-
A novel comparison of Møller and Compton electron-beam polarimeters
Authors:
J. A. Magee,
A. Narayan,
D. Jones,
R. Beminiwattha,
J. C. Cornejo,
M. M. Dalton,
W. Deconinck,
D. Dutta,
D. Gaskell,
J. W. Martin,
K. D. Paschke,
V. Tvaskis,
A. Asaturyan,
J. Benesch,
G. Cates,
B. S. Cavness,
L. A. Dillon-Townes,
G. Hays,
J. Hoskins,
E. Ihloff,
R. Jones,
P. M. King,
S. Kowalski,
L. Kurchaninov,
L. Lee
, et al. (16 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
We have performed a novel comparison between electron-beam polarimeters based on Møller and Compton scattering. A sequence of electron-beam polarization measurements were performed at low beam currents ($<$ 5 $μ$A) during the $Q_{\rm weak}$ experiment in Hall C at Jefferson Lab. These low current measurements were bracketed by the regular high current (180 $μ$A) operation of the Compton polarimete…
▽ More
We have performed a novel comparison between electron-beam polarimeters based on Møller and Compton scattering. A sequence of electron-beam polarization measurements were performed at low beam currents ($<$ 5 $μ$A) during the $Q_{\rm weak}$ experiment in Hall C at Jefferson Lab. These low current measurements were bracketed by the regular high current (180 $μ$A) operation of the Compton polarimeter. All measurements were found to be consistent within experimental uncertainties of 1% or less, demonstrating that electron polarization does not depend significantly on the beam current. This result lends confidence to the common practice of applying Møller measurements made at low beam currents to physics experiments performed at higher beam currents. The agreement between two polarimetry techniques based on independent physical processes sets an important benchmark for future precision asymmetry measurements that require sub-1% precision in polarimetry.
△ Less
Submitted 25 January, 2017; v1 submitted 19 October, 2016;
originally announced October 2016.
-
Precision Electron-Beam Polarimetry using Compton Scattering at 1 GeV
Authors:
A. Narayan,
D. Jones,
J. C. Cornejo,
M. M. Dalton,
W. Deconinck,
D. Dutta,
D. Gaskell,
J. W. Martin,
K. D. Paschke,
V. Tvaskis,
A. Asaturyan,
J. Benesch,
G. Cates,
B. S. Cavness,
L. A. Dillon-Townes,
G. Hays,
E. Ihloff,
R. Jones,
S. Kowalski,
L. Kurchaninov,
L. Lee,
A. McCreary,
M. McDonald,
A. Micherdzinska,
A. Mkrtchyan
, et al. (11 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
We report on the highest precision yet achieved in the measurement of the polarization of a low energy, $\mathcal{O}$(1 GeV), electron beam, accomplished using a new polarimeter based on electron-photon scattering, in Hall~C at Jefferson Lab. A number of technical innovations were necessary, including a novel method for precise control of the laser polarization in a cavity and a novel diamond micr…
▽ More
We report on the highest precision yet achieved in the measurement of the polarization of a low energy, $\mathcal{O}$(1 GeV), electron beam, accomplished using a new polarimeter based on electron-photon scattering, in Hall~C at Jefferson Lab. A number of technical innovations were necessary, including a novel method for precise control of the laser polarization in a cavity and a novel diamond micro-strip detector which was able to capture most of the spectrum of scattered electrons. The data analysis technique exploited track finding, the high granularity of the detector and its large acceptance. The polarization of the $180~μ$A, $1.16$~GeV electron beam was measured with a statistical precision of $<$~1\% per hour and a systematic uncertainty of 0.59\%. This exceeds the level of precision required by the \qweak experiment, a measurement of the vector weak charge of the proton. Proposed future low-energy experiments require polarization uncertainty $<$~0.4\%, and this result represents an important demonstration of that possibility. This measurement is also the first use of diamond detectors for particle tracking in an experiment.
△ Less
Submitted 17 February, 2016; v1 submitted 22 September, 2015;
originally announced September 2015.
-
The Q_weak Experimental Apparatus
Authors:
Qweak Collaboration,
T. Allison,
M. Anderson,
D. Androic,
D. S. Armstrong,
A. Asaturyan,
T. D. Averett,
R. Averill,
J. Balewski,
J. Beaufait,
R. S. Beminiwattha,
J. Benesch,
F. Benmokhtar,
J. Bessuille,
J. Birchall,
E. Bonnell,
J. Bowman,
P. Brindza,
D. B. Brown,
R. D. Carlini,
G. D. Cates,
B. Cavness,
G. Clark,
J. C. Cornejo,
S. Covrig Dusa
, et al. (104 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
The Jefferson Lab Q_weak experiment determined the weak charge of the proton by measuring the parity-violating elastic scattering asymmetry of longitudinally polarized electrons from an unpolarized liquid hydrogen target at small momentum transfer. A custom apparatus was designed for this experiment to meet the technical challenges presented by the smallest and most precise ${\vec{e}}$p asymmetry…
▽ More
The Jefferson Lab Q_weak experiment determined the weak charge of the proton by measuring the parity-violating elastic scattering asymmetry of longitudinally polarized electrons from an unpolarized liquid hydrogen target at small momentum transfer. A custom apparatus was designed for this experiment to meet the technical challenges presented by the smallest and most precise ${\vec{e}}$p asymmetry ever measured. Technical milestones were achieved at Jefferson Lab in target power, beam current, beam helicity reversal rate, polarimetry, detected rates, and control of helicity-correlated beam properties. The experiment employed 180 microA of 89% longitudinally polarized electrons whose helicity was reversed 960 times per second. The electrons were accelerated to 1.16 GeV and directed to a beamline with extensive instrumentation to measure helicity-correlated beam properties that can induce false asymmetries. Moller and Compton polarimetry were used to measure the electron beam polarization to better than 1%. The electron beam was incident on a 34.4 cm liquid hydrogen target. After passing through a triple collimator system, scattered electrons between 5.8 degrees and 11.6 degrees were bent in the toroidal magnetic field of a resistive copper-coil magnet. The electrons inside this acceptance were focused onto eight fused silica Cerenkov detectors arrayed symmetrically around the beam axis. A total scattered electron rate of about 7 GHz was incident on the detector array. The detectors were read out in integrating mode by custom-built low-noise pre-amplifiers and 18-bit sampling ADC modules. The momentum transfer Q^2 = 0.025 GeV^2 was determined using dedicated low-current (~100 pA) measurements with a set of drift chambers before (and a set of drift chambers and trigger scintillation counters after) the toroidal magnet.
