-
To what extent homophily and influencer networks explain song popularity
Authors:
Niklas Reisz,
Vito D. P. Servedio,
Stefan Thurner
Abstract:
Forecasting the popularity of new songs has become a standard practice in the music industry and provides a comparative advantage for those that do it well. Considerable efforts were put into machine learning prediction models for that purpose. It is known that in these models, relevant predictive parameters include intrinsic lyrical and acoustic characteristics, extrinsic factors (e.g., publisher…
▽ More
Forecasting the popularity of new songs has become a standard practice in the music industry and provides a comparative advantage for those that do it well. Considerable efforts were put into machine learning prediction models for that purpose. It is known that in these models, relevant predictive parameters include intrinsic lyrical and acoustic characteristics, extrinsic factors (e.g., publisher influence and support), and the previous popularity of the artists. Much less attention was given to the social components of the spreading of song popularity. Recently, evidence for musical homophily - the tendency that people who are socially linked also share musical tastes - was reported. Here we determine how musical homophily can be used to predict song popularity. The study is based on an extensive dataset from the last.fm online music platform from which we can extract social links between listeners and their listening patterns. To quantify the importance of networks in the spreading of songs that eventually determines their popularity, we use musical homophily to design a predictive influence parameter and show that its inclusion in state-of-the-art machine learning models enhances predictions of song popularity. The influence parameter improves the prediction precision (TP/(TP+FN)) by about 50% from 0.14 to 0.21, indicating that the social component in the spreading of music plays at least as significant a role as the artist's popularity or the impact of the genre.
△ Less
Submitted 28 November, 2022;
originally announced November 2022.
-
Loss of sustainability in scientific work
Authors:
Niklas Reisz,
Vito D. P. Servedio,
Vittorio Loreto,
William Schueller,
Márcia R. Ferreira,
Stefan Thurner
Abstract:
For decades the number of scientific publications has been rapidly increasing, effectively out-dating knowledge at a tremendous rate. Only few scientific milestones remain relevant and continuously attract citations. Here we quantify how long scientific work remains being utilized, how long it takes before today's work is forgotten, and how milestone papers differ from those forgotten. To answer t…
▽ More
For decades the number of scientific publications has been rapidly increasing, effectively out-dating knowledge at a tremendous rate. Only few scientific milestones remain relevant and continuously attract citations. Here we quantify how long scientific work remains being utilized, how long it takes before today's work is forgotten, and how milestone papers differ from those forgotten. To answer these questions, we study the complete temporal citation network of all American Physical Society journals. We quantify the probability of attracting citations for individual publications based on age and the number of citations they have received in the past. We capture both aspects, the forgetting and the tendency to cite already popular works, in a microscopic generative model for the dynamics of scientific citation networks. We find that the probability of citing a specific paper declines with age as a power law with an exponent of $α\sim -1.4$. Whenever a paper in its early years can be characterized by a scaling exponent above a critical value, $α_c$, the paper is likely to become "ever-lasting". We validate the model with out-of-sample predictions, with an accuracy of up to 90% (AUC $\sim 0.9$). The model also allows us to estimate an expected citation landscape of the future, predicting that 95% of papers cited in 2050 have yet to be published. The exponential growth of articles, combined with a power-law type of forgetting and papers receiving fewer and fewer citations on average, suggests a worrying tendency toward information overload and raises concerns about scientific publishing's long-term sustainability.
△ Less
Submitted 3 February, 2022;
originally announced February 2022.
-
Quantifying exaptation in scientific evolution
Authors:
Márcia R. Ferreira,
Niklas Reisz,
William Schueller,
Vito D. P. Servedio,
Stefan Thurner,
Vittorio Loreto
Abstract:
Rediscovering a new function for something can be just as important as the discovery itself. In 1982, Stephen Jay Gould and Elisabeth Vrba named this phenomenon Exaptation to describe a radical shift in the function of a specific trait during biological evolution. While exaptation is thought to be a fundamental mechanism for generating adaptive innovations, diversity, and sophisticated features, r…
▽ More
Rediscovering a new function for something can be just as important as the discovery itself. In 1982, Stephen Jay Gould and Elisabeth Vrba named this phenomenon Exaptation to describe a radical shift in the function of a specific trait during biological evolution. While exaptation is thought to be a fundamental mechanism for generating adaptive innovations, diversity, and sophisticated features, relatively little effort has been made to quantify exaptation outside the topic of biological evolution. We think that this concept provides a useful framework for characterising the emergence of innovations in science. This article explores the notion that exaptation arises from the usage of scientific ideas in domains other than the area that they were originally applied to. In particular, we adopt a normalised entropy and an inverse participation ratio as observables that reveal and quantify the concept of exaptation. We identify distinctive patterns of exaptation and expose specific examples of papers that display those patterns. Our approach represents a first step towards the quantification of exaptation phenomena in the context of scientific evolution.
△ Less
Submitted 19 February, 2020;
originally announced February 2020.
