-
FELIX-2.0: New version of the finite element solver for the time dependent generator coordinate method with the Gaussian overlap approximation
Authors:
D. Regnier,
N. Dubray,
M. Verrière,
N. Schunck
Abstract:
The time-dependent generator coordinate method (TDGCM) is a powerful method to study the large amplitude collective motion of quantum many-body systems such as atomic nuclei. Under the Gaussian Overlap Approximation (GOA), the TDGCM leads to a local, time-dependent Schrödinger equation in a multi-dimensional collective space. In this paper, we present the version 2.0 of the code FELIX that solves…
▽ More
The time-dependent generator coordinate method (TDGCM) is a powerful method to study the large amplitude collective motion of quantum many-body systems such as atomic nuclei. Under the Gaussian Overlap Approximation (GOA), the TDGCM leads to a local, time-dependent Schrödinger equation in a multi-dimensional collective space. In this paper, we present the version 2.0 of the code FELIX that solves the collective Schrödinger equation in a finite element basis. This new version features: (i) the ability to solve a generalized TDGCM+GOA equation with a metric term in the collective Hamiltonian, (ii) support for new kinds of finite elements and different types of quadrature to compute the discretized Hamiltonian and overlap matrices, (iii) the possibility to leverage the spectral element scheme, (iv) an explicit Krylov approximation of the time propagator for time integration instead of the implicit Crank-Nicolson method implemented in the first version, (v) an entirely redesigned workflow. We benchmark this release on an analytic problem as well as on realistic two-dimensional calculations of the low-energy fission of Pu240 and Fm256. Low to moderate numerical precision calculations are most efficiently performed with simplex elements with a degree 2 polynomial basis. Higher precision calculations should instead use the spectral element method with a degree 4 polynomial basis. We emphasize that in a realistic calculation of fission mass distributions of Pu240, FELIX-2.0 is about 20 times faster than its previous release (within a numerical precision of a few percents).
△ Less
Submitted 27 October, 2017; v1 submitted 21 July, 2017;
originally announced July 2017.
-
FELIX-1.0: A finite element solver for the time dependent generator coordinate method with the Gaussian overlap approximation
Authors:
D. Regnier,
M. Verrière,
N. Dubray,
N. Schunck
Abstract:
We describe the software package FELIX that solves the equations of the time-dependent generator coordinate method (TDGCM) in N-dimensions (N $\geq$ 1) under the Gaussian overlap approximation. The numerical resolution is based on the Galerkin finite element discretization of the collective space and the Crank-Nicolson scheme for time integration. The TDGCM solver is implemented entirely in C++. S…
▽ More
We describe the software package FELIX that solves the equations of the time-dependent generator coordinate method (TDGCM) in N-dimensions (N $\geq$ 1) under the Gaussian overlap approximation. The numerical resolution is based on the Galerkin finite element discretization of the collective space and the Crank-Nicolson scheme for time integration. The TDGCM solver is implemented entirely in C++. Several additional tools written in C++, Python or bash scripting language are also included for convenience. In this paper, the solver is tested with a series of benchmarks calculations. We also demonstrate the ability of our code to handle a realistic calculation of fission dynamics.
△ Less
Submitted 11 May, 2015;
originally announced May 2015.
-
A Bayesian Approach for Parameter Estimation and Prediction using a Computationally Intensive Model
Authors:
Dave Higdon,
Jordan D. McDonnell,
Nicolas Schunck,
Jason Sarich,
Stefan M. Wild
Abstract:
Bayesian methods have been very successful in quantifying uncertainty in physics-based problems in parameter estimation and prediction. In these cases, physical measurements y are modeled as the best fit of a physics-based model $η(θ)$ where $θ$ denotes the uncertain, best input setting. Hence the statistical model is of the form $y = η(θ) + ε$, where $ε$ accounts for measurement, and possibly oth…
▽ More
Bayesian methods have been very successful in quantifying uncertainty in physics-based problems in parameter estimation and prediction. In these cases, physical measurements y are modeled as the best fit of a physics-based model $η(θ)$ where $θ$ denotes the uncertain, best input setting. Hence the statistical model is of the form $y = η(θ) + ε$, where $ε$ accounts for measurement, and possibly other error sources. When non-linearity is present in $η(\cdot)$, the resulting posterior distribution for the unknown parameters in the Bayesian formulation is typically complex and non-standard, requiring computationally demanding computational approaches such as Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) to produce multivariate draws from the posterior. While quite generally applicable, MCMC requires thousands, or even millions of evaluations of the physics model $η(\cdot)$. This is problematic if the model takes hours or days to evaluate. To overcome this computational bottleneck, we present an approach adapted from Bayesian model calibration. This approach combines output from an ensemble of computational model runs with physical measurements, within a statistical formulation, to carry out inference. A key component of this approach is a statistical response surface, or emulator, estimated from the ensemble of model runs. We demonstrate this approach with a case study in estimating parameters for a density functional theory (DFT) model, using experimental mass/binding energy measurements from a collection of atomic nuclei. We also demonstrate how this approach produces uncertainties in predictions for recent mass measurements obtained at Argonne National Laboratory (ANL).
