-
Artificial Intelligence for the Electron Ion Collider (AI4EIC)
Authors:
C. Allaire,
R. Ammendola,
E. -C. Aschenauer,
M. Balandat,
M. Battaglieri,
J. Bernauer,
M. Bondì,
N. Branson,
T. Britton,
A. Butter,
I. Chahrour,
P. Chatagnon,
E. Cisbani,
E. W. Cline,
S. Dash,
C. Dean,
W. Deconinck,
A. Deshpande,
M. Diefenthaler,
R. Ent,
C. Fanelli,
M. Finger,
M. Finger, Jr.,
E. Fol,
S. Furletov
, et al. (70 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
The Electron-Ion Collider (EIC), a state-of-the-art facility for studying the strong force, is expected to begin commissioning its first experiments in 2028. This is an opportune time for artificial intelligence (AI) to be included from the start at this facility and in all phases that lead up to the experiments. The second annual workshop organized by the AI4EIC working group, which recently took…
▽ More
The Electron-Ion Collider (EIC), a state-of-the-art facility for studying the strong force, is expected to begin commissioning its first experiments in 2028. This is an opportune time for artificial intelligence (AI) to be included from the start at this facility and in all phases that lead up to the experiments. The second annual workshop organized by the AI4EIC working group, which recently took place, centered on exploring all current and prospective application areas of AI for the EIC. This workshop is not only beneficial for the EIC, but also provides valuable insights for the newly established ePIC collaboration at EIC. This paper summarizes the different activities and R&D projects covered across the sessions of the workshop and provides an overview of the goals, approaches and strategies regarding AI/ML in the EIC community, as well as cutting-edge techniques currently studied in other experiments.
△ Less
Submitted 17 July, 2023;
originally announced July 2023.
-
Accelerators for Electroweak Physics and Higgs Boson Studies
Authors:
A. Faus-Golfe,
G. H. Hoffstaetter,
Q. Qin,
F. Zimmermann,
T. Barklow,
E. Barzi,
S. Belomestnykh,
M. Biagini,
M. Chamizo Llatas,
J. Gao,
E. Gianfelice,
B. List,
V. Litvinenko,
E. Nanni,
T. Raubenheimer,
T. Roser,
T. Satogata,
V. Shiltsev,
S. Stapnes,
V. Telnov
Abstract:
We discuss the goals, the designs, the state of technical readiness, and the critical R&D needs of the accelerators that are currently under discussion as Higgs and electroweak factories. We also address the respective staging options enabling future energy-frontier colliders. The accelerators covered are based on many different techniques and approaches. They include several circular colliders, v…
▽ More
We discuss the goals, the designs, the state of technical readiness, and the critical R&D needs of the accelerators that are currently under discussion as Higgs and electroweak factories. We also address the respective staging options enabling future energy-frontier colliders. The accelerators covered are based on many different techniques and approaches. They include several circular colliders, various linear colliders, colliders based on energy recovery linacs (ERLs), ERL-ring combinations, as well as gamma-gamma colliders. The linear colliders proposed consist of options for the International Linear Collider (ILC), for the Compact Linear Collider (CLIC), for the Cold Copper Collider (C^3), and for the more recent Higgs-Energy Lepton Collider (HELEN). ERLs are key components of the Recycling Linear e+e- Collider (ReLiC), of the Energy Recovery Linear Collider (ERLC), and of the Circular Energy Recovery Collider (CERC). Among the more conventional ring colliders, the following proposals are featured: the Future Circular Collider (FCC-ee), the Circular Electron Positron Collider (CEPC), the Electron Positron Circular Collider at Fermilab (EPCCF), and the Large Electron Positron collider $\#$3 (LEP-3). In addition, we consider the X-ray FEL based gamma-gamma Collider Higgs Factory (XCC) and the High-Energy High-Luminosity gamma-gamma collider (HE&HL gamma-gamma). Finally, a Higgs factory based on a circular muon collider is mentioned for completeness.
△ Less
Submitted 20 November, 2022; v1 submitted 13 September, 2022;
originally announced September 2022.
