finite volume methods. We used both symmetry-preserving and standard second-order accurate discretization methods in OpenFOAM on structured meshes. The results are compared to DNS and experimental data.
The results of channel flow demonstrate a static QR model performs equally well as the dynamic models while reducing the computational cost. The model constant of $C=0.024$ gives the most accurate prediction, and the contribution of the sub-grid model decreases with the increase of the mesh resolution and becomes very small (less than 0.2 molecular viscosity) if a fine mesh is used. Furthermore, the QR model is able to predict the mean and rms velocity accurately up to $Re_τ= 2000$ without a wall dam** function. The symmetry-preserving discretization outperforms the standard OpenFOAM discretization at $Re_τ=1000$. The results for the flow over a cylinder show that the mean velocity, drag coefficient, and lift coefficient are in good agreement with the experimental data and the central difference schemes conjugated with the QR model predict better results. The various comparisons carried out for flows over periodic hills demonstrate the need to use central difference schemes in OpenFOAM in combination with the minimum dissipation model. The best model constant is again $C=0.024$. The single wind turbine simulation shows that the QR model is capable of predicting accurate results in complex rotating scenarios.
△ Less
Submitted 2 November, 2023;
originally announced November 2023.
-
A local dynamic gradient Smagorinsky model for large-eddy simulation
Authors:
Wybe Rozema,
H. Jane Bae,
Roel W. C. P. Verstappen
Abstract:
This paper proposes a local dynamic model for large-eddy simulation (LES) without averaging in homogeneous directions. It is demonstrated that the widely-used dynamic Smagorinsky model (DSM) has a singular dynamic model constant if it is used without averaging. The singularity can cause exceedingly large local values of the dynamic model constant. If these large values are not mitigated by applica…
▽ More
This paper proposes a local dynamic model for large-eddy simulation (LES) without averaging in homogeneous directions. It is demonstrated that the widely-used dynamic Smagorinsky model (DSM) has a singular dynamic model constant if it is used without averaging. The singularity can cause exceedingly large local values of the dynamic model constant. If these large values are not mitigated by application of averaging, they can amplify discretization errors and impair the stability of simulations. To improve the local applicability of the DSM, the singularity is removed by replacing the resolved rate-of-strain tensors in the Smagorinsky model with the resolved velocity gradient tensor. These replacements result in the new dynamic gradient Smagorinsky model (DGSM). Results of simulations of three canonical turbulent flows (decaying homogeneous isotropic turbulence, a temporal mixing layer, and turbulent channel flow) are presented to demonstrate the potential of this model. The DGSM provides improved stability compared to the local DSM, and does not require averaging for stability at time step sizes that are typically used for a static locally consistent LES model. Results obtained with the DGSM are generally as accurate as results obtained with the DSM, while the DGSM has lower computational complexity. Moreover, the DGSM is easy to implement and does not require any homogeneous direction in space or time. It is thus anticipated that the model has a high potential for the simulation of complex flows.
△ Less
Submitted 7 July, 2022; v1 submitted 11 October, 2021;
originally announced October 2021.
-
A symmetry-preserving second-order time-accurate PISO-based method
Authors:
Ed M. J. Komen,
Jannes A. Hopman,
Edo M. A. Frederix,
F. Xavi Trias,
Roel W. C. P. Verstappen
Abstract:
A new conservative symmetry-preserving second-order time-accurate PISO-based pressure-velocity coupling for solving the incompressible Navier-Stokes equations on unstructured collocated grids is presented in this paper. This new method for implicit time step** is an extension of the conservative symmetry-preserving incremental-pressure projection method for explicit time step** and unstructure…
▽ More
A new conservative symmetry-preserving second-order time-accurate PISO-based pressure-velocity coupling for solving the incompressible Navier-Stokes equations on unstructured collocated grids is presented in this paper. This new method for implicit time step** is an extension of the conservative symmetry-preserving incremental-pressure projection method for explicit time step** and unstructured collocated meshes of Trias et al. (2014). In order to assess and compare both methods, we have implemented them within one unified solver in the open source code OpenFOAM. We combine both methods with a Butcher tableau for a family of explicit and diagonally implicit Runge-Kutta temporal schemes. We assess the energy conservation properties of the implemented discretisation methods and the temporal consistency of the selected Runge-Kutta schemes using Taylor-Green vortex and lid-driven cavity flow test cases.
