-
A Science4Peace initiative: Alleviating the consequences of sanctions in international scientific cooperation
Authors:
A. Ali,
M. Barone,
S. Brentjes,
D. Britzger,
M. Dittmar,
T. Ekelöf,
J. Ellis,
S. Fonseca de Souza,
A. Glazov,
A. V. Gritsan,
R. Hoffmann,
H. Jung,
M. Klein,
V. Klyukhin,
V. Korbel,
P. Kokkas,
P. Kostka,
U. Langenegger,
J. List,
N. Raicevic,
A. Rostovtsev,
A. Sabio Vera,
M. Spiro,
G. Tonelli,
P. van Mechelen
, et al. (1 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
The armed invasion of Ukraine by the Russian Federation has adversely affected the relations between Russia and Western countries. Among other aspects, it has put scientific cooperation and collaboration into question and changed the scientific landscape significantly. Cooperation between some Western institutions and their Russian and Belarusian partners were put on hold after February 24, 2022.…
▽ More
The armed invasion of Ukraine by the Russian Federation has adversely affected the relations between Russia and Western countries. Among other aspects, it has put scientific cooperation and collaboration into question and changed the scientific landscape significantly. Cooperation between some Western institutions and their Russian and Belarusian partners were put on hold after February 24, 2022. The CERN Council decided at its meeting in December 2023 to terminate cooperation agreements with Russia and Belarus that date back a decade. CERN is an international institution with UN observer status, and has so far played a role in international cooperation which was independent of national political strategies. We argue that the Science4Peace idea still has a great value and scientific collaboration between scientists must continue, since fundamental science is by its nature an international discipline. A ban of scientists participating in international cooperation and collaboration is against the traditions, requirements and understanding of science. We call for measures to reactivate the peaceful cooperation of individual scientists on fundamental research in order to stimulate international cooperation for a more peaceful world in the future. Specifically, we plead for finding ways to continue this cooperation through international organizations, such as CERN and JINR.
△ Less
Submitted 12 March, 2024;
originally announced March 2024.
-
Science4Peace in difficult times
Authors:
Pierre Van Mechelen
Abstract:
The war on Ukraine has affected significantly scientific cooperation and communication in particle physics and also in many other fields of scientific, cultural and educational exchange. Immediately after the war in February 2022, many scientific institutions paused or banned scientific cooperation and exchange with Russian and Belorusian institutes and their scientists. Publications were out on h…
▽ More
The war on Ukraine has affected significantly scientific cooperation and communication in particle physics and also in many other fields of scientific, cultural and educational exchange. Immediately after the war in February 2022, many scientific institutions paused or banned scientific cooperation and exchange with Russian and Belorusian institutes and their scientists. Publications were out on hold or even banned, if Russian scientists were on the author list. The Science4Peace (S4P) Forum was created in March 2022 as a consequence of these restrictions, as a completely independent Forum for open communication among scientists, using independent ZOOM rooms and webpages. The basic ideas of the S4P Forum are fully in line with the policy of IUPAP of supporting and encouraging free scientific exchange. In the course of discussions on the consequences of the war on Ukraine, the S4P Forum organized a high-level panel discussion on "Sanctions in Science - One Year of Sanctions". The war on Ukraine has also increased enormously the risk of nuclear escalation. Together with 14 Nobel laureates and many Scientists, the S4P Forum launched an appeal to subscribe to the "no-first use" policy and urged the governments to subscribe to the Treaty of the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons adopted by the United Nations. The S4P Forum fully supports the ideas and activities originating from the International Year of Basic Sciences for Sustainable Development (IYBSSD) to open and to keep open discussion channels at all levels, using Science as a common language.
△ Less
Submitted 9 November, 2023;
originally announced November 2023.