-
Strategies in Education, Outreach, and Inclusion to Enhance the US Workforce in Accelerator Science and Engineering
Authors:
M. Bai,
W. A. Barletta,
D. L. Bruhwiler,
S. Chattopadhyay,
Y. Hao,
S. Holder,
J. Holzbauer,
Z. Huang,
K. Harkay,
Y. -K. Kim,
X. Lu,
S. M. Lund,
N. Neveu,
P. Ostroumov,
J. R. Patterson,
P. Piot,
T. Satogata,
A. Seryi,
A. K. Soha,
S. Winchester
Abstract:
We summarize the community-based consensus for improvements concerning education, public outreach, and inclusion in Accelerator Science and Engineering that will enhance the workforce in the USA. The improvements identified reflect the product of discussions held within the 2021-2022 Snowmass community planning process by topical group AF1: Beam Physics and Accelerator Education within the Acceler…
▽ More
We summarize the community-based consensus for improvements concerning education, public outreach, and inclusion in Accelerator Science and Engineering that will enhance the workforce in the USA. The improvements identified reflect the product of discussions held within the 2021-2022 Snowmass community planning process by topical group AF1: Beam Physics and Accelerator Education within the Accelerator Frontier. Although the Snowmass process centers on high-energy physics, this document outlines required improvements for the entire U.S. accelerator science and engineering enterprise because education of those entering and in the field, outreach to the public, and inclusion are inextricably linked.
△ Less
Submitted 16 March, 2022;
originally announced March 2022.
-
Design concept for the second interaction region for Electron-Ion Collider
Authors:
B. R. Gamage,
E. -C. Aschenauer,
J. S. Berg,
V. Burkert,
R. Ent,
Y. Furletova,
D. Higinbotham,
A. Hutton,
C. Hyde,
A. Jentsch,
A. Kiselev,
F. Lin,
T. Michalski,
C. Montag,
V. S. Morozov,
P. Nadel-Turonski,
R. Palmer,
B. Parker,
V. Ptitsyn,
R. Rajput-Ghoshal,
D. Romanov,
T. Satogata,
A. Seryi,
A. Sy,
C. Weiss
, et al. (5 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
The possibility of two interaction regions (IRs) is a design requirement for the Electron Ion Collider (the EIC). There is also a significant interest from the nuclear physics community in a 2nd IR with measurements capabilities complementary to those of the first IR. While the 2nd IR will be in operation over the entire energy range of ~20GeV to ~140GeV center of mass (CM). The 2nd IR can also pr…
▽ More
The possibility of two interaction regions (IRs) is a design requirement for the Electron Ion Collider (the EIC). There is also a significant interest from the nuclear physics community in a 2nd IR with measurements capabilities complementary to those of the first IR. While the 2nd IR will be in operation over the entire energy range of ~20GeV to ~140GeV center of mass (CM). The 2nd IR can also provide an acceptance coverage complementary to that of the first. We present a brief overview and the current progress of the 2nd IR design in terms of the parameters, magnet layout, and beam dynamics.
△ Less
Submitted 20 August, 2021; v1 submitted 27 May, 2021;
originally announced May 2021.
-
Demonstration of electron cooling using a pulsed beam from an electrostatic electron cooler
Authors:
M. W. Bruker,
S. Benson,
A. Hutton,
K. Jordan,
T. Powers,
R. Rimmer,
T. Satogata,
A. Sy,
H. Wang,
S. Wang,
H. Zhang,
Y. Zhang,
F. Ma,
J. Li,
X. M. Ma,
L. J. Mao,
X. P. Sha,
M. T. Tang,
J. C. Yang,
X. D. Yang,
H. Zhao,
H. W. Zhao
Abstract:
Cooling of hadron beams is critically important in the next generation of hadron storage rings for delivery of unprecedented performance. One such application is the electron-ion collider presently under development in the US. The desire to develop electron coolers for operation at much higher energies than previously achieved necessitates the use of radio-frequency (RF) fields for acceleration as…
▽ More
Cooling of hadron beams is critically important in the next generation of hadron storage rings for delivery of unprecedented performance. One such application is the electron-ion collider presently under development in the US. The desire to develop electron coolers for operation at much higher energies than previously achieved necessitates the use of radio-frequency (RF) fields for acceleration as opposed to the conventional, electrostatic approach. While electron cooling is a mature technology at low energy utilizing a DC beam, RF acceleration requires the cooling beam to be bunched, thus extending the parameter space to an unexplored territory. It is important to experimentally demonstrate the feasibility of cooling with electron bunches and further investigate how the relative time structure of the two beams affects the cooling properties; thus, a set of four pulsed-beam cooling experiments was carried out by a collaboration of Jefferson Lab and Institute of Modern Physics (IMP).
The experiments have successfully demonstrated cooling with a beam of electron bunches in both the longitudinal and transverse directions for the first time. We have measured the effect of the electron bunch length and longitudinal ion focusing strength on the temporal evolution of the longitudinal and transverse ion beam profile and demonstrate that if the synchronization can be accurately maintained, the dynamics are not adversely affected by the change in time structure.
