Agent-based modeling of the COVID-19 pandemic in Florida
Authors:
Alexander N. Pillai,
Kok Ben Toh,
Dianela Perdomo,
Sanjana Bhargava,
Arlin Stoltzfus,
Ira M. Longini Jr.,
Carl A. B. Pearson,
Thomas J. Hladish
Abstract:
The onset of the COVID-19 pandemic drove a widespread, often uncoordinated effort by research groups to develop mathematical models of SARS-CoV-2 to study its spread and inform control efforts. The urgent demand for insight at the outset of the pandemic meant early models were typically either simple or repurposed from existing research agendas. Our group predominantly uses agent-based models (ABM…
▽ More
The onset of the COVID-19 pandemic drove a widespread, often uncoordinated effort by research groups to develop mathematical models of SARS-CoV-2 to study its spread and inform control efforts. The urgent demand for insight at the outset of the pandemic meant early models were typically either simple or repurposed from existing research agendas. Our group predominantly uses agent-based models (ABMs) to study fine-scale intervention scenarios. These high-resolution models are large, complex, require extensive empirical data, and are often more detailed than strictly necessary for answering qualitative questions like "Should we lockdown?" During the early stages of an extraordinary infectious disease crisis, particularly before clear empirical evidence is available, simpler models are more appropriate. As more detailed empirical evidence becomes available, however, and policy decisions become more nuanced and complex, fine-scale approaches like ours become more useful.
In this manuscript, we discuss how our group navigated this transition as we modeled the pandemic. The role of modelers often included nearly real-time analysis, and the massive undertaking of adapting our tools quickly. We were often playing catch up with a firehose of evidence, while simultaneously struggling to do both academic research and real-time decision support, under conditions conducive to neither. By reflecting on our experiences of responding to the pandemic and what we learned from these challenges, we can better prepare for future demands.
△ Less
Submitted 19 June, 2023;
originally announced June 2023.
Late 19th-Century Navigational Uncertainties and Their Influence on Sea Surface Temperature Estimates
Authors:
Chenguang Dai,
Duo Chan,
Peter Huybers,
Natesh Pillai
Abstract:
Accurate estimates of historical changes in sea surface temperatures (SSTs) and their uncertainties are important for documenting and understanding historical changes in climate. A source of uncertainty that has not previously been quantified in historical SST estimates stems from position errors. A Bayesian inference framework is proposed for quantifying errors in reported positions and their imp…
▽ More
Accurate estimates of historical changes in sea surface temperatures (SSTs) and their uncertainties are important for documenting and understanding historical changes in climate. A source of uncertainty that has not previously been quantified in historical SST estimates stems from position errors. A Bayesian inference framework is proposed for quantifying errors in reported positions and their implications on SST estimates. The analysis framework is applied to data from the International Comprehensive Ocean-Atmosphere Data Set (ICOADS3.0) in 1885, a time when astronomical and chronometer estimation of position was common, but predating the use of radio signals. Focus is upon a subset of 943 ship tracks from ICOADS3.0 that report their position every two hours to a precision of 0.01° longitude and latitude. These data are interpreted as positions determined by dead reckoning that are periodically updated by celestial correction techniques. The posterior medians of uncertainties in celestial correction are 33.1 km (0.30° on the equator) in longitude and 24.4 km (0.22°) in latitude, respectively. The posterior medians of two-hourly dead reckoning uncertainties are 19.2% for ship speed and 13.2° for ship heading, leading to random position uncertainties with median 0.18° (20 km on the equator) in longitude and 0.15° (17 km) in latitude. Reported ship tracks also contain systematic position uncertainties relating to precursor dead-reckoning positions not being updated after obtaining celestial position estimates, indicating that more accurate positions can be provided for SST observations. Finally, we translate position errors into SST uncertainties by sampling an ensemble of SSTs from the Multi-scale Ultra-high resolution Sea Surface Temperature (MURSST) data set.
△ Less
Submitted 13 December, 2020; v1 submitted 10 October, 2019;
originally announced October 2019.