△ Less
Submitted 17 September, 2014; v1 submitted 10 July, 2014;
originally announced July 2014.
-
Derivative-free optimization for parameter estimation in computational nuclear physics
Authors:
Stefan M. Wild,
Jason Sarich,
Nicolas Schunck
Abstract:
We consider optimization problems that arise when estimating a set of unknown parameters from experimental data, particularly in the context of nuclear density functional theory. We examine the cost of not having derivatives of these functionals with respect to the parameters. We show that the POUNDERS code for local derivative-free optimization obtains consistent solutions on a variety of computa…
▽ More
We consider optimization problems that arise when estimating a set of unknown parameters from experimental data, particularly in the context of nuclear density functional theory. We examine the cost of not having derivatives of these functionals with respect to the parameters. We show that the POUNDERS code for local derivative-free optimization obtains consistent solutions on a variety of computationally expensive energy density functional calibration problems. We also provide a primer on the operation of the POUNDERS software in the Toolkit for Advanced Optimization.
△ Less
Submitted 17 September, 2014; v1 submitted 20 June, 2014;
originally announced June 2014.
-
Error Analysis in Nuclear Density Functional Theory
Authors:
Nicolas Schunck,
Jordan D. McDonnell,
Jason Sarich,
Stefan M. Wild,
Dave Higdon
Abstract:
Nuclear density functional theory (DFT) is the only microscopic, global approach to the structure of atomic nuclei. It is used in numerous applications, from determining the limits of stability to gaining a deep understanding of the formation of elements in the universe or the mechanisms that power stars and reactors. The predictive power of the theory depends on the amount of physics embedded in…
▽ More
Nuclear density functional theory (DFT) is the only microscopic, global approach to the structure of atomic nuclei. It is used in numerous applications, from determining the limits of stability to gaining a deep understanding of the formation of elements in the universe or the mechanisms that power stars and reactors. The predictive power of the theory depends on the amount of physics embedded in the energy density functional as well as on efficient ways to determine a small number of free parameters and solve the DFT equations. In this article, we discuss the various sources of uncertainties and errors encountered in DFT and possible methods to quantify these uncertainties in a rigorous manner.
△ Less
Submitted 11 July, 2014; v1 submitted 17 June, 2014;
originally announced June 2014.
-
Tensor hypercontraction: A universal technique for the resolution of matrix elements of local, finite-range $N$-body potentials in many-body quantum problems
Authors:
Robert M. Parrish,
Edward G. Hohenstein,
Nicolas F. Schunck,
C. David Sherrill,
Todd J. Martinez
Abstract:
Configuration-space matrix elements of N-body potentials arise naturally and ubiquitously in the Ritz-Galerkin solution of many-body quantum problems. For the common specialization of local, finite-range potentials, we develop the eXact Tensor HyperContraction (X-THC) method, which provides a quantized renormalization of the coordinate-space form of the N-body potential, allowing for a highly sepa…
▽ More
Configuration-space matrix elements of N-body potentials arise naturally and ubiquitously in the Ritz-Galerkin solution of many-body quantum problems. For the common specialization of local, finite-range potentials, we develop the eXact Tensor HyperContraction (X-THC) method, which provides a quantized renormalization of the coordinate-space form of the N-body potential, allowing for a highly separable tensor factorization of the configuration-space matrix elements. This representation allows for substantial computational savings in chemical, atomic, and nuclear physics simulations, particularly with respect to difficult "exchange-like" contractions.