△ Less
Submitted 29 October, 2020;
originally announced October 2020.
-
The GlueX Beamline and Detector
Authors:
S. Adhikari,
C. S. Akondi,
H. Al Ghoul,
A. Ali,
M. Amaryan,
E. G. Anassontzis,
A. Austregesilo,
F. Barbosa,
J. Barlow,
A. Barnes,
E. Barriga,
R. Barsotti,
T. D. Beattie,
J. Benesch,
V. V. Berdnikov,
G. Biallas,
T. Black,
W. Boeglin,
P. Brindza,
W. J. Briscoe,
T. Britton,
J. Brock,
W. K. Brooks,
B. E. Cannon,
C. Carlin
, et al. (165 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
The GlueX experiment at Jefferson Lab has been designed to study photoproduction reactions with a 9-GeV linearly polarized photon beam. The energy and arrival time of beam photons are tagged using a scintillator hodoscope and a scintillating fiber array. The photon flux is determined using a pair spectrometer, while the linear polarization of the photon beam is determined using a polarimeter based…
▽ More
The GlueX experiment at Jefferson Lab has been designed to study photoproduction reactions with a 9-GeV linearly polarized photon beam. The energy and arrival time of beam photons are tagged using a scintillator hodoscope and a scintillating fiber array. The photon flux is determined using a pair spectrometer, while the linear polarization of the photon beam is determined using a polarimeter based on triplet photoproduction. Charged-particle tracks from interactions in the central target are analyzed in a solenoidal field using a central straw-tube drift chamber and six packages of planar chambers with cathode strips and drift wires. Electromagnetic showers are reconstructed in a cylindrical scintillating fiber calorimeter inside the magnet and a lead-glass array downstream. Charged particle identification is achieved by measuring energy loss in the wire chambers and using the flight time of particles between the target and detectors outside the magnet. The signals from all detectors are recorded with flash ADCs and/or pipeline TDCs into memories allowing trigger decisions with a latency of 3.3 $μ$s. The detector operates routinely at trigger rates of 40 kHz and data rates of 600 megabytes per second. We describe the photon beam, the GlueX detector components, electronics, data-acquisition and monitoring systems, and the performance of the experiment during the first three years of operation.
△ Less
Submitted 26 October, 2020; v1 submitted 28 May, 2020;
originally announced May 2020.
-
Study of Beam Synchronization at JLEIC
Authors:
V. S. Morozov,
Ya. S. Derbenev,
J. Guo,
A. Hutton,
F. Lin,
T. Michalski,
P. Nadel-Turonski,
F. Pilat,
R. Rimmer,
T. Satogata,
H. Wang,
Y. Zhang,
B. Terzic,
U. Wienands
Abstract:
The ion collider ring of Jefferson Lab Electron-Ion Collider (JLEIC) accommodates a wide range of ion energies, from 20 to 100 GeV for protons or from 8 to 40 GeV per nucleon for lead ions. In this medium energy range, ions are not fully relativistic, which means values of their relativistic beta are slightly below 1, leading to an energy dependence of revolution time of the collider ring. On the…
▽ More
The ion collider ring of Jefferson Lab Electron-Ion Collider (JLEIC) accommodates a wide range of ion energies, from 20 to 100 GeV for protons or from 8 to 40 GeV per nucleon for lead ions. In this medium energy range, ions are not fully relativistic, which means values of their relativistic beta are slightly below 1, leading to an energy dependence of revolution time of the collider ring. On the other hand, electrons with energy 3 GeV and above are already ultra-relativistic such that their speeds are effectively equal to the speed of light. The difference in speeds of colliding electrons and ions in JLEIC, when translated into a path-length difference necessary to maintain the same timing between electron and ion bunches, is quite large. In this paper, we explore schemes for synchronizing the electron and ion bunches at a collision point as the ion energy is varied.
△ Less
Submitted 29 June, 2016;
originally announced June 2016.