Although both implemented methods are based on a symmetry-preserving discretisation, we show that both methods still produce a small amount of numerical dissipation when the total pressure is directly solved from a Poisson equation. This numerical dissipation is mainly caused by the corresponding pressure error which is of $O(Δt Δh^2)$. When an incremental-pressure approach is used, where a pressure correction is solved from a Poisson equation, the pressure error reduces to $O(Δt^2 Δh^2)$, yielding better conservation properties: both methods are then effectively fully-conservative. Furthermore, we conclude that all selected explicit and implicit higher order temporal schemes suffer from a reduction of the temporal order to approximately one when the pressure Poisson equation is based on the total pressure due to the presence of a pressure error of $O(Δt Δh^2)$.
△ Less
Submitted 8 October, 2020;
originally announced October 2020.
-
Mixed modeling for large-eddy simulation: The single-layer and two-layer minimum-dissipation-Bardina models
Authors:
L. B. Streher,
M. H. Silvis,
P. Cifani,
R. W. C. P. Verstappen
Abstract:
Predicting the behavior of turbulent flows using large-eddy simulation requires modeling of the subgrid-scale stress tensor. This tensor can be approximated using mixed models, which combine the dissipative nature of functional models with the capability of structural models to approximate out-of-equilibrium effects. We propose a mathematical basis to mix (functional) eddy-viscosity models with th…
▽ More
Predicting the behavior of turbulent flows using large-eddy simulation requires modeling of the subgrid-scale stress tensor. This tensor can be approximated using mixed models, which combine the dissipative nature of functional models with the capability of structural models to approximate out-of-equilibrium effects. We propose a mathematical basis to mix (functional) eddy-viscosity models with the (structural) Bardina model. By taking an anisotropic minimum-dissipation (AMD) model for the eddy viscosity, we obtain the (single-layer) AMD-Bardina model. In order to also obtain a physics-conforming model for wall-bounded flows, we further develop this mixed model into a two-layer approach: the near-wall region is parameterized with the AMD-Bardina model, whereas the outer region is computed with the Bardina model. The single-layer and two-layer AMD-Bardina models are tested in turbulent channel flows at various Reynolds numbers, and improved predictions are obtained when the mixed models are applied in comparison to the computations with the AMD and Bardina models alone. The results obtained with the two-layer AMD-Bardina model are particularly remarkable: both first- and second-order statistics are extremely well predicted and even the inflection of the mean velocity in the channel center is captured. Hence, a very promising model is obtained for large-eddy simulations of wall-bounded turbulent flows at moderate and high Reynolds numbers.
△ Less
Submitted 7 January, 2021; v1 submitted 15 June, 2020;
originally announced June 2020.
-
A new subgrid characteristic length for turbulence simulations on anisotropic grids
Authors:
F. X. Trias,
A. Gorobets,
M. H. Silvis,
R. W. C. P. Verstappen,
A. Oliva
Abstract:
Direct numerical simulations of the incompressible Navier-Stokes equations are not feasible yet for most practical turbulent flows. Therefore, dynamically less complex mathematical formulations are necessary for coarse-grained simulations. In this regard, eddy-viscosity models for Large-Eddy Simulation (LES) are probably the most popular example thereof. This type of models requires the calculatio…
▽ More
Direct numerical simulations of the incompressible Navier-Stokes equations are not feasible yet for most practical turbulent flows. Therefore, dynamically less complex mathematical formulations are necessary for coarse-grained simulations. In this regard, eddy-viscosity models for Large-Eddy Simulation (LES) are probably the most popular example thereof. This type of models requires the calculation of a subgrid characteristic length which is usually associated with the local grid size. For isotropic grids this is equal to the mesh step. However, for anisotropic or unstructured grids, such as the pancake-like meshes that are often used to resolve near-wall turbulence or shear layers, a consensus on defining the subgrid characteristic length has not been reached yet despite the fact that it can strongly affect the performance of LES models. In this context, a new definition of the subgrid characteristic length is presented in this work. This flow-dependent length scale is based on the turbulent, or subgrid stress, tensor and its representations on different grids. The simplicity and mathematical properties suggest that it can be a robust definition that minimizes the effects of mesh anisotropies on simulation results. The performance of the proposed subgrid characteristic length is successfully tested for decaying isotropic turbulence and a turbulent channel flow using artificially refined grids. Finally, a simple extension of the method for unstructured meshes is proposed and tested for a turbulent flow around a square cylinder. Comparisons with existing subgrid characteristic length scales show that the proposed definition is much more robust with respect to mesh anisotropies and has a great potential to be used in complex geometries where highly skewed (unstructured) meshes are present.
△ Less
Submitted 1 December, 2017; v1 submitted 8 November, 2017;
originally announced November 2017.