△ Less
Submitted 4 September, 2013; v1 submitted 21 January, 2013;
originally announced January 2013.
-
UNEDF: Advanced Scientific Computing Collaboration Transforms the Low-Energy Nuclear Many-Body Problem
Authors:
H. Nam,
M. Stoitsov,
W. Nazarewicz,
A. Bulgac,
G. Hagen,
M. Kortelainen,
P. Maris,
J. C. Pei,
K. J. Roche,
N. Schunck,
I. Thompson,
J. P. Vary,
S. M. Wild
Abstract:
The demands of cutting-edge science are driving the need for larger and faster computing resources. With the rapidly growing scale of computing systems and the prospect of technologically disruptive architectures to meet these needs, scientists face the challenge of effectively using complex computational resources to advance scientific discovery. Multidisciplinary collaborating networks of resear…
▽ More
The demands of cutting-edge science are driving the need for larger and faster computing resources. With the rapidly growing scale of computing systems and the prospect of technologically disruptive architectures to meet these needs, scientists face the challenge of effectively using complex computational resources to advance scientific discovery. Multidisciplinary collaborating networks of researchers with diverse scientific backgrounds are needed to address these complex challenges. The UNEDF SciDAC collaboration of nuclear theorists, applied mathematicians, and computer scientists is develo** a comprehensive description of nuclei and their reactions that delivers maximum predictive power with quantified uncertainties. This paper describes UNEDF and identifies attributes that classify it as a successful computational collaboration. We illustrate significant milestones accomplished by UNEDF through integrative solutions using the most reliable theoretical approaches, most advanced algorithms, and leadership-class computational resources.
△ Less
Submitted 1 May, 2012;
originally announced May 2012.
-
Advancing Nuclear Physics Through TOPS Solvers and Tools
Authors:
E Ng,
J Sarich,
S M Wild,
T Munson,
H Aktulga,
C Yang,
P Maris,
J P Vary,
N Schunck,
M G Bertolli,
M Kortelainen,
W Nazarewicz,
T Papenbrock,
M V Stoitsov
Abstract:
At the heart of many scientific applications is the solution of algebraic systems, such as linear systems of equations, eigenvalue problems, and optimization problems, to name a few. TOPS, which stands for Towards Optimal Petascale Simulations, is a SciDAC applied math center focused on the development of solvers for tackling these algebraic systems, as well as the deployment of such technologies…
▽ More
At the heart of many scientific applications is the solution of algebraic systems, such as linear systems of equations, eigenvalue problems, and optimization problems, to name a few. TOPS, which stands for Towards Optimal Petascale Simulations, is a SciDAC applied math center focused on the development of solvers for tackling these algebraic systems, as well as the deployment of such technologies in large-scale scientific applications of interest to the U.S. Department of Energy. In this paper, we highlight some of the solver technologies we have developed in optimization and matrix computations. We also describe some accomplishments achieved using these technologies in UNEDF, a SciDAC application project on nuclear physics.
△ Less
Submitted 8 October, 2011;
originally announced October 2011.
-
UNEDF: Advanced Scientific Computing Transforms the Low-Energy Nuclear Many-Body Problem
Authors:
M. Stoitsov,
H. Nam,
W. Nazarewicz,
A. Bulgac,
G. Hagen,
M. Kortelainen,
J. C. Pei,
K. J. Roche,
N. Schunck,
I. Thompson,
J. P. Vary,
S. M. Wild
Abstract:
The UNEDF SciDAC collaboration of nuclear theorists, applied mathematicians, and computer scientists is develo** a comprehensive description of nuclei and their reactions that delivers maximum predictive power with quantified uncertainties. This paper illustrates significant milestones accomplished by UNEDF through integration of the theoretical approaches, advanced numerical algorithms, and lea…
▽ More
The UNEDF SciDAC collaboration of nuclear theorists, applied mathematicians, and computer scientists is develo** a comprehensive description of nuclei and their reactions that delivers maximum predictive power with quantified uncertainties. This paper illustrates significant milestones accomplished by UNEDF through integration of the theoretical approaches, advanced numerical algorithms, and leadership class computational resources.
△ Less
Submitted 25 July, 2011;
originally announced July 2011.
