-
Three-dimensional modelling of the shock-turbulence interaction
Authors:
Domenico Trotta,
Oreste Pezzi,
David Burgess,
Luis Preisser,
Xochitl Blanco-Cano,
Primoz Kajdic,
Heli Hietala,
Timothy S. Horbury,
Rami Vainio,
Nina Dresing,
Alessandro Retino',
Maria Federica Marcucci,
Luca Sorriso-Valvo,
Sergio Servidio,
Francesco Valentini
Abstract:
The complex interaction between shocks and plasma turbulence is extremely important to address crucial features of energy conversion in a broad range of astrophysical systems. We study the interaction between a supercritical, perpendicular shock and pre-existing, fully-developed plasma turbulence, employing a novel combination of magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) and small-scale, hybrid-kinetic simulation…
▽ More
The complex interaction between shocks and plasma turbulence is extremely important to address crucial features of energy conversion in a broad range of astrophysical systems. We study the interaction between a supercritical, perpendicular shock and pre-existing, fully-developed plasma turbulence, employing a novel combination of magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) and small-scale, hybrid-kinetic simulations where a shock is propagating through a turbulent medium. The variability of the shock front in the unperturbed case and for two levels of upstream fluctuations is addressed.We find that the behaviour of shock ripples, i.e., shock surface fluctuations with short (a few ion skin depths, $d_i$) wavelengths, is modified by the presence of pre-existing turbulence, which also induces strong corrugations of the shock front at larger scales. We link this complex behaviour of the shock front and the shock downstream structuring with the proton temperature anisotropies produced in the shock-turbulence system. Finally, we put our modelling effort in the context of spacecraft observations, elucidating the role of novel cross-scale, multi-spacecraft measurements in resolving shock front irregularities at different scales. These results are relevant for a broad range of astrophysical systems characterised by the presence of shock waves interacting with plasma turbulence.
△ Less
Submitted 24 May, 2023;
originally announced May 2023.
-
ULF wave transmission across collisionless shocks: 2.5D local hybrid simulations
Authors:
Primoz Kajdic,
Yann Pfau-Kempf,
Lucile Turc,
Andrew P Dimmock,
Minna Palmroth,
Kazue Takahashi,
Eemilia Kilpua,
Jan Soucek,
Naoko Takahashi,
Luis Preisser,
Xochitl Blanco-Cano,
Domenico Trotta,
David Burgess
Abstract:
We study the interaction of upstream ultra-low frequency (ULF) waves with collisionless shocks by analyzing the outputs of eleven 2D local hybrid simulation runs. Our simulated shocks have Alfvénic Mach numbers between 4.29-7.42 and their $θ_{BN}$ angles are 15$^\circ$, 30$^\circ$, 45$^\circ$ and 50$^\circ$. The ULF wave foreshocks develop upstream of all of them. The wavelength and the amplitude…
▽ More
We study the interaction of upstream ultra-low frequency (ULF) waves with collisionless shocks by analyzing the outputs of eleven 2D local hybrid simulation runs. Our simulated shocks have Alfvénic Mach numbers between 4.29-7.42 and their $θ_{BN}$ angles are 15$^\circ$, 30$^\circ$, 45$^\circ$ and 50$^\circ$. The ULF wave foreshocks develop upstream of all of them. The wavelength and the amplitude of the upstream waves exhibit a complex dependence on the shock's M$_A$ and $θ_{BN}$. The wavelength positively correlates with both parameters, with the dependence on $θ_{BN}$ being much stronger. The amplitude of the ULF waves is proportional to the product of the reflected beam velocity and density, which also depend on M$_A$ and $θ_{BN}$. The interaction of the ULF waves with the shock causes large-scale (several tens of upstream ion inertial lengths) shock rippling. The properties of the shock ripples are related to the ULF wave properties, namely thier wavelength and amplitude. In turn, the ripples have a large impact on the ULF wave transmission across the shock because they change local shock properties ($θ_{BN}$, strength), so that different sections of the same ULF wave front encounter shock with different characteristics. Downstream fluctuations do not resemble the upstream waves in terms the wavefront extension, orientation or their wavelength. However some features are conserved in the Fourier spectra of downstream compressive waves that present a bump or flattening at wavelengths approximately corresponding to those of the upstream ULF waves. In the transverse downstream spectra these features are weaker.
△ Less
Submitted 25 January, 2022;
originally announced January 2022.
-
First observations of irregular surface of interplanetary shocks at ion scales by Cluster
Authors:
Primož Kajdič,
Luis Preisser,
Xóchitl Blanco-Cano,
David Burgess,
Domenico Trotta
Abstract:
We present the first observational evidence of the irregular surface of interplanetary (IP) shocks by using multi-spacecraft observations of the Cluster mission. In total we discuss observations of four IP shocks that exhibit moderate Alfvénic Mach numbers (M$_A\leq$6.5). Three of them are high-$β$ shocks with upstream $β$ = 2.2--3.7. During the times when these shocks were observed, the Cluster s…
▽ More
We present the first observational evidence of the irregular surface of interplanetary (IP) shocks by using multi-spacecraft observations of the Cluster mission. In total we discuss observations of four IP shocks that exhibit moderate Alfvénic Mach numbers (M$_A\leq$6.5). Three of them are high-$β$ shocks with upstream $β$ = 2.2--3.7. During the times when these shocks were observed, the Cluster spacecraft formed constellations with inter-spacecraft separations ranging from less than one upstream ion inertial length (d$_i$) up to 100~d$_i$. Expressed in kilometers, the distances ranged between 38~km and $\sim$10$^4$~km. We show that magnetic field profiles and the local shock normals of observed shocks are very similar when the spacecraft are of the order of one d$_i$ apart, but are strikingly different when the distances increase to ten or more d$_i$. We interpret these differences to be due to the irregular surface of IP shocks and discuss possible causes for such irregularity. We strengthen our interpretation by comparing observed shock profiles with profiles of simulated shocks. The latter had similar characteristics (M$_A$, $θ_{BN}$, upstream ion $β$) as observed shocks and the profiles were obtained at separations across the simulation domain equivalent to the Cluster inter-spacecraft distances.
△ Less
Submitted 27 March, 2019;
originally announced March 2019.