-
Beyond a Year of Sanctions in Science
Authors:
M. Albrecht,
A. Ali,
M. Barone,
S. Brentjes,
M. Bona,
J. Ellis,
A. Glazov,
H. Jung,
M. Mangano,
G. Neuneck,
N. Raicevic,
J. Scheffran,
M. Spiro,
P. van Mechelen,
J. Vigen
Abstract:
While sanctions in political and economic areas are now part of the standard repertoire of Western countries (not always endorsed by UN mandates), sanctions in science and culture in general are new. Historically, fundamental research as conducted at international research centers such as CERN has long been seen as a driver for peace, and the Science4Peace idea has been celebrated for decades. How…
▽ More
While sanctions in political and economic areas are now part of the standard repertoire of Western countries (not always endorsed by UN mandates), sanctions in science and culture in general are new. Historically, fundamental research as conducted at international research centers such as CERN has long been seen as a driver for peace, and the Science4Peace idea has been celebrated for decades. However, much changed with the war against Ukraine, and most Western science organizations put scientific cooperation with Russia and Belarus on hold immediately after the start of the war in 2022. In addition, common publications and participation in conferences were banned by some institutions, going against the ideal of free scientific exchange and communication.
These and other points were the topics of an international virtual panel discussion organized by the Science4Peace Forum together with the "Natural Scientists Initiative - Responsibility for Peace and Sustainability" (NatWiss e.V.) in Germany and the journal "Wissenschaft und Frieden" (W&F) (see the Figure). Fellows from the Hamburg Institute for Peace Research and Security Policy (IFSH), scientists collaborating with the large physics research institutes DESY and CERN, as well as from climate and futures researchers were represented on the panel.
In this Dossier we document the panel discussion, and give additional perspectives.
The authors of the individual sections present their personal reflections, which should not be taken as implying that they are endorsed by the Science4Peace Forum or any other organizations. It is regrettable that some colleagues who expressed support for this document felt that it would be unwise for them to co-sign it.
△ Less
Submitted 3 November, 2023;
originally announced November 2023.
-
Trap** in irradiated p-on-n silicon sensors at fluences anticipated at the HL-LHC outer tracker
Authors:
W. Adam,
T. Bergauer,
M. Dragicevic,
M. Friedl,
R. Fruehwirth,
M. Hoch,
J. Hrubec,
M. Krammer,
W. Treberspurg,
W. Waltenberger,
S. Alderweireldt,
W. Beaumont,
X. Janssen,
S. Luyckx,
P. Van Mechelen,
N. Van Remortel,
A. Van Spilbeeck,
P. Barria,
C. Caillol,
B. Clerbaux,
G. De Lentdecker,
D. Dobur,
L. Favart,
A. Grebenyuk,
Th. Lenzi
, et al. (663 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
The degradation of signal in silicon sensors is studied under conditions expected at the CERN High-Luminosity LHC. 200 $μ$m thick n-type silicon sensors are irradiated with protons of different energies to fluences of up to $3 \cdot 10^{15}$ neq/cm$^2$. Pulsed red laser light with a wavelength of 672 nm is used to generate electron-hole pairs in the sensors. The induced signals are used to determi…
▽ More
The degradation of signal in silicon sensors is studied under conditions expected at the CERN High-Luminosity LHC. 200 $μ$m thick n-type silicon sensors are irradiated with protons of different energies to fluences of up to $3 \cdot 10^{15}$ neq/cm$^2$. Pulsed red laser light with a wavelength of 672 nm is used to generate electron-hole pairs in the sensors. The induced signals are used to determine the charge collection efficiencies separately for electrons and holes drifting through the sensor. The effective trap** rates are extracted by comparing the results to simulation. The electric field is simulated using Synopsys device simulation assuming two effective defects. The generation and drift of charge carriers are simulated in an independent simulation based on PixelAV. The effective trap** rates are determined from the measured charge collection efficiencies and the simulated and measured time-resolved current pulses are compared. The effective trap** rates determined for both electrons and holes are about 50% smaller than those obtained using standard extrapolations of studies at low fluences and suggests an improved tracker performance over initial expectations.
△ Less
Submitted 7 May, 2015;
originally announced May 2015.