-
MEIC Design Summary
Authors:
S. Abeyratne,
D. Barber,
A. Bogacz,
P. Brindza,
Y. Cai,
A. Camsonne,
A. Castilla,
P. Chevtsov,
E. Daly,
Y. S. Derbenev,
D. Douglas,
V. Dudnikov,
R. Ent,
B. Erdelyi,
Y. Filatov,
D. Gaskell,
J. Grames,
J. Guo,
L. Harwood,
A. Hutton,
C. Hyde,
K. Jordan,
A. Kimber,
G. A. Krafft,
A. Kondratenko
, et al. (30 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
This document summarizes the design of Jefferson Lab's electron-ion collider, MEIC, as of January 20, 2015, and describes the facility whose cost was estimated for the United States Department of Energy Nuclear Sciences Advisory Committee EIC cost review of January 26-28, 2015. In particular, each of the main technical systems within the collider is presented to the level of the best current infor…
▽ More
This document summarizes the design of Jefferson Lab's electron-ion collider, MEIC, as of January 20, 2015, and describes the facility whose cost was estimated for the United States Department of Energy Nuclear Sciences Advisory Committee EIC cost review of January 26-28, 2015. In particular, each of the main technical systems within the collider is presented to the level of the best current information.
△ Less
Submitted 29 April, 2015;
originally announced April 2015.
-
Science Requirements and Conceptual Design for a Polarized Medium Energy Electron-Ion Collider at Jefferson Lab
Authors:
S. Abeyratne,
A. Accardi,
S. Ahmed,
D. Barber,
J. Bisognano,
A. Bogacz,
A. Castilla,
P. Chevtsov,
S. Corneliussen,
W. Deconinck,
P. Degtiarenko,
J. Delayen,
Ya. Derbenev,
S. DeSilva,
D. Douglas,
V. Dudnikov,
R. Ent,
B. Erdelyi,
P. Evtushenko,
Yu. Filatov,
D. Gaskell,
R. Geng,
V. Guzey,
T. Horn,
A. Hutton
, et al. (33 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
This report presents a brief summary of the science opportunities and program of a polarized medium energy electron-ion collider at Jefferson Lab and a comprehensive description of the conceptual design of such a collider based on the CEBAF electron accelerator facility.
This report presents a brief summary of the science opportunities and program of a polarized medium energy electron-ion collider at Jefferson Lab and a comprehensive description of the conceptual design of such a collider based on the CEBAF electron accelerator facility.
△ Less
Submitted 5 September, 2012; v1 submitted 4 September, 2012;
originally announced September 2012.
-
RHIC Low-Energy Challenges and Plans
Authors:
T. Satogata,
L. Ahrens,
M. Bai,
J. M. Brennan,
D. Bruno,
J. Butler,
A. Drees,
A. Fedotov,
W. Fischer,
M. Harvey,
T. Hayes,
W. Jappe,
R. C. Lee,
W. W. MacKay,
N. Malitsky,
G. Marr,
R. Michnoff,
B. Oerter,
E. Pozdeyev,
T. Roser,
F. Severino,
K. Smith,
S. Tepikian,
N. Tsoupas
Abstract:
There is significant interest in RHIC heavy ion collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}=$5--50 GeV, motivated by a search for the QCD phase transition critical point. The lowest energies for this search are well below the nominal RHIC gold injection collision energy of $\sqrt{s_{NN}}=19.6$ GeV. There are several operations challenges at RHIC in this regime, including longitudinal acceptance, magnet field q…
▽ More
There is significant interest in RHIC heavy ion collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}=$5--50 GeV, motivated by a search for the QCD phase transition critical point. The lowest energies for this search are well below the nominal RHIC gold injection collision energy of $\sqrt{s_{NN}}=19.6$ GeV. There are several operations challenges at RHIC in this regime, including longitudinal acceptance, magnet field quality, lattice control, and luminosity monitoring. We report on the status of work to address these challenges, including results from beam tests of low energy RHIC operations with protons and gold, and potential improvements from different beam cooling scenarios.
△ Less
Submitted 12 October, 2007;
originally announced October 2007.
-
Description of the RHIC Sequencer System
Authors:
T. D'Ottavio,
B. Frak,
J. Morris,
T. Satogata,
J. van Zeijts
Abstract:
The movement of the Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider (RHIC) through its various states (eg. injection, acceleration, storage, collisions) is controlled by an application called the Sequencer. This program orchestrates most magnet and instrumentation systems and is responsible for the coordinated acquisition and saving of data from various systems. The Sequencer system, its software infrastructure…
▽ More
The movement of the Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider (RHIC) through its various states (eg. injection, acceleration, storage, collisions) is controlled by an application called the Sequencer. This program orchestrates most magnet and instrumentation systems and is responsible for the coordinated acquisition and saving of data from various systems. The Sequencer system, its software infrastructure, support programs, and the language used to drive it are discussed in this paper. Initial operational experience is also described.
△ Less
Submitted 13 November, 2001;
originally announced November 2001.
