-
The Next Generation Event Horizon Telescope Collaboration: History, Philosophy, and Culture
Authors:
Peter Galison,
Juliusz Doboszewski,
Jamee Elder,
Niels C. M. Martens,
Abhay Ashtekar,
Jonas Enander,
Marie Gueguen,
Elizabeth A. Kessler,
Roberto Lalli,
Martin Lesourd,
Alexandru Marcoci,
Sebastián Murgueitio Ramírez,
Priyamvada Natarajan,
James Nguyen,
Luis Reyes-Galindo,
Sophie Ritson,
Mike D. Schneider,
Emilie Skulberg,
Helene Sorgner,
Matthew Stanley,
Ann C. Thresher,
Jeroen Van Dongen,
James Owen Weatherall,
**gyi Wu,
Adrian Wüthrich
Abstract:
This white paper outlines the plans of the History Philosophy Culture Working Group of the Next Generation Event Horizon Telescope Collaboration.
This white paper outlines the plans of the History Philosophy Culture Working Group of the Next Generation Event Horizon Telescope Collaboration.
△ Less
Submitted 5 April, 2023;
originally announced April 2023.
-
The Ecology of Fringe Science and its Bearing on Policy
Authors:
HM Collins,
A Bartlett,
LI Reyes-Galindo
Abstract:
In this paper we illustrate the tension between mainstream 'normal', 'unorthodox' and 'fringe' science that is the focus of two ongoing projects that are analysing the full ecology of physics knowledge. The first project concentrates on empirically understanding the notion of consensus in physics by investigating the policing of boundaries that is carried out at the arXiv preprint server, a fundam…
▽ More
In this paper we illustrate the tension between mainstream 'normal', 'unorthodox' and 'fringe' science that is the focus of two ongoing projects that are analysing the full ecology of physics knowledge. The first project concentrates on empirically understanding the notion of consensus in physics by investigating the policing of boundaries that is carried out at the arXiv preprint server, a fundamental element of the contemporary physics publishing landscape. The second project looks at physics outside the mainstream and focuses on the set of organisations and publishing outlets that have mushroomed outside of mainstream physics to cover the needs of 'alternative', 'independent' and 'unorthodox' scientists. Consolidating both projects into the different images of science that characterise the mainstream (based on consensus) and the fringe (based on dissent), we draw out an explanation of why today's social scientists ought to make the case that, for policy-making purposes, the mainstream's consensus should be our main source of technical knowledge.
△ Less
Submitted 18 June, 2016;
originally announced June 2016.
-
A note concerning Primary Source Knowledge
Authors:
HM Collins,
P Ginsparg,
L Reyes-Galindo
Abstract:
We add a small increment to understanding the notion of Primary Source Knowledge, knowledge that the non-expert and the citizen can acquire by assiduously reading the primary scientific journal literature without being embedded in the cultural life of the corresponding technical specialty. This comes from exposing four papers to the automated computer filters used by the physics preprint server ar…
▽ More
We add a small increment to understanding the notion of Primary Source Knowledge, knowledge that the non-expert and the citizen can acquire by assiduously reading the primary scientific journal literature without being embedded in the cultural life of the corresponding technical specialty. This comes from exposing four papers to the automated computer filters used by the physics preprint server arXiv. These filters are used to flag papers in need of further review by human assessors before being promulgated on the server; papers not flagged by the algorithm are generally posted on arXiv without further review. After the filtering, human moderators decide whether papers should be posted based on a relatively low bar of whether they are of interest, relevance and value to the research communities that populate arXiv.
△ Less
Submitted 23 May, 2016;
originally announced May 2016.
-
Automating the Horae: Boundary-work in the age of computers
Authors:
Luis Reyes-Galindo
Abstract:
This paper describes the intense software filtering that has allowed the arXiv eprint repository to sort and process large numbers of submissions with minimal human intervention, making it one of the most important and influential cases of open access repositories to date. The paper narrates arXiv's transformation, using sophisticated sorting-filtering algorithms to decrease human workload, from a…
▽ More
This paper describes the intense software filtering that has allowed the arXiv eprint repository to sort and process large numbers of submissions with minimal human intervention, making it one of the most important and influential cases of open access repositories to date. The paper narrates arXiv's transformation, using sophisticated sorting-filtering algorithms to decrease human workload, from a small mailing list used by a few hundred researchers to a site that processes thousands of papers per month. However there are significant negative consequences for authors who have been filtered out of the main categories. There is thus a continued need to check and balance arXiv's boundaries, based in the essential tension between stability and innovation.
△ Less
Submitted 11 March, 2016;
originally announced March 2016.