△ Less
Submitted 6 January, 2015; v1 submitted 24 September, 2014;
originally announced September 2014.
-
The lead-glass electromagnetic calorimeters for the magnetic spectrometers in Hall C at Jefferson Lab
Authors:
H. Mkrtchyan,
R. Carlini,
V. Tadevosyan,
J. Arrington,
A. Asaturyan,
M. E. Christy,
D. Dutta,
R. Ent,
H. C. Fenker,
D. Gaskell,
T. Horn,
M. K. Jones,
C. E. Keppel,
D. J. Mack,
S. P. Malace,
A. Mkrtchyan,
M. I. Niculescu,
J. Seely,
V. Tvaskis,
S. A. Wood,
S. Zhamkochyan
Abstract:
The electromagnetic calorimeters of the various magnetic spectrometers in Hall C at Jefferson Lab are presented. For the existing HMS and SOS spectrometers design considerations, relevant construction information, and comparisons of simulated and experimental results are included. The energy resolution of the HMS and SOS calorimeters is better than $σ/E \sim 6%/\sqrt E $, and pion/electron ($π/e$)…
▽ More
The electromagnetic calorimeters of the various magnetic spectrometers in Hall C at Jefferson Lab are presented. For the existing HMS and SOS spectrometers design considerations, relevant construction information, and comparisons of simulated and experimental results are included. The energy resolution of the HMS and SOS calorimeters is better than $σ/E \sim 6%/\sqrt E $, and pion/electron ($π/e$) separation of about 100:1 has been achieved in energy range 1 -- 5 GeV. Good agreement has been observed between the experimental and simulated energy resolutions, but simulations systematically exceed experimentally determined $π^-$ suppression factors by close to a factor of two. For the SHMS spectrometer presently under construction details on the design and accompanying GEANT4 simulation efforts are given. The anticipated performance of the new calorimeter is predicted over the full momentum range of the SHMS. Good electron/hadron separation is anticipated by combining the energy deposited in an initial (preshower) calorimeter layer with the total energy deposited in the calorimeter.
△ Less
Submitted 28 April, 2012;
originally announced April 2012.
-
The T2K Experiment
Authors:
T2K Collaboration,
K. Abe,
N. Abgrall,
H. Aihara,
Y. Ajima,
J. B. Albert,
D. Allan,
P. -A. Amaudruz,
C. Andreopoulos,
B. Andrieu,
M. D. Anerella,
C. Angelsen,
S. Aoki,
O. Araoka,
J. Argyriades,
A. Ariga,
T. Ariga,
S. Assylbekov,
J. P. A. M. de André,
D. Autiero,
A. Badertscher,
O. Ballester,
M. Barbi,
G. J. Barker,
P. Baron
, et al. (499 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
The T2K experiment is a long-baseline neutrino oscillation experiment. Its main goal is to measure the last unknown lepton sector mixing angle θ_{13} by observing ν_e appearance in a ν_μ beam. It also aims to make a precision measurement of the known oscillation parameters, Δm^{2}_{23} and sin^{2} 2θ_{23}, via ν_μ disappearance studies. Other goals of the experiment include various neutrino cross…
▽ More
The T2K experiment is a long-baseline neutrino oscillation experiment. Its main goal is to measure the last unknown lepton sector mixing angle θ_{13} by observing ν_e appearance in a ν_μ beam. It also aims to make a precision measurement of the known oscillation parameters, Δm^{2}_{23} and sin^{2} 2θ_{23}, via ν_μ disappearance studies. Other goals of the experiment include various neutrino cross section measurements and sterile neutrino searches. The experiment uses an intense proton beam generated by the J-PARC accelerator in Tokai, Japan, and is composed of a neutrino beamline, a near detector complex (ND280), and a far detector (Super-Kamiokande) located 295 km away from J-PARC. This paper provides a comprehensive review of the instrumentation aspect of the T2K experiment and a summary of the vital information for each subsystem.
△ Less
Submitted 8 June, 2011; v1 submitted 6 June, 2011;
originally announced June 2011.
