The Evaluation of Mechanical Properties of LB650 Cavities
Authors:
J. Holzbauer,
G. Wu,
H. Park,
K. McGee,
A. Wixson,
T. Khabiboulline,
G. Romanov,
S. Adams,
D. Bice,
S. K. Chandrasekaran,
J. Ozelis,
I. Gonin,
C. Narug,
R. Thiede,
R. Treece,
C. Grimm
Abstract:
The PIP-II project's LB650 cavities could potentially be vulnerable to mechanical deformation because of the geometric shape of the cavity due to reduced beta. The mechanical property of the niobium half-cell was measured following various heat treatments. The 5-cell cavities were tested in a controlled drop test fashion and the real-world road test. The result showed that the 900 $°$C heat treatm…
▽ More
The PIP-II project's LB650 cavities could potentially be vulnerable to mechanical deformation because of the geometric shape of the cavity due to reduced beta. The mechanical property of the niobium half-cell was measured following various heat treatments. The 5-cell cavities were tested in a controlled drop test fashion and the real-world road test. The result showed that the 900 $°$C heat treatment was compatible with cavity handling and transportation during production. The test provides the bases of the transportation specification and ship** container design guidelines.
△ Less
Submitted 18 July, 2023;
originally announced July 2023.
Spatial variation in the basic reproduction number of COVID-19: A systematic review
Authors:
Renate Thiede,
Nada Abdelatif,
Inger Fabris-Rotelli,
Raeesa Manjoo-Docrat,
Jennifer Holloway,
Charl Janse van Rensburg,
Pravesh Debba,
Nontembeko Dudeni-Tlhone,
Zaid Kimmie,
Alize le Roux
Abstract:
OBJECTIVES: Estimates of the basic reproduction number (R0) of COVID-19 vary across countries. This paper aims to characterise the spatial variability in R0 across the first six months of the global COVID-19 outbreak, and to explore social factors that impact R0 estimates at national and regional level.
METHODS: We searched PubMed, LitCOVID and the WHO COVID-19 database from January to June 2020…
▽ More
OBJECTIVES: Estimates of the basic reproduction number (R0) of COVID-19 vary across countries. This paper aims to characterise the spatial variability in R0 across the first six months of the global COVID-19 outbreak, and to explore social factors that impact R0 estimates at national and regional level.
METHODS: We searched PubMed, LitCOVID and the WHO COVID-19 database from January to June 2020. Peer-reviewed English-language papers were included that provided R0 estimates. For each study, the value of the estimate, country under study and publication month were extracted. The median R0 value was calculated per country, and the median and variance were calculated per region. For each country with an R0 estimate, the Human Development Index (HDI), Sustainable Mobility Index (SMI), median age, population density and development status were obtained from external sources.
RESULTS: A total of 81 studies were included in the analysis. These studies provided at least one estimate of R0, along with sufficient methodology to explain how the value was calculated. Values of R0 ranged between 0.48 and 14.8, and between 0.48 and 6.7 when excluding outliers.
CONCLUSIONS: This systematic review provides a comprehensive overview of the estimates of the basic reproduction number of COVID-19 globally and highlights the spatial heterogeneity in R0. Higher values were recorded in more developed countries, and countries with an older population or more sustainable mobility. Countries with higher population density had lower R0 estimates. For most regions, variability in R0 spiked initially before reducing and stabilising as more estimates became available.
△ Less
Submitted 10 December, 2020;
originally announced December 2020.
